OF THE
TIMES

"We had a load that was going to Fairbanks, and then we had somebody else that was going to distribute from Wasilla to Talkeetna. And then we were going to do Anchorage and the Valley. And then our second one would've come in the following day, and we would've taken that one back down to the Peninsula to fulfill the rest of our orders."But the plan hit a snag when the bees were pushed from the original Delta flight. Instead, the airline rerouted them to Atlanta, where they were supposed to catch a direct flight to Anchorage.
"What can you do with provisional ballots set off to the side? You can mass adjudicate them anytime down the road however you want and then tabulate them to the count using the RTR process outlined in the Dominion user manuals."
[...]
Now according to the test laboratories and the EAC, this "anomaly" was related to "the imported D-Suite 5.5 election definition used on the D-Suite 5.5-B system." In other words, a ton of ballots were marked as provisional, and mass adjudicated because the machines had an outdated software configuration, which caused them to misread the ballots.
They chalked this up to a simple mistake, but if this was merely an accident, why wasn't this caught during the Logic and Accuracy testing PRIOR to the election? Isn't that what these so called "testing laboratories" are supposed to do? Aren't Pro V&V and SLI Compliance hired SPECIFICALLY to make sure that the machines are running the proper software before an election?!?! And they just so happened to miss something of this significance?
In my opinion, this proves that either:Not to mention, I feel that something so severe SHOULD have resulted in a total STOP of the election until this issue was resolved. However, as you can clearly see, the Dominion machines allowed for the election to continue, and for the "anomaly" to go undetected.
- A) Logic and Accuracy testing is a JOKE.
- B) This was done intentionally to allow for manipulation
- C) All of the above
Comment: People seem to be jumping the gun on the Twitter thing. Musk hasn't taken ownership of the platform yet, so all the old "violation of terms" rules still apply. The reactivation of some banned accounts were probably the result of Twitter purging algorithmic bans that weren't exactly above board that they didn't want to be discovered once Musk takes control of the company. But you can bet that Lindell and others like him (Trump, for instance) still have a wait ahead before they're allowed back on the platform. In other words, it's the same old Twitter, for now.
See also: