OF THE
TIMES

"Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections," the ruling states. "All other pending motions are dismissed as moot."
The US Supreme Court has rejected the request by Texas to sue four battleground states for improperly administered elections, citing "lack of standing" under the Constitution. Justices Alito and Thomas dissented.
The court announced on Friday evening that the motion by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton was denied the leave to file "for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution."
President Trump tweeted earlier in the day before the Supreme Court made their decision.The corruption in all segments of the political and juridical system in the USA is more than obvious. Despite much evidence of election irregularities, the court ruled in Biden's favor. The New York Post brings us this:
Trump tweeted in response just before midnight on Friday:
Earlier this month, Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) announced plans to challenge the tally when Congress convenes on Jan. 6 to count the Electoral College votes and certify the winner.
During an appearance on C-SPAN earlier this week, Brooks โ who claimed that "millions" of votes were cast illegally โ said he had "no clue" if any senator would join him in the effort, which is all but certain to fail but would have the effect of forcing Republicans to side with or against Trump."I can either surrender or fight to protect the integrity of our system. I'm choosing to fight," he said.
Comment: See also: