A field campaign provides important new insights into the Late Neolithic period in Southeastern Europe.
© Fynn WilkesHere at the Vokány site (Hungary), the combination of standard methods, such as surface sampling and the latest geophysical technologies, provided the researchers from Kiel with important new insights into the Late Neolithic period in Southeastern Europe.
Together with cooperation partners from the Museum of Vojvodina in Novi Sad (Serbia), the National Museum Zrenjanin and the National Museum Pančevo, a team from the ROOTS Cluster of Excellence has
discovered a previously unknown Late Neolithic settlement near the Tamiš River in Northeast Serbia. "This discovery is of outstanding importance, as hardly any larger Late Neolithic settlements are known in the Serbian Banat region," says team leader Professor Dr Martin Furholt from the Institute of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology at Kiel University.
Geophysics reveals a 13-hectare settlement structureThe newly discovered settlement is located near the modern village of Jarkovac in the province of Vojvodina. With the help of geophysical methods, the team was able to fully map its extent in March of this year. It covers an area of eleven to 13 hectares and is surrounded by four to six ditches.
"A settlement of this size is spectacular. The geophysical data also gives us a clear idea of the structure of the site 7000 years ago," says ROOTS doctoral student and co-team leader Fynn Wilkes.
Parallel to the geophysical investigations, the German-Serbian research team also systematically surveyed the surfaces of the surrounding area for artefacts. This surface material indicates that the settlement represents a residential site of the Vinča culture, which is dated to between 5400 and 4400 BCE.
However, there are also strong influences from the regional Banat culture. "This is also remarkable, as only a few settlements with material from the Banat culture are known from what is now Serbia," explains Fynn Wilkes.
© Cluster ROOOTS/Museum of Vojvodina Novi Sad/National Museum Zrenjanin/National Museum PančevoResults of the geophysical survey of the previously unknown site of Jarkovac (Serbia). The settlement, whose surface material points to both the Vinča culture and the Banat culture (5400-4400 BCE), has a surface area of up to 13 ha and is surrounded by four to six ditches. The deep black angular anomalies indicate a large number of burnt houses.
Investigation of circular enclosures in HungaryDuring the same two-week research campaign, the team from the Cluster of Excellence also investigated several Late Neolithic circular features in Hungary together with partners from the Janus Pannonius Museum in Pécs. These so-called "rondels" are attributed to the Lengyel culture (5000/4900-4500/4400 BCE). The researchers also used both geophysical technologies and systematic walking surveys of the surrounding area.
Thanks to the combination of both methods, the researchers were able to differentiate the eras represented at the individual sites more clearly than before. "This enabled us to re-evaluate some of the already known sites in Hungary. For example, sites that were previously categorised as Late Neolithic circular ditches turned out to be much younger structures," explains co-team leader Kata Furholt from the Institute of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Archaeology at Kiel University.
© Fynn Wilkes, base map DGM: European Union, 1995–2024Map of the sites that were surveyed as part of the 2024 spring campaign.
New insights into the distribution of wealth and knowledge in the Neolithic periodThe highlights of the short but intensive fieldwork in Hungary included the re-evaluation of a settlement previously dated to the Late Neolithic period, which is very likely to belong to the Late Copper Age and Early Bronze Age Vučedol culture (3000/2900-2500/2400 BCE), as well as the complete documentation of a Late Neolithic circular ditch in the village of Vokány.
"Southeast Europe is a very important region in order to answer the question how knowledge and technologies spread in early periods of human history and how this was related to social inequalities. This is where new technologies and knowledge, such as metalworking, first appeared in Europe. With the newly discovered and reclassified sites, we are collecting important data for a better understanding of social inequality and knowledge transfer," summarises Professor Martin Furholt.
The results are being incorporated into the interdisciplinary project "Inequality of Wealth and Knowledge" of the Cluster of Excellence ROOTS, which is focussing on these issues. The analyses are still ongoing.
Reader Comments
Archaeology is always learning though, this area is not far from the infamous massive Pyramid in Bosnia.
Also the area has many very large perfectly circular boulders, obviously shaped by man, like from the Olmec civilization in Central America.
Still believe knowledge came from West to east, Hyperboreans were real, and Doggerland had a major civilization at one time, prior to sea level rise.
So so much we don’t know.
to answer the question how knowledge and technologies spread in early periods of human history and how this was related to social inequalities.
FFS what a moronic thing to say, social inequality did not exist back then, it is a modern construct brought to us by the (((social anthropologists))). Back then you were what you could do for the good of the settlement, in any way if you could not hunt/metalwork whatever you could contribute with other skills.