Puppet Masters

Six minutes of Time magazine: The deadliest propagandists on Earth

Phil Butler
New Eastern Outlook
Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:32 UTC

It's a six-minute read, or so Six Minutes of Time Magazine: The Deadliest Propagandists on Earth. Before I dove in, my first question was, "Who wrote this?" I guess you already suspect some would-be propaganda expert. And Peter Pomerantsev is the spurt in question. Now, if I may, allow me to poke holes like the Swiss in this cheesy bit of Putin-phobia.

Before I launch into this Time Magazine horse manure, it's significant to note that Pomerantsev hatched his genius Putin hate piece with a catchy story about traveling to Kyiv from Poland. Please, let's face it: anybody traveling from Poland to Ukraine's capital is never going to be carrying any good news about Russia. Let's address the author's (or Time's ownership's) the biggest question. Do Russians believe the news in Russia? I am told by most Russians I know that, like any other media market in the world, a lot depends on who you are reading, watching, or listening to. That said, the best way to shred Time Magazine's propaganda is to examine what Western elites say Putin lies about. A few examples will suffice.

Regime of Changes

In 2014, the Russian people were told that the Euromaidan revolution was a coup orchestrated by the EU and the United States. (See Reuters) Western media back then called all that "Kremlin propaganda." Well, few can forget the conversation between the U.S. State Department's Victoria Nuland and Ambassador Pyatt discussing strategies to work with the three leading opposition figures: Klitschko, Arseny Yatseniuk, former Ukrainian economy minister, and Oleh Tyahnybok, the far-right nationalist opposition leader to run the country. On this note, I'd like to quote from the Socialist magazine Jacobin, based in New York:

Like today's Russia-NATO tensions more broadly, at the heart of the Maidan protests was the push by some Western governments, especially the United States, to isolate Russia by supporting the integration of peripheral parts of the former Soviet Union into European and Atlantic institutions — and Moscow's pushback against what it saw as an encroachment on its sphere of influence.

Moving forward, we mustn't forget President Putin televising Russia's destruction of ISIS at a moment when the West's Central Command was reporting pickup trucks and foxholes being blown up with a billion dollars in bombs and missiles. I reported on this. The following is an excerpt from the 2015 report:

"Israel and the US coalition were likely flying air cover for ISIL (ISIS- is banned in Russia) over Kurdistan and eastern Syria. In an earlier report, my colleague Holger Eekhof and I suggested the Russian Ministry of Defense should televise on YouTube missions against jihadists in Syria in order to prove the coalition's non-mission. On September 30th RT began rebroadcasting Russian Ministry of Defense YouTube broadcasts of the destruction of ISIL."

Russia's aerospace forces blasting thousands of ISIS oil tankers headed for Turkey and ultimate destinations such as Israel were a devastating blow to the Obama White House on social media channels. And speaking of propaganda against Russia and other nations, the Western mainstream media joined the White House and the Pentagon in downplaying the significance of these social media revelations. The Russian people believed Putin's administration, even before Russia's Defense Ministry provided the motive, the means, and the method in high-definition aerial footage. Earlier, in October 2015, the super brains at Time Magazine published an anti-Putin propaganda piece by Simon Shuster telling how the Syria campaign was a gamble.

Shuster claimed the assistance to Syria's Assad was intended to, get this, "trying to end Russia's economically crippling isolation from the West." Shuster, a pretty bright guy, also reported in 2014 how "Russia Is Testing NATO's Resolve in Eastern Europe." This report gives us an eagle-eye view of what caused the current situation. Unintentionally, Time Magazine's best expert reveals how Barack Obama was getting set for something big. Part of the story involves his trip to Estonia, Russia's neighbor to the West. That's fodder for another report. Let's get back to the Russian people and who they should believe.

Before I go on, take note of how Time and the Western fake-news machine managed to layer their lies about the Russians, and especially their president. President Barack Obama's Arab Spring for Assad revealed so much, but examining the real propaganda wizards is a hundred times more rewarding. Desperate Russia kills off ISIS revenue in a single, swift stroke while my country flew air cover for head-chopping terrorists. There are so many lies and levels of misinformation on Syria and Russian involvement, it's impossible to list them all. Let's remember that Vladimir Putin told his people and The Guardian that U.S. regime change in Syria would force a reaction from his country. Yes, he warned Washington, London, and the rest about what would happen.

Big Words Don't Equal Truth

Let's speed up and fast-forward to the beginning of Russia's military operation in Ukraine, another alleged Putin propaganda campaign. This time, the New York Times's Max Fisher spins the web of deceit. In "Putin's Case for War, Annotated," he makes a horrendous mistake for a propagandist (other than using a catchword in the title). He lays down a quote by Mr. Putin as evidence that Russia's leader is lying to his people and the world about Ukraine. Here is the quote under the heading: "The Case for War."

"It is a fact that over the past 30 years we have been patiently trying to come to an agreement with the leading NATO countries regarding the principles of equal and indivisible security in Europe. In response to our proposals, we invariably faced either cynical deception and lies or attempts at pressure and blackmail, while the North Atlantic alliance continued to expand despite our protests and concerns."

The record reveals that Russia has attempted to come to terms with the NATO countries. Putin even proposed that Russia might become a part of NATO to combat worldwide terror and security more effectively. The record also shows that NATO intends to expand to the frontiers of every border of Russia. Some will argue, but they will be either idiots, sellouts, or flat our liars. Fisher pokes at Putin for saying the West is trying to destroy Russia. Objectivity, research, and reading are beyond the former Vanity Fair writer's grasp. Let's look at a quote from NATO's commander, Army Gen. Christopher Cavoli, about a week ago. The General is speaking of expanded relationships Russia, North Korea, and China are forging:

"These countries are forming interlocking, strategic partnerships in an attempt to challenge the existing order. This is profoundly inimical [harmful or dangerous] to U.S. national interests."

This is from a report from the U.S. Department of Defense. In the report, which was also part of the general's pitch to the U.S. Armed Services Committee, he assures American politicians that the U.S. and its allies are ready to fight Russia and win. Now, I am not sure what your definition of "win" is, but to the Russian people, hostile enemies on their borders are not assumed to be Girl Scouts selling cookies. Again, Mr. Putin is telling not only his people the truth of matters, but he's trying to let the world know Russia is not the aggressor in all this. Interestingly, about two-thirds of the world believes him. The thirds who doubt they are the victims of the masters of propaganda.

Take Over Russia: Period!

On Mr. Putin's claims, Washington and the West want to destroy him and Russia are proven in the words that now proliferate the WWW. Some may recall that on 26 March, U.S. President Joe Biden, speaking in Warsaw, said: "For God's sake, this man [Putin] cannot remain in power." And consider Biden's statement that essentially said Washington is trying to punish Russia after invading, so the people of Russia know what he has brought on them. He said, "That is what this is all about." Mr. Putin and his spokespersons have repeatedly told Russians and the world of the West's hyperbolic war against Russia. The elite puppets have no qualms about calling for regime change for Russia or for any nation standing in the way of the hegemony. I could list 500 comments by the leadership of Western countries. Another meaningful one came from former UK PM Boris Johnson's office, who said of the sanctions on Russia, "we are introducing, that large parts of the world are introducing, are to bring down the Putin regime."

Former German Chancellor Angela Merkel's revelations about stalling talks to help Ukraine build up militarily, idiotic stories of Ukraine frogmen diving from sailboats to do underwater demolition on key pipelines, the list of lunatic claims with a Russophibic aim is endless now. Do the Russian people believe Vladimir Putin? Of course, they do. Who should they believe? Perhaps the news media, generals, billionaires, and politicians continually villify and dehumanize them. We have senators in America bragging how economical it is to kill Russians! As far as I know, and this is important, not even the most hysterical RTTV broadcast has ever hinted that killing Americans should be a goal. I've been interviewed or reported for almost every major Russian media outlet, and never once was I told what to say or write. Conversely, it's customary to be chopped off at the knees in American media and business if you utter a dissenting view.

Propaganda/prɒpəˈɡandə/noun - information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote a political cause or point of view.

Everyone promotes. We should search for where the preponderance of truth lies. In Putin's case, the weight of his statements catapults Western rhetoric toward the balance of truth and justice.

Reader Comments

Baybars · 2024-04-23T19:49:00Z

Chuck it off your balcony and shout, "My, how Time flies"...

Created by two YALE graduates in 1923, it's over a century in print! A long time for a propaganda outlet, and if you don't believe it's propaganda then you should know that during the first years of Time publishing, " J. P. Morgan retained a certain control through two directorates and a share of stocks, both over Time and Fortune. Other shareholders were Brown Brothers Harriman & Co., and the New York Trust Company (Standard Oil) "

WIKI notes that, " During the second half of 2009, the magazine had a 34.9% decline in newsstand sales. During the first half of 2010, another decline of at least one-third in Time magazine sales occurred. In the second half of 2010, Time magazine newsstand sales declined by about 12% to just over 79,000 copies per week. "

In 2016: " Time has a total circulation which averages over 3.2 million annually and a readership which is estimated to be 25 million. 80% of Time readers come from the United States. " [Link]
In 2017: " Revenue for the quarter that ended June 30 fell $75 million, or 10%, to $694 million compared with the same period last year, the company reported. The drop reflected declines in advertising and circulation revenues ." [Link]
In 2018 Time was sold to American internet mogul Marc Benioff

Going back to the propaganda; In 2022 Time named Zelensky person of the year.

I would not wipe my arse with this rag - paper cuts

LindaMay · 2024-04-23T20:12:27Z

Baybars The top and the bottom are sooo hilarious

ReRan ·

Baybars

· 2024-04-24T01:56:47Z

Gator ·

Baybars

· 2024-04-24T16:29:47Z

Dwoods44 · 2024-04-24T06:46:25Z

Yes, Time magazine is garbage.

However, I wonder about the author. Quote: "Everyone promotes. We should search for where the preponderance of truth lies. In Putin's case, the weight of his statements catapults Western rhetoric toward the balance of truth and justice."

It could be that this is just a wishy-washy way of attacking the Western globalist propaganda, but it looks like neuro linguistic programming.

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T12:34:53Z

Must read...

Although the time of our enemies, the social parasites on our planet, has come to an end, they do not intend to give up and we intend to continue with our monstrous plans. These must be clearly known in order to withstand…

Vultures of ultra-globalism

The Davos Forum and the Black Sun anti-world

Author: Andrei Fursov

The World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (or, more correctly, "health burials" or "mass health murders") are tools of the ultra-globalists in creating their new world order, the anti-world of the "new normal", the anti-world that has end/end the era of humans - this is what Schwab and Harari and other demons and imps of ultra-globalism are talking about. The ways of creating the Black Sun anti-world are very diverse: "pandemics", wars, famines and many others. But all these means cause mental epidemics, mass organized psychosis. So let's see how it's done.

From January 15 to 19, 2024, another meeting of the ravens or vultures of globalization was held in Davos - WEF, created in 1971 by a certain Klaus Schwab on the initiative of Henry Kissinger and J. S. Smith. Galbraith Sr. Initially, the forum was established to pursue American interests in Europe, to educate the transnational pro-Atlantic elite in Europe, identifying not with their own countries, but with the interests of the United States and Atlantic elites.

With the development of globalization in the 1990s, Atlantic interests acquired a global scale and global forms, as well as in their extreme, most radical varieties (ultra-globalist), and therefore the goals, interests and ideology supported by the WEF led by Schwab acquired an ultra-globalist character. At the same time, part of the American and Western elites in general - traditional globalists and isolationists, who should not be confused - remained outside ultra-globalism.

Let me remind you that the difference between globalists and ultra-globalists is as follows. Traditional globalists assume that the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank and other structures of this type should play their role, they stand above states, largely determine their policies, but do not eliminate them. States must be preserved in a globalized world, as must industry, the middle class and much of what characterized the 1930-1980 era. In the world planned by ultra-globalists, based on advanced technologies and so-called new (i.e. fictitious) finances, there should be no state in principle, and no middle class either. The world should consist of a few large mega-corporations, a new edition of the British East India Company, and the sector of the real (“physical”) economy, i.e. industry, should be limited as much as possible.

The IMF and the World Bank are a "superstructure" over sovereign financial systems that ensures the transfer of resources and profits from countries with non-reserve currencies to countries with reserve currencies. Ultraglobalists do not need such an addition. They need direct, non-economic control over zones of cheap raw materials and cheap labor, and "new finance" is no longer a "superstructure" but a "base". The headquarters of this "base world" are to be located in charter cities and on floating archipelagos outside the jurisdiction - the projects are already ready, financing from the largest corporations is guaranteed. The struggle between ultra-globalists and globalists reflects, on the one hand, the conflict between various factions of the late capitalist class, and, on the other hand, between the emerging dominant groups of the post-capitalist world and the bourgeoisie that opposes them and is fading into the past.

Ultraglobalists ("classics of the genre" - Obama and the overwhelming majority of members of the leadership of the US Democratic Party, although of course they are not the only ones) seek to create one global supranational elite (unity and integrity, of course, are hierarchical) of the majority of the country's elites who have sworn allegiance to ultraglobalism. Not only is this elite not above the state, but there is no greater need for it.

Traditional globalists, whose position externally (but only externally) resembles the old American imperialism, do not accept any transnational elite. For them, the global world is America's world; those who want to get there - "where it is clean and bright" - can be nothing more than vassals of great America, which of course has a global reach and global ambitions. This is republican globalism.

It is true that America is turning into a global empire, but it is an empire, not part of the global world under the leadership of supranational, and therefore supra-American, elites. It is also the source of many irreconcilable contradictions between the United States and Britain, or, more precisely, between US-British and British-US international clans and networks.

Ultra-globalism is causing a kind of giddy success among the WEF and some of the global elite they serve. For example, John Kerry, former US Secretary of State and now a key figure in Obama's Chicago political economy network, recently declared that he and people like him are a "select group of people" who talk about saving the planet on the WEF, nothing more, nothing less. I wonder about salvation from whom? Apparently from humanity, or at least from the majority, because the central point of ultra-globalists - sustainable development - requires a reduction of the population to 2 billion people (minimum program) and even to 0.5 billion (maximum program).

Davos is closely linked to two other ultra-globalization events, forming an annual triad with them: Davos (usually in January), the Bilderberg meeting (usually in May or June, because it is mid-year, preliminary summary), and the G20 meeting (usually in November or December, i.e. at the end of the year).

About 30-40% of the participants of all meetings are more or less regular participants, flowing from one meeting to another. But under no circumstances should we think that these are world government meetings. I have written many times about the fact that there is no world government as one body and cannot exist. The world is too large and complex to be controlled from a single center. I'm not even talking about the contradictions between the various layers, factions and clans of the world elite. The overwhelming majority of representatives of this elite understand this.

For a quarter of a century, from the late 1940s to the early 1970s, research by systemic and cyberneticists who, at the request of the world's elite, investigated the possibility of a world government, showed that in principle no world government was possible. This is prohibited by the Ashby-Shannon-Wiener, Anokhin-Beer and Sedov-Nazaretyan organizational-cyber laws (details below). Experts rightly believe that "a complex dynamic system must have either distributed, contradictory relative self-management, or more or less rigid external control, where managers are not part of the system." And only a much smaller part of the world's elite, in one way or another, considers the second option. However, in my opinion, the phenomenon of deep power can remove this contradiction, but that is a separate issue.

Right now, what they are trying to present as a world government is a system of institutions and structures that are interconnected in terms of functionality and staffing. If Davos and the Bilderbergers act according to Griboyedov Repetilov's principle - "we make noise, brother, we make noise", then the world's functional structures operate without noise, without kinship, as the French would say. Each of these structures has its own sphere of activity, they are not particularly well known (for example, the International Science Council). Davos and Bilderberg are, so to speak, their advertising, PR, public relations and disinformation departments at the same time.

At meetings such as Davos, there are no real masters of the world, they are not patronized. The triad of events, and Davos in particular, are meetings of high-ranking political and financial officials who discuss and release certain information into the public space, firstly to test reactions; secondly, dealing an emotional and informational blow to people, intimidating them; Thirdly, by framing the question in one way or another, by exaggerating this or that topic, by diverting attention from real problems that are really interesting and/or pose a real threat to them and their masters. They proclaim what the owners have already decided and discussed in a closed group, and then discuss it at their "party meetings" of the world's turntables.

Dwoods44 ·

KRNABRNY Thanks.

· 2024-04-24T19:06:46Z

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T12:39:42Z

...next part....

At this point, another structure should be mentioned, which ignorant people automatically oppose to "imperialists" (traditional globalists), "nationalists" ("populists") or supporters of macro-regional development. This is the G30, which, by the very fact of its existence, reflects the struggle of two groups of financial capital, and not along the "ultraglobalists - globalists" line, but along the other. S.V. Kugushev described one group as "supporters of endless horror" and the other as supporters of a "terrible end".

The first group is a significant part of European financiers and the management of the European Union, which (together with China) strive to continue emissions as long as possible. The second group is the Federal Reserve, some American banks, Swiss banks and the Bank of England. They argue not only for stopping emissions, but for a much more radical measure: withdrawing one third of the money supply from the global economy, and the financial bubble will burst, the global economic crisis will "wipe everything away like a powerful hurricane" and allow us to start the game from scratch. Among other things, the Covid “pandemic” did not allow this particular variant, whose main ideologist (and the G30) was Kenneth Rogoff, to materialize. And, of course, the G30 summit is perhaps more serious than the Davos summit, it is a matter of real money, a basic operation, not cover activities.

This does not mean that Davos and the other two elements of the triad are not worthy of attention and analysis. On the contrary. In one way or another, these gatherings reflect the real problems and concerns of the world's elite.

2

Each EEF meeting has its own slogan. The slogan of the 2024 agenda is “Restoring trust”. This is very significant and symptomatic, it is one of the main problems of ultra-globalists and one of the main concerns, but I will come back to it later, but for now let's get on with the agenda. Overall, its theme is traditional for Davos in recent years:

– counteracting climate change that is allegedly caused by human activity (CO2 emissions); hence the topic of carbon footprint;

– Green agenda as a means of combating the allegedly impending natural and climate catastrophe;

– fight against the upcoming terrible pandemic, against disease “X”; vaccinations and the need for a pandemic agreement;

- Artificial intelligence;

– fight against Russia;

– the issue of total international security (primarily in the cyber sphere and even in outer space);

– global management (including training of young world leaders in Swabia – approx. 1,200 people – new generation of biorobots such as Sunak, Macron, Baerbock).

I will start with two episodes - comic and comic only superficially.

1. Compared to Davos 2023, the problem of escorts, i.e. prostitutes serving high-ranking world officials, has become even more acute this year. This - almost ridiculous - problem fully emerged in 2023, when it turned out that there was an overwhelming demand to provide the participants (and there were 2,700 of them) with an escort, and if we call a spade a spade, prostitutes of both sexes. It is so overwhelming that Switzerland's capacity was exhausted and it was necessary to order "girls with reduced social responsibility" from Italy and Germany.

However, meticulous journalists learned that the Swiss, pressed to the wall, decided to save money (crisis!) Judging by the prices, they were not Italians and Germans, but Romanians: prostitutes invited by the WEF organizers charged 1,500 Swiss francs (1,400 euros) and 2,550 francs ( 2,350 euros) per night for 4 hours, while Western European priestesses of love charged 9,000 euros. In 2024, the problem of providing the inhabitants of Davos with representatives of the first ancient profession has not lost its acuteness, on the contrary. Well, just like in 2023, EEF organizers demanded that the airlines that transported participants were unvaccinated. This despite the fact that WEF members are hysterical supporters of vaccinations. The fact is that since the fall of 2023, the number of sudden deaths of vaccinated people has increased dramatically and continues to increase in the West. Hence the demand for unvaccinated pilots.

2. From to Putani. During the Climate and Nature session. The systemic response to needs was performed in a shamanic and sorcery ritual. The shaman of the Yawanava people, Raimunda Putani (Brazil), in his national costume, recited a spell and blessed those present in a pagan way, then approached everyone sitting on the stage and blew on each of them's forehead. On stage sat, among others: Hilda Schwab, wife of Klaus Schwab; Catherine Hayhoe, Canadian atmospheric scientist and evangelical Christian; Ajay Banga, president of the World Bank Group in Washington (the one who sincerely declares: "I believe that your (US) - Author) The owner of the digital ID must be the government"); Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the IMF; Jesper Brodin, CEO of Ingka Group; Swiss billionaire André Hoffmann, heir to the Roche holding (a pharmaceutical company). After the performance, Putani received a standing ovation.

Why did you invite your exotic aunt? They explained: “To look to the future, we must look back and find out what our ancestors' desires were.” Next time, they'll probably take drugs together. By the way, one of the journalists noticed that the shamanic rite resembles a scene from the movie "Harvest", where ten Egyptian plagues fall on a small town and a messenger of Satan arrives. The shaman's active presence in Davos is more than symptomatic. The fact is that EEF's plans and projects are as follows:

a) anti-Christian nature - hence shamanism, witchcraft; it is significant that the Jesuit Pope of Rome, Francis I, sent a congratulatory message to the Davos meeting in which he never mentioned either Christ or the Christian Church, but emphasized the positive role of the WEF in the development of the globalization process;

b) in its essence it is anti-religious, the desire to replace religion with magic (this is a trend; cf. Harry Potter - demodernization, archaization).

3

Now let's talk about things that are closer to reality. If the previous Davos was about defeating Russia, here there was already talk of preventing Russia from winning. A Russian victory, Macron said, would mean the destruction of the Western system of ruling the world. Just a month later, Macron explodes again with belligerent rhetoric - trying to make France the military leader of Europe. However, in Davos he spoke differently. However, this weathervane with an incomprehensible sexual orientation and a clear penchant for gerontophilia keeps changing his position.

According to WEF experts, the fragmentation of the global system into macro zones will continue, and they do not like this. They feel even less comfortable with the prospect of protectionism, which they believe will cost the global economy 7%. GDP. But this is not what worries them most, but the development of industry and the military-industrial complex related to the conflict in Ukraine. Ultraglobalists express primarily interest in financial capital and transnational, transnational structures.

The armed conflict in Ukraine and the prospect of a new Thirty Years' War, only this time not European but planetary, means, firstly, the development of industry; Secondly, strengthening the state - wars are fought by states, not corporations. Macron is right that Ukraine actually determines the fate of the Western system of world domination that has existed for the last 250-300 years.

China also got this on the forum. In her speech, the head of the IMF, Kristalina Georgieva, welcomed the growing difficulties of the Chinese economy. Indeed, there are difficulties. For example, in early 2024, Chinese shares in Hong Kong fell to a 19-year low amid a lack of new economic stimulus. The Hang Seng China Enterprise Index at one point fell by 2.96% to 4,975.3 points. The biggest decline is recorded by Chinese technology giants. Last year, the Chinese economy was driven by small and medium-sized enterprises. China's growth rate of 5% is not bad, but for a developing economy burdened with one of the largest debts in the world, it means stagnation (at best) or entering the negative zone plus deflation, which due to the size of the Chinese economy may be long-lasting .

I agree with those who believe that China will either find a source of growth or enter a permanent downward trend, but the collapse of such a huge economy is unlikely due to its inertia. The problem is that China is becoming uninteresting as a world factory for the masters of the core capitalist system, they have started looking for a replacement for it.

Vultures of ultra-globalismHowever, Georgieva has already condensed the colors too much. Zelensky the beggar also spat towards China, which, in the spirit of Tabaki the jackal, rushed towards Chinese Prime Minister Li Qiang. He said that his, Zelensky's, level was Xi, the CPC secretary general, and let the prime ministers meet with the prime minister. But these are all vignettes, although very important ones. Let's take a look at what ultra-globalists consider most important and constantly push into the world.

4

Firstly, it is the “green transformation” as a fight against supposedly anthropogenic climate change. Here in Davos there were two lines:

1) scary stories with specific suggestions about what should be done to avoid the supposedly imminent disaster;

2) The question of money – how much money is needed for this.

Dwoods44 ·

KRNABRNY thanks

· 2024-04-24T19:14:00Z

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T12:42:08Z

...next part...

In Davos 2024, the scarecrows have completely reversed themselves, raising the stakes even higher. Ursula von der Leyen, a notorious corrupt official, declared milk, eggs and meat as unhealthy foods and called for a switch to vegetarian food or, in extreme cases, artificial protein. This is also demanded by another thief, the director of the WHO, an Ethiopian Trotskyist, Gates' favorite Ghebreyesus, who is wanted in Ethiopia on charges of genocide and stealing huge sums of money. In accordance with this nature, it is necessary to switch to a plant diet, as well as insect food. By the way, the Torah categorically forbids Jews from eating insects or food prepared from them. But what's even more serious, doctors warn that eating insects may pose a risk of cancer and immunological diseases. So those who profit from drugs and vaccines will have somewhere to roam.

Let's go further: JoJo Mehta, founder of Stop Ecocide Now, speaking in Davos, equated agriculture and fishing with ecocide! Hence her conclusion: we must end agriculture - agriculture and cattle breeding. It is no coincidence that the European Parliament, in the spirit of Davos, plans to ban the sale of meat and dairy products in Europe's largest cities by 2030; Ultraglobalists believe that this should be the case around the world by 2030. And immediately – implementation.

After Davos 2024, Gates and von der Leyen, modern-day avatars of Basilio the Cat and Alice the Fox, headed to Italy. Firstly, to put pressure on Meloni, which actively opposes the globalist agenda (in particular the ban on the use of insect meal in Made in Italy products; anti-immigration measures, etc.; even in Italian federal channels there is criticism of the ultra-globalist agenda and Davos); secondly, an attempt to carry out an ultra-globalist project of abolition of agriculture in the province of Emilia-Romagna, managed by their supporter.

Von der Leyen announced that each peasant/farmer who stops cultivating the land will receive 1,500 euros. A total of $1.2 billion was allocated for this purpose. euro. It's like this: bury gold in the Field of Miracles in the Land of Fools. But judging by the massive farmers' protests in Italy, France and Germany, there are no fools there. And also those who are ready to agree with Vanessa Kerry, special envoy of the WHO Director-General, who believes that it is necessary to move away from fossil fuels.

Many of these issues are already actively discussed in the European Parliament as quite practical. It is impossible not to agree with Christine Anderson, who, being a member of the European Parliament herself, said about the European Union as a whole: “We are currently dealing with a government of global misanthropes. … They start to realize that people won't let them get away with this anymore. And they can no longer fool people into believing that we need to save the planet now, fight climate change, etc. (Telegram channel “Big Shock Theory”. November 2, 2024).

And the cherry on the cake from Davos: Swiss banker H. Keller went as far as to say that coffee emits 15-20 tons of CO2 per tonne of coffee. Therefore, we stop drinking coffee. But all these calls – for coffee, meat, milk, etc. – do not apply to the elites, including those who came to Davos. The director of the restaurant in Davos where ultraglobes eat, in a conversation with Raffaella Rigoni, a journalist from the 4th channel of Italian television, said that there are no vegetarians among the forum participants. His restaurant's dishes include all meats. In other words, low-quality, low-calorie plant-based nutrition and artificial protein are intended for the lower classes, for 80-90% of the population.

It is impossible not to recall the idea of anthropological transformation, put forward at a conference at the Santa Fe Institute of Complexity (USA) in 2018. It was about the need to build a society in which the upper and lower classes are distinct from each other as two biological species. The upper classes (there is no middle class in this society) live for 120-140 years, enjoy excellent health, their habitat is ecologically clean areas where the lower classes do not enter, they eat high-quality food and move around the world easily. The lower classes live 40-60 years or even less, in ecologically polluted areas, they eat plant foods and artificial proteins (which, among other things, do not contain iron, which is so necessary for the brain and blood).

Poor quality of the natural environment and food provokes chronic diseases, hence the need for treatment and vaccinations (i.e. bringing profits to Big Pharma). Incidentally, in Western Europe and the United States, a process is already underway in this direction. As Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. noted, when his uncle John F. Kennedy was president in the early 1960s, only 6% of Americans suffered from chronic disease; Today, 60 years later, it is 60%.

The ultra-globalists' focus on the biological perpetuation of social differences down to life expectancy and the development of various specialized and service human species recalls images from the novels of H.G. Wells' The Time Machine, in which society is divided into two socio-biological species - Eloi and Morlocks, and from Ivan Efremov's novel The Hour of the Bull, in which two categories of people live on the planet Tormans - "g" ("long-lived") and "kzhi" ("short-lived"), and from Frank Herbert's little-known novel (at least compared to the "Dune" series) "Hellstorm Hive" (1957).

The plot is as follows. A certain secret service (in the novel it is called "The Bureau") became interested in a certain farm that belonged to the entomologist Nils Hellstorm. A group of agents are sent to the Farm and discover that the Farm is a social experiment. It has been carried out for a long time, since the almost colonization of America, and involves breeding specialized functional species (or breeds) of humans according to the anthill model. Over time, many strong minds of humanity have joined this “Project 40”.

Most of the inhabitants of Antowisko are workers. They cannot (cannot) speak, they obey their instincts and are controlled by pheromones. The inhabitants of the Anthill identify themselves and strangers using pheromones; If someone does not have pheromone cells, they are destroyed. In this way, those who accidentally enter the territory of the Anthill are automatically destroyed as if they were not human. There is a group of specially bred intellectuals, their task is to work with the brain, but they are physically disabled - they cannot walk, they are carried by specially trained assistants with a minimum level of intelligence.

Top lives for a long time, feeds not only on plant food, but also animal food (the supplements are only plant-based, provided by hydroponic farms) and looks great. Hellstorm is many years old, but he doesn't look older than thirty. Francey Calothermi, who has given birth to eight children, is 58 years old, but cannot be older than twenty. But only those who are important to the Anthill live long. Ordinary – 30-40 years, and – to Kotło. Occasionally, workers may venture outside the Anthill in search of meat, from animals to humans.

The anthill has a "roof": the sheriff of the local town, just in case, but also a few senators. The system has been built for several hundred years.

In essence, Herbert depicted the emergence of a new sociobiological species, human insects (or insect-humans), biologically human but socially insects that are gradually drawn into a Darwinian-type intraspecies struggle with humans. This is exactly what Schwab, Harari and their masters dream of.

This is what the anthropological transformation is all about, and its necessity is supported by, among others, supposedly catastrophic climate change due to human activity.

And what do serious and, most importantly, impartial scientists say? Willy Sun, a famous astrophysicist from Malaysia, emphasizes that carbon dioxide doesn't actually affect anything, it's about something else: a small group of people lie in their own self-interest. Australian TV presenter Alan Jones gives the following figures: CO2 makes up 0.04% of the atmosphere; Of these four hundredths, humanity is responsible for 3% (The Big Shock Theory, 13/01/2024), which is 0.0012% of the atmosphere.

Weather Channel founder John Coleman puts it bluntly: “There is no significant human-caused global warming at this time: it has not happened in the past and there is no reason to expect it in the future.” And further: “The (United States – Author) government allocates approximately $2.5 billion annually to climate research. It only gives money to scientists who provide scientific results that support the global warming hypothesis” (The Big Shock Theory, March 2, 2024). According to Angus Dalglish, a leading British oncologist, if humanity stopped all artificial emissions tomorrow, it would starve to death because the decline in CO2 would lead to an agricultural situation that would lead to famine on the planet.

So not only the desire to make a lot of money from the green transition and push a huge part of humanity into poverty, but also the desire to cause mass starvation by obtaining, in addition to an artificially induced pandemic, another way to reduce the population and gain enormous power by controlling food, is the heart of the climate fraud WEF.

The second line of the fight "for greenery" is this "greenness", but not natural, but monetary, based on the dollar. Ultraglobalists do not hide, but on the contrary, they emphasize that the green transformation and carbon neutrality are extremely expensive. Christine Lagarde, who was acquitted by bankers of financial fraud, said in Davos that the green transition would require $620 billion a year. According to Davos, achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 will require EUR 1.1 trillion, i.e. tax increases. Another ultra-globalist, Saudi Finance Minister Mohammad al-Jadaan, says outright that climate transformation is impossible without "globally coordinated carbon taxes."

To prevent people, including individuals, from avoiding such a tax, a new individual device was presented in Davos to track the carbon footprint of individual people: their purchases, food, travel. This was done by Alibaba Group CEO J. Michael Evans. The scheme is simple: buy meat or travel by car, plane or even helicopter - pollute the atmosphere - pay. By the way, the entire Davos camarilla arrived by plane or helicopter, many private individuals. The engine of Schwab's car, which was waiting for him in Davos, was running continuously. As the chauffeur explained to the journalist, the idea was to keep the cabin warm.

Another favorite topic of ultra-globalists is the pandemic and vaccinations. At this year's Davos, people were intimidated by the new disease "X". They do not know what this disease is, but they confidently claim that its pandemic will break out no later than May 2024, spread around the world within 36 hours and claim at least 80 million lives. It's like the joke from Odessa: "Żora, fry the fish. “There are no fish. “You fry, there will be fish.”

Like Covid in 2019-2020, Disease According to forecasts, this was to happen in the years 2019-2021 and it resulted from the overlap of three circumstances, three moments.

Point one. The crisis of 2008-2009, which was supposed to improve the economy - this is the function of medium-term cyclical crises (8-12 years) - did not fulfill its task: the time of another crisis came, which had to become an order of magnitude more severe, because problems had to be solved both own and its predecessor.

Second point. The existence of the most serious, not medium-term, but long-term problems of the capitalist system that have no solution within it. Each system develops as follows. It starts with short-term problems, which are solved in a way that has medium-term characteristics and over time gives rise to medium-term problems. These, in turn, require long-term systemic solutions, the application of which creates long-term problems, often not immediately, but in the long run, in what Fernand Braudel called longue durée. However, they cannot be solved in a systematic way, and within the system there is a systemic crisis, as opposed to a structural crisis (short- and medium-term problems). The 2020s are marked by an overlap of cyclical and supra-political, systemic and macro-historical crises.

Third note. While most Western analysts (for example, the epigones of the Club of Rome with the report "Come on, capitalism") discovered with the naivety of the first kiss that capitalism has nowhere to develop, nowhere to throw contradictions, no longer non-capitalist zones to transform into the capitalist periphery and thus solve the problem of profit and capital accumulation, Soviet researchers (P.G. Kuznetsov, V.V. Krylov, M.M. Gołański) understood this already in the early 1980s. They were sure that at the beginning of the 21st century, capitalism, having spread over the entire planet, would physically exhaust it and it will lead to, so to speak, "heat death". When that time came, part of the capitalist elite tried to cheat history and set in motion the growth of fictitious capital. The result was the crisis of 2008-2009, but this did not stop the magicians and by the end of 2010 their world was on the brink of the abyss. The start of the Covid “pandemic” was supposed to somehow solve the problem, but it only slowed down the decline with all the ensuing consequences. Disease X, along with other nasty things, may be “trial 2.”

According to ultra-globalists, we need to prepare for disease "X"

Dwoods44 ·

KRNABRNY thanks

· 2024-04-24T19:26:07Z

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T12:45:54Z

...next part....

As I. Nikulina explains, people die due to the effects of ADE, i.e. antibody-dependent increase in infection - the virus binds to bodies that are not fully neutralizing and actively penetrates into the body's cells. Biologist Weinstein adds the following about the shortcoming of mRNA vaccines: "The most important one is that the lipid nanoparticles that deliver mRNA to our cells have no targeting mechanism... and will literally move all over the body" (NASTIKA (2/14/24) .

By the way, it's worth thinking about the WHO: half of the members of the WHO Committee on Transgender Health have no medical education and consist mainly of LGBT* activists.

Jeremy Hunt, the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, is also afraid of a new pandemic: yes, there will be another pandemic and there will be new vaccines. The WEF and Gates continue to insist that despite many side issues, the covid vaccination campaign has been a success and should continue, as should vaccination campaigns in general. Gates announced in Davos that his foundation would donate $8.6 billion. vaccination programs around the world. What are the real data on the results of anti-COVID vaccinations? They are deadly dangerous.

A senior EU official has officially stated that countries with the highest levels of COVID vaccinations show the highest rates of excess mortality. According to the UK's Office for National Statistics, the UK's vaccinated population accounted for 95% of covid deaths from June 1, 2022 to May 31, 2023, and 94% of that 95% were among people who had received four shots.

Elderly people especially died. Conversely, as Danish cardiologist Kirk Milhoan emphasizes: “The lowest risk of contracting Covid is in people who have not been vaccinated at all. As vaccination rates increase, the risk of disease increases.” Despite this, Ghebreyesus repeats: we (WHO - Author) must focus on vaccinating the older generation - 60-65 years old. So clearly we are talking about destroying those whom the ultras consider social ballast, unnecessary eaters and an excessive burden on the biosphere.

However, anti-Covid vaccinations do not only affect the weak - the elderly and the young from the same generation. Doctors believe they pose a threat to future generations. For example, Dr. Russell warns that the covid vaccine could lead to an explosion of autism, schizophrenia and other diseases in future generations. One of the reasons is the presence of nanoparticles in vaccines, primarily from Pfizer. Pfizer has long denied this fact, but recently its CEO A. Bourla was forced to admit that their vaccines contain nanoparticles, and if so, it is in fact chipping. It is not without reason that Andrew Bridgen, a member of the British Parliament, said that the mRNA vaccine against COVID ranks first in the forefront of excess mortality from cardiovascular diseases; It has been said many times that it causes cancer. Hence the conclusion of Dr. Pierre Cory (France): vaccinations against covid are a humanitarian disaster.

Masanori Fukushima, a retired professor at Kyoto University, described the mass covid vaccination program as follows: “Well, let's say it's murder. You could even say it was a massacre." The Japanese government has allocated significant funds to compensate people whose health has been damaged as a result of anti-COVID vaccinations. The perception of this procedure as a crime is spreading in both Europe and Latin America. In Spain and several Spanish-speaking countries, May 13 was declared a world day of remembrance for the victims of the Covid-19 vaccine. And in the Saxon town of Zinnwald-Georgenfeld, a monument to the victims of vaccination as a disaster was unveiled on a popular tourist route.

But for some it's a disaster, for others it's money. Ursula von der Leyen, who is associated with this corporation, profited from Pfizer vaccines. The United States' chief vaccinator, Fauci, whom R. Kennedy Jr. wrote an exposé, increased his fortune from $7 million to $12 million during the covid epidemic.

5

The topic of artificial intelligence (AI) was not forgotten at Davos, this time from an unexpected perspective. Schwab happily announced that soon the entire world and individual countries will be able to do without elections at all, saving money and time because artificial intelligence will tell you who to vote for and voting will become automatic. Artificial intelligence will make the choice. “Today's technologies and digital technologies,” says the Gruppenführer from Davos, “primarily perform an analytical function. Now it comes to the forecasting function. And we have seen the first examples, ... The next step may be to switch to a predictive function, in a normative mode. And that means you no longer need choices because you can already predict them. And then you can say: "Why do we need elections?" – because we know what their result will be” (telegram channel “Global Reset”, 18/01/24). In fact, it is openly about destroying the last remnants of formal democracy in the West.

Artificial intelligence will enable the collection of data about people, and this data will become new capital. It is not without reason that Schwab's "six" Yuval Harari says that today, next to billionaires, there are new rich people - "ludiarders". These are billionaires who have billions of data about people.

Overall, the enthusiasm for AI is surprising. After all, it is pure combinatorics that may work in conditions of stability, but is of little use in conditions of socio-economic turbulence, especially crisis. It is significant that the Western media has not written and is not writing anything about the published report of the British and Australian intelligence research institutes on the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, in which they convincingly showed and analyzed the impotence of AI in cases where society is faced with the emergence of fundamentally new problems. S.V. Kugushev was right when he noted that "the current generation of artificial intelligence is only mathematical and statistical analysis on huge tables, and statistics is a poor helper in forecasting", i.e. many predictions cannot be made with it.

In part, the emphasis on artificial intelligence is due to the deteriorating consciousness of the global elite, which is becoming increasingly anti-scientific, mystical and magical. At the same time, there is a trick here: you can hide behind artificial intelligence by presenting its solutions, based on particular group interests, as a product of the activities of supra-social artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence is part of the global digitalization agenda. Ultra's dream is to connect the digital world with the biological one, i.e. to create a biodigital creation that is primarily under digital control and is subject to the influence of not only biological but also digital viruses. When it is entwined with a technical, crystalline substance, the biological substance inevitably dies. If artificial intelligence does not have human self-awareness, it will mean a mutation of intelligence.

Hence the possibility of causing a total crisis through the digital line and its threat of blackmail and control over the world. In the meantime, a digital ID card is enough for control, as Queen Máxima of the Netherlands advocates. He believes it can be used not only to control the financial sphere, but also to control school enrollment, to determine who is vaccinated and who is not. By the way, at the beginning of the year, digital ID was discussed as a completely practical problem.

Maybe a digital ID is needed to fight pedophilia? Not completely. World Economic Forum calls for decriminalization of pedophilia; They believe that anti-pedophilia laws violate human rights. And now the German Ministry of Justice is taking this under the hood and wants to lessen the penalty - not yet for pedophilia, but for its component - child pornography.

The WEF works in the same direction as other propaganda structures of ultra-globalism - it seeks to erase and destroy all the taboos that make man human, which will allow them to completely invalidate the human world, the world of people, and replace it with the world of posthumans, posthumanism (posthumanism), neo-orcs. There are only three taboos: sex with children, incest and cannibalism. The rehabilitation of pedophilia, so dear to the hearts and other parts of the body of certain segments of the world's elite, is in full swing. The need to soften the attitude towards incest has been written about in the West for several years, trying to navigate the line of "Overton windows". And now, at last, there is a clear call to reconsider attitudes towards cannibalism. On February 14, 2024, the British magazine "New Scientist" published an article titled "Isn't it time for a gentler (subtle, gentle, skillful, cunning) approach to cannibalism?" The article says that new archaeological finds show that ancient people ate each other, sometimes out of mercy. “This discovery allows us to reassess our views on this topic.”

But above all, the fact that ancient people often engaged in cannibalism is nothing new, it is not a discovery. The outstanding Soviet scientist B.F. Porshnev based his entire theory of the origin of man and humanity on the role of cannibalism in this process. Secondly, does the fact that ancient humans, or rather early humans, practiced cannibalism mean that we should change our attitude towards it? Why on earth? Why should early humans or ancient humans be what defines our values and attitudes today? Is it because this is what those who seek to dehumanize man want?

To be continued

Its automatic translation from russian.

Source:

[Link]

Dwoods44 ·

KRNABRNY excellent.

· 2024-04-24T19:32:02Z

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T12:53:32Z

...next part...

6

Well, now about the most important issue of this meeting - the slogan "Restoring trust". About what kind of trust, in whom and why it needs to be rebuilt to such an extent that it has become a slogan? Why were the ultras afraid? The Covid story has shown them that, firstly, humans are not an irresistible herd; secondly, there are enough specialists among scientists and intellectuals who can expose the adventures of ultra-globalists regarding vaccinations, climate, green agenda, digitalization, etc. And they have the civic courage to do it despite informational, psychological and political pressure. Davosites consider this one of their main threats.

People don't believe their scarecrows, their "experts"; they see selfish interest behind them. That's why ultra-globalists lamented in Davos that in other circles the word "expert" has become synonymous with "liar" and sounds like an insult. Hence the calls to restore trust. A paradigm shift is needed, Schwab argues, that restores trust (read: in the WEF), otherwise the world will become more self-centered at national and global levels. And how do the Swaboids plan to restore trust? Very simply: through repression and suppression of their critics in the information sphere.

Critics of ultra-globalists, their "experts", vaccines and the "green agenda" are considered supporters of conspiracy theories and more dangerous than terrorists. This is the position expressed by one of the managing directors of the WEF, Saadia Zahidi, in the published "Report on Global Risks" (Davos 2024). And we need to fight terrorists, i.e. critics of ultra-globalism, among others: through repressive laws. And now in France they are working on the "Pfizer Amendments" bill, according to which criticism of mRNA vaccines will be treated as a crime punishable by a year in prison or a fine of one and a half thousand dollars.

The key word for the people of Davos is disinformation. This is what they call any criticism of them, any attempt to question their plans. Hence: combating disinformation is the main method of restoring trust. Ursula von der Leyen clearly calls for controls on social media platforms to "fight disinformation and polarization in today's world." Soros Jr. talks about disinformation as a very dangerous threat. The American Psychological Association, which works with the WEF, is actively seeking federal funding to implement total internet censorship.

Even in Davos 2023, the issue of technical means that would enable the creation of a thought police was raised. Ultras primarily call on non-state actors to combat disinformation. At the same time, they emphasize: the most important factor in the fight against disinformation is mental health. This means that it is assumed that critics of ultra-globalists cannot deal with the mental sphere, with the psyche. They should be treated, if necessary, by force.

Conclusion: ultra-globalists seek to establish a monopoly on knowledge - on knowledge dismantled in their interests and imposed on humanity, primarily in the part of it that is polar to them. Therefore, the main threat to them is resistance based on alternative expert, scientific knowledge. That's why I greatly appreciate the importance of the fake address to the WEF by the Iranian Daimon Inani, who sent Schwab, the WEF and their new world order to three cheerful letters. It's not even about the fake itself, but about the mass enthusiasm with which it was received around the world, not only in the Global South, but also in the Global North.

Let me remind you that before Davos 2023, Musk launched a global vote on Twitter** regarding "WEF control of the world". 1.1 million people took part in it. 86.3% were against WEF control and about 10% were in favor of it. This is the real approach and it will not change in favor of the WEF. Hence their fight against "disinformation" and lamentation about "trust".

7

We talk about what was discussed in Davos 2024, what issues were raised. Equally important is what issues were not discussed there. What are the Davosites silent about? But they are silent about what is most important, the basic operation, in connection with which everything they talk about is a cover-up operation, a means to an end, but not an end. The goal, the basic operation, is global redistribution, the expropriation of assets through the introduction of digital currency as a means of establishing planetary power. Among other things, this should eliminate the enormous global debt that global finance has created over the last 30 years, leading to the collapse of both capitalism and globalization. This is how David Webb (a former hedge fund manager with insider knowledge of Wall Street) describes in his book Great Take the central banks' plan to seize all securities, bank deposits and debt-financed assets. This plan, according to Webb, has been in the works over a 50-year period, since the very beginning of the neoliberal revolution, and clearly represents its ultimate goal (a further representation of the "Great Conquest," according to anagaminx's LiveJournal abstract).

The Great Wean is the final stage of the current debt accumulation supercycle. The plan (and debt) covers all financial assets and bank deposits, all stocks and bonds, and therefore all the main assets of all state corporations (land, minerals, inventions, machinery, intellectual property) and private property, assets of private enterprises. If this plan is implemented, a global network of central banks, with the main spider - the International Settlement Bank (ICB) in Basel - will gain control over states, parties, intelligence services, police, media and corporations. Those who run this network are a small group of people. In essence, their plan is a plan for total hybrid war against humanity.

Webb shows how the forces behind the Central Bank (CB) spent half a century creating legal structures around the world to limit the ownership of securities. Now ownership and control are taken away from the owner; now it is not a physical paper certificate that you can touch. Today, stocks, bonds and other investments are centralized, re-pledged and re-used, resulting in multiple bidders for the same item.

Brokerage account holders only appear to be owners; if their broker goes bankrupt, Webb writes, the stocks and bonds they believe they own will be used to satisfy their broker's preferred creditors. Webb gives the following example. In 2008, a small broker went bankrupt in Florida, and the bankruptcy trustee did not send the clients' securities to another broker, but simply accepted them. But there are also small examples - the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. It set a precedent that allows secured creditors to seize a client's assets in the event of insolvency. The most secured and preferred creditors are the financial institutions closest to the Central Bank: JP Morgan, Black Rock, Goldman Sacks and others. Moreover, if a person is unable to service his or her debts, the "elders" can seize not only securities, but any debt-financed asset: a house, an apartment, a car, a business, a retirement account.

In this way, Webb concludes, the world's most powerful and richest families have managed to entangle much of the world in debt and create a system that undermines the ownership of securities. It would take a major financial crisis to take away the wealth of the vast majority of the world's population. I would add that it could be due to a pandemic or war. The financial crisis itself is being prepared in the form of a bubble explosion, in the spirit of the so-called the mortgage crisis in the United States of 2008–2009. To achieve this, it was necessary to increase consumer debt as much as possible and cover as many households as possible, and then "pop" the bubble.

It is impossible - emphasizes Webb - to own something that is also someone else's responsibility, since legal structures have already been created to take away such property in the event of a crisis. Specifically, fiat currency is an unsecured obligation of a bankrupt government. Once you deposit currency in a bank, writes former financier Webb, it is no longer yours; technically and legally it is the bank's property, while your property is merely an unsecured obligation of the bank. This also applies to precious metals deposited in the safe.

Dwoods44 · 2024-04-24T19:40:49Z

KRNABRNY To SOTT readers, at least read this one. We will all be affected by the financial collapse.

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T12:56:14Z

...next part...

What does Webb advise? First, buy gold and silver bullion coins (for example, Canadian Maple Leaf or American Eagle). Second, invest in real estate, but not in mortgages. Thirdly, Bitcoins, which it is no coincidence that bankers do not like them so much. Bitcoin is a digital bearer instrument, it is not someone's obligation, it is completely under the owner's control. Bitcoin ensures the monetary sovereignty of the individual in relation to both the state and, most importantly, the Central Bank.

The most important thing is this. A huge debt, a huge debt bubble that only needs to be burst to deprive people of their wealth and turn them into slaves of the new rulers of the post-capitalist world - this is what Davos is silent about. There they discuss what can be surpassed, not talking about this goal, of course, but establishing something either as a threat to humanity (pandemic) or as an absolute necessity - the fight against climate change, the "green agenda", "digitalization".

When dealing with VEF people, you have to watch their hands and it's better to put your wallet in your breast pocket.

The seizure of world power by the Basel-based bankers in the IDB and its branches - the central banks - effectively created transnational power, resetting previous history. A measure of global redistribution, withdrawal of funds on a global scale, crisis according to the pattern of "epidemic - war - famine", and success depended on the speed of operations - as Schwab repeatedly emphasized. Ultra did this on a limited scale between 2020 and 2023, but 2021 and 2023 showed that, firstly, the blitzkrieg failed; second, a lot went wrong: resistance from the grassroots and from the highest to the pandemic in 2021, hence the Covid lockdown; miscalculations regarding the strength of the economies of the Russian Federation and the West, respectively; the war stopped the process of absorption of the state by corporations; growing importance of industrial capital.

The excessive activity of crazy Covid-scam supporters on the one hand and the unexpected resistance of people on the other have caused dissatisfaction among part of the world's elite with the development of the situation (Kissinger, at the Washington meeting of the Bilderberg Council in June 2022, expressed his dissatisfaction with the transparency of the glass). The world elite saw this as a threat to the already fragile world balance, an additional factor in further unbalancing the entire structure of Western domination. The conflict in Ukraine, invented by Western rulers for opposite purposes - several at once, including as part of an experiment, serve this purpose.

The situation is also complicated by the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, more precisely by Israel's actions on the one hand, and the opposing interests of the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican in this region and the world on the other.

Right now, Israel is in a losing situation: there is a war going on on its territory (for the first time) and it is suffering reputational costs. As noted by an Irish lawyer representing the "South Africa vs. Israel" case in court, the conflict in Gaza is the first genocide in history to be broadcast in "real time" (Telegram channel "Big Shock Theory", 12/01/24). Now it will be more difficult for Israel to use its "Holocaust" advantage.

We are left with three questions:

1) What are the most likely actions of the forces behind the WEF?

2) What is WEF and Davos?

3) What is the optimal attitude towards them at this stage?

First question. I have already said that the blitzkrieg according to the "epidemic-war-famine" scheme failed. Judging by the conversations about disease "X", ultra-globalists are tempted to repeat the pattern on a larger scale and for a longer period. However, this is risky, especially at a time when hostilities are ongoing in Ukraine. If there are many victims, then the perpetrators will respond - formally or informally, because the Kennedy family has been punished for three generations. Deaths – alleged suicides – in prison cells are also not uncommon.

Next. Ultra-globalists need a big war in a large theater of operations. It can only be the Middle East with conflict between Sunnis and Shiites. But this makes it impossible for Israel to exist. This is also an ambiguous situation.

Hunger. World hunger is a blow primarily to Europe, but also to the United States. And also in India, which the Anglo-Saxons use as a counterweight to China. This is also a double situation. And time is running out - ultra has less and less of it. What options are theoretically possible? The first is to decide on a risky game, cause a pandemic, that is, get involved, and then we will see. This is what Napoleon preferred to do, but this is not the Napoleonic era. So it's unlikely. It is true that in a situation of dynamic equilibrium, the role of chance and the human factor rarely increases.

But you can't predict a black swan.

The following seems more likely to me. The ultra-globalists' ability to play in this historic period is limited by the world situation. In such cases, they slow down a bit, play roles like in billiards to put their opponent in a difficult situation and force him to make mistakes; expect a deterioration of the economic and political situation in Russia and China; possibilities of compromise between globalists and ultras. And for this purpose, you can allow Trump to become president, sabotage his policies, put all the blame on him and try to play sometime in 2027-2028.

Second question. Davos/WEF is not a think tank, but a relay, a platform for causing infoepidemics, opening "Overton windows", etc. Davos is a platform, a screen for an open conspiracy (Wells) of part of the world's elites aimed at creating a society of BET fascism in which social differences will be forever biologically fixed. Schwab's gang is not even Woland's gang from M. Bulgakov's novel "The Master and Margarita"; Schwab is one of Woland's servants, but not Woland; I'm not even talking about people like Harari: as Dostoyevsky would say, "a little devil with a cold, one of the losers." Nevertheless, it is precisely because of what VEF members have managed to say and do in recent years that they could be dragged into a trial like Nuremberg 2.0 on charges of biological and information terrorism. It is obvious that at this stage it is physically impossible, but we need to constantly talk about it, hitting the so-called trust. Moreover, this should be done not only by individuals and groups, but also by the governments of the countries concerned. The Swaboids and their masters are waging a civilizational, class and biological-species war against humanity. According to the judgment of the court in Nuremberg, Nazi criminals were hanged for less.

Third question. Despite this, we should not demonize Davos, the Swaboids. If anyone is attracted to something demonic-like, it is his masters. Schwab's company is basically a deck of old cards, clowns coming into circulation, gesheftmacher such as Gebreyesus, Burla, Fauci, Lagarde, etc.

The WEF is starting to sink, just as the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission once sank. At the same time, we must remember: no matter what condition Davos is in, he is our enemy, and with the enemy - according to the laws of war. An enemy that must be unmasked, his true goals and plans revealed and made public. Time is against these inhumans, which is why they are in such a hurry, and the more they hurry, the more mistakes they will make.

We cannot miss these moments to implement our program. And for this - most importantly - you need to have it, and in two versions: a minimum program and a maximum program. We must learn from the Bolsheviks, from Lenin (by the way, Jan von Neumann called for this). But Lenin is not enough - Stalin is also needed. And we must remember: only a state that has its own image, a project for the future, can be truly sovereign. And ultra-globalist structures, including WHO, should not participate in this project. Fortunately, Russia has taken the first steps towards distancing itself from this structure.

Dwoods44 ·

KRNABRNY excellent

· 2024-04-24T19:46:56Z

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T12:58:04Z

...next part...

8

On February 2, 2024, an order of the Prime Minister of the Russian Federation M.V. was published. Mishustin of January 31, 2024 No. 200-r on the suspension of the implementation of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, revision 11 (ICD-11) in the Russian Federation. Currently, ICD-10 is in force in the Russian Federation. How does ICD-11 differ from ICD-10? ICD-11 states: 1) same-sex attraction is a norm in itself (per se); 2) transsexualism (including: chemical and surgical sex change, complete rejection of gender through castration, fetishism, and even sadomasochism) is declared as an option for healthy human behavior; children are granted the right to change their gender, giving them any number of genders - this is in line with the WHO guidelines of July (2023), which ordered all governments to introduce a "third gender" section in passports; 3) sexual attraction to children and adolescents is considered a norm if the person himself is not bothered by it and if he does not resort to violence against children for this purpose.

ICD-10 doesn't have all this. This means that in ICD-11, WHO and its owners were trying to achieve the same thing as in ICD-10 compared to ICD-9. In the 9th ICD, pederasty was officially recognized as a mental illness (section "Psychiatry", subsection "Perversions and sexual disorders", No. 302.0). In ICD-10, in one voice, without presenting scientific evidence, pederasty was excluded from the category of mental illness. Despite the fact that Russia once adopted ICD-10, all this nonsense is blocked in our country by the decree of the President of the Russian Federation on the protection of traditional values and the legislative ban on gender change (except for congenital physiological pathologies), as well as the recognition of the LGBT movement as an extremist organization. But it happened not so long ago, and Mishustin's order was only in February. However, already in 2021, a plan was considered to introduce ICD-11 in the Russian Federation by 2024, which was aimed at revising the regulations in this area and adapting our health care system to the requirements of ICD-11. But the Northern Military District began, our conflict with the West developed, the West set itself the task of destroying Russia as a state, civilization and Russians as ethnocultural integrity. WHO is working to solve these problems. However, despite this, already in 2023, the Minister of Health M.A. After the meeting with Gebreyesus, Murashko announced an agreement to organize joint events in Russia with the WHO on partnership in the fight against infections. I understand that this is not about Muraszko. But the official had to understand that there was a war going on with the collective West, and in Ukraine we were opposed by the same hostile countries and forces that control the WHO.

The situation would have been "good" if, during the Great Patriotic War, the USSR Ministry of Health had planned to cooperate with the Ministry of Health of Nazi Germany, one of the custodians of the concentration camps. WHO today is actively building a global biomedical concentration camp. But with Hitler fighting against us it is impossible, but with the collective West fighting against us, partnership in the non-military sphere is possible?

This is what it turns out to be, and then we complain: we have been deceived again - and once again! But they cheat either those who like to be cheated or suckers. You shouldn't be both.

It is significant that the order to suspend ICD-11 was issued by M.V. Mishustin "due to the large number of appeals from citizens and social organizations", which means that it was not an initiative of officials but of civil society, but it most likely could not have taken place without the security forces. The telegram channel "Katyusha" played an active role. Mishustin's decision is a litmus test. I am sure that the liberal shell in Russia, the "six" of globalists, will certainly express their critical "fi" and begin to accuse the government of incompetence, populism, lack of modernity, etc., will talk about the negative impact on the quality of medical care in the Russian Federation. I wonder how a ban on sexual attraction to children might affect the quality of medical care?

I am critical of Mishustin's decision. This decision was right, but it had to come to the end, it had to not be suspended, but reset. Neither the WHO recommendations nor the WHO itself deserve anything less. After all, it is absolutely clear that the WHO is one of the most vile and dangerous organizations of ultra-globalists, bringing not only the destruction of normal human life, the man himself, but also death. Controlled by people like the Rockefellers, Gates, Soros and others, this organization plays a key role in creating the world of the so-called new normality, and in fact - global bioecotechnofascism.

9

In fact, WHO was not a medical organization from the very beginning. In 1910, the International Medical Department was established at the Rockefeller Foundation. He solved two problems: 1) research in the field of eugenics, i.e. breeding high-quality human beings, a superior race; 2) control over political processes through administrative control over medical education based on the results of eugenics research. The Foundation was very interested in Soviet research, e.g. the experiments of Academician Pavlov and experiments with organ transplantation. In 1943, through the Rockefeller SS Foundation, he was invited to New York. Bryukhonenko. He conducted experiments on the continuation of life of the head separated from the body (they once inspired Alexander Belyaev to write one of his most famous novels, "Professor Dowell's Head") and on transplanting the head of one dog to another. Although many of Bryukhonenko's experiments were closed and supervised by the intelligence services, he was allowed to go to New York. There, in the presence of hundreds of scientists, Bryukhonenko demonstrated the following experiment. The blood was pumped out of the dog and 15 minutes after its heart stopped beating, the blood was pumped back through the "artificial lungs and heart" machine, the dog soon began to move, and after 12 hours he was fully recovered. In the 1960s–70s Rockefeller's medical structures were very interested in transplantology; At that time, the USSR was ahead of the United States in this field. It is obvious that the Rockefellers had a personal interest here - it is not without reason that David Rockefeller later transplanted a heart 7 times and lived to the age of 102. And yet, the most important thing here was the use of medicine for earlier eugenic purposes under a different name, firstly, to obtain an effective means of control over the elite ("practical immortality" of the elite), on the one hand, and the lower classes, on the other, and, secondly, to extend the life of the elites ("anthropological passage").

Because eugenics as a direction was discredited by the Nazis, their program of creating racially complete people (the Rockefeller Foundation cooperated with this program), at the end of 1946 the International Department was transformed into WHO and they began to deal with eugenics, changing its name. In 1949, the USSR left the WHO, and in 1955 the N.S. Khrushchev gave him our country back. Today, WHO is not so much about medicine, but about LGBT people, juvenile justice, euthanasia, pedophilia, opposition to the consumption of meat and dairy products, and agriculture, which allegedly harms the climate.

The medical aspect of WHO's activities is also specific. This means declaring epidemics and pandemics and then combating them with imposed vaccinations. In 2009, the WHO tried to commit the first pandemic fraud - swine flu. The scam failed and the WHO was criticized for causing panic. After the Council of Europe announced this, part of the WHO leadership had to leave. The ultra-globalists were better prepared for another fraud. In October 2019, the Gates Foundation, together with the WHO and other structures, conducted an "exercise" Event 201 - concerning the fight against the global epidemic, i.e. the coronavirus pandemic, and in 2020 a pandemic was announced. Excessive measures have been launched to combat Covid, accompanied by a range of actions violating human rights, citizenship and the constitution in all countries except Belarus and Sweden. Masks, gloves, blockades, senseless PCR tests, mandatory, i.e. forced, vaccinations with who knows what, not with any liquid, but in many cases with a deadly liquid.

According to experts, 17 million additional deaths worldwide since 2020 are the result of the coronavirus crisis. Firstly, these are deaths resulting from the fact that during the "pandemic" medical care was drastically limited for the really sick who needed it, and secondly, these are deaths resulting from vaccinations. It is significant that in those countries and areas where the most vaccinations were carried out, the mortality rate is the highest today. The absolute record holder in terms of vaccinations is Portugal, which is also the record holder in terms of mortality. There are high levels of excess mortality in almost all active vaccination zones, including among children. As for the death rate from Covid itself, the numbers are falsely inflated. In Italy, only 5% of deaths attributed to Covid are actually caused by it, a study by Italian doctors has shown. In many countries, including Russia - I know of such cases - those who died during the declared pandemic due to anything were recorded as Covid mortality.

Dwoods44 ·

KRNABRNY excellent

· 2024-04-24T19:50:39Z

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T13:04:30Z

...next part...

10

Who is the main beneficiary of these deaths? It is known that it was not the WHO itself, but officials who also suffered. The main beneficiaries are their owners.

The WHO's vaccination requirement and repression of vaccine refusal solved two problems. The first is that people become accustomed to such social control that destroys privacy and deprives people of the right to dispose of their own bodies and the bodies of their children; social training designed to develop fearful, submissive victim behavior in people. Today it is a recognized opening. German sociologist Heinz Boude openly talks about how German and non-German "experts" along with the authorities deceived people to get the desired behavior from them. The second task is to ensure huge profits for Big Pharma and a certain part of the global elite - funds and banks. Here are the data published by Corporate Watch. If we take the so-called the AstraZeneca vaccine, BlackRock owns 7% of its shares (the head of the company is Larry Fink); 5% - group managing the Wellington investment company (head of the company - Brendan Swords), one of the oldest investment companies Capital Group - 4%; 6% of Astra Zeneca's future profits should go to the University of Oxford (24% will go to Vaccitech Ltd., whose directors are researchers Sarah Gilbert and Adrian Hill. The main shareholder of Vaccitech is Oxford University Investment Co).

Now Moderna. The company's CEO, Stephane Bancel, owns 9% of the shares and has earned millions; Noubar Afeyan, CEO of Moderna, owned 14% of the company's shares at the beginning of 2020; a Scottish investment fund increased its share to 11% during the pandemic (led by Bailey Gifford); Vanguard Group – the exact profit is unknown, but it is present in almost all the largest companies in the world, including pharmaceuticals; BlackRock manages 8.68 trillion assets; 4% of Moderna shares; Rishi Sunak, co-founder of the hedge fund Theleme, which invested in Moderna, declined to answer questions about whether he benefited from the sale of Moderna.

Pfizer (I repeat: recently Pfizer director Burla, who was not vaccinated himself, admitted what he had long denied: yes, the vaccine contains nanoparticles). Vanguard Group (led by Mortimer J. Buckley) – 7% of Pfizer shares; State Street, one of the world's largest banks and investment company, handles $3.5 trillion invested in the Russian Federation; BlackRock owns 5% of Pfizer; Ugur Sahin and Ozlem Tureci, husband and wife, co-founders of BioNTech, partner of Pfizer, one of the richest couples in Germany (4 billion); Struengmann brothers (twins Thomas and Andreas), 50% BioNTech (23 billion). In this way, the top of the world's capitalists, the ultra-globalists, profited from vaccines, and these profits were enormous. Of course, this also happened to the WHO and its officials.

And yet, for many reasons, at the end of 2021 it was decided to slow down the fraud. There are three main reasons: 1) population resistance that exceeded the expected limits; 2) dissatisfaction of part of the world elite; 3) the Anglo-American provocation planned for autumn 2021, which was to trigger a conflict between Ukraine and Russia and involve Europe in it - there is no time for a pandemic. And yet the main reasons are the first two (I repeat: Kissinger openly talked about this during the closed part of the Washington Bilderberg meeting in June 2022).

For two years, not only was there no talk about the possibility of a new pandemic, but it was talked about somewhat slowly, out of inertia. And so, during the Davos Sabbath in January 2024, the ultra-globalists, represented by their Ghebreyesus "six", spoke loudly about the inevitability of a new pandemic of "disease in May 2024, and the mortality rate will be 20 times higher than the mortality rate due to Covid and will amount to 80 million (I immediately remembered the hysteria of A. Merkel and B. Johnson at the beginning of 2020: millions will die!). This shows once again that Covid was primarily a mental epidemic; psychosis, causing stress and reducing the body's immunity - this was the so-called covid pandemic. In fact, this new pandemic has not started yet, and the WHO has already carried out a psychological attack, psychosis has begun to intensify, the result of which should be a psychosomatic blow and at the same time a test of the means of mass psychosomatic impact.

At the same time, during the pandemic in 2020, there was formally something to complain about - deaths. But now there is absolutely nothing! And they tell us: it will be so! But doesn't this mean that WHO and its owners, just like in 2019, are planning to create a new pandemic using the same artificially created virus (what many have been saying from the very beginning has now been proven)? Otherwise, how do they know about the new pandemic and its exact start date?

In fact, we are dealing with blackmail involving the unleashing of biological terror, terror using biological weapons. Ultraglobalists need this blackmail to push through the so-called Pandemic Agreement, which WHO plans to be signed by all governments in May 2024. This agreement essentially gives WHO (and the families, corporations, banks and investment funds behind it) unlimited supranational powers, invalidating the state sovereignty of all countries.

Repressive health and sanitary (actually socio-political) measures are being introduced that will be mandatory for all signatory countries. By the way, Estonia and Slovakia have already announced their refusal to sign this agreement. This behavior deserves respect because the owners of the WHO punish stubborn small and weak countries and their leaders with death, like a real mafia. Thus, in Africa, the presidents of four countries who dared to oppose WHO requirements and refused to be vaccinated died in one year.

This is Tanzanian President John Magufuli, who openly said that the WHO and WEF agreed with Facebook**, Google and the CIA to organize the pandemic. On March 17, 2021, at the age of 61, he was assassinated, and Samia Suluhu Hassan, who was directly associated with the WEF, became the president of Tanzania.

This is the president of Burundi, Nkurunziza, who opposed experimental vaccinations and expelled the WHO from the country. He died suddenly on June 8, 2021, according to one version, due to Covid, according to another - from a heart attack.

This is the president of Côte d'Ivoire, Amed Bakayoko. He criticized the WHO. In February 2021, he was flown on a special flight to Paris for a medical examination. First, he was admitted to the American Hospital in Paris, where his health suddenly deteriorated and he was transferred to Freiburg (Germany), where he died on March 10, 2021, at the age of 56. The official diagnosis was liver cancer.

It was Swaziland's President Ambrose Dlamini, another WHO critic, who died on December 13, 2020 at the age of 52 while undergoing treatment in South Africa.

Four cases. Coincidence? No more than, for example, the death of four Warsaw Pact defense ministers in one year: December 20, 1984 - Marshal D.F. Ustinov (USSR, heart failure); January 15, 1985 - Army General Martin Dzur (Czechoslovakia, acute heart failure); December 5, 1985 - General of the Army Heinz Hoffmann (GDR, acute heart failure); December 15, 1985 - General Istvan Olah (Hungary, also heart). This is how the Warsaw Pact was cut down on the eve of Gorbachev's rise to power. I would like to see Gorbachev play tricks on the lively, tough and strict Ustinov. Of course, WHO has nothing to do with the deaths of military commanders. I'm talking about something else - strange coincidences of death in which the presence of the person concerned is clearly visible. But let's get back to the WHO today.

There have also been cases outside Africa. On July 7, 2021, at the age of 53, Haitian President Jovenel Moïse was shot and killed by a group of assassins. Not only did he reject the WHO and vaccines, but he stated that he had evidence of the involvement of the CIA, the Clinton Foundation and Epstein in human trafficking - the same one who owned an entire island of pedophiles for the pleasure of Western political and show business elites and who was hanged in a prison cell as an unwanted witness. Before his death, the financier, already wounded by several shots, was tortured.

But why go far away - to Africa and Haiti? President of Belarus A.G. Lukashenko categorically refused Borel, who came to convince him to join the anti-Covid effort and cancel the May 9 Victory Parade. This was the last straw and in the summer of 2020 there was an attempted coup during which there were plans to physically destroy Lukashenko. He didn't work out. Belarus is not Africa or Haiti, and Russia is close. But the very fact of the physical destruction of the leaders of small countries who challenge the WHO or simply do not meet the demands it pushes, we must note, especially since in the spring of 2024 the WHO, at the request of its owners (Rockefeller Foundation, Gates Foundation, etc.) and its main shareholders will be pushed through the Pandemic Agreement.

Dwoods44 · 2024-04-24T19:54:22Z

KRNABRNY When someone doesn't follow the "rules-base order",

"This is Tanzanian President John Magufuli, who openly said that the WHO and WEF agreed with Facebook**, Google and the CIA to organize the pandemic. On March 17, 2021, at the age of 61, he was assassinated , and Samia Suluhu Hassan, who was directly associated with the WEF, became the president of Tanzania."

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T13:06:19Z

...next part...

11

The pandemic agreement is the introduction of a global biomedical dictatorship. Moreover, this is only the first step, a trial balloon. Next, agreements are planned on the global food program (global dictatorship) and global security (global military-police dictatorship, including the thought police; at the last gathering in Davos, critics of the WEF were considered conspiracy theorists and conspiracy theorists who are more dangerous than terrorists - with everything that comes with it, hence the consequences).

All this shows once again: WHO is not about health, but about global control, about a new world order in the interests of corporations and banks, an order in which there will be no states; it's about transhumanism, i.e. the destruction not only of traditional values, but also of man as such. WHO is the enemy of humanity, people. It is not without reason that Schwab and his Harari "six" openly say that the human era is ending and the era of transhumans, posthumans - chipped beings - is beginning. WHO is also working tirelessly to bring this world closer to us.

The information below shows the extent to which WHO's activities go far beyond the (very limited) scope of medicine. Ghebreyesus has recently started a campaign against meat and milk (let me remind you that on the eve of Davos, von der Leyen issued a statement on the harmfulness of meat, milk and eggs as food). She said: “Our food systems are harming the health of people around the world. Food systems are responsible for more than 30% of greenhouse gas emissions” (Banksta telegram channel, February 8, 2024) . It's a lie. I have already talked about the calculations of specialists, according to them, carbon dioxide, which is so "afraid" of Swaboids and their owners, constitutes 0.04% of the atmosphere, and only 3% of this volume (i.e. production is 0.0012%) is the result of human activity.

The course is very clear: they must reduce agriculture to a minimum, put food production under full control, control of corporations and their farms, so that no one can afford to feed themselves. Such control will make it possible to deal with hunger, and WHO is actively involved in the implementation of this program.

Someone will ask: but why primitivise the social system so much? What, there are no other methods of control? This audience doesn't. The world became too complex, large and fast for them, so they decided to follow the path of population reduction, primitivism of the economy and society, and simplification of human behavior. There are three known laws of control:

1) Ashby-Shannon-Wiener Law: The control system must be more complex and powerful than the system being controlled;

2) Anokhin-Beer law: the control system must be able to make advanced predictions about the development of the controlled system;

3) Sedov-Nazarethian Law: in a complex, hierarchically organized system, diversity at a higher level can be ensured by suppressing diversity at a lower level by simplifying and impoverishing that level.

Today, the capitalist system is experiencing a systemic crisis, falling into chaos, and because this system is global, this disintegration is global, creating a situation that is extremely difficult to control. Under these conditions, the vertex, i.e. the control (sub)system, can satisfy the Ashby-Shannon-Wiener law, i.e. be more complex than the controlled (sub)system, only based on Sedov's law - the law of Nazareth, i.e. through qualitative and quantitative simplification controlled subsystems and numerical reduction of their carriers. What we have seen in recent years is the implementation of this very option. And the WHO plays a big and nasty role in this.

Another question: why are ultra-globalists in such a hurry and are ready to launch the "epidemic-war-famine" (or "epidemic-famine-war") program for the second time after 2020-2021, or at least blackmail them in this way? The fact is that, as Schwab and his co-author J. Mallere wrote with concern in their 2020 book on Covid and the New Normal, time is on the ultra-globalists' side. Resistance towards them is growing, they are not believed. It is not without reason that the motto of the last action in Davos was "Restoring trust." As more and more scientists, including doctors and biologists, politicians (for example Robert Kennedy Jr.), increasingly expose globalist frauds - pandemics, anthropogenic climate change, digitalization with its artificial intelligence, they must: a) restore this trust by suppressing dissidents - critics of the WHO and the "green agenda" characterize people as more dangerous than terrorists; b) hurry up, because the world of bioecotechnofascism (BET-fascism)*** started to collapse already at the construction stage.

12

The conclusion is this.

WHO is part of the international mafia, the global organized crime group (OCG), its biomedical segment with a bioterrorist nature. In a situation of military confrontation between Russia and the collective West, which "the West has been planning for decades" (Stoltenberg), it is part of the West, our enemy, working to destroy our sovereignty and our values. Therefore, it is necessary not only to suspend ICD-11, or even to suspend contacts with WHO, but to withdraw from it. This is much easier and simpler than leaving the IMF and WTO (in the same way you have to leave the IOC - it is even easier).

However, withdrawal from WHO cannot be limited. We need to combine unmasking actions and publications with ridiculing the WHO, Schwab, ultra-globalists and their structures, especially since there are plenty of reasons and clown caricatures in these structures. “A deck of old cards”, “a snake that survived poison”, “a gynecologist accustomed to looking at the world as an object typical of her profession” – what are images not?!

It is also desirable (even if it is symbolic) to create an International Tribunal for the activities of the WHO. This will clearly consolidate our position and will be a blow not only to this structure, but also to all ultra-globalists - enemies of Russia.

Only those who are betting on Russia's defeat in the conflict with the West, or those who are at least willing to continue traveling to the West at state expense, may be interested in maintaining our membership in the WHO. This is a tiny handful compared to the majority of the country's population that the WHO has targeted with its war viruses.

We are at war here. And we must act according to the laws of war and the rules of conduct on the front lines, both internationally and domestically. Moreover, in modern technical conditions, the entire country turns into a front zone.

Dwoods44 · 2024-04-24T20:03:07Z

KRNABRNY I appreciate the effort to post all of this information. The information is important because it gives a sense of the scale of the propaganda and social engineering.

As David Icke says, it is the "totalitarian tiptoe". It is meant to be so gradual that the sheeple think it just happened. It is entirely engineered, however the engineering is breaking down. People see the genocide of the bioweapon vax. People see the corruption in government. People see how the PEDOPHILES are trying to change the laws to protect them from child sexual abuse and satanic ritual abuse.

JohnDukes · 2024-04-24T14:23:07Z

Start a Substack. You long-winded commenters. Don’t waste your words here for someone else to steal and monetize, because they certainly will not give credit to a commentator on this page. SOTT is one of the places paid writers come to look for ideas. Start a Substack. Any good ideas put into comments here will just be stolen by some podcaster playing a stereotype.

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-24T16:27:25Z

I don't participate in this forum anymore, I rarely post when the material is interesting.

As for thieves... where are they not? ;-)

LindaMay · 2024-04-24T16:52:09Z

KRNABRNY Lollll 🙌

and who's the john?

JohnDukes · 2024-04-24T19:37:50Z

KRNABRNY If you do decide publish, please provide a link? I would enjoy the reading. The above analysis was a very good read, and was more informative than the article that inspired the comments.

LindaMay · 2024-04-24T20:18:08Z

JohnDukes We did appreciate and understand your concern.

Gator · 2024-04-24T23:00:18Z

KRNABRNY I enjoyed this post despite its length it has some very important aspects to what the globalists are up too. Thanks.

KRNABRNY · 2024-04-25T05:26:53Z

You didn't read it and it's important, I provided the link at the end of one of the comments, but somewhere in the middle of the set :-)

Poor, poor The Ukraine - place is only imaginary now..... Better for the citizens to go back and be with the bear roused. Soon - real soon - more...

Buffalo_Ken

Anybody seen this crap yet? [Link] - Assuming the link works - tis from Congressman Matt G - oh boy....oh boy oh boy o boy... ~ ps - the link goes...

Buffalo_Ken

At a recent pro-Palestine protest at UNC, where officers were protecting the American flag, an officer is allegedly caught on camera spitting on a...

Psstoffgoy

Clarke claimed the letter had been a parody mocking the controversial book The Bell Curve . That book must really hit home to a weak mind, she has...

Psstoffgoy

The avalanche got moving. God help those poor Ukrainian souls who happen to be in its way ...

codis

Puppet Masters

Six minutes of Time magazine: The deadliest propagandists on Earth

Reader Comments

Latest News

Picture of the Day

Quote of the Day

Recent Comments

Quantum Quirk