OF THE
TIMES
That may come as a surprise given the Democrats' recent line of argument that Trump must be impeached because he tried to force new Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to open a corruption investigation into the gas company that had Joe Biden's son Hunter on its board - a "quid pro quo" that qualified as bribery and election interference, somehow."Russia. It's about Russia. Russia invading eastern Ukraine ...all roads lead to Putin. Understand that."



Thank you @NATO! #NATOLondonpic.twitter.com/8gJeXZxwpHMeanwhile, both Trump's domestic critics and the hostile mainstream press were busy hyping the president's early departure as a sign he is mentally unstable, a thin-skinned "snowflake," and "privately viewed with a mixture of mirth and alarm" (The Guardian).
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 4, 2019
: "When one great power threatens to displace another, war is almost always the result — but it doesn't have to be"(with a clear emphasis on the first part of the subtitle). Martyanov correctly calls this (typically "political science geeks") cliché as very dangerous and misleading. He then proceeds to debunk a who's who list of US political science cliches, including the latest one, the so-called "hybrid warfare". He speaks of "unnecessary and pseudo-scholastic confusion" and he adds that the current "Western think-tankdom" is "utterly unprepared" for the realities of modern warfare. As somebody who worked (during my college years) for several US think tanks in Washington DC, I can only agree. I also know for a fact that most think tanks will write anything, no matter how false, just to secure more funding (I even had colleague who worked in "respectable" think tanks laugh about the nonsense they were writing just to get more funding).

Comment: While no one can chart the course of the latest unhinged Democratic gambit, the tone seems to be coming increasingly desperate. If the Russia card doesn't play with the American public any more, what do they have left?