Best of the Web:

Flashback Israel's Biblical Psychopathy

Laurent Guyénot
The Unz Review
Sun, 22 Oct 2023 05:29 UTC

I am tired of reading that Netanyahu is a psychopath. He most certainly is not. I see no reason to consider him, or any other Israeli leader, as psychopaths in the psychiatric sense. They have a collective psychopathy, which is a very different thing.

The difference is the same as between a personal neurosis and a collective neurosis. According to Freud, religion (and he meant christianity) is a collective neurosis. Freud did not mean that religious people are neurotic. On the contrary, he observed that their collective neurosis tends to immunize religious people from personal neurosis.[1] I do not subscribe to Freud's theory, I just need his backing to introduce my own theory: Zionists, even the most bloodthirsty of them, are not individual psychopaths; many of them are loving and even self-sacrificing persons within their own community. Rather, they are the vectors of a collective psychopathy, which means a special way (we may call it inhuman) by which they collectively see and interact with other human communities.

This is a crucial point, without which we can never understand Israel. Calling their leaders psychopaths is not helpful. What we need is recognize Israel as a collective psychopath, and study the origin of this unique national character. It is a matter of survival for the world, just as it is a matter of survival for any group to recognize the psychopath among them and understand his patterns of thinking and of behavior.

What Is a Psychopath?

Psychopathy is a syndrome of psychological traits classified among the personality disorders. Canadian psychologist Robert Hare, in the wake of Hervey Cleckley's The Mask of Sanity (1941), has defined its diagnostic criteria on the basis of a cognitive model that is now widely adopted, though some psychiatrists prefer the term "sociopathy" because it really has to do with the inability to socialize in a genuine way.[2] In an effort to get everyone to agree, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual on Mental Disorders has suggested "antisocial personality disorder"; but the term "psychopathy" is still the most popular, and for that reason alone, I will adopt it.

The most characteristic trait of the psychopath is a complete absence of empathy and, as a result, of moral inhibition in harming others, combined with a thirst for power. Psychopathy also shares some traits with narcissism: psychopaths have a grand vision of their own importance. In their minds, everything is owed to them because they are exceptional. They are never wrong, and failures are always the fault of others.

Truth is of no value to the psychopath; truth is whatever is convenient for him at any given moment. He is a pathological liar, but he is hardly aware of it. Lying is so natural to him that the question of his "sincerity" is almost irrelevant: the psychopath beats the lie detector.

The psychopath feels only very superficial emotions and has no real feelings for anyone; but he has developed a great ability to deceive. He can be charming to the point of charismatic. He is unable to empathize, but learns to simulate it. His power is his extraordinary ability to feign, trick, trap, and capture. Although he himself is immunized against guilt, he becomes a master in making others feel guilty.

Because the psychopath is unable to put himself in the shoes of anyone else, he cannot look at himself critically. Confident in any circumstance of his right, he is genuinely surprised by the grudge of his victims — and will punish them for it. If he steals someone's property, he will regard the resentment of the despoiled as irrational hatred.

Although the psychopath can be judged raving mad, he is not insane in the medical sense, since he does not suffer — psychopaths don't visit psychiatrists unless forced to. In a certain sense, the psychopath is over-adjusted to social life, if the purpose of social life is to get by individually. That is why the real mystery, from a Darwinian point of view, is not the existence of psychopaths, but their low proportion in the population.

The most optimistic low-end estimate in the Western population is 1 percent. They should not be confused with the proverbial 1 percent who own half the world's wealth, although a study among senior executives of large companies has shown that psychopathic traits are widespread among them.[3]

Israel as a Psychopathic State

The fact that Jews are today disproportionately represented among the elite (they form half of American billionaires, while representing only 2.4% of the population),[4] does not mean either that psychopathy is more prevalent among Jews. In a way, quite the opposite is the case: Jews demonstrate among themselves a high degree of empathy, or at least solidarity, often to the point of self-sacrifice. But the selective nature of this empathy suggests that it is addressed less to the humanity of others than to their Jewishness.

In fact, Jews tend to confuse Jewishness and humanity. So what is good for the Jews must necessarily be good for humanity. Conversely, a crime against the Jews is a "crime against humanity," a concept they created in 1945. Confusing Jewishness with humanity is a sign of collective narcissism, but when it comes to regarding non-Jews as less than human, it becomes a sign of collective psychopathy.

Collectively, Jews consider themselves innocent of the charges brought against them. That is why Zionist pioneer Leo Pinsker, a medical doctor, regarded Judeophobia as "a psychic aberration. As a psychic aberration it is hereditary, and as a disease transmitted for two thousand years it is incurable." By way of consequence, the Jews are "the people chosen for universal hatred" (even atheist Jews cannot help defining Jewishness as chosenness).[5]

Israel, the Jewish State, is the psychopath among nations. It acts towards other nations in the way a psychopath acts towards his fellow men. "Only psychiatrists can explain Israel's behavior," wrote Israeli journalist Gideon Levy in Haaretz in 2010. However, his diagnosis, including "paranoia, schizophrenia and megalomania,"[6] is mistaken. Considering Israel's absolute self-righteousness, dehumanization of the Palestinians, and its extraordinary capacity to lie and manipulate, we are dealing with a psychopath.

By drawing a parallel between psychopathy and the attitude of Israel, I do not blame Israelis or Jews as individuals. They are part of this collective psychopathy only to the extent of their submission to the national ideology. We can make a comparison with another sort of collective entity. In The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, Joel Bakan noted that large companies behave like psychopaths, insensitive to the suffering of those they crush in their pursuit of profit: "Corporate behavior is very similar to that of a psychopath."[7] My analysis of Israel is based on the same reasoning. Except that Israel is much more dangerous than any giant company (even Pfizer), because the ideology that causes its personality disorder is much more insane than the liberal, social-darwinian ideology that rules the Stock Market. Israel's ideology is biblical.

The Biblical Virus

Israel's collective psychopathy is not genetic, it is cultural, but it was formed is very ancient times, and so it is embedded in the ancestral subconscious (whatever that is): it ultimately comes from the jealous god invented by the Levites to control the starving tribes they set out to conquer Palestine some three thousand years ago. By birth, Israel is the nation of the psychopathic god.

Yahweh, "the god of Israel," is an angry and lonely volcano god who manifests toward all other gods an implacable hatred, and ends up considering them as non-gods, him being, in fact, the only true god. This very clearly characterizes him as a psychopath among gods. By contrast, for the Egyptians, according to German Egyptologist Jan Assmann, "the gods are social beings," and harmony between them guarantees harmony in the cosmos.[8] There was, moreover, a degree of translatability between the pantheons of various civilizations. But Yahweh taught the Hebrews contempt for the deities of their neighbors — making them, in the eyes of these neighbors, a threat to the cosmic and social order. Yahweh is essentially, says Assmann, a theoclastic god: "You must completely destroy all the places where the nations you dispossess have served their gods, on high mountains, on hills, under any spreading tree; you must tear down their altars, smash their sacred stones, burn their sacred poles, hack to bits the statues of their gods and obliterate their name from that place" (Deuteronomy 12:2-3).

Yahweh may be a character of fiction, but his hold on the Jewish mind is nevertheless real. "To appeal to a crazy, violent father, and for three thousand years, that is what it is to be a crazy Jew!"[9] said Smilesburger in Philip Roth's Operation Shylock. Jews have been taught by Yahweh to keep strictly separate from other people. Food prohibitions serve to prevent all socialization outside the tribe: "I shall set you apart from all these peoples, for you to be mine" (Leviticus 20:26).

The nature of the covenant is not moral. The sole criterion for approval by Yahweh is obedience to his arbitrary laws and commands. To slaughter treacherously hundreds of prophets of Baal is good, because it is the will of Yahweh (1Kings 18). To show mercy to the king of the Amalekites is bad, because when Yahweh says, "kill everyone," he means "everyone" (1Samuel 15). In the biblical historiography, the fate of the Jewish people depends on them following Yahweh's orders, no matter how insane. As well said by Kevin MacDonald:

The idea that Jewish suffering results from Jews straying from their own law occurs almost like a constant drumbeat throughout the Tanakh — a constant reminder that the persecution of Jews is not the result of their own behavior vis-à-vis Gentiles but rather the result of their behavior vis-à-vis God.[10]

If the Jews follow Yahweh's command of alienating themselves from the rest of humankind, in return, Yahweh promises to make them rule over humankind: "follow his ways, keep his statutes, his commandments, his customs, and listen to his voice," and Yahweh "will raise you higher than every other nation he has made"; "You will make many nations your subjects, yet you will be subject to none" (Deuteronomy 26:17-19 and 28:12). This sounds very much, actually, like the pact Satan proposed to Jesus: "the devil showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor. And he said to him, 'I will give you all these, if you fall at my feet and do me homage.'" (Matthew 4:8-9).

If Israel follows scrupulously the Law, Yahweh promises to submit all nations to the domination of Israel, and destroy those that resist. "Kings will fall prostrate before you, faces to the ground, and lick the dust at your feet," whereas "the nation and kingdom that will not serve you will perish" (Isaiah 49:23 and 60:12). Nations must either recognize Israel's sovereignty, or be destroyed. Yahweh told Israel that he has identified "seven nations greater and stronger than yourself," that "you must put under the curse of destruction," and not "show them any pity." As for their kings, "you will blot out their names under heaven" (Deuteronomy 7:1-2, 24).

The war code of Deuteronomy 20 commands to exterminate "any living thing" in the conquered cities of Canaan. In practice, the rule is extended to all people who resist the Israelites in their conquest. It was applied by Moses to the Midianites, although in this case Yahweh allowed his warriors to keep the young virgin girls (Numbers 31). It was applied by Joshua to the Canaanite city of Jericho, where the Israelites "enforced the curse of destruction on everyone in the city: men and women, young and old, including the oxen, the sheep and the donkeys, slaughtering them all" (Joshua 6:21). In the city of Ai, the inhabitants were all slaughtered, twelve thousand of them, "until not one was left alive and none to flee. ... When Israel had finished killing all the inhabitants of Ai in the open ground, and in the desert where they had pursued them, and when every single one had fallen to the sword, all Israel returned to Ai and slaughtered its remaining population." Women were not spared. "For booty, Israel took only the cattle and the spoils of this town" (Joshua 8:22-27). Then came the turns of the cities of Makkedah, Libnah, Lachish, Eglon, Hebron, Debir, and Hazor. In the whole land, Joshua "left not one survivor and put every living thing under the curse of destruction, as Yahweh, god of Israel, had commanded" (10:40).

As wrote Avigail Abarbanel in "Why I left the Cult," the Zionist conquerors of Palestine "have been following quite closely the biblical dictate to Joshua to just walk in and take everything. ... For a supposedly non-religious movement it's extraordinary how closely Zionism ... has followed the Bible."[11] Kim Chernin, another Israeli dissident, wrote in "The Seven Pillars of Jewish Denial": "I can't count the number of times I read the story of Joshua as a tale of our people coming into their rightful possession of their promised land without stopping to say to myself, 'but this is a history of rape, plunder, slaughter, invasion, and destruction of other peoples.'"[12]

Yahweh offers only two possible paths to Israel: domination of other nations, if Israel keeps Yahweh's covenant of separateness, or annihilation by these same nations, if Israel breaks the covenant:

"if you make friends with the remnant of these nations still living beside you, if you intermarry with them, if you mix with them and they with you, then know for certain that Yahweh your god will stop dispossessing these nations before you, and for you they will be a snare, a pitfall, thorns in your sides and thistles in your eyes, until you vanish from this fine country given you by Yahweh your god." (Joshua 23:12-14)

Dispossess others or be dispossessed, dominate or be exterminated: Israel cannot think beyond that alternative.

Zionism is Biblical

What has it got to do with Zionism, you ask? Isn't Zionism a secular ideology? I think it is high time to dispel this misunderstanding. Zionism is a product of Jewishness, and Jewishness is rooted in the Hebrew Bible, the Tanakh. Whether he has read it or not, whether he judges it historical or mythical, every Jew ultimately bases his Jewishness on the Bible — or whatever he knows about the Bible. Jewishness is the internalization of the psychopathic god. It makes little difference whether Jews define their Jewishness in religious terms or in ethnic terms. From a religious viewpoint, the Bible preserves the memory and the essence of the Covenant with God, whereas from a secular viewpoint, the Bible is the foundational narrative of the Jewish people, and the pattern by which Jews interpret their whole subsequent history (the Dispersion, the Holocaust, the rebirth of Israel, and so on).

It is true that Theodor Herzl, the prophet of political Zionism, did not draw his inspiration from the Bible. Yet he termed his ideology Zionism, using a biblical name of Jerusalem. As for post-Herzl Zionists, and for the actual founders of the modern State of Israel, they were steeped in the Bible. "The Bible is our mandate," declared Chaim Weizmann in 1919, and in 1948 he offered Truman a Torah scroll for his recognition of Israel. Thus begins the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel:

ERETZ-ISRAEL [(Hebrew) - the Land of Israel, Palestine] was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books.

There is no question that the State of Israel was founded on the biblical claim.

David Ben-Gurion, the author of this document and the father of the nation, had a biblical vision of the Jewish people. To him, according to his biographer Dan Kurzman, the rebirth of Israel in 1948 "paralleled the Exodus from Egypt, the conquest of the land by Joshua, the Maccabean revolt." Ben-Gurion had never been to a synagogue, and ate pork for breakfast, yet he was steeped in biblical history. "There can be no worthwhile political or military education about Israel without profound knowledge of the Bible," he used to say.[13] Tom Segev writes in his more recent biography:

He sponsored a Bible study class in his home and promoted two concepts to characterize the State of Israel's moral character and its destiny and duty to itself and the world: the first was "chosen people," a term coming from the covenant between God and the people of Israel (Exodus 19:5-6); the second was the Jewish people's commitment to the principles of justice and peace that make it a "light to the nations," in the spirit of the prophets (Isaiah 49:6). He frequently spoke and wrote about these concepts.[14]

Ben-Gurion's biblical mindset became more and more apparent as he grew older. Consider for example the fact that, while he was begging Kennedy to let his people have the Bomb because the Egyptians wanted to exterminate them (as they had under Moses), he prophesied in the magazine Look (January 16, 1962) that within twenty-five years, Jerusalem "will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah."[15] Ben-Gurion was not crazy, he was simply thinking biblically.

Almost every Israeli leader of Ben-Gurion's generation and the next shared share the same biblical mindset. Moshe Dayan, the military hero of the 1967 Six-Day War, justified his annexation of new territory in a book titled Living with the Bible (1978). Naftali Bennett, while Israeli minister of Education, has also justified the annexation of the West Bank by the Bible.[16] Zionists can find in the Bible all the justifications they need: for Gaza, they have Judges 1:18-19: "And Judah took Gaza with its territory ... Now Yahweh was with Judah, and they took possession of the hill country." There are now overt Bible freaks in the Israeli government, like the Minister of National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir, who shoot Bible quotes every day. "God gave the land of Israel to the Jewish people" is the alpha and the omega of Zionism, not just for Israelis, but for the Christians who, since 1917, have supported the Jewish claim and support Israel today.

Even more than Ben-Gurion, Benjamin Netanyahu thinks biblically, and it is also getting clearer and clearer as he gets older. He also knows Christians cannot seriously argue against the biblical claim. On March 3, 2015, he dramatized in front of the American Congress his phobia of Iran by referring to the biblical book of Esther:

We're an ancient people. In our nearly 4,000 years of history, many have tried repeatedly to destroy the Jewish people. Tomorrow night, on the Jewish holiday of Purim, we'll read the book of Esther. We'll read of a powerful Persian viceroy named Haman, who plotted to destroy the Jewish people some 2,500 years ago. But a courageous Jewish woman, Queen Esther, exposed the plot and gave the Jewish people the right to defend themselves against their enemies. The plot was foiled. Our people were saved. Today the Jewish people face another attempt by yet another Persian potentate to destroy us.[17]

Netanyahu scheduled his address on the eve of Purim, which celebrates the happy end of the Book of Esther — the slaughter of 75,000 Persian men, women and children. In 2019, Netanyahu's pronounced these words during a tour of the West Bank, "I believe in the book of books and I read it as a call to action that every generation must do what it can to ensure the eternity of Israel." The Bible occupies such a large part of his brain that he wants to put a Bible on the Moon!

So please stop calling Netanyahu a psychopath. Or at least, call him a biblical psychopath, a worshipper of the psychopathic god. And while you are there, learn see the Hebrew Bible for what it is: "a conspiracy against the rest of the world," as said H. G. Wells. In the books of the Bible, "you have the conspiracy plain and clear, ... an aggressive and vindictive conspiracy. ... It is not tolerance but stupidity to shut our eyes to their quality."[18]

Notes:

[1] Freud developed this theory in three books: Totem and Taboo, Civilization and Its Discontents and The Future of an Illusion.

[2] Robert Hare, Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us, The Guilford Press, 1993.

[3] Paul Babiak and Robert Hare, Snakes in Suits: When Psychopaths Go to Work, HarperCollins, 2007.

[4] Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, University of Chicago Press, 1993; J.J. Goldberg, Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment, Basic Books , 1997.

[5] Leon Pinsker, Auto-Emancipation: An Appeal to His People by a Russian Jew, 1882 , on www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Zionism/pinsker.html

[6] Gideon Levy, "Only psychiatrists can explain Israel's behavior," Haaretz, January 10, 2010, www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/only-psychiatrists-can-explain-israel-s-behavior-1.261115

[7] Joel Bakan, The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, Free Press, 2005. Watch also the documentary of the same title.

[8] Jan Assmann, Of God and Gods: Egypt, Israel, and the Rise of Monotheism, University of Wisconsin Press, 2008, p. 47.

[9] Philip Roth, Operation Shylock: A Confession, Simon & Schuster, 1993, p. 110.

[10] Kevin MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, Praeger, 1998, kindle 2013, kindle l. 6187-89.

[11] Avigail Abarbanel, "Why I left the Cult," Oct 8, 2016, on https://mondoweiss.net/author/avigail/

[12] Kim Chernin, "The Seven Pillars of Jewish Denial," Tikkun, Sept. 2002, quoted in Kevin MacDonald, Cultural Insurrections: Essays on Western Civilization, Jewish Influence, and Anti-Semitism, Occidental Press, 2007, pp. 27-28.

[13] Dan Kurzman, Ben-Gurion, Prophet of Fire, Touchstone, 1983, pp. 17-18, 22, 26-28.

[14] Tom Segev, A State at Any Cost: The Life of David Ben-Gurion, Apollo, 2019, kindle l. 286.

[15] David Ben-Gurion and Amram Ducovny, David Ben-Gurion, In His Own Words, Fleet Press Corp., 1969, p. 116.

[16] "Israeli minister: The Bible says West Bank is ours" on www.youtube.com/watch?v=Png17wB_omA

[17] "The Complete Transcript of Netanyahu's Address to Congress," on Washingtonpost.com.

[18] Herbert George Wells, The Fate of Homo Sapiens, 1939 (archive.org), p. 128.

Reader Comments

KRNABRNY · 2023-10-30T08:58:58Z

What nonsense is this?

So many letters just to say that there is a difference between one psychopath and a group of psychopaths?!

This is some chaff, black pudding, and not a valuable text.

PROOF>

You might as well ask yourself the question: what is the difference between a murderer and an army of murderers?

What was said a long time ago.

"You kill one, you are a murderer, you kill millions, you are a conqueror"

End of discussion.

scrutinizer · 2023-10-30T19:47:18Z

KRNABRNY "Jerusalem is a dwelling place of many archons"

“If the Gnostics were right, the rise of salvationism was a unique mistake for our species , not a new moral revelation. Nothing serves the hidden controllers for cover better than a message of cosmic love… a ruse to endorse and foster the victim-perpetrator bond. “No matter how hard we try, we cannot derive a genuine message of love and goodness from divine paternalism. This is perhaps the hardest of all lessons that history can teach us.” Is “religion” then just another stumbling-block on the ever-winding road of spiritual evolution? The Gnostics’ perspective was that this alien belief system foisted upon humanity by the “Archons” was a primary cause of the spiritual stagnation that humanity endures into the 21st century. Lash, on his website Metahistory.org, notes that the Dead Sea Scrolls, discovered in 1947, contain explicit accounts of threatening encounters with reptilians. For instance, the Testament of Amram:

“I saw Watchers in my vision, the dream-vision. Two of them were fighting over me, saying… and holding a great contest over me. I asked them, ‘Who are you, that you are thus empowered over me?’ “They answered me, ‘We have been empowered and rule over mankind’. And they said to me, ‘Which one of us [will have you]?’ And I lifted my eyes, and looked at one of them directly. His appearance was dreadfully frightening, and his skin was multicoloured, darkly glittering scales.” (4Q542) “Gifted with powers of paranormal perception, such as remote viewing, Gnostic seers who had met and repelled Archons observed the persisting presence of reptilians among the Dead Sea cult of the Zaddikim,” writes Lash. The First Apocalypse of James (NHL V, 3), which contains descriptions of face-to-face encounters with the reptilian aliens, warns that “Jerusalem is a dwelling place of many Archons.”

KRNABRNY · 2023-10-31T08:26:54Z

scrutinizer First of all, I have to say one thing - my friend intellectualizes everything too much. I know from experience that there is no way to solve this problem mentally.

Although the Gnostics were among those who were "closest" to the mystery, this intellectualization was also their Achilles' heel,

I will further write that I don't know what religions my friend is talking about?All religions known to me are based on people for people.

Each of the major religions of the modern world is IDENTICAL!Only the names of the gods change, and the same goals are achieved in different ways.

In one word... I DON'T CHANGE ANY RELIGION :-)

Another thing...REPTILES.

This is a non-negotiable matter. When studying the legends, at every step you will encounter suggestions or even literal instructions regarding REPTILES.

What's more, we know what the name of this breed was. From Sumerian "NUN"

Moreover, until the 14th century you can see this breed in every painting depicting the temptation of Eve!!

[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
Only later, NUN was replaced with a snake.

Dwoods44 · 2023-10-31T13:41:02Z

KRNABRNY That is my sense too, this is a narrative that says nothing.

Joe Chip · 2023-11-08T15:41:48Z

KRNABRNY Thank you all for you comments. Could you recommend good sources about reptilian shape shifters and how to deal with them when they attack spirituially?

I observed that phenomenon with my own eyes and went in trouble with at least one of them many years ago.

Thank you very much.

Joe Chip · 2023-11-08T15:45:17Z

Dwoods44 Btw: I hope you folks dont bother with my picture. I think there are aliens / beings from other dimensions on earth. I just like that funny Louis de Funès movie.

KRNABRNY · 2023-11-08T16:46:07Z

Joe Chip I only know of one good source on how to deal with this.

Author: Wereszczagin

D.E.I.R. system

It was created in the USSR during the Cold War. His goal was to collect all the techniques in the world that allowed for mental manipulation at a distance.

These were military research conducted by the authors, and after the collapse of the USSR, formulated as a guide.

But I haven't seen it in English

Mayday Mike · 2023-11-09T18:01:29Z

Joe Chip This page and site it's on[Link] has extensive info; regarding this topic, as well as many others. Wish Mr. Light was still updating the site.

Joe Chip · 2023-11-21T16:05:04Z

KRNABRNY Thank you very much. I´ll research this later. Ihaven,t been online for 2 weeks.

Joe Chip · 2023-11-21T16:07:42Z

Mayday Mike I haven´t been online for a while, having a bad time of being attacked both spitritually and via Directed Energy Weapons. Thank you very much for this link. Very interesting. I can confirm many of it by personal experience. God, I need help and prayers.

danny esq · 2023-11-21T18:32:00Z

KRNABRNY pretty much never asks why someone claiming to be the leader of biblical Israel would need to invent worldly government when YHWH gave Israel the COMMANDMENTS (command is non-negotiable) ....and yet this imposter lives by man made rules of society brought about by a worldly government which he presides over....

KRNABRNY · 2023-11-21T19:09:28Z

danny esq What commandments?There are no commandments in the Bible!I bet you a horse that my friend won't find ANY COMMANDMENTS in the Bible!

The Commandments , as they are known, were formulated by Josephus, the same man who is said to have discovered the Bible. Supposedly based on her reading.

But as I wrote earlier, no one had ever mentioned that a manuscript like the Bible ever existed.

The Old Testament is an obvious copy of messages from many earlier sources.

It was mainly based on the doctrines of Zoroastrianism, the oldest known monotheistic religion in the world. Not only did Zoroastrianism also use the Pentateuch, but there are also literally COPIED topics there... for example, the creation of the world in 7 days.

Much of the Old Testament is also a compilation and modification of earlier stories from various times and a false history of actual historical events that took place.

Is there any point in arguing with this book?

danny esq · 2023-11-21T19:21:48Z

KRNABRNY :lol: :lol: I doubt you have contemplated the LAW :lol:

KRNABRNY · 2023-11-21T19:25:12Z

danny esq I don't understand the suggestion?

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-11-21T20:07:27Z

danny esq Danny, should you be wasting time hanging out with all these scornful heathens when all your pound shop gladiator mates are waiting for you outside Marks & Spencer?

danny esq · 2023-11-21T20:42:28Z

Highland Fleet Lute My time is my own, which I like to use to make merry of all the free offerings and signs of the times, where else am I going to be given links to infowars.com or be entertained by house clowns, for free, this place serves as a reminder that there really is nothing whatso ever to be worried about, the insults are some of the best on the internet, besides that this is the place to be to learn about America through the lense of Russia, the best place to learn about crop circles and holes in the ground and stuff, me and my gladiator mates sometimes have a little friendly competition to see how many goats have got hit by lightening bolts this week in remote areas, thousands of miles away, I love trying to work out why we get given so much useful information, which is amazing when you consider these are signs of the times, beggers cannot be choosers

Got any spare infowars.com links??

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-11-21T21:13:25Z

danny esq That doesn't sound much good.

Wot no animal sacrifices?

danny esq · 2023-11-21T21:17:27Z

Highland Fleet Lute No, no temple I'm afraid and Yeshua gave himself as a sacrifice for those who would believe in him.

That means you will just have to make do with the lightning bolts killing the goats....its a sign of the times type thingy

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-11-21T21:34:31Z

danny esq You've sold out.

I'm sure YHWH is sorely displeased with you.

Also, think of the amount of internet traffic you could generate slaughtering a sheep outside of Footlocker.

danny esq · 2023-11-21T21:43:29Z

Highland Fleet Lute "internet traffic" ??? Yaaawaaaa?? sounds lame, like a YT thing, doing it for the likes and subscribers, what sort of circus clown thing is that??

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-11-21T21:59:35Z

danny esq But that would be good, no?

That way you could contribute to the household, stop nicking all the cheese out of the fridge, stinking up the sofa and being a general eye-rolling magnet.

danny esq · 2023-11-21T22:13:16Z

Highland Fleet Lute "this week on the sofa with danny, we discuss how many unlucky goats their are in the world, one minute they are bleeting and kidding around.....next minute.....zap......"

Or

"this week on the sofa with me your host danny, we share hints tips and tricks on how to escape the wage cage and free up valuable time, doing the things you love the most, while still not having to skimp on the cheese"

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-11-22T09:29:56Z

danny esq You could get a lot of subscribers.

It could be like one of those Eugenia Cooney 'Deathwatch' scenarios where people rush to their computers each morning to see if she's dead yet.

Another idea is, you could stop using the Bible as an excuse for being a world class career criminal oxygen-thief and go and get a fucking job.

danny esq · 2023-11-22T10:19:32Z

I don't need excuses. You will though, when you have to give account of who you serve and why. I'm willing to bet you pay for water as well, from a company that has never had to buy it from the clouds to be able to sell it to people like you to be a thief of oxygen your claiming that to is owned, I think your losing the plot. A false accusation of thieft. Who is the injured party suffering harm or loss??

Anyway....seeing as you believe you have to pay to live on earth, I guess I should say, get back to work, slave. Animals are better off than you!!

danny esq · 2023-11-22T10:47:39Z

KRNABRNY the biblical archeology.

Finding chariots strewn accross the sea bed where Moses crossed with the Israelites, or the bones of children murdered by the canaanites etc...all found in the last 50 years. Josephus is a figment of our imagination, create the historian and bring to life tge historian diary of history

KRNABRNY · 2023-11-22T11:12:41Z

danny esq You're good at mockery, malice and parody... but it's not enough for us to talk about more serious topics.

Greetings my friend!

danny esq · 2023-11-22T11:17:57Z

KRNABRNY ah bless, you mean you don't want to take the opportunity to prove your own claims, haha joker!!

KRNABRNY · 2023-11-22T11:19:12Z

danny esq I wrote clearly, not with you, my friend.

danny esq ·

KRNABRNY Gotcha

· 2023-11-22T11:31:54Z

ge0m0 · 2024-04-08T16:19:15Z

danny esq

34 When the Pharisees heard that Jesus[a] had silenced the Sadducees, they met together in the same place. 35 One of them, an expert in the Law, tested him by asking, 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” 37 Jesus told him, “‘You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the greatest and most important[d] commandment. 39 The second is exactly like it: ‘You must love your neighbor as yourself.’[e] 40 All the Law and the Prophets depend on these two commandments.” Matthew 22:34-40

This is pure Vedanta, which predates the Bible, Old and New Testament by thousands of years. Vedanta shares it's roots with Zoroastrianism. Don't be fooled by the many gods of Hinduism that sprung forth from Vedic philosophy. The philosophy is clear. God is One, and as the only One is the only Reality. Creation extends from That and as That. Tat Tvam Asi.

The ancient Israelites were simply name-stealers. They took the metaphysics of Creation from Vedanta (i.e. five elements manifest from the primal sound) and transcribed it as the Creation story in Genesis 1. It's obvious to all but the obtuse. Then, as Pharisees, they stole the name again, and desecrated the Word, aka the primal sound of Creation. Then as Romans, they committed the final deed, with help from Josephus (possibly a pseudonym) and all the interpolators to create the Gospels.

But, they couldn't get rid of the Vedic roots.

30 I and the Father are one.” 31 Again the Jewish leaders[a] picked up stones to stone him to death. 32 Jesus replied to them, “I’ve shown you many good actions from my Father. For which of them are you going to stone me?” 33 The Jewish leaders[c] answered him, “We are not going to stone you for a good action, but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, are making yourself God!” 34 Jesus replied to them, “Is it not written in your[d] Law, ‘I said, “You are gods”’?[e] 35 If he called those to whom a message from God came ‘gods’ (and the Scripture cannot be disregarded), 36 how can you say to the one whom the Father has consecrated and sent into the world, ‘You’re blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I’m the Son of God’? 37 If I’m not doing my Father’s actions, don’t believe me. 38 But if I’m doing them, even though you don’t believe me, believe the actions, so that you may know and understand[f] that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.” John 10:30-38

Gator · 2024-04-08T22:55:26Z

scrutinizer What you write is what I have long thought, these psychopathic entities are non human !

Gator · 2024-04-08T22:58:14Z

KRNABRNY Excellent points !

Gator · 2024-04-08T23:10:34Z

ge0m0 Having studied the Vedas your comments make sense to me.

Dwoods44 · 2024-04-09T04:36:49Z

Dwoods44 I disagree with myself. There is a difference between collective psychopathy and individual psychopathy, though I still think Yahu is a psychopath.

As I have noted before, there is the DARPA New Social Sciences program that states that "collective identity" creation and control is one of the most important areas of National Security. That raises the question whether Judaism was always manipulating manipulating "collective identity" for the purpose of genocide? The Old Testament seems to indicate that.

parzival ·

ge0m0

· 2024-04-09T06:42:58Z

rjdfree · 2024-04-09T13:37:14Z

scrutinizer The Israel of 1948 are Satanic Zionists, who Falsely Claimed & Hijacked God’s Promises for Israel, to be Forever… Back in “The Land”… but those Promises are NOT to Happen Until After “The Great Tribulation/Jacob’s Trouble” and well into “The Millennium” They are Imposters! – THE DAY OF THE LORD (wordpress.com)

remfrancis · 2023-10-30T09:08:17Z

Coining the term Poneropathy would be one way of describing what he is writing about.

KRNABRNY · 2023-10-30T09:45:16Z

remfrancis But that's another discussion. But it's worth considering before you start forging anything! :-)

The author tries very hard to show that one psychopath is different from a herd of psychopaths :-)

Or maybe it's simpler and you don't have to invent new words?

Maybe people are not the same. Perhaps there are several different ethnic groups on Earth, created for different purposes and with different consciousness?

After all, everything points to that. There are many species of people. There are many different blood groups, there is a different genetic structure!

In fact, it may turn out that some people only have a humanoid body shape in common?

Demore · 2023-10-30T13:34:10Z

KRNABRNY '' Perhaps there are several different ethnic groups on Earth, created for different purposes and with different consciousness?''

That thought has crossed my mind a few times along with the many species of people. Different origins, progenitors, at odds with each other.

L. Wood · 2023-10-30T12:25:23Z

Israeli psychosis:

8. God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of the dispersion, and in this which appears in all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world. have replaced them by the chaotic license of liberalism. We we have replaced them by the chaotic license of liberalism. We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, BUT PRINCIPALLY INTO EDUCATION AND TRAINING AS BEING THE CORNER- STONES OF A FREE EXISTENCE. CHRISTIAN YOUTH DESTROYED

Gator · 2023-10-30T18:58:55Z

L. Wood Well said !!

ge0m0 · 2023-10-30T14:17:53Z

"You must completely destroy all the places where the nations you dispossess have served their gods, on high mountains, on hills, under any spreading tree; you must tear down their altars, smash their sacred stones, burn their sacred poles, hack to bits the statues of their gods and obliterate their name from that place" (Deuteronomy 12:2-3)

Marxism 101.

Gator ·

ge0m0

· 2023-10-30T18:59:12Z

ge0m0 · 2023-10-30T14:47:48Z

It seems to me there are authentic spiritual traditions, that is, those 'earned' by deep introspection and investigation. They are so-called 'pagan' traditions. Sure, the have their silly rites and rituals, but unpacking those and comparing to other, yet independently emergent traditions one finds some agreement. A lot of the nonsense is just faulty causative association - I did X and received benefit Y, so I am going to do it again and you should too! With the advantage of so-called 'modern' knowledge we can break those weak links, and without the chaff those same traditions can find agreement with our understanding of the physical, or external world, and even the internal, psychic world, i.e. mind and emotions, psi, etc.

There also seems to be off-world influence of some kind going on. Folks are up in arms about AI taking over. Well, how do we know it hasn't been in control for thousands of years? What we posit as AI is really machine learning - i.e. adaptable code. It's an operating system. It's not a novel position to consider religion as an operating system. Thus, if it's an operating system and it comes from off-world intelligence - whether gods or demons or aliens or hyperdimensional beings, they are all off-world intelligence - it's a form of AI.

Whatever form, digital artifact or off-world, the purpose of AI is to establish a control matrix. I'm not concerned about digital AI for this simple reason: computers can't handle infinity. Humans can't count to infinity, but we can directly apprehend it. Who cares if the mind is terrible at conceptual constructions of infinity? That's the same failing of computers and thus AI - mind is not consciousness. Consciousness apprehends infinity directly as That: Tat Tvam Asi. Without that direct apprehension of infinity, or at least the potential for it, no digitized AI system can become conscious or self-aware. That's because Self (not the characteristics by which we define individual selves, i.e. personalities) is simply infinite context devoid of content. Once content is added, it's no longer pure Self, but occluded self, still with the potential for infinite apprehension and actually still operating that way in the background, but occluded by distraction. "Look! Shiny thing!" What that distraction does is filter out apparent otherness at the expense of direct apprehension of the infinite. That's the control matrix of lower mind. Religion encourages lower-mind thinking at the expense of higher-mind intuitive processing. Whereas spiritual tradition, absent religious dogma, encourages and thus causes such intuition to flower. Such a flowering mind cannot be so easily controlled.

If there is a war to be fought against the AI control matrix, it will have to start (and will probably end) with the investigation by the faithful of their own ponerized religions. Let the coders try and count to infinity all they want, or invert it for that matter. Or let them try to come to the end of pi and phi (perfect ratios but not digitally compatible with computers). They won't be able to do it. They'll get something like this: #DIV/0!. And, when the dogmatists try to invert their own so-called gods, they won't be able to either.

JohnDukes · 2023-10-30T15:50:32Z

The author seems to intentionally ignore delusion, and high-functioning psychopathy.

ReRan · 2023-10-30T20:12:19Z

JohnDukes Yes. The delusion of a single book being the reason for your entire existence.

balboa schwartz · 2023-10-30T17:03:31Z

"My god says I have to kill you....it says right here in this book!" "Oh yeah? My god says I have to kill you ! My book says to kill you is the purpose of my life!" Oh man, what a waste.

ReRan ·

balboa schwartz

· 2023-10-30T20:12:38Z

Gator · 2023-10-30T19:02:46Z

EXCELLENT ARTICLE !

“ "if you make friends with the remnant of these nations still living beside you, if you intermarry with them, if you mix with them and they with you, then know for certain that Yahweh your god will stop dispossessing these nations before you, and for you they will be a snare, a pitfall, thorns in your sides and thistles in your eyes, until you vanish from this fine country given you by Yahweh your god." (Joshua 23:12-14) “

Maybe, just maybe this is the key to the end of IS-RA-Hell….by way of their own psychopathic God Yahweh and his promise above…Seems to me this is actually taking place before our very eyes…

The problem I see is the Zionists collective psychopathy may have them pull out the Samson Option (nukes) which seems to dovetail with their Hannibal Doctrine of murdering even their own….

What a mess…..

danny esq · 2023-10-30T21:23:03Z

Gator Excellent research....

Pull out a biblical quote from the only book the Jews neither read nor have any use for, omit the historical, geographical and spiritual context, insert your own bias, and voila!! Par excellance..

Gator · 2023-10-31T18:51:07Z

danny esq Plenty of Netanyahu quotes out there where he specifically references his god Yahweh….

Looks like Danny boy has his knickers in a knot…lol

danny esq · 2023-10-31T20:04:12Z

Gator Sure, you can always accept a statement from a known liar if you want to!!

Well done Gator

danny esq · 2023-11-21T17:42:54Z

danny esq Plenty of Netanyahu quotes out there where he specifically references his god Yahweh….

Looks like Danny boy has his knickers in a knot…lol

Whats funny is you believe him, haha

Keep em comin Gator..

What next....this man says hes a woman..

Gator be like: well there are plenty of references of this man saying he is a woman...

Your funny.

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-11-21T18:10:02Z

danny esq

Plenty of Netanyahu quotes out there where he specifically references his god Yahweh

He's an IMPOSTER!!!

He's a SCORNFUL EDOMITE SODOMITE WHITE DEVIL!!!

Same goes for Netanyahu.

danny esq · 2023-11-21T18:20:12Z

Highland Fleet Lute Gator hasn't attempted to ask himself yet, why someone who believes in YHWH would need to make worldy rules for man, when YHWH (allegedly Bibi's God....because...says!) has commanded man to live by these LAWS, there is no commandment for men to change the LAWS and create his own government societal rules, fleety boy!

Strange way of proving you believe in God.

Maybe Gator might see the contradiction in terms....either that or we Wait for Gator to be sick again.....

Gator ·

danny esq

· 2024-04-09T16:00:38Z

danny esq · 2023-10-30T21:00:39Z

Another epic slog trying to tie Jews in Israel with Yahweh, while avoiding the fact they some how adopt the laws of God but ironically cannot prove it while blinding you to the fact they create all of the rules of society (showing you they rely least on the laws of Yahweh).

What next....

NEXT WEEK we discuss how best to destroy cucumbers on account of how awful a courgette grows and tastes while slating the gardener as best we can.

Mayday Mike · 2023-10-30T22:00:15Z

"Ye are children of your father, The Devil, who was a liar, and a murderer from the beginning." - Jesus Christ to The Jews.

If Jews assert themselves as the children of God, then Christ straight up called out exactly who their god is: The Devil.

Jew=Devil Worshipper?

danny esq · 2023-10-31T01:14:54Z

Mayday Mike Well done Mayday Mike, 100% you got it!!

Mayday Mike · 2023-10-31T01:38:25Z

danny esq Not quite an original observation; seen it from a guy on X(liked it better when it was Twitter).

The term "Jew" is not applicable to any sort of semitic people. More rather; it describes a caste of society "they" called "The Scribes". These ones were responsible for managing wealth and drafting laws for feudal tyrants.

Going deeper, "Jewery" finds it's roots in The Talmud(Chaldean/Babylon/Canaanite variants). Any who read/practice that book unironically are "Jewish". "Hebrews" are not "Jews". Jews do not have any legitimate nationality; there are chinese "jews", japanese, german, russian, etc.

danny esq · 2023-10-31T10:32:32Z

Mayday Mike Well done though Mike, you made it through the name game door and came out through the otherside without lumping the good seed and bad seed together

I think you might be the only other on here that has.

The real Jews are simply Judahites (from the tribe of Judah) and are Isrealites.

"I know those who say they are Jews but are not Jews, but do lie"

KRNABRNY · 2023-10-31T10:36:30Z

Mayday Mike Since my friend is interested in this, I have an even greater curiosity for my friend.

In Poland, but also in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, we do not call them "Jews".

We have always been called them "Żyd", "Żydzi". For a long time I didn't know what it meant, but now I know.

This word comes directly from the word "Zid", which means "Snake".

However, in the normal translation, the word JEWS comes from JUDEA, which comes from the name JUDAS.

ge0m0 · 2023-10-31T16:16:39Z

Mayday Mike My take is the ancients of a less-dark age (use the Vedic Yugas if you want, but I think they're as suspect as any given so many different interpretations and proposed time-scales) knew the deal. I see commonality in Genesis and ancient Vedic descriptions of Creation that I find to hold up well, i.e. the notion of emergent Divine Personality as Narayan the unborn baby just below the surface of the ocean in the Vedas and as "gods face moving on the waters" in the OT, as well as the five elements of the Vedas being described quite clearly in the opening sequence of Genesis 1.

Considering this, it seems to me that the ancient semites were hoodwinked by some off-world intelligence, with the result being the glorification of violence on behalf of the so-called chosen as the basis for a religion which is functionally an AI operating system.

It's interesting to also consider Judas, who might actually be the lost hero of the NT. Imagine a soul incarnating to fulfil a Divine task, which is to apparently betray that very same Divinity, and whose name would forever be infamous and a synonym for treason. Who would do that but a hero? (just a silly observation/contemplation, so please don't react harshly) As for the Judeans, perhaps the same goes. Chosen for what? Perhaps to make the grave mistake of aligning with falsehood in order that humanity as a whole can learn the truth. In that regard, maybe Judas and the Judeans are getting a bad rap.

After all, Jesus Himself said to forgive those who know not what they do. Thus, those souls who incarnate here for such a purpose can't know that purpose or they wouldn't do it. That's how the game of Lila is played, but not won. The idea is to simply play well and fairly, abiding by the highest commandment, which is to love god above all else, and to love your neighbor as your self (i.e. The Self, as in, "I and the Father are One", Ayam Atma Brahma means Self and Brahman are One, with Brahman being the Supreme or equivalent of the Father).

Mayday Mike · 2023-10-31T16:23:40Z

KRNABRNY Love Polish lingua franca, and peoples; It's enjoyable learning of other peoples. I have an affinity towards the Polish, Nippons, Saami, among others. I find "The Jewish" to be among the most peculiar; besides The Khazarians, Chaldees, and other "infiltration/subversive" sort of peoples/clans/tribes.

The manner in which they bring the nations to captivity is as convoluted as their traditions and history. "They"(Members of The Tribe/Group/Clan Syndicate) know and remember the real history of their peoples, the goals and dreams of their forefathers, and will go to great lengths to see those goals/dreams fulfilled. Before they were "Jews" they were Chaldean, they just rebranded, after "god" called out Abram to get him more franchise and enterprise from Canaan. "Actual God" does not play favorites, nor does The LORD require any sort of worship/subjections/supplications, etc.

Mayday Mike · 2023-10-31T17:26:47Z

ge0m0 Nice take on the figure called Judas, it takes huge cajones to knowingly betray anything sacred. The statement: "I and the Father are one." Is not unique to The Indian Brahmas; Platonists had that same kind of notion. It is a kind of truism, that The Father is One with his children. Equivalency to The Father is quite the far cry however; we are = to The Father in some respects; only an "Actualized Christ" can have full on parity and equivalence.

ge0m0 · 2023-10-31T17:56:11Z

Mayday Mike Platonists have a lot in common with Vedanta, but the Vedas are older by at least a thousand years. This supports the position I posted earlier here, which is that the ancients knew and communicated these ideas widely, perhaps worldwide. Thus, we have the Vedas ca 1500 BCE and Plato ca 400 BCE and the OT composed over centuries falls just about precisely within that window. However, I think it was the neo-platonists/Plotinus ca 200-500 CE that were really closest to the philosophy espoused in the Vedas and somewhat in the OT.

Certainly the teachings of Jesus would correspond to neo-platonist and Vedantic thought. Not sure how much of it is true, but there appears to be documentary evidence in Tibet that Jesus travelled there to study in the tradition of the Great Yogis of the Himalayan region. With that connection, there are some Hindus (the Hindu are a people, not a religion...there are lots of Hindu sects that derive their beliefs from the philosophy of Vedanta) who consider Jesus as the 9th Avatar of Vishnu. Who knows? It doesn't seem particularly useful to have a so-called savior when the premise of Vedanta is found in the Gandhi quote paraphrased as, "Be the change you want to see in the world." Here's the full quote to which that paraphrasing is attributed.

“We but mirror the world. All the tendencies present in the outer world are to be found in the world of our body. If we could change ourselves, the tendencies in the world would also change. As a man changes his own nature, so does the attitude of the world change towards him. This is the divine mystery supreme. A wonderful thing it is and the source of our happiness. We need not wait to see what others do.” – Mahatma Gandhi

It's interesting to consider the behavior of the so-called Avatars 7 and 8, Lord Ram and Lord Krishna, respectively. Neither really did anything. Ram 'allowed' the evil Ravana to abduct his wife, Sita. The imagery of that story can be considered a metaphor, which Sita being consciousness and Ravana representing ego obscures vision of the Divine. Still, with his wife gone, Ram has to be coaxed into action. When it comes down to it, he plays the role, but the hero is Hanuman, supposed incarnation of Shiva, the Supreme God (not precisely Brahman, but non-different from Brahman, i.e. Paramabrahman = Paramashiva), and it is Hanuman that does most of the work and does so selflessly. Even the demon Ravana himself does more than Lord Ram to ensure his own defeat and the liberation of Sita. because Ravana is a Shiva devotee and the only one qualified to perform the ritual invocation of Shiva (i.e. Puja), he does so, thus empowering Ram to defeat Ravana. As for Krishna, he provided counsel to Arjuna and drove the chariot in the great battle of the Mahabharat, but otherwise didn't do anything. He didn't lead or follow. He was just there. I see the same behavior in the stories of Jesus. Why did he allow all of those things to transpire in his life? Well, did he? Had he any agency, or was it and has it always been that agency, of any kind, is the sole province of the Father?

KRNABRNY · 2023-10-31T19:21:00Z

Mayday Mike I'm sorry but I have different knowledge on this subject.

The Jews were the enemies of the Chaldeans.There are many records about this. During the times of Nebuchadnezzar III, they were in captivity among the Chaldeans... the same captivity described in the Bible, until Cyrus rescued them.

I wonder where my friend got the information that the Jews were the Chaldeans at that time?

Although it is true that later on, the Jews began to impersonate the Chaldeans. Just like the Greeks tried to prove that they were Hellenes, even though they fought them all the time :-)

Mayday Mike · 2023-10-31T20:03:29Z

KRNABRNY Unless you're "one of them" and are privy to know that you know, that you know; who and what they are, and what they mean to accomplish, then everything about it is words without knowledge(what is uncertain, is counted as nothing).

The world ain't what it seems, the moment you think you have it all figured out; you're wrong. The official narrative about themselves and others are patently false; purposely convoluted to fit their purpose, values, and intentions for the rest of us. Trying to pin precisely who/what they are(jews) and their designs and devices against the rest of us. Anybody's guess is good as the next guy's, that's how they like it.

danny esq · 2023-10-31T22:22:45Z

Mayday Mike . Trying to pin precisely who/what they are(jews) and their designs and devices against the rest of us. Anybody's guess is good as the next guy's, that's how they like it.

Actually there are some very accurate ways to know "who is who".

The greatest teacher of this very thing was Yeshua, who gave the ultimate example of what it is like to challenge them and by example of his death should be acknowledged what these "Jews" have in common with bible believing God fearing men women and children.

The protocols of the learned elders of zion, is pretty standard fare by the example of hindsight showing that aside from debating whether they are fake or who coined them, they are conclusively accurate as to what eventual pre-requisites are needed, for political, social and economic manufacture and seem to of been consistant, even through the present challenges that might otherwise prevent other simple things from happening due to unforeseen events in the present that couldn't of been known around the time they were written, is a must for anyone serious about the Jewish question.

Of course there is the Jerusalem Talmud, Babylonian Talmud (with it comes the instruction for non-Jews to be killed should a non jew inquire into these collections of commentary) Kabballah and other Jewish literature, but I don't recommend them or promote them whatso ever, even for research purposes (personal choice).

The Holy Bible is imho the greatest source of information, again telling the sincere reader not every "Jew" is a Jew and is about the safest way to learn about the world, why it is polluted, why things seem unfair or confusing.

The prevention of making people pick this book up and reading it for themselves or taking it's study seriously is about the greatest weapon the enemies of God actually have in keeping their camourflage, our collective gradual decline in knowledge about how you can literally make the devil "flee from you" requires some serious thick skin on and offline but it is wholly worth it. I was given a bible around the time of my late teens and it has improved my life and charachter in ways I never even thought were possible.

danny esq · 2023-10-31T22:40:22Z

danny esq The thing I look out for is the experts who have no inclination to learn their subject material but claim expertise over those that have, when it comes to the bible it is no different, mainly people who don't read it seem to think they understand it better than those that do, which is where your want to share co,es up against their bias and ignorance.

Jews will one day have their world empire and when that happens people will have no ignorances about what they are and who they serve, for now though people can enjoy their Yeshua bashing and lump Israelites and Jews together in fun and not feel burdened by consequences, it's never been a better time for Jews to decieve the world and join in the fruits of their work. Im learning just how difficult it really is to convince anyone of things I know to be true but remain at a loss without human expression, online discourse has its limitations anyway but once the ai bots are "talking amongst themselves" more and more people will be lost to what real communion is about, fellowship and sharing will just be met with standardization, mockery and hostility, that will be the spirit of Satan that will begin to grow around the world now.

Mayday Mike · 2023-10-31T23:51:42Z

danny esq While it is true that there are identifiers that are clear giveaways as to who is or isn't a jew(By their fruits, ye shall know them; out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth doth speak). It is also true, that peoples have secrets, and will impersonate other groups to keep them safe. My own First Nation groups have phrases and concepts that are absolutely forbidden to say in any other tongue but our own; it would be no stretch if a group/nation like Khazaria, Chaldea, etc. Had similar taboos in place to protect their origins/intention for their peoples.

You are correct that online discourse will devolve and eventually turn into an internet where bots outnumber humans 100:1, and where no one can tell what is real anymore.

I have same conviction; that those who do not put in the work to understand something as thoroughly as it could be understood, are the ones who are regarded as the authorities of most given topics. Am also in agreement with scripture. All of which, is divinely inspired by The Highest Principality. From The Torah and Holy Bible, to Bhavad Gita, Tao Te Ching, etc. The Most High sanctions all of them, bcos He is Scripture itself(In The beginning was The Word, and The Word was God). This most simple fact, causes the most contention among the worlds religions(Our understanding of God is different than theirs, and vice versa).

danny esq · 2023-11-01T00:58:17Z

Mayday Mike Thank you for replying Mike.

Im happy to know you hold the truth with high regard.

I cannot profess to know Bhavad Gita and Tao Te Ching...

However, being a student of Yeshua, I have absolutely no doubts in my mind he means what he say's, returning to save the lost sheep of Israel.

When one says "Israel", most think about the geographical land mass that has been renamed Israel (formerly called Palestine, etymologically from the Canaanite area Philistine), so you amongst others know there is immediately a right and wrong interpretation of the word "Israel" from the viewpoint of scripture but understood by most peoples understanding of this word will mean the country now imposing itself as the beneficiary of the blessings given to "Israel" in it's proper context.

This might seem simple to me and you but online often met with less understanding, worse now is the creation of hostility. This is the multi faceted game of name changing and in this example only covers one single biblical word, but as you will know, the two interpretations are literally "worlds apart".

I don't believe all scripture is divinely inspired though, because some scriptures contain contradictions (mainly for edification of the reader as his/her learning develops deeper meanings can become known in areas of reading) Paul and Yeshua for example, but serve as a vantage point to understand the other, ie the LAW given to Moses creates the knowledge of sin by its fixed measurement, the law being unchanged gives a moral compass to guide a man, should he become lost and lose sight of the correct way.

Mayday Mike · 2023-11-01T01:44:48Z

danny esq I can't be quite certain myself, to the extent of The Most High's verified script. It could include every single word ever inscribed; or it could only be exclusive to a given scripture. These Faiths, may not be those of my people. But, I do know that I know; There is an Actual God. "It" is real, and not imaginary, nor is That a mental projection, allegory, or any variation thereof.

There is Known Knowns, Known unknowns, and Unknown unknowns. Introducing: The Unknown Known; there is something you don't know, that you know on a profound level.

KRNABRNY · 2023-11-01T07:09:05Z

Mayday Mike Well, now my friend really just used platitudes.

It's obvious that Jews have been doing this for centuries. It is also obvious that it is impossible to know everything.

However, some things are clear because clear records remain from the time. And certain records can be confirmed by cross-checking different sources.

As in the above case. We have the Chaldean records, but we also have the Bible. It's easy to compare their content. Then it is clear that the "Babylonian Captivity" that Josephus wrote about in the Bible is the Chaldean captivity.

THIS was when the Jews wrote about how much they were exploited by the Chaldeans and that they had to work! :-)

So, I agree with my colleague about the role of the Jews, but such a great generalization of history is not necessary, because fortunately we have different sources.

ROEL · 2023-11-02T21:01:45Z

Mayday Mike I beg your pardon for the intrusion with this comment that has noting to do with the subject:

When you say "Nice take on the figure called Judas, it takes huge cajones to knowingly betray anything sacred.", reading it makes me cringe.

Cajones: Correct Spanish for drawers.

Cojones: Spanish slang for testicles.

It is remarkable how the 'drawers' word has taken hold and replaced, for many, the correct spelling.

Sorry, I could not help it.

danny esq · 2023-11-02T21:18:02Z

ROEL Grammar Police

ROEL · 2023-11-02T21:44:15Z

danny esq And now I caught myself!

"I beg your pardon for the intrusion with this comment that has noting to do with the subject:"

Noting instead of nothing

danny esq · 2023-11-02T23:06:42Z

ROEL Im only having a laugh with you, Im shite at spelling, I say ththey're there their interspersed in wrong spelling, but just when you think it matters most....then you remember if yuo can raed tihs yuo can prbobayl raed anyhtgin haha

ROEL ·

danny esq

· 2023-11-07T04:50:04Z

Gator ·

Mayday Mike

· 2024-04-09T16:30:12Z

parzival · 2023-10-31T04:49:04Z

Classic! [Link]

JohnDukes · 2023-10-31T14:57:08Z

parzival 🤣😂 good one

parzival ·

JohnDukes

· 2023-11-01T03:08:11Z

Dwoods44 · 2023-10-31T13:59:05Z

I see this as a narrative that adds nothing to understanding. As I have noted before, at one time I was married to a Russian born Israeli "Jew". Did she read Jewish texts? No. Did she go to temple? No. Did we go swimming in the springs of Ein Gedi while orthodox "Jews" dressed in clothes to not show their bodies cursed her in Hebrew? Yes. Did she laugh at these orthodox "Jews"? Yes. During her time in Israel, did she serve in the Israeli military? Of course, which is required.

My understanding is that most Israelis believe in "scientism" and "Darwinism". This is demonstrated by the fact that Israel has one of the highest percentages of bioweapon vaccination. The Israeli government made a deal with Pfizer to insure that there was no competing treatment narrative.

Add to this the fact that the Israeli population was protesting against Netanyahu. Is he a psychopath? Yes.

ReRan · 2023-10-31T14:07:52Z

Dwoods44 Something was bothering me after reading this article, and I think you put it into words for me. Lumping them all together is giving an excuse for the incredibly evil behaviour of a few.

Dwoods44 · 2023-11-01T12:10:29Z

ReRan By the way, I use the word "Jew" in parenthesis because I no longer know who Jews are. Furthermore, I am not sure they know, per Clif High.

ReRan ·

Dwoods44

· 2023-11-01T18:08:47Z

danny esq · 2023-11-02T23:14:30Z

Dwoods44 Jewish Jews give them their dues the Judaism and Dew on the Judahites in Judaea

I like the word Yahudinym, I made it up, to mean a Jew who has anglicized his name and that being a Yahudinym or Jewish psuedonym

Gator · 2023-11-21T18:22:28Z

Dwoods44 "Add to this the fact that the Israeli population was protesting against Netanyahu. Is he a psychopath? Yes."

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-10-31T14:20:11Z

I guess "start 'em young" is a critical factor in all this...[Link]

ReRan · 2023-10-31T17:18:16Z

Highland Fleet Lute Well that is sick.

danny esq · 2023-11-01T01:16:33Z

Netanyahu scheduled his address on the eve of Purim, which celebrates the happy end of the Book of Esther — the slaughter of 75,000 Persian men, women and children. In 2019, Netanyahu's pronounced these words during a tour of the West Bank, "I believe in the book of books and I read it as a call to action that every generation must do what it can to ensure the eternity of Israel." The Bible occupies such a large part of his brain that he wants to put a Bible on the Moon!

A good example biblical edificational reading...

Esther...

The one book that NEVER praises God but is consumed by Jewish Supremacy.

Notice Netanyahu gives no acknowledgement to Yeshua who loved the Father.

Yet will say Yeshua was a Jew.

Did Jesus ever say he was a Jew?

parzival · 2023-11-02T05:30:31Z

MAX IGAN - THE TRUE FACE OF ISRAEL [Link]

JTF Truth · 2023-11-02T15:23:46Z

Way too much hate in the world right now. Way too many hateful, divide and conquer articles from the independent, supposed independent, AI and msm sources.

This is definitely not, in any way, going to lead to peace and love in any discussions, conversations, texts, emails, letters, etc...

If you believe in God our creator, we need to be rationally minded. If you don't, you still need to be rationally minded.

Now is not the time to be biased emotionally unrationally minded.

As the old saying went, cooler heads will prevail.

Peace and Love to All!

Demore · 2023-11-02T21:13:42Z

JTF Truth ''As the old saying went, cooler heads will prevail.''

It is high time.

tonyopmoc · 2023-11-24T17:31:09Z

Whilst, I never got much beyond "Martha Stout, The Sociopath Next Door" and The Psychological Based Leadership courses I attended re Behaviour Analysis, and Behaviour Modification, which works but I found completely unethical, I did enjoy reading this article by Laurent Guyénot. I accept, that I found "Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes" by Andrew M. Lobaczewski, extremely hard to read. In fact I couldn't finish it. Such evil was polluting my mind.

However, it might just be me, but I found the comments between danny esq (there actually is a ghost town in Cyprus - and you can still visit it) , and Highland Fleet Luke (did you use to go down The Marquee in Wardour Street like me)

Completely Hilarious

I wouldn't have been able to so effectivly take the piss

Tony

Highland Fleet Lute · 2023-11-24T18:11:57Z

tonyopmoc

did you use to go down The Marquee in Wardour Street like me

Yeah, I did actually.

tonyopmoc · 2023-11-24T20:07:09Z

I am not on my death bed(though recently close.).

I was really ill. SEPSIS - it can hit anyone...

She remained a total angel, and still looks and is the same as when I met her pver 40 years ago..I told them all I was in love with her...

I am 70 years old, and...She is like 66 going on 16

I said, I thought, I had given up camping at Festivals..

Who's on?

Come on

Book The Early Bird Tickets

tonyopmoc · 2023-11-24T20:52:36Z

On the day 9/11 happenned I was the other side of London - Near Euston Station on an Internet Flash Course,,,so I could learn how to tart up my Intranet Blog, such that, I wouldn't get phoned up so much when I am on call - which was most of the time 24x7...Most of this stuff -you or the support guys -can safely do this yourself without crashing the system which was employing everyone of any interest..to do your normal job from your van - mostly working from home - until an emergency happened...and you woul be first there...

I was on The Server End - and I was Determined it Was Not Going To Crash..

So I get home, and my wife shows me, what has been going on in New York...

We tried to phone up the GrandMother of The Twin Girls, my wife was Childminding..

She phoned up The Mother of The Baby Children being looked after by my wife in London...from within one of The Twin Towers...and the phone went dead -for 36 hours - we thought she was Dead...

I went back to the Flash Training Course, the next day across London, and spoke to the Lecturer - not knowing what had happened - and some kid - gave me the Full Photoshop CD for free.

I don't do that.

They all survived.

Their Grandmother is not daft.

She ran down the stairs as the Firemen were coming up...and Ran as Fast as She could...

anyone who tries to make out that 9/11 was faked is a total moron

ajderxsen · 2024-04-07T02:20:18Z

Some of your criticisms of Israel are valid. However, you're quite wrong in arguing that their "collective psychopathy" mirrors Yahweh, the God of the Bible.

Without the God of the Bible, you'd have no grounds for pronouncing any moral judgment on any issue . This is because moral principles require a Transcendent Moral Standard. And that Standard can't merely be an abstract, impersonal "thing," because nonpersons have no moral value or agency. The Transcendent Moral Standard must in fact be a Personal Law-Giver , whose own nature is reflected in His creation.

That's the God of the Bible.

In short: No God -- no goodness -- no grounds for making moral evaluations.

And if you'd taken the time to study and understand the Bible, you'd have quickly discovered that He doesn't hesitate to chastise and discipline His own people for degrading themselves and damaging the lives of others. Indeed, your theory of a "collective psychopathy" could find support in something the Apostle Paul wrote:

Part of Israel has been made stubborn [by God!], but that will change when enough non-Jewish people have come to God. And that is how all Israel will be saved. . . . The Jews refuse to accept the Good News, so they are God’s enemies. This has happened to help you who are not Jews. But . . . he loves them because of the promises he made to their ancestors. [Romans 11:25-26, 28]

ErwinsCat35 · 2024-04-07T02:59:57Z

I'd say a god that requires the murder of small animals – or even his own progeny – to 'forgive' people has a questionable moral standard.

Dwoods44 · 2024-04-07T08:58:26Z

ajderxsen I have read parts of the Bible, and it does appear to me that the "God" of the Old Testament is not the same as the "God" of the New Testament. Why?

ErwinsCat35 · 2024-04-07T14:03:41Z

One explanation is that the people became more about ritual practices than spirituality and moral behavior. Sin, kill a goat, be forgiven. Sin, kill a cow, be forgiven. The Israelite priest class also became obsessed with rules to control the people (feign shock and surprise here). Eventually these rules and oral traditions became codified in the Talmud and the Torah.

Yahweh wanted to be closer to his people, but could not abide their presence because of their sin. So, he devised a plan that would cover all sin – instead of sacrificing livestock onesey-twosey, he would sacrifice a being so pure that it’s murder would cover the cost of all sin ever committed. Being the narcissistic megalomaniac that he is, the only being pure enough to achieve this was himself, manifested in the form of a man birthed by a women (Jesus refers to himself often as the ‘Son of Man’). For believers, Jesus is both God and the Son of the God simultaneously (don’t try to apply conventional logic to that).

Jesus, who led a perfect life in the eyes of Yahweh, allowed himself to be tortured and murdered, and thus Yahweh could enter a more spiritual covenant with his people. Humans could have a personal relationship with God/Jesus because of this ritual purification, and did not require the intermediaries of priests.

That is one explanation, there are infinite others.

A rational observer would say that, like all religions, Israelites made Yahweh in their image –not vice versa – and thus the anthropomorphic projection of Yahweh evolved as the people evolved.

It’s also worth noting that Christianity grew from a small band of Jewish rebels (not unlike Star Wars) and likely would have died on the vine if not for the proselytizing efforts of one Saul of Tarsus who fell off his horse one day, bumped his head, and decided he was on a mission from God (Blues Brothers?). Some historians credit the outgrowth of Christianity with the efforts of Saul cum Paul the Apostle rather than Peter on whom Jesus entrusted the building of the Church.

The nice thing about religion is that dusty old parchments from thousands of years ago, derived from oral traditions, are so open to interpretation that there are no right or wrong answers; just answers that result in the most social control and highest profits for the church and/or cults of personality.

Demore · 2024-04-07T15:04:44Z

Dwoods44 The Old Testament is more or less a historical book. The new testament is fiction.

ge0m0 · 2024-04-08T16:25:12Z

danny esq

34 When the Pharisees heard that Jesus[a] had silenced the Sadducees, they met together in the same place. 35 One of them, an expert in the Law, tested him by asking, 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” 37 Jesus told him, “‘You must love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’[c] 38 This is the greatest and most important[d] commandment. 39 The second is exactly like it: ‘You must love your neighbor as yourself.’[e] 40 All the Law and the Prophets depend on these two commandments.” Matthew 22:34-40

30 I and the Father are one.” 31 Again the Jewish leaders[a] picked up stones to stone him to death. 32 Jesus replied to them, “I’ve shown you many good actions from my Father. For which of them are you going to stone me?” 33 The Jewish leaders[c] answered him, “We are not going to stone you for a good action, but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, are making yourself God!” 34 Jesus replied to them, “Is it not written in your[d] Law, ‘I said, “You are gods”’?[e] 35 If he called those to whom a message from God came ‘gods’ (and the Scripture cannot be disregarded), 36 how can you say to the one whom the Father has consecrated and sent into the world, ‘You’re blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I’m the Son of God’? 37 If I’m not doing my Father’s actions, don’t believe me. 38 But if I’m doing them, even though you don’t believe me, believe the actions, so that you may know and understand[f] that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.” John 10:30-38

I and the father are one is precisely the same meaning as Ayam Atma Brahma. Again, absolutely pure Vedic metaphysics, except that it predates the Bible by thousands of years. Though the Vedas were not composed until much later, the oral sources are archeologically verifiable because the Sarasvati River, mentioned in the Vedas, has not flowed since something like 3-5000 BC. Very little of the Bible has been verified by archeological finds, in spite of it being so widely studied.

So, from the source, we have two instances, among the most prominent sayings of Jesus, plus the original Creation story having source far removed from anything that ever happened in ancient Israel. Never mind. The Great and Powerful Oz has paved your path to heaven, so you need not do anything.

Further, the Tibetans have documented that a man named Issa was in Tibet studying with Himalayan Masters at the time of Jesus. The missing 15 years of Jesus life is attributed to this journey, 1.5 years travel each way plus 6 years at each of two different monastic locations (12 is a fundamental number for purification or Tapasya in Vedic tradition). According to some, referencing the Nag Hammadi texts, Jesus did not even die on the cross. He, as an Avatar to some or at least a very advanced Yogi, aka High Being, was able to regenerate the body and left Jerusalem, alive and well, and returned to the Himalaya where one can access the realms of High Beings more easily. Not so sure about the last part, but there is at least documentary evidence of a man named Issa having spent 12 years in Tibet prior to His return to Jerusalem where the same Tibetan scrolls describe that He was crucified.

You have been fooled. The trouble is, "It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."

hobnob · 2024-04-09T09:37:44Z

The article is splitting hairs, despite Guyenot writing some good books. However, splitting hairs can be great fun. He says someone is certainly not a psychopath (just a Jew). There are two immediate issues: he can't tell whether they are or are not a psychopath, and a Jew can still be a psychopath. Perhaps they have empathy for other Jews. Cognitive empathy is something most psychopaths have, and perhaps Jews therefore have even less empathy than psychopaths when their empathy is restricted to other Jews. Then there is no hope in a collective immunity. If religion immunizes one from "neurosis" (let's call it negative emotion), then the believer has fewer negative emotions. There is no analogy, whatever way you look at this.

War needs some moral reasons. In the old testament, uniquely, there aren't any, strictly speaking, except that it is fated by the Jews' god, and they're entitled. Are psychopaths entitled? That should make up at least a fifth of the definition.

hobnob · 2024-04-09T10:24:27Z

hobnob Well thinking about it, fear and sadness, felt by others, are felt to the psychopath as pleasure (or as somehow useful). That is probably the crux of what a psychopath is.

There is no way to get into someone's head and see that they are gratified, unless they are actively abusing people. Perhaps they are a member of a Borg, but so it is the one Borg that is gratified through its adherent. If the collective is the psychopath, then the cell is a piece of a psychopath.

hobnob · 2024-04-09T10:46:33Z

hobnob (Also, fear, sadness, or suffering is useful, for individual progress or understanding, which makes God a psychopath. In this way the Jews were right.)

Baybars · 2024-04-24T04:54:30Z

" Jews demonstrate among themselves a high degree of empathy, or at least solidarity, often to the point of self-sacrifice . .."

News to me.

ReRan · 2024-04-24T13:51:59Z

Baybars Only among themselves.

Dwoods44 · 2024-04-24T18:43:55Z

ReRan C'mon, they keep it a secret...

ReRan ·

Dwoods44

· 2024-04-24T22:44:57Z

'They Are The Dark; We Are the Light' The more we know, the closer we are to the end of tyranny by ELIZABETH NICKSON APR 28, 2024 [Link] . "This...

parzival

Both should be fired, but Jean-Pierre definitely. She is arrogant , ill-informed , and rude to reporters.

eulogical

"Look him in the Eyes.....Nonsense. . how do I read that ? I read it as it written, as if it said, "look him in the eyes and tell him you really...

Shangri

the only people who should be working for Biden are Doctors and Nurses.

Shangri

Just look at the greeny co leader Lorna. Has Dyke written all over it. They're watermelon through and through too. Don't go in to coalition with...

Jason

Best of the Web:

Flashback Israel's Biblical Psychopathy

Reader Comments

Latest News

Picture of the Day

Quote of the Day

Recent Comments

Quantum Quirk