
© Chris Jackson/Getty ImagesOne scientist said the Government ‘was very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be locked down’
Members of Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour express regret about 'unethical' methods
Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour have expressed regret about 'unethical' methods used to control behaviour in Covid crisis and admitted they should be considered 'totalitarian'.
Scientists on a committee that encouraged the use of fear to control people's behaviour during the Covid pandemic have admitted its work was "unethical" and "totalitarian". Members of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour (SPI-B) expressed regret about the tactics in a new book about the role of psychology in the Government's Covid-19 response.
The group warned in March last year that ministers needed to increase "the perceived level of personal threat" from Covid-19 because
"a substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened".Gavin Morgan, a psychologist on the team, said: "Clearly, using fear as a means of control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It's not an ethical stance for any modern government. By nature, I am an optimistic person, but all this has given me a more pessimistic view of people."
Comment: