Society's Child
"Since you're giving pardons to people, please consider pardoning those who, at great personal sacrifice, exposed the deception and criminality of those in the deep state," Gabbard said in a tweet addressed to the president on Thursday, referring to Snowden and Assange.
The request comes less than a day after Trump granted a pardon for former national security adviser Michael Flynn. His case became a central plank in the Trump-Russia "collusion" narrative after he was accused of misleading investigators about contacts with a Russian diplomat following Trump's election win in 2016. While the Justice Department moved to have the case thrown out, citing misconduct in the FBI's probe, a federal judge resisted that effort, prompting the president to intervene on Wednesday.
Gabbard, who's set to leave office at the end of her congressional term, previously introduced a resolution alongside GOP lawmaker Matt Gaetz (Florida) urging the government to drop its charges against Snowden - who was indicted under the World War I-era Espionage Act for his role in leaking classified material revealing illegal mass surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA). Though the antiquated law was originally intended to prosecute foreign spies, it has been repeatedly wielded against journalists and whistleblowers.
Snowden himself weighed in later on Thursday, saying he had "seen more calls for pardon this year than in all others combined. No other issue in our time unites left, right, and center like the struggle to end governments' abuse of mass surveillance and secrecy."
The Libertarian Party echoed the message, noting that Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie has publicly backed the pardons as well, while journalist Glenn Greenwald argued that nothing would "shape Trump's legacy" better than a reprieve for the two whistleblowers.
Snowden approached Greenwald after making off with a massive trove of classified documents in 2013 while working as an NSA subcontractor under Booz Allen Hamilton. Fearing prosecution, he fled the US, hoping to secure asylum in Latin America, but was stranded in Russia after his passport was revoked by US authorities. He has remained there since, where he has been granted permanent residency status after seven years in legal limbo.
Assange co-founded the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks, which has published thousands of pages of secret documents from governments around the world, including material exposing US war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan. He was slapped with a 17-count indictment by Trump's DOJ last year, and was arrested by British authorities soon after. His extradition trial is still ongoing, facing nearly two centuries behind bars should he be found guilty in an American court.
Reader Comments
Pity that DT has no personal interest in helping these two real patriots [he has called Julian Assange a 'traitor'] ....as that is typical of the causes he appears to bring his office to bear upon....
Our concern for these brave spirits - and all who raise their voices in refuting all tyrannies - will never cede to silence!
he could if he wished; he pardoned Flynn while his case is in limbo
Regarding the earlier misinformation about pardons: It is not necessary to have been convicted of a crime in order to be granted a pardon. In the absence of a previous conviction, a pardon serves as a grant of immunity from any prosecution regarding the matter in question that occurred up to the time of the pardon. For example, if Snowden were pardoned for disclosing classified information, he could never be prosecuted for any such release prior to when the pardon was issued. However, he could still be prosecuted for releasing any information after having been given the pardon.
Also, many (most?) folks think that pardons require the naming of particular people when actually, as I recall, it was the pardon power that Carter used to grant amnesty to the Vietnam War's 'draft dodgers.'
R.C.
I have ethics and standards, so not only would they never allow me into the legal profession, I wouldn't debase myself to such a low level.
I might have once considered the legal "profession", but quickly found that one has to be adept at BS, mendacity, and chicanery to even hope to succeed at it. As is clearly evident today, all the honest and ethical attorney went extinct many decades, if not centuries or millennia, ago.
I do not deny your points, even while I acknowledge that my nature is to critique anything written with which I do not 100% agree.
I do know that Winston Smith (and, I think, another SOTTite) have claimed to be of that formerly rightly exclusive club, which passed around 2001.
Please take it as the compliment it was intended to be.
RC
You could just release a man who has the integrity to stand by the truth. I would like to see him awarded a Nobel peace prize instead of an endless stream of murderous Presidents.