Puppet MastersS

Eye 1

Banana Follies: the mother of all color revolutions

trump biden
A gaming exercise of the perfect, indigenous color revolution, code-named Blue, was leaked from a major think tank established in the imperial lands that first designed the color revolution concept.

Not all the information disclosed here about the gaming of Blue has been declassified. That may well elicit a harsh response from the Deep State, even as a similar scenario was gamed by an outfit called Transition Integrity Project.

Both scenarios should qualify as predictive programming - with the Deep State preparing the general public, in advance, for exactly how things will play out.

The standard color revolution playbook rules usually start in the capital city of nation-state X, during an election cycle, with freedom fighting "rebels" enjoying full national and international media support.

Blue concerns a presidential election in the Hegemon. In the gaming exercise, the incumbent president, codenamed Buffoon, was painted Red. The challenger, codenamed Corpse, was painted Blue.

Attention

Biden's 'victory' speech: Was Joe even there?

Biden's Victory Speech
© blog.nomorefakenews.com
This is what I saw Friday night.

I was watching the "Bloomberg QuickTake: Now" live feed of the Wilmington, Delaware, outdoor space. Long shot. Vehicles parked. Occasional sounds of horns honking. At the front of the space, lit up in the darkness, an empty stage. Flags. A podium.

The Bloomberg crew appeared to be waiting for Biden to walk out on that stage and deliver his speech. Why else would they set up their cameras and hold on that long shot for minutes?

I assumed Biden was late. So I kept watching that shot of the space, the cars, the stage.

Suddenly, two big screens on either side of the stage lit up. Biden was there, on screen, standing at an INDOOR podium, against a plain background. He started talking.

What??

Bad Guys

Best of the Web: US media declare Biden winner - Trump says it's NOT over

BidenTrump
© The Georgia Sun/Marketwatch/Getty Images/KJN
Joe Biden appeared to clinch a victory on Saturday morning to become 46th president of the United States, closing out an election cycle that was dominated in the final months by debates around COVID-19, the economy, and police reform.

The Associated Press projected that Biden garnered 284 electoral votes after nabbing Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, all of which voted to elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The former vice president appeared to be ahead in Nevada and Georgia, though neither state has been called at the time of this writing. Fox News, NBC News, and The Washington Post also project Biden as the winner.


Comment: Nabbing = stealing.


Trump has promised to pursue at least one recount in Wisconsin, which Biden won by 20,000 votes, according to the Associated Press. The White House has also filed lawsuits in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Nevada โ€” though he has already lost the former two bids โ€” and vowed to challenge the results in front of the Supreme Court, casting certain states' mail-in ballots as illegitimate. On Twitter, Trump continued to claim victory.


On Wednesday, the president claimed victory in Pennsylvania, Georgia, and North Carolina, which had not yet been called for either candidate at the time, and Michigan, which had been called for Biden.


Comment: Biden is already transition planning, expected to announce Cabinet choices by Thanksgiving. Grab the sick bags:



Trump's response:

Republicans are split after Media/Biden's premature declaration. That's the problem with RINOs. They will not discuss election fraud seriously because it ruins the fake image of the USA as a beacon of democracy.


Chart Bar

SOTT Focus: Undeniable Mathematical Evidence The Election Was Stolen From Trump

biden fraud
According to CBS News, President Trump does not plan to concede in the event that the media declares Joe Biden the winner of the election, and elected the 46th president of the United States. The Trump campaign and its top advisers called for multiple lawsuits on the grounds that the ongoing vote count would result in tallying illegally cast ballots.

The lawsuits will amount to an aggressive effort to highlight anomalies, statistical impossibilities, or other perceived problems that could affect vote counts before a final presidential winner is declared.

Many reporters at press conferences that took place in Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Michigan on Thursday asked his political appointees and supporters for evidence of the wide-scale problems they alleged occurred.

If it is just the mathematical evidence Americans are looking for, there is endless evidence. Here are just the facts.

Comment: People have noticed the statistical improbabilities.

Will the Supreme Court recognise them?

It's supposed to be strictly impartial. If it is impartial in its deliberations, it will give the election to Trump.

But the SC may 'go political', if only - as its justices see it - to 'protect the reputation of American democracy'...




Here Sidney Powell comments on how as much as 3% of the vote total was changed in pre-election counting connected to 'Hammer' and 'Scorecard' software:


...which is a whole other 'score' on which this election was likely rigged: tabulation software that simply 'flipped' otherwise legal votes from Trump to Biden. So when Trump says 'only LEGAL votes must be counted', such a focus won't by itself uncover the extent of post-processing vote flipping.

What a sh*tshow!

Well, that's American (and thus 'Western') democracy for you...

UPDATE (11/8): Another metric: bellweather counties, i.e. counties known for results matching the final winner. Guess what, they voted Republican.



UPDATE (11/9): Even more data analytics suggestive of fraud. First, a graph showing the ballot count changes over time:


Click through to read the entire thread of this next one. It shows how Biden/Trump ratios changed over time in various states. Swing states show anomalies not found in non-swing states:


Here is the proportion of PA mail-in ballots that were returned suspiciously close to the time they mailed out (sometimes before). 109,421 suspicious ballots (3.53%):


Another possible 'glitch' or two:


Finally, not a voting statistic, but still statistically significant:

UPDATE: Another Benford analysis of Michigan:
Biden's vote numbers in Michigan do not match Benford's law at a 99.999% significance level.

Benfords law has been used on many occasions to prove election fraud (2000 & 2004 elections, 2003 California gubernatorial election, etc.).

Let me know if you would elaboration but the numbers can be computed in a spreadsheet using data taken from Michigan's election data tracker from individual precincts. For context, Biden scored a 0.0000017 and trump scored a 0.58.

While Benford's Law is not 100% proof that fraudulent data has been manufactured, "In the United States, evidence-based on Benford's law has been admitted in criminal cases at the federal, state, and local levels."

It was also used to determine fraud in the 2000 and 2004 U.S elections. I conducted a Chi-test comparing Michigan's precinct vote counts to Benford's law and found that Biden/Haris votes returned a, 0.000017% (Statistically significant, especially with a very large sample) whereas Trump/Pence votes returned a score of,
53.059791% and whilst looking at my data set I noticed there were 0 write-in votes in Michigan.

Very odd stuff.

This is the source I used for my data, https://detroitmi.gov/webapp/election-results.

Here are some pictures of the spreadsheets with a graph comparison of the expected results vs what actually happened.
benford trump
Trump's data matches the law (not manufactured vote counts)
benford biden
Biden's data differs greatly (fake data)
The highlighted percentage value tells you how sure you can be that fraud was committed, typically a score below 0.05 is statistically significant, and Biden scored a 0.00000017



Whistle

'American Hustle': Party insiders tell the true story of how Philadelphia elections work

Michael Ozzie Myers
© unknownMichael Ozzie Myers, currently under indictment for bribery
Most Americans might not know the name Ozzie Myers, although a part of his tale was told in the hit 2013 movie American Hustle about the FBI sting that sent four congressmen to prison in the 1970s.

If you're from Philadelphia, though, you know his name, and knew it well before 2013. He's important to the country now because he's currently under indictment for bribing a state elections judge to stuff ballots for Democratic candidates. Among the candidates he was paid to get elected are three as-yet-unnamed judges sitting on the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court. That's where President Donald Trump's reelection campaign has to go when local election officials refuse to let campaign monitors oversee ballot integrity, as has been the case these past few days throughout Pennsylvania.

In addition, Trump's U.S. attorney, William McSwain, has hinted that in addition to the three unidentified judges, those Democrats tainted by election-fixing go all the way from local officials to the U.S. Congress.

Why should anyone care about that court? Because it's playing a major role in the presidential election.

Comment: It is Pennsylvania-style graft and this is not big news to Philadelphians:
What else has been uncovered in the Pennsylvania election muck? At least 21,000 dead people are voting!
A lawsuit filed by the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) alleges that there are at least 21,000 dead people on Pennsylvania's voter rolls. The lawsuit claims that Pennsylvania failed to "reasonably maintain" their voter registration records under federal and state law in time for the 2020 presidential election.

The lawsuit states:
"As of October 7, 2020, at least 9,212 registrants have been dead for at least five years, at least 1,990 registrants have been dead for at least ten years, and at least 197 registrants have been dead for at least twenty years.

"Pennsylvania still left the names of more than 21,000 dead individuals on the voter rolls less than a month before one of the most consequential general elections for federal officeholders in many years."
According to the lawsuit, about 92 percent of the 21,000 dead people on Pennsylvania's voter rolls died sometime before October 2019. About 216 dead people show voting credits after federally listed dates of death in 2016 and 2018, the lawsuit alleges. PILF President J. Christian Adams said in a statement:
"This case is about ensuring that those deceased registrants are not receiving ballots. This case isn't complicated. For nearly a year, we've been offering specific data on deceased registrants to Pennsylvania officials for proper handling ahead of what was expected to be a tight outcome on Election Day. When you push mail voting, your voter list maintenance mistakes made years ago will come back to haunt in the form of unnecessary recipients and nagging questions about unreturned or outstanding ballots."
In May, Pennsylvania election officials admitted that duplicate ballots were mailed out to registered voters. Likewise, Judicial Watch sued Pennsylvania for allegedly having 800,000 inactive voters on their state voter rolls.

The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The case number is No. 1:20-cv-01905.
See also:


Arrow Up

Best of the Web: The 2019 Bolivian precedent justifies Trump's accusations of fraud

fraud graphic
© One World
The precedent established by the Organization of American States' claims that fraud was committed in the 2019 Bolivian presidential election after a suspicious delay in releasing the tally resulted in then-President Morales emerging the victor without a second round being necessary like would have otherwise been the case had the pre-delay trend held solid justifies Trump's accusations that fraud was also committed during the US' very similar electoral crisis concerning the equally suspicious and ultimately game-changing delay in reporting on mail-in ballots.

Two Countries, Two Years, Two Elections, Two Suspicious Outcomes

"The Anti-Trump Regime Change Sequence Is Worthwhile Studying", as I remarked earlier on Thursday, yet what's just as worthwhile to consider is the way in which the 2019 Bolivian precedent justifies Trump's accusations of fraud during the US' very similar electoral crisis. To explain, the suspicious delay in releasing the tally during the Bolivian election resulted in then-President Morales emerging the victor without a second round being necessary like would have otherwise been the case had the pre-delay trend held solid. This is almost the exact same scenario as what recently unfolded in the the several battleground states where an equally suspicious and ultimately game-changing delay resulted in Biden suddenly obtaining literally hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots.

Comment: The Bolivian election was a tactical trial run for USA and Israel


Arrow Down

Nobel-winning Ethiopian PM has overseen country's descent into barbarity and madness

Ethiopian protest London
© LightRocket via Getty Images/Keith Mayhew/SOPA Images/Abiy Ahmed/Reuters/Michel EulerOromo Women in the UK stage a protest outside Downing Street against Ethiopian Prime Minister, Abiy Ahmed's abuse of human rights.
The Western media have hailed Ethiopia's Premier Abiy Ahmed as a "liberal reformer" ever since he rose to power in the East African country nearly two years ago. Remarkably, despite the chaos and conflict that has accompanied his leadership, the same media tend to portray the mayhem as somehow due to opposition to his benign reforms.

This week, federal military forces have launched operations in a northern region of Tigray. Western media amplified Abiy's claim that the state of emergency was necessitated because Tigray militia had attacked federal forces first. Tigray leaders say that is turning reality on its head, claiming that they are the victims of aggression sanctioned by the central government in Addis Ababa.

Comment: See also:


Star of David

Irish government blasts Israel West Bank destruction as 'disgraceful and illegal'; EU and UN call halt to demolitions

Destroyed homes
© Reuters/Raneen SawaftaSite of destroyed Palestinian homes and shelters
Humsa Al Bqai'a in Jordan Valley, Israeli-occupied West Bank
Ireland's Foreign Minister has slammed Israel for destroying 70 buildings, including family homes, in the West Bank. The "reprehensible acts" have left 73 Palestinian people homeless, including 41 children.

Simon Coveney said he is "deeply dismayed" that Israeli authorities demolished buildings belonging to 11 Palestinian Bedouin families in Humsa Al Bqai'a in the northern Jordan Valley. Israeli bulldozers destroyed the village including houses, businesses, and sanitation facilities.

The United Nations labeled the demolition the "largest displacement incident in over four years."

Minister Coveney said the acts are "clearly prohibited" under international law, and Israel had failed to meet its obligations as the occupying power.
"The eviction of families and demolition of their homes is a brutal and violent act. These most vulnerable of people should be protected by the occupation authorities, not subject to further injustice. It is deeply disappointing that Israel continues to carry out these reprehensible acts which are a grave breach of international humanitarian law."

Comment: More than mere commenting and agonizing over Israel's demolitions and land grabs has to occur. No one seems willing to outline actionable recourse. Meanwhile for Israel, every bypass lowers the bar, validates abuses and adds to its territory and power structure.



Laptop

Trump's 'special' Twitter treatment would end with Biden win

trump tweets
Trump's tweets have been throttled by Twitter
As U.S. president, Donald Trump receives special treatment from Twitter Inc. when he violates the company's rules around offensive or misleading content. That exemption will end in January if he loses the presidency.

The social network treats transgressions from world leaders differently than those from regular users, and often leaves up tweets that violate its content policies, adding a warning instead of forcing users to delete the posts. This is part of Twitter's philosophy that people should be able to hear from world leaders even when they share controversial posts because their messages are inherently newsworthy.

But former world leaders aren't protected under that policy. High-profile politicians no longer in office -- like former U.S. President Barack Obama -- are treated like regular users if they violate Twitter's rules, which prohibit messages that include hate speech or posts that glorify violence or contain certain types of false information, like dangerous health-related misinformation.

Comment: The arrogance of a private company presuming to censor the leader of a country is breathtaking. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Google and the lot should lose their Section 230 protections as soon as possible.


Bad Guys

Lebanon's president demands US provide evidence that justifies its sanctions on former foreign minister Bassil

Bassil
© AFPWashington has imposed sanctions on Free Patriotic Movement leader Gebran Bassil for alleged ties with Hezbollah
Lebanon's President Michel Aoun said on Saturday that his country would seek evidence and documents from the United States that had led Washington to impose sanctions on his son-in-law, Gebran Bassil, a former foreign minister.

The US on Friday blacklisted Bassil, leader of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) party, Lebanon's biggest Christian political bloc and founded by Aoun.

The US has accused Bassil of corruption and ties to the Iranian-backed Hezbollah movement, which Washington classifies as a terrorist group.

Comment: Since when has truth and reason been the driving force of US sanctions? What's more likely happening is that the US is attempting to damage Bassil political career, likely because they perceive him as a threat to their objectives: Also check out SOTT radio's: The Truth Perspective: Bill Browder, the Magnitsky Act, and anti-Russia Sanctions: Interview with Alex Krainer