OF THE
TIMES
Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito ordered all of the county election boards in Pennsylvania to segregate all late-arrival ballots from the rest of the mail-in ballots and to keep them separated when the voting is conducted in a Friday night ruling.Boockvar's 2012 video surfaced:
Earlier Friday, the Pennsylvania Republican Party had called upon the U.S. Supreme Court to take up a case related to Pennsylvania's own Supreme Court, allowing the extension of the counting of mail-in ballots to three days after Election Day.
Judge Alito responded:"All county boards of election are hereby ordered, pending further order of the Court, to comply with the following guidance provided by the Secretary of the Commonwealth on October 28 and November 1, namely, (1) that all ballots received by mail after 8:00 p.m. on November 3 be segregated and kept 'in a secure, safe, and sealed container separate from other voted ballots,' and (2) that all such ballots, if counted, shall be counted separately.Trump campaign lawyers have repeatedly urged the Supreme Court to take up the Pennsylvania case this week. The GOP told the Supreme Court on Friday:
"Until today, this Court was not informed that the guidance issued on October 28, which had an important beating on the question where to order special treatment of the ballots in question, had been modified. The application received today also informs the Court that neither the applicant not the Secretary has been able to verify that all bards are complying with the Secretary's guidance, which, it is alleged, is not legally binding on them."Republican Party of Pennsylvania has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking this Court to resolve the important questions of federal law implicated by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's 4-3 decision extending the General Assembly's Election Day received-by deadline and mandating a presumption of timeliness for non-postmarked ballots.Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, had filed a response on behalf of Kathy Boockvar, the secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, on Thursday related to Trump campaign efforts:
"In particular, RPP asks the Court to order Respondents Secretary of State Boockvar and the county boards of elections to log, to segregate, and otherwise not to take any action related to any ballots that arrive after the General Assembly's Election Day received-by deadline but before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's judicially extended deadline. Given the results of the November 3, 2020 general election, the vote in Pennsylvania may well determine the next President of the United States โ and it is currently unclear whether all 67 county boards of elections are segregating late-arriving ballots.""Because the Trump Campaign cannot satisfy the standard for intervention as of right or by permission, the motion should be denied. This matter has been pending before this Court for nearly six weeks. One day after Election Day, and for the second time in this case, the Trump Campaign has filed a motion for leave to intervene. The Trump Campaign's first motion was properly denied by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court because its generalized grievance in maintaining the electoral status quo was insufficient to justify standing or intervention. That defect has not been cured by the passage of time.In late October, Pennsylvania's secretary of state issued an order to county election boards saying that "all mail-in and civilian absentee ballots delivered by the USPS and received between 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 3, 2020 and 5:00 p.m. on Friday, November 6, 2020 shall be kept separate and segregated from all other voted ballots" and that "the county boards of elections shall not pre-canvass or canvass" any of those ballots "until further direction is received."
"In an effort to obviate the need for further proceedings before this Court, counsel for RPP contacted counsel for county boards of elections to request confirmation that the boards would segregate any late-arriving ballots" and that 42 counties "affirmatively responded that they would do so, and no county indicated that it would not" while the Pennsylvania Secretary of State "requested such confirmation and received it from 33 of those counties.
"To date, a total of 25 Pennsylvania county boards of elections have not indicated whether they are segregating the late-arriving ballots."
But the GOP said the Supreme Court should issue an order to make sure of that."In short, an order from the Court is badly needed. But given some county boards' refusal to confirm that they are segregating ballots and the Secretary's changing guidance, an order requiring segregation of ballots may not suffice to preserve RPP's appellate rights. An order at this juncture is necessary to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to resolve this matter on the merits, as well as its ability to enter an appropriate remedy for this general election."The Trump campaign argued this week that the Supreme Court should be the final arbiter after the high court decided late in October that it would not expedite its review of the matter before Election Day."The United States Constitution is clear on this issue: the legislature sets the time, place, and manner of elections in America, not state courts or executive officials. As the President has rightly said, the Supreme Court must resolve this crucial contested legal question, so President Trump's Campaign is moving to intervene in the existing Supreme Court litigation over the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's unlawful extension of the mail-in ballot receipt deadline."Pennsylvania's Act 77 allowed its voters to cast their ballots by mail but required that all mailed ballots be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day to be counted. It had not changed that deadline during the coronavirus pandemic. But Pennsylvania's Supreme Court said in a 4-3 ruling that mail-in ballots would not need to be received by Election Day, instead deciding that ballots could be counted so long as they were postmarked on or before Tuesday and were received within three days. The Pennsylvania Democratic Party told the high court on Thursday:"There is no reason for the Court to reverse course now, mere days after Election Day. If anything, the need for immediate review has diminished, because any interest in providing clear pre-election guidance has evaporated.To view on SCRIBD, go here.
"The Court's handling of the important constitutional issue raised by this matter has needlessly created conditions that could lead to serious post-election problems. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has issued a decree that squarely alters an important statutory provision enacted by the Pennsylvania Legislature pursuant to its authority under the Constitution of the United States to make rules governing the conduct of elections for federal office.
"This is not a denial of a request for this Court to order that ballots received after election day be segregated so that if the State Supreme Court's decision is ultimately overturned, a targeted remedy will be available."
Some think the Dem's subterfuge to hide their corruption will lead to a Trump win:
Along with Pennsylvania's Democrat Gov. Tom Wolf and Democrat Secretary of State Josh Shapiro, Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar publicized her opposition to the president in a tweet shared in 2017.
Corey Lewandowski from the Trump team spoke yesterday on how the Trump team had to get a court order to be allowed to review the ballot counting process in the state of Pennsylvania. When they were finally given access, they were denied entry.Caught on camera? Penn officials say video of 'crooked' ballot workers is 'altered' and false:
By hiding their activities the Democrats have prevented the proper review of the 1.3 million ballots counted in Pennsylvania. Democrats broke the law in not permitting a review of their process in awarding 1 million of those ballots counted since the election for Biden which helped Biden overcome the President's 700,000 vote lead.
Now this evening Justice Alito issued an order for Pennsylvania to set aside all ballots received after 8pm on election day in PA.
If and when this is addressed in front of a court, those votes which were counted during the period of spoliation [destroys or withholds information] may be excluded, thereby giving the President the victory in Pennsylvania and perhaps other states where this occurred, since the President was way ahead in the election on election night in these states.
Viral video footage shared on social media showing election workers in Delaware County, Pennsylvania filling out blank ballots sparked accusations of fraud. However, officials there say they were just transcribing damaged votes. WATCH THIS:See also:
Delaware County officials have called these videos "manipulated." In a press release on Friday, county officials said that while the videos are genuine, and taken from a live stream of the counting room, they are zoomed in and don't show the "bipartisan observers a few feet away at each end of the table." According to the press release, the staff were transcribing ballots damaged by an extracting machine, as instructed by the Delaware County Bureau of Elections.
"I warmly welcome the election of Joe Biden as the next president of the United States. I know Mr. Biden as a strong supporter of NATO and the transatlantic relationship. We need this collective strength to deal with the many challenges we face, including a more assertive Russia, international terrorism, cyber and missile threats, and a shift in the global balance of power with the rise of China."
"...If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more...the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule...you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle...even 36..."


President Donald Trump's lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, said that he's "up early working" on fraud cases in Pennsylvania. Giuliani claims that Joe Biden's win there was crooked, and the state GOP too has demanded an audit of the vote.
"Why were Republicans excluded?," he continued, before asking his followers to "tweet me your guess, while I go prove it in court."
Like his boss, Giuliani has insisted that Biden's apparent victory was the result of fraud. Republican observers say they were denied access to counting centers, which allowed staff inside to do "bad things" with the ballots, in Trump's words. At least one postal worker has claimed that he was ordered to backdate mail-in ballots, while the Trump campaign has alleged that droves of dead people voted in Philadelphia, and that staff there illegally counted late-arriving mail ballots.
Giuliani called the "Philadelphia Democrat machine" "brazen," and claimed that the late heavyweight boxer Joe Frazier and actor Will Smith's grandfather both voted in previous elections in the city after their deaths.
"I bet Biden dominated this group," he tweeted. "We will find out."Biden beat Trump in Pennsylvania by around 40,000 votes, or 0.6 percent of the total vote, though a small number of ballots remain to be counted. Though Republicans in the Keystone State have not outright called Biden's win fraudulent, State House Speaker Bryan Cutler called on Friday for Governor Tom Wolf to launch a "full audit" of the vote there before certifying the result.Just an example of how brazen the Philadelphia Democrat machine is.Former heavyweight champion Joe Frazier voted in the 2018 election. He died on 11/7/18.Will Smith's grandfather voted in 2017, 2018. He died in 2016.I bet Biden dominated this group. We will find out.
โ Rudy W. Giuliani (@RudyGiuliani) November 8, 2020
[Ed. note: The tweet has been deleted]
In a letter to Wolf, Cutler cited the widespread use of mail-in ballots without signatures, the exclusion of Republicans from polling places, and the extension of the mail-in deadline as "issues that cannot be overlooked."

Comment: A thank-you to this author for both background and vision, explored and projected. The implications of this election outcome couldn't be more crucial to the future of the USA and its way forward.