The last unanswered question about Alexei Navalny was answered this week in a Moscow courtroom by Navalny himself. For the first time he didn't have production back-up from his MI6 helper, Maria Pevchikh of London, or his CIA and BND teams in the Black Forest of Baden-Württemberg.
The question is a medico-psychiatric one. It was first made public by Navalny's treating doctors at the Charité clinic in Berlin.
These doctors, it was, who revealed that Navalny was a heavy user of lithium and benzodiazepine drugs. They published this in a set of four data tables they attached as appendices to their case
report on Navalny. Their data raised the question — what would happen if Navalny was forced to withdraw from his drugs quickly.
After eighteen days in remand prison in Moscow, Navalny answered this question himself in the Babushkinsky district court on February 5.
The disclosure that in his Tomsk hotel on August 19, hours before he collapsed and the Anglo-German OPERATION NOVI-NOVICHOK commenced,
Navalny had taken a large dose of lithium, diazepam, nordazepam, oxazepam, and temazepam, was first published on December 22 in
The Lancet. Read the report and the analysis
here.
The medico-psychiatric literature is clear on what happens to a habitual user of these drugs if rapid withdrawal is attempted: for lithium, read
this; for the benzodiazepines,
click to open.
Comment: Yeah. Sure. A significant number of deeply upset and seriously harmed citizens make an attempt to oust a totalitarian disaster of a politician and they get called: "right-wing conspiracy theorists, white nationalists, anti-vaxxers" and "groups who encourage violence on our democratic institutions."
Lest anyone forget why the citizens of California have tried to oust this pseudo-reality-espousing and power-grabbing sociopath, just take a gander at the following - and remember that our puppet-in-chief supports him: