Society's ChildS


Pistol

Boulder mass shooting suspect's anti-Trump posts uncovered: Obliterate 'right-wing extremist' claims

ahmad al issa posts
The news broke on Tuesday that the name of the suspected mass shooter in the Boulder, Colorado supermarket incident was released. The suspect, who is accused of killing ten innocent people, including a police officer, is named Ahmad al Alissa.

"Police have identified the suspect in the Boulder, Colo., shooting as Ahmad Alissa," the New York Daily News reported. "The 21-year-old is charged with 10 counts of murder in the first degree in connection with the Monday afternoon shooting at the King Sooper supermarket, police said Tuesday at a press conference."

Reports also surfaced that the Biden administration has been briefed on potential ISIS sympathies.

Comment: See also:


Pistol

21-year-old wanted for murder in Dallas nightclub shooting that killed woman and injured 7 others

pryme nightclub dallas
© NBC DallasA woman was killed and five people were wounded in a shooting at a Dallas night club early Saturday, police say.
A 21-year-old man is wanted for murder in connection to a shooting at a Dallas club early Saturday, police say.

Authorities are looking for Jonathanlacory Terrell Rogers, 21, who faces one murder charge and seven counts of aggravated assault, Dallas police said.

Police said Rogers is 5 feet, 8 inches tall and weighs about 170 pounds. He is considered armed and dangerous.

Eye 1

'Outlandish & arrogant theft': Former CEO John Matze sues Parler, says company stole his ownership stake & fired him illegally

parler app
Parler's ex-CEO John Matze has sued the conservative-friendly social media site, claiming he was unlawfully forced out of his position and that his ownership stake in the platform was stolen from him by rivals within the firm.

Matze filed his suit on Monday in a Nevada state court, accusing several higher-ups at Parler of breach of contract, conversion - or when one party takes control of another party's property with the intent of changing ownership - unlawful firing, defamation and conspiracy to commit each of those offenses.

Primarily targeting high-profile conservative donor and Parler partner Rebekah Mercer, the legal challenge comes after Matze was abruptly ousted from the CEO role earlier this year, which he claims was part of a scheme to deprive him of his 40% ownership stake in Parler, a company now worth millions.

"Rebekah Mercer sought to co-opt [Parler] as a symbol or as the 'tip of the spear' for her brand of conservatism, and plotted to force Matze out as CEO, manager and member, and steal his 40% ownership interest," Matze's court filing reads.

Comment: See also: Palace coup: Parler CEO John Matze terminated by Mercer-controlled board of directors: 'The future of Parler is no longer in my hands'


Attention

One year to flatten life as we knew it

flatten the curve
It is a year since we embarked on an untried, untested, unscientific, draconian and frankly mad medical, social, economic and psychological experiment on millions of people. On the day we were thrust into this folly I wrote, "So that seems to be that. The end of Britain as we knew it." All that has taken place since has, I believe, confirmed that, and my only surprise is that millions of people still cling to the bizarre idea that Lockdowns were based on science, that they were necessary, that they have been effective, and that we have a benevolent Government whose aim has been to keep us all safe. None of these things are true.

A Brief Recap of What Has Taken Place

You will search in vain for pre-2020 medical and scientific literature advocating the mass quarantining of healthy people as an appropriate response to a pandemic. In fact, after a panicked Mexican Government flirted with the idea for five whole days during the 2009 Swine Flu outbreak (ending it once it was realised how devastating it would be), the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) at the time, Dr Margaret Chan, explicitly warned against such destructive measures being used:
"In this regard, let me make a strong plea to countries to refrain from introducing measures that are economically and socially disruptive, yet have no scientific justification and bring no clear public health benefit."
So this disruptive, unscientific measure, with no clear public health benefit was quietly buried and forgotten about. Until, that it is, it was implemented in January 2020, in the Chinese province of Hubei, on the orders of Xi Jinping, leader of one of the most totalitarian regimes on the planet, as the lawyer Michael Sanger details in great depth here.

Comment: See also:


Light Sabers

HART's covid report attacked in The Times

tom whipple
HART's must-read report "COVID-19: an overview of the evidence", written about in Lockdown Sceptics on Thursday, has been making waves today. Former Supreme Court Judge Jonathan Sumption praised it in the Telegraph this morning, and then this afternoon Times Science Editor Tom Whipple did his best to bury it under smears of being anti-vaccine and "extremely irresponsible".

In a mean-spirited piece that makes no effort to engage with the arguments of the report, Whipple rounds up the usual suspects to heap opprobrium on anything that deviates from the establishment line or raises awkward questions.

Originally headlined "Scientists condemn report claiming vaccines caused second wave deaths", it now reads "Scientists condemn report questioning role of vaccine in second wave deaths", presumably after someone pointed out to the editors that the report never makes such a claim but only raises questions based on patterns in data. The report clearly states that "we cannot infer causation from correlation".

Footprints

Raddatz interview: Migrant admits he came to US because of Biden, 'definitely' not if Trump were president

Migrants & kids
© Guillermo Arias/AFP/Getty ImagesMigrants and children
'The same environment that's been going on today wasn't there last year' A migrant who is seeking asylum in the United States admitted in an interview that aired Sunday that he would not have attempted to travel to the U.S. if Donald Trump were still president. In fact, the migrant said specifically that he decided now was the right time to seek asylum here because of President Joe Biden.

What are the details?

ABC News anchor Martha Raddatz recently spoke with a Brazilian man just one of the tens of thousands of migrants who are traveling to the U.S. in search of asylum — who admitted that Biden's presidency was a motivating factor for coming to America.

"Would you have tried to do this when Donald Trump was president?" Raddatz asked.

"Definitely not. Definitely. We have a chance, you know. The same environment that's been going on today wasn't there last year," the man responded. "We used to watch the news and I definitely wouldn't do this."

Comment: The so-called 'mess' Biden inherited was a well-thought out and executed plan that functioned to the benefit of the migrants and the USA. Biden unplugged this systematic mechanism, choosing chaos over order, politics over Americans. Put one more checkmark in the column titled: 'Voter' Regrets.


Footprints

Mexico deploys 8700 troops to cut migrant traffic to US border

Mexican troops
© AP/Marco UgarteMexican forces to be deployed to Mexico's Northern Border
Mexico deployed 8,715 soldiers to stop the flow of migrants to the U.S. border, according to new federal disclosures. The move comes as U.S. immigration authorities struggle to absorb the rising number of Central American migrants entering that country.

During a news conference, Secretary of Defense Luis Cresencio Sandoval said the military set up 347 immigration checkpoints in Mexico along three main routes (Gulf, Center, Pacific). According to Sandoval, military forces had already "rescued" 12,905 migrants in March. Sandoval did not specify if the migrants were simply apprehended or if they were being held involuntarily by human smuggling organizations.

Sandoval's announcement comes at the same time that U.S. President Joe Biden announced a diplomatic delegation to Mexico to discuss the ongoing immigration crisis.

Comment: See also:


Fire

Kiev: Ukrainian presidential office vandalized by radicals protesting sentence handed to notorious Neo-Nazi leader

Fire Ukraine plaque
© Reuters/Valentyn OgirenkoFar-right protesters attempt to burn a "President of Ukraine" plaque during a rally outside the Ukrainian Presidential Office.
A crowd supporting a notorious Ukrainian far-right leader, sentenced to seven years in prison for the kidnapping of a politician, has vandalized the presidential office in Kiev as they demanded his release. No arrests were made.

Some 3,000 radicals gathered in front of the landmark building, on Saturday, to mark the birthday of Sergey Sternenko, the former head of the Odessa branch of the Right Sector, an association of radical anti-Russia Ukrainian Neo-Nazi organizations. The ultranationalists used the occasion to call for him to be freed.

Russian Flag

Under threat of ban, Twitter has begun removing content prohibited in Russia - but Moscow says social network is acting too slowly

twitter
© Jirapong Manustrong/Shutterstock/Fotodom
US social media giant Twitter has begun to remove banned content after Russia's state regulator Roskomnadzor threatened to block it altogether. The agency has demanded that the California-based site delete more than 3,000 posts.

However, Roskomnadzor believes Twitter's rate of removal "remains unsatisfactory," with two-thirds of all demands still being ignored.

Two weeks ago, Russia began to throttle Twitter's speed, adopting the measure after the social network dismissed requests from Moscow to remove the specified content, including child pornography and material advertising the use of drugs.

Comment: It says a lot about the nature of Twitter that it is not removing actual harmful content of its own volition, while also banning people whose politics don't fall in line with the establishment.

See also:


Attention

Nearly 3,800 incidents of racism against Asian-Americans in past year, study says

asian attacks
© Screenshots / Twitter
Nearly half of hate-related incidents targeting Asian Americans since the start of the coronavirus pandemic occurred in the state of California, according to a report from the Stop AAPI Hate Reporting Center released Tuesday.

The organization said it received 3,795 firsthand accounts of hate incidents nationwide from March 19, 2020, to Feb. 28, 2021. Of that total, 68.1% of the incidents were classified as verbal harassment, while 20.5% were cases of "shunning" of Asian-Americans and 11.1% were cases of alleged physical assault.

States around the country have reported a spike in violence and hate-related incidents toward Asian-Americans during the pandemic. Of the reported incidents, 1,691, or roughly 45%, occurred in California while 517, or about 14%, occurred in New York and 158, or about 4%, occurred in Washington state. No other state accounted for more than 3% of reported incidents.

"The number of hate incidents reported to our center represent only a fraction of the number of hate incidents that actually occur, but it does show how vulnerable Asian Americans are to discrimination, and the types of discrimination they face," the authors of the Stop AAPI Hate Reporting Center's study said.