© Corbett Report
Eat your heart out, Al Gore. Being a
carbon billionaire is so passé now that we're in the age of the
$100 trillion climate swindle. So the real question is who (or at least which corporate front) will be the first carbon trillionaire? Will it be a
carbon eugenics promoting
Rockefeller or a global government promoting
Rothschild, or a
carbon divesting Saudi government, or one of the
shady hedge funds that are spearheading
weather derivatives and other
Enron-developed financial instruments to try to cash in on the carbon fraud?
Whatever the answer, one thing is for certain: you won't see this question asked (let alone answered) in the establishment gatekeeping press. Instead you will see endless iterations of the accusation that anyone who disbelieves in the
woo woo pseudoscience of climate catastrophism is
funded by the very Big Oil oiligarchs who stand to benefit from the
debunked climate scare.
Both mainstream press and pseudo-alternatives religiously trot out hit pieces from attack sites like Desmogblog to smear scientists and avoid actual scientific debate (which, for the record, the alarmists
always lose). Conveniently left out of this chapter-and-verse reliance on Desmogblog is the fact that it is
a PR front itself whose
primary benefactor is a
convicted money launderer. More to the point, they can't even research or accurately report on the most basic facts. I should know; when I started my
ClimateGate.tv website with a free WordPress template and about $5/month of GoDaddy hosting they produced a
laughable article claiming that the website was a tv station that was being funded by Big Oil.
No, there's not time at all in the mainstream press to raise even the slightest question about the hundreds of billions that are already being pumped into the carbon scam from government and institutional investors around the world or the tens of trillions that are expected to be spent in the coming decades. Instead, all of the media coverage is focused on the other side of the issue: who funds those who critique this (demonstrably incorrect) "consensus" on global warming?
A perfect case in point is the "exposé" that was published in the LA Timesand InsideClimate News last year alleging that Exxon had the entire global warming puzzle solved as far back as the 1970s...and then actively worked to cover up that information. Never mind that they
didn't actually withhold any of their research or findings from the public, and never mind their conclusion (namely, that the massive uncertainty surrounding climate variables meant that they had no clear picture of what is actually happening in the climate) was neither well-informed nor cause for panic; the narrative was already set.
A massive "#ExxonKnew" campaign was organized around the reports and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's claim that he would organize a posse of state AGs to investigate and prosecute Exxon for...something. Unsurprisingly, that campaign
has disintegrated, not least because "
investigators simply don't know what a climate model is."
Comment: See also: