Science & Technology
Did you hear the one about 14 firefighters walking away after a 110-storey building supposedly toppled down on them?
It sounds like a gag. But it really happened.
Twenty years ago this September, on 9/11, a group of firefighters were trapped in the ground level of a stairway in the centre of the half-mile-high World Trade Center North Tower (WTC1). When the dust cleared, beams of sun shone down on them.
This is well-documented, such as in the film "The Miracle of Stairwell B."
If WTC1 had collapsed the men would have been crushed by the building's steel and concrete. That would have been the case whether a plane flew into the building -- with the resultant intense fires causing key support beams to fail, and then each floor falling by gravity on the one below it (the mainstream narrative); or whether there had been controlled demolition, thermite or mini-nuke explosions (the main 'opposition' narratives).
Yet the firefighters walked away largely unharmed.
For some reason, though, influential people still dismiss the evidence-based conclusion -- from Judy Wood -- that fits this and virtually all of the other phenomena that were observed on that watershed day.
In her 500-page, 2010 book Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11, Wood details her forensic study of every piece of publicly available evidence. She doesn't engage in formulating theories; rather, she arrives at solid conclusions based on facts.
Wood uses hundreds of diagrams, photographs, mathematical calculations, eye-witness accounts and references to do so. You can see for yourself - you can order copies of her book here.
She determined that the twin towers (WTC1 and 2), WTC3, WTC7, most of WTC4 and 6, and part of WTC5 disintegrated and turned to dust - a phenomenon she dubs 'dustification.' Wood also concluded that this happened to each building extremely quickly and without a lot of noise. In the last chapters she details the explanation that best fits all this: powerful and precise harnessing (at ambient temperature) of directed free energy.
Her website drjudywood.com summarizes this. For example, there is a lot of detail about her 2007 lawsuit on this page of her website. (In the suit she requested that the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST] correct its fundamentally flawed, fall 2005, report on what happened on 9/11/.)
Among the most striking images in her book are those of the holes left where the buildings had been. They're on, among others, pages 20, 39, 62, 137 and 143, and almost all of the pages of chapters 9 and 10.
"This is the dawn of a new age," Wood said in a 2012 talk. "Somebody has the ability to direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter."
I first heard of Wood about 15 years ago. But when I asked a more knowledgeable friend of mine about her, he said she'd been discredited. I believed him and didn't look into it myself.
But then in mid-March 2021 I was contacted by Andrew Johnson. He's volunteered tens of thousands of hours since 2004 to help Wood counter misinformation about her work (by, among many other things, being the main person responsible for distributing her book).
Johnson emailed me because he'd read some of my articles. He recognized that I, like he and Wood, try to seek the truth no matter which 'side' of an issue it falls on.
We spoke on the phone and a few weeks later he mailed me Wood's book. (I paid him back for it.)
I immediately read the book. Wood - a former professor of mechanical engineering who has a BS in civil engineering, an MS in engineering mechanics and a PhD in materials engineering science - leaves few if any stones unturned in examining what happened that day.
Unfortunately, groups such as Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and high-profile people like Greg Jenkins (a former member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth) make erroneous assumptions and ignore many pieces of evidence. They also 'debunk' Wood, by twisting information and hiding facts.
Among the phenomena these individuals and groups ignore or don't accurately account for are: 1) very little debris from the towers hitting the ground, as evidenced by the Stairwell B 14 firefighters -- and, among other things, the many photos showing how little debris there was, and the lack of a significant seismic signature (which would have been present if the onemilliontons of material in the buildings had hit the ground); 2) more than an inch of dust covering the ground and people all around lower Manhattan immediately after the towers disappeared; 3) the strange ways several steel beams were bent and twisted; 4) the vast majority of eye witnesses not feeling heat in the vicinity of the WTC buildings or from the hundreds of cars 'on fire' near the buildings (Wood dubs them 'toasted,' and not because they were all scorched but because they were rendered inoperable); 5) no scorch marks on most of those cars, and leafy trees and paper around them remaining largely undamaged; and 6) virtually no significant damage to the concrete basin around the WTC's foundation (known as a 'bathtub') -- and therefore very little Hudson-River water entering the WTC plaza or any other part of lower Manhattan.
"For the alternative hypotheses such as planes flying into the building, controlled demolition or mini-nukes to hold up, you have to keep the dustification covered up. And you have to keep the lack of debris covered up," Johnson told me in a telephone interview. "Instead, you have to claim that the debris was spread over a wide area or had collapsed into the area under the towers. You also have to claim that the twisted metal of the steel beams was caused by heating it a great deal, and that the toasted cars were damaged by very hot substances. In other words, you have to cover up the fact that that happened without much heat being present."
I've pasted at the bottom of this article a table Wood uses to summarize her conclusions. It shows that only directed free energy - cold, directed energy to be exact - accounts for the main phenomena that took place on 9/11. (I'll discuss in a future article the tritium and ionizing radiation.) The other explanations account for none, or only one or two, of those phenomena.
For example, as Wood details in Chapter 5, there wasn't significant damage to the 'bathtub.' This is the 70-foot-deep, concrete retaining basin below the water table and around the foundations of the buildings (WTC1, 2, 3 and 6) that were located in the west half of the WTC plaza.
The bathtub could not have remained mostly intact if hundreds of thousands of tons of rubble had fallen into it, with the accompanying seismic impact on the bedrock beneath it.
But it received only relatively minor damage. Therefore very little water from the Hudson River entered the main basin or the adjoining train tunnels in the smaller basin underneath the east side of the WTC plaza.
The hypotheses of fires from airplanes' fuel and controlled demolition, and explosions/fires with thermite or mini-nukes, also don't fit the facts. The biggest clue that this is the case is the absence of major debris and no significant damage to the bathtub or seismic signature as the buildings went 'poof' (a term used by Wood to describe their disintegration in mid-air).
And as Wood observes in Chapter 17 (on page 110), "everything that goes 'boom' is not necessarily a bomb." For example, there were eye-witness accounts of firefighters' oxygen tanks exploding in the WTC area. Therefore that's the most likely explanation for the minor explosions that occurred that day.
There also were very few people needing emergency care; little significant damage to the surrounding buildings; very little heat or fire; less than 10 percent of the 3,000 victims' bodies were found; and only one filing cabinet was discovered, along with no other pieces of furniture, sinks, toilets or computers. In fact more unburned paper and aluminum cladding remained than virtually anything else.
Chapter 8 is on dustification. It's full of photos and eyewitness accounts of steel core columns and huge concrete blocks turning into dust while aloft.
Also notably, the volume of dust coating the ground and people in the area of the WTC plaza was far larger than would have resulted from the towers collapsing by gravity, explosions or controlled demolition.
Moreover, many eyewitness firefighters described the area becoming enveloped with white dust so thick that the sunlight was blocked for a few minutes. Their eyes, mouths, noses and lungs rapidly clogged with the gritty, dense dust.
A typical account is from Deputy Chief Medical Officer David Prezant (page 156).
"There was all sorts of particulate matter in my throat and in my eyes, and my eyes were burning. My throat was burning. I was coughing. I was choking," Prezant said. ... "[It] was completely black. It was blacker than midnight. I could not see the sky. The air was like syrupy charcoal paste."
Large volumes of the fine dust floated upwards as the towers vanished, gradually reaching the upper atmosphere (see Chapter 14).
About 1,400 cars and other types of vehicles were 'toasted' on 9/11 -- some as far as 1,000 feet from the WTC plaza. Wood focuses on them in Chapter 11.
The strange things about them included: unburned plastic and paper in and around vehicles that were in flames or appeared to have been burnt; unnaturally rapid rusting of large surfaces of the cars; melted or completely missing tires and windows while the remaining areas of the vehicles were left relatively intact; and, upside-down cars and trucks, with nearby trees trees remaining unscathed even though they wouldn't have escaped damaged if fast-moving air had been responsible for flipping the vehicles.
The most logical explanation for all of this, using the currently available public information, is the "Tesla-Hutchison Effect.' It harnesses naturally occurring ('free') energy forces.
In Chapter 17 Wood describes the similarities between how the Hutchinson Effect changes matter and what happened to the toasted cars and to various materials from the WTC buildings.
"I use the Hutchison [E]ffect as an illustrative example or model of what kinds of known extraordinary effects can result from electromagnetic interference," Wood writes on page 356 [italics in the original]. "I use Hutchison's work also because a great deal of information is available about it, especially on the internet."
The name of this effect comes from two men, one of whom is Nikola Tesla. He was a Serbian inventor and experimental scientist. Tesla is famous for having made many advances in mechanical and electrical engineering.
John Hutchison is a Canadian who, based on the discoveries of Tesla and others, has been increasing the understanding of the interplay between magnetism, gravity, radio waves and electricity. Decades ago Hutchinson discovered, while trying to duplicate some of Tesla's experiments, that weak magnetic fields can be used to steer electrostatic fields.
Dramatic things can happen to objects in the vicinity of those intersecting fields, including: fusion of different types of materials such as metal and wood; spontaneous combustion, 'melting,' peeling, 'jellification,' fracturing, and thinning and rapid aging of metals, with little if any accompanying heat; levitation; and very rapid temporary or permanent altering of materials' crystalline structure and physical properties, (and some of those transformations continuing even after the energy fields are removed).
Hutchison is agnostic about who he works with and how the findings are used. He's given demonstrations to and/or collaborated with, among others, industry, NASA, the Canadian Department of National Defense, US military, the Pentagon and Los Alamos National Labs.
Most of the resultant discoveries are classified. But there also have been many media reports on his experiments by journalists who witnessed them first-hand.
Wood's old website has material on the Hutchinson Effect and on Hutchinson - https://www.drjudywood.com/oldindex.htm.
Hutchinson's own website is http://www.johnkhutchison.com/. There are documents on it such his detailed sworn affidavit in support of Wood's NIST-related lawsuit. In it, Hutchison states, among other things, that (page 3), "Upon examination of the destructive effects done to the WTC on 9/11, as documented by Dr. Wood and as reviewed by me, I can and do assert that the WTC was destroyed by devices that are scaled up, refined and/or weaponized versions of the effects that I named the 'Hutchison effect.'"
There also are these documents on his website by other observers. They provide details of: the equipment he's used to create the Hutchison Effect, including Tesla coils; the phenomena his effect causes; and hypotheses about how and why these occur.
Andrew Johnson's website checktheevidence.com also has a lot of relevant material. For example there is a radio interview of Wood and Hutchinson. There is this interview of retired U.S. Army Colonel John Alexander in which he describes Hutchison's work. And Johnson has written two books on Wood's work - you can download them for free from this page on his website.
In her book, Wood amasses additional evidence supporting her conclusion. For example, in Chapter 19 she documents a very significant geomagnetic event that occurred on 9/11: between 8:20 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. that day the earth's magnetic field fluctuated wildly.
Overall, Wood's work answers several key questions about what happened on that September day 20 years ago.
But many puzzles remain.
Why are influential people in the 9/11 truth movement working hard to divert attention from Wood's work?
Why was the directed free-energy technology used on 9/11?
Has it been used before and if so where and when?
What is the array of possible constructive uses of directed free energy?
I'll try to answer those questions in a future article.
Table Created by Judy Wood Comparing Different Proposed Mechanisms for Destruction of Twin Towers on 9/11 (reproduced here with Wood's permission)
After obtaining an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, Rosemary Frei became a freelance writer. For the next 22 years she was a medical writer and journalist. She pivoted again in early 2016 to full-time, independent activism and investigative journalism. Her website is RosemaryFrei.ca.
Reader Comments
steven23 Well, on startpage I just typed out: DR. JUDY WOOD EMAILthanks..ive tried those but no luck..judy wood knows who i am,she signed a copy of her book for me at one of her talks in england..she knows me as 'masonfreeparty'..i was banned by the david icke forum for a long while..another guy im very suspicious of
and I got this: [Link] also this: [Link]
Good luck.
RC
Where did they(?) get the energy and how was it directed? One possibility is the hurricane not reported off the coast of NYC. it makes you question weather manipulation technology.
My father launched nothing but military NSA type satellites and I knew by a very early age that spy and military satellites usually occupy a polar orbit so that by slowing them down, or speeding them up, they could be placed over anyplace on the globe within a reasonable time. (See what I later had reconfirmed by Tom Clancy, et al., about how those things work.*)
I absolutely must make clear my father (aside from stoking my interest into physics) never violated any of the many secret oaths that I'm sure he took. (Same for my Mum and my family!)
As re me, they would have shut down KSC and CCAFS before they would've given me a secret clearance.
rc
My Mum, working on the STS had much more leeway to speak of such things, although, by that time, I was mostly focused on surfing and girls and racquetball, and later snow skiing, and working so I'm sure that I never pestered her as I did my father. (I was born in the very late 1950s.)
Anyway, it's public knowledge that military and spy satellites are on polar orbits.
My Mum is great!
My father was . . . the best man, the best human (most likely - I'm still alive) I'll ever know. RIP (This needs to be redrafted to delete any incorrect impression of comparisons, and now this clause needs it too. WTF ever . . )
RC
Did that at least.
RC
But there's a big assumption in the middle of it, which we tried pointing out to her.
Rosemary Frei wrote above:
She doesn't engage in formulating theories; rather, she arrives at solid conclusions based on facts.That's not strictly true. Wood's theory is 'directed-energy weapons', with the implication that some 3D man-made source was behind it. Since then, it's almost become a meme online whenever something 'strange' happens.
Fires burning lots of California? DEWs.
Weather really weird in your area? DEWs.
Gas explosion wrecks a port? DEWs.
And so on. Now and then, 3D military technology may be responsible for incidents, whether 'natural' or 'terrorist'. There's usually solid grounds for suspecting geopolitical motive though (the bizarre 'vaporization' of a Russian passenger plane above Egypt, for example).
But in the case of the Twin Towers blowing away in the wind, harnessing the power of a hurricane to 'dustify' two of the largest structures in the world, in the process causing the planet's magnetic field to fluctuate wildly, is beyond human ken. Certainly, it was back then.
RC
Silly jest: "If someone believed in you, but also believed in nothing, would that make them a Niallist?
rc
Was an 'exotic energy weapon' used to down Russian plane in Sinai?
Attentive observers of global politics may have noticed that when 'terror attacks' take place, Western authorities usually have a preprepared narrative about what happened and which terror group...Behind the Headlines: Did a 'Directed Energy' Weapon Bring Down the Russian Plane over Egypt?
As the investigation into the tragic crash of Russia-bound Metrojet Flight 9268 continues, a stream of unnamed 'experts' and people 'close to the investigation' have come forward with...What other free energy, what kind of nonsense are, you all writing here?Assuming from the tenor of your statement above that you know all about all the sorts of energies that might be brought to bear in a given situation, perhaps you'd care to illuminate for us the entire gamut of those possibilities.
You rightly suggest we don't have the technology to do it. Judy made a theory. If it is true then there is technology the public does not know. The National Security act is to keep military technology secret.
Are they good at keeping things secret?
Of course that was another C.T. 'coincidence.'
RC
'Major coverup' is a MAJOR understatement! They only took out 90% of the Pentagon's CPA's that day!**I made that up - but at least I point it out when I lie rather than try to obfuscate it.)
RC
49 of the 50 ONI officers were killed that day, and every bit of the evidence produced during their investigation was destroyed in the explosion and conflagration that followed.
Killing children is a well practised technique of war for instilling fear, it is a form of terrorism. The daycare in the Murrah building in OKC was also destroyed.
Those specializing in alternative history can speculate how world events would have turned out differently if Hurricane Erin would've threatened the Northeast in September 2001If 9/11 had not been a planned event, Erin would never have taken the course that it did. Erin was manipulated to be off the coast that morning, they needed it there to do whatever they did to dustify the towers
Can those use "fake" hurricanes, to deceive and block out satellites?
Can anyone categorically confirm that one of these isn't hiding in the middle of that cloud cover - [Link]
(I saved the top picture, Visible satellite image of Hurricane Erin off the East Coast, and zoomed in all the way)
(Of course I'm pissed off at the lack of audio, etc., but I'll take what I can get.)
RC
The video, with no sound!, was a bit confusing as originally I thought we were watching the ball hit the first tower, but it goes behind it was was times to coordinate this the second plane
I suppose there wasn't the same about of focus on the first tower when it was hit - I get the feeling that if there was we might be seeing a grey ball in that one too
It looks like the ball holds a consistent angle of descent - someone should back-calculate the trajectory and find where it could have been launched from. It does pose the question of how accuracy (and timing) was ensured, I'd suspect homing signals coming from the target points
I watched the three buildings fall. I also watched the Oklahoma City building news reports from that day and the days following.
I need more than what this woman is offering to answer all of my questions.
Red herring. There are a lot of questions outstanding with this event. I appreciate what 9-11 Truth is trying to do and I understand why they dismiss this woman and her approach.They did murder her student who was helping her with the 911 investigation..he was in 911 scholars for truth ,michael zebuhr..he was shot in the head coming out of a resturant for no apparent motive .....Associated PressMINNEAPOLIS — An 18-year-old who said he panicked during a mugging attempt in Uptown and fatally shot a Clemson University graduate student in the head was sentenced Thursday to 30 years in prison.Billy Ray Deshawn Johnson had pleaded guilty to second-degree intentional homicide in a deal that spared him life in prison. If Johnson’s prison record is good, he could be eligible for parole in 20 years.Johnson admitted he pulled the trigger the night 25-year-old Michael Zebuhr was killed. Zebuhr, a doctoral student in bioengineering at Clemson University in South Carolina, was visiting family in the Twin Cities.On March 18, he went to dinner in Uptown with his mother, his sister and another woman. As they were walking to their car, Johnson and another man, Donte Lamar Jacobs, approached them and asked for Zebuhr’s mother’s purse, according to a criminal complaint. Police said no one resisted, but Johnson shot Zebuhr anyway.Zebuhr, of Buckhannon, W.Va., died two days later at Hennepin County Medical Center.Jacobs, 18, faces trial April 16. Because Johnson entered a guilty plea, he can be called to testify against Jacobs.Lasonya D. Miles, 19, is serving a year in the workhouse and will be on probation for being an accomplice after the fact for giving false testimony about the case to a grand jury.
I watched the three buildings fall. I also watched the Oklahoma City building news reports from that day and the days following.
I need more than what this woman is offering to answer all of my questions.
Her work covers the physical aspect but cannot provide answers without other people creating equally impressive works to document the "human" side
Silverstein - His cheap purchase of the WTC complex just before the event, the overvalued insurance dealings and whilst were at it, his confirmation that the decision had been made to "pull" WTC7
The targeted destruction of documents in WTC7
The targeted destruction of the Pentagon financial records
The missing gold from the WTC1&2 basements
The complete stand down of all US defences
The disappearance of the President and VP
The reason why "space weapons" is so unacceptable is because they want to ignore all these human factors (motives) and still pretend it was all down to some bearded bloke in a cave on the other side of the world.
Even the most sedated of the sheep will not be able to accept a narrative that claims Bin Laden had space weapons
Once you take in the human factors, it is impossible not to accept that this was a ultra-state plot above the highest levels that we know about. Those are the type of people who would also have access to technology way beyond the most advanced that we know about
Investigators and the curious spent weeks finding evidence of thermite in the wreckage before the building materials were swiftly removed, and the idea that fast acting chemical reagents were responsible for shearing off the huge beams has been a core principal in the amazing free-fall of the towers. Was the thermite just there by accident?
Maybe she is on to something, I don't know, but I have been following the legal proceedings launched by victims families and other groups against the government, the city, the NIST, etc. and the last thing those victims need is something that cannot be proven.
You didn't answer my question. Was the thermite just sort of sprinkled around as a cover?
I'm fairly certain that thermite was used. Prof. Jones wouldn't have been screwed like he was otherwise.
I don't know if it was cover - I can't see the malevolents being that far ahead of us; they rather simply rely on how dumbed down and programmed the idiot proles are. The vanishing spire of steel sure seems to have been impossible purely with thermite.
It's also my understanding that you could go to some rooftop downwind of WTC and STILL find nanosized particles (if not larger) on rooftop nooks and crannies.
RC
I think the dust particles also contained sulphur, suggesting it was Thermate and not Thermite that was used
Thermate is a variation of thermite and is an incendiary pyrotechnic composition that can generate short bursts of very high temperatures focused on a small area for a short period of time. It is used primarily in incendiary grenades. The main chemical reaction in thermate is the same as in thermite: an aluminothermic reaction between powdered aluminium and a metal oxide.
Thermate can also utilize magnesium or other similar elements in place of aluminium. In addition to thermite, thermate sometimes contains sulphur and sometimes barium nitrate, both of which increase its thermal effect, create flame in burning, and significantly reduce the ignition temperature. Various mixtures of these compounds can be called thermate, but to avoid confusion with thermate-TH3, one can refer to them as thermite variants or analogues.
The composition by weight of Thermate-TH3 (in military use) is 68.7% thermite, 29.0% barium nitrate, 2.0% sulphur and 0.3% binder (such as polybutadiene acrylonitrile (PBAN)). As both thermite and thermate are notoriously difficult to ignite, initiating the reaction normally requires supervision and sometimes persistent effort. Because thermate burns at higher temperatures than ordinary thermite, it has military applications in cutting through tank armour or other hardened military vehicles or bunkers.
SOTTfolk: Good points above about the paint et al.
RC
Could thermite / thermate be a result of an unknown weapon being used
RC
I'm had the thought that the big grey ball could be solid metal with just one or two strangelets at the core
" directed free energy. "Ain't no such thing as "free" energy. Never read or heard Judy call it that either.
All forms of energy require investment of time, money, and labor to capture and convert to other more convenient forms. Doesn't matter if it is free-flowing NG, crude oil, or sunshine and wind, etc. (And NO , energy cannot be extracted from a null "point" in space. No dark energy/zero point modules and all those related wishful ideas.)
Its been known for quite some time that electrostatic/high frequency radiation changes the molecular structure of various elements, making them "permeable" as though their atomic bonds are modified. Before Lasers were Masers, both operating on the same principle of pumping the energy states of atoms, which therefore changes the physical characteristics. I reviewed Judy's investigations and have no trouble accepting her hypothesis.
And NO , energy cannot be extracted from a null "point" in space.And you "know" that with such certainty how ?
Sounds more to me like a mere belief rattling around within a closed mind . . . No insult is in any way intended . . . just callin' 'em as I see-s 'em . . .
RC
Fathomless Infinities are verboten, unbounded awareness and boundedless imagination are nixed at every turn.
We've allowed ourselves to be conned into living beliefs whereby we
We've done so to either learn that we are none of those or to acquiesce to the Lies.
We choose what we will be . . .
SPACE;
1 a) the three-dimensional, continuous expanse extending in all directions and containing all matter: variously thought of as boundless or indeterminately finite.
If all matter is removed from a flask (impossible) then it has no dimension within it. The flask has dimension at its boundaries of matter, but within it AFA the absent matter is concerned, it does not comply with the definition.
Very simple. Such a thing does not exist, by definition.That doesn't begin to cut it, depending entirely as it does human preconceptions . . . and that leads to the question, "Whose "definition" ?"
What I do not do is mix the metaphysical with the physical.
All of Physics is based on definitions, to the extent we understand the behaviour of Nature.Right, and with that exposition of our limitations you exactly made my point which is far better stated below
What I do not do is mix the metaphysical with the physicalThey are inseperable . . . .
From of all places, the LA Times [Link] we have this reminder:
“I won’t bore you,” writes Lionel C. Meeker of Temecula, “by hauling out the famous statement from Shakespeare about ‘stranger things in heaven and earth. . . . ‘ “But of course he has hauled it out, if only to misquote it slightly. Hamlet has just talked with his father’s ghost and learned of his uncle’s perfidy, and when Horatio calls this confrontation “wondrous strange,” Hamlet says:“And therefore as a stranger give it welcome. There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”The point is well made, though, misquoted or not. As Meeker says: “The fact remains that in spite of ‘science’ and Carl Sagan and the professional debunkers, there is more, far more in the universe that we are totally in ignorance of. We are limited by our five senses. Once in a while we get a few fleeting insights on inexplicable phenomena, but that doesn’t mean the whole of the inexplicable should be rejected because ‘they cannot be duplicated in a laboratory.’ ”
I quote from Webster so that we are conversing using the same conceptThat's an extremely risky assumption, Webster's is notorious for its online updates, resulting it meaning totally changing from one day to the next
A recent example was the SCOTUS nomination hearing for Amy Coney Barrett - in the morning she used the phrase "sexual preference" and Websters updated their dictionary so that it that afternoon ACB could be accused of using an offensive term
In 2020 one might have legitimately argued that the EGT jab is not, by any definition, a vaccine - but that argument was quickly quashed with a quick update to the online "dictionary"
My dictionary is a big fat red book from about 1980 - even if I check every day, none of the definitions change
oh my goshness! I can only HOPE to be as smart as you, when I grow up..
"as though their atomic bonds are modified."
'free energy' is as flirting with Lindamay. (the atomic bonds of water)
[Link]
I own more than one 'vacuum pump' is that even possible?Indeedy weedy . . . Last I looked I had two roughing pumps, one directly driven one belt driven; no diffusion pumps though . . .
To the original topic of Dark Matter/Dark Energy; those who invented these oxymorons are the ones who defined them, saying that they are not observable nor detectable, but their presence can be inferred by the behavior of matter and energy that is. (Never mind that the latter is presumption, not fact). In the science of Physics (which is universal to all fields of investigation), If it can be observed--even by inference (for matter and energy in one part of the Universe affects matter and energy in another) indicates that it CAN be detected, observed, measured, quantified, characterized and classified, and above all, our conceptions of Nature's behavior TESTED . If one's conceptions cannot be tested and verified by experiment, they remain in the realm of that which is not physical, but conceptual, and thus of no use in determining what is actual.
SOTT is infested with a flock of belligerent parakeets, whose only presence here is driven by their need to receive validation of their preconceptions of their own world. It is not narrow-mindedness to adhere to the strict rules of mathematics, nor the strict methodologies of scientific investigation. I have no use for those persons who don't.
RC, you should know where to find me.
if I check every day, none of the definitions changeNeither do mine, which are more than one, because I have not bothered to "update" them. A scientific dictionary of terms is more preferable. But such is beyond the pale of the average parakeet. And besides, I have not bothered to find one, probably not just due to the difficulty and expense, but the fact that it too would be "updated" on occasion with crap discussed at Phys.org.
Your comment that the belligerent parakeets "...need to receive validation of their preconceptions of their own world" is very accurate; I have seen ample evidence in the reporting of events these past few months.
"It is not narrow-mindedness to adhere to the strict rules of mathematics, nor the strict methodologies of scientific investigation." Science, by it's very nature can never be 'settled'. If one tries, science becomes 'dogma' just like a religion. Our world and what lies beyond is far too dynamic for dogma.
Thank you, klokman for your post.
I think we all would agree that almost all science and technology today is driven by how deftly the resulting applications can generate money for the OligarchsI have hesitated to enter that arena, out of the foreboding of generating more intellectual hash here. But yes, that is very plain in the writings of Douglas Reed on the topic of the Protocols , and the more recent finding of Charles Burris about the founding and rise of the Illuminati ideology. (Lew Rockwell.com)
In some of the histories of Albert Einstein, it is strongly indicated he acquired support for his misguided notions in his imagination (Tesla really took him to task for that), if he would support the objectives of Zionism. Money is the origin and tool of that Cabal's agenda, and it is not just politicians who have been suborned by it. That carrot is also what induced Henry Ford to sell out his countrymen and play both sides of the war technology. As for Albert, I have arrived at an interim assessment of why his instructors of youth labeled him the village idiot. He was always terrible at mathematics, could distinguish what was real (Physics, the study of behavior of Nature) and his own flights of imagination. In the practical, factual world scientific investigation, there is no such thing as "thought" experiment. Experiments are the testing of one's ideas about Nature, with how it behaves. This he never did, to my knowledge.
Anyhow. Someone, I believe on Zero Hedge, where I received so many extraordinary links and information, posted a link to this film. I was struck again about the free energy machines, klok, which have been "invented" and "reinvented" time and time again only to have labs, persons, and lives destroyed as the Cartel takes the equipment and absconds. So many lovely moments in this film by the Thrive Movement. I'm posting the link from this site because the one on UTube has those ghastly advertisements every few minutes. This link doesn't. You can go full screen uninterrupted. "Science talk" starts about 32:00 into the video. I thought you might enjoy his exploration of the subject although I'm sure you already know about all this stuff. [Link]
For those who are feeling a little Covid depressed and might benefit from some positivity, journey to 2:12:00--wait for a number of people to speak.
Here is a link to the casimir effect experimental measurement.A very interesting skim, I'll get to in a bit.
In the meantime we have the works of Paramahamsa Tewari seen at this Google [Link] and on his homepage [Link] and in the 'Book' section [Link]
And we also have:
Reactionless electromagnetic generator (RLG) from Paramahamsa Tewari – Entirely novel and environmentally friendly energy technologies and new concepts in physics [Link]
Except it wasn't "reactionless", rather, Tewari had developed a way to greatly reduce what for the sake of brevity I'll call, "The Lenz Effect" where, for instance, mechanically loaded motors act as generators that buck their driving EMF and electrically loaded generators try to become motors that buck their mechanical driving force.
The hurricane? They didn't want interference and kept it parked off the coast as they can easily do--we've seen the same routine with many, many other hurricanes--Houston, New Orleans, etc.--parked over an area for 3-4 days. An unmoving hurricane. Fancy that. Lived in Florida many years growing up. Experienced some of the strongest hurricanes on record. Never experienced a hurricane which sat over our area for 4 days. Or a hurricane which began to move on and circled around to park again. The magic of weather in the 21st century.
"This is the dawn of a new age," Wood said in a 2012 talk . "Somebody has the ability to direct energy to disrupt the molecular bonds of matter."There is the matter of the "vaporising" spire, of which I have a series of pix at this [Link]
Now, we're endlessly told around here that 4D is a realm of "variable physicality" which I take to mean it's a realm where the effects of our thoughts, if we know how, directly effect the form(s) of "physical" manifestation(s). Given that and given that our STS adversaries work from 4D it's no great stretch to imagine they too can directly effect the "molecular bonds of matter" and do so in ways that make no "sense" to us because we simply cannot do such things, yet . . .
I long ago gave up on trying to awaken folks to it. If they can watch WTC-7 fall without having their world views destroyed, it ain't worth the effort.
RC
A fool cannot be protected from his folly. He will allow himself to be repeatedly swindled.
AND
Stupidity cannot be cured with money, education, or legislation. It is the universal capital offense. Execution is automatic without pity.
Good ol RAH
Wood behaved in a very defensive and weird manner.
I couldn't work out whether there was just a bit of bad chemistry going on that day or what.
Judy Wood "Where Did The Towers Go?" playlist....[Link]
WTC1 and 2 officially collapsed by defying Newtons law of equal and opposite forces - "Scientifically" as each floor (from the top down) spewed out its steel girders hundreds of metres in all directions at velocities over 100kpm and all the other building components just turned to dust and spread out all across New York, the remaining 10% of the mass of that floor would ram into the 80 storey solid building below it and just totally crush that building, floor by floor
Not one single concrete floor was found in all the debris, they also did not find anything such as computer or any office equipment, they did find the remains of one filing cabinet
I know Newton would never be able to stomach such a "reality" but the rest who don't are just conspiracy theorists (Its getting to that time were we should just call anyone that is not a CT, a Reality Denier instead)
Re the bodies and DNA - it's pretty grim when you get into the actual miniscule bits of body parts that they found. I think it is something ridiculous such as a half-finger being the largest body part that they found. Not one single skull.
Not one single concrete floor was found in all the debris, they also did not find anything such as computer or any office equipment, they did find the remains of one filing cabinetAh, come on, man.
I know Newton would never be able to stomach such a "reality" but the rest who don't are just conspiracy theorists (Its getting to that time were we should just call anyone that is not a CT, a Reality Denier instead)
Re the bodies and DNA - it's pretty grim when you get into the actual miniscule bits of body parts that they found. I think it is something ridiculous such as a half-finger being the largest body part that they found. Not one single skull.
They did find a passport that was in pretty good nick.
The only other significant object to survive was the part of the landing gear from a plane, it may have been from a different plane to the ones that hit the towers, but at least its conclusive proof that planes were used
"Collapsed" is somewhat at odds with Wood's "powderised" thesis.
*Of course, one can go back before that to OKC and Waco and the Gulf War, Gulf of Tonkin, Lusitania, no way to list them all. Suffice it to say 12/23/1913.
RC
Gave my copy to someone else
Makes me wonder about all the near misses that went out to sea....
Nice find!
steven23 I did a gaggle search on "Newfoundland stories about hurricane ERIN". Only stries that come up are all MS - "official channels" and the only local Erin stories I find are about hurrican Erin in the the 90's and 2019. The Biggest Hurricane of 2001 didn't generate any local stories of contact with the hiurricane.yes very conveniently erin managed to miss all the land based weather stations..i know i was on to something when andrew johnson blocked me instantly when i said erin was faked..ive known this guy for 14 years and ive been with him to many talks helping with his presentations..he works for the bbc open university..hes had MI5 ops david shayler and annie machon stay at his house...machon was pushing the controlled demolition theory with Rodriguez the last man out of the tower
Makes me wonder about all the near misses that went out to sea....
Nice find!
steven23 hes had MI5 ops david shayler and annie machon stay at his house...Always a bad sign. Sounds like the folks who were assigned to me. RC
It's odd that Erin wasn't on any of the weather maps
I don't believe the ISS images - that thing is meant to be travelling at 17,000 mph - 5 miles per second
If they were observing from Canada, say 500 miles away, there would be 31 miles of curvature, Those towers should appear to be leaning away. ... but anyway, why didn't he see Erin?
and the reason they did this was in my opinion to advertise the fact that they have the technology to create and move hurricaines at will through geoenginnering but in reality its fake bullshit..also it was a red herring to give the impression you need an energy source to power a directed energy weapon..this is also false and Andrew Johnson has been spouting complete bollocks about Erin and geoengineeriing..probably by design to deflect attention from the grand solar minimum
steven23 I am still not clear. I understand that fake Erin was to misdirect Judi, to lead them to think weather control and possible power source for fake directed energy which leads them away from some other source of dustification? Did it serve another purpose? How do saw es it show up in some news casts and not others?dwoods44..i think its partly to deflect the evidence of the grand solar minimum...ive tried to get in touch with dr judy wood but seems impossible to make contact so either she has been duped about erin or her and johnson are going along with the erin lie to promote man made geo engineering
Erin should have been visible on Gabrielle 14TH SEPTEMBER IMAGE [Link]I'm not so sure about that. In the image you linked Long Island is at the very top extremity of the pic, as taken at 10.15 (am) 14th Sept, so according to this (page 5) [Link] Erin would have been much further up the nor'eastern seaboard from Long Island and the latitude would be about level with the southern end of Nova Scotia, at the 43rd parallel, and would have also been further eastward than Barbados which is much further east than the bottom right hand side of the pic where the top of the Lesser Antilles are only just about coming into view.
At approx that time putting the eye of Erin would be here [Link] (the red marker).
steven23ive got two satellite images of erin and gabrielle taken on 14th september at 10.15am and if you draw a line at 41 degree latitude the trailing edge of erin ought to be in the north east corner of the gabrielle image but its not there [Link]Erin should have been visible on Gabrielle 14TH SEPTEMBER IMAGE [Link]I'm not so sure about that. In the image you linked Long Island is at the very top extremity of the pic, as taken at 10.15 (am) 14th Sept, so according to this (page 5) [Link] Erin would have been much further up the nor'eastern seaboard from Long Island and the latitude would be about level with the southern end of Nova Scotia, at the 43rd parallel, and would have also been further eastward than Barbados which is much further east than the bottom right hand side of the pic where the top of the Lesser Antilles are only just about coming into view.
At approx that time putting the eye of Erin would be here [Link] (the red marker).
I think you're confusing the green outline of Nova Scotia on the Erin image with Long Island at the top of the Gabrielle image.
Apparently, they felt it was time to post it there as it just showed up today? I dunno but it's worthwhile. (And yeah, I have my doubts about Snowden, FWIW.)
R.C.
Hurricane Harvey, 2017 Considered one of the costliest tropical cyclones in U.S. history, Hurricane Harvey made landfall on the Texas coast as a Category 4 storm with winds of more than 130 mph. In a five-day period, the storm produced more than 50 inches of rain in the Houston area, flooding more than 300,000 structures and causing more than $120 billion in damage. Harvey was also a prolific tornado producer, with 57 tornadoes preliminarily reported during the storm. Sixty-eight people lost their lives in Harvey.Have you watched the alternative weather guys on UTube and other channels? Investigate. Can't find my fav anymore. I guess he packed up shop. He used to show daily... ad nauseum ...how storms in the Pacific were literally gutted. With straight edges. Straight edges which would eviscerate the swirling forming area of a nice rainfaill coming to Cali. Every single day . He had all the weather satellite feeds and radars. Like a weather man...but underground. Does Mother Nature work with straight-ruler lines? Does she eviscerate forming storms by shooting a white straight line, visible on radar, into a storm?
Riiinnngggg. Riiiinnnnngggg. That's your alarm clock going off. Time to wake up.
my tone is not intended to be dismissive Love.
what drives our 'weather' is 'Latent heat of evaporation' this is the very cycle that heat-pumps and all modern cooling systems use. l copied and pasted what I just wrote. [Link]
I will give honest and direct answers to anything that you ask me.
Here I am...in a new rental. My first Vegas summer in this rental with temps hitting 113-117 degrees on a fairly consistent pattern from mid-June until this week. So, I was pondering. Should my A/C be running for 5-7 hours straight? Why does my thermostat not agree with the thermometer in the kitchen? How high will my electric bill be this month?
So, I initiated the "Service Request" via my property management company. And was delighted I only waited two days for the HVAC guys who were really nice guys. One was training.
They checked out the thermostat and pronounced it working. Then, they checked out the A/C on the roof. Somehow the signal was not being received in a timely manner to the A/C. We went with replacing the thermostat, and if that doesn't solve the problem, call for another appointment to replace the Control Panel in the A/C.
The best part is that the new thermostat is basic and simple. Gone is the elaborate hoo-doo version of announcing when you're leaving, returning, sleeping, and waking. I told the guy that I absolutely love the new thermostat. It has the temp, an up/down button, fan button, and on/off switch. The display is huge probably because they saw my white hair and figured that I might need assistance.
I told them that I wanted to simplify my life, and they had assisted me greatly. So, far, I am happy to report that my A/C is not running into infinity. In fact, I raised the temp twice. I think we might have a solution. I shook their hands although we live in Covid times...but no one is wearing masks anymore here.
my heart smiles that you were treated the way that I would have treated you..
well, mebbe...
[Link]
I'm shocked...I tell you...I'm shocked. Was that young lady disrobing on the motorcycle?
Here's one back atchya. [Link]
When I was in NYC after finishing college, a fellow followed me all the way down the street, outside where Hendrix was performing, telling me he could introduce me to Jimi. I was already late for an appointment.
Intense fires causing key support beams to fail? So now, we are again facing the canard about steel melting at burning jet fuel temperature?
One more thing. The important matter is not how the crumbling happened, but rather determining WHO DID IT.
" That would have been the case whether a plane flew into the building -- with the resultant intense fires causing key support beams to fail, and then each floor falling by gravity..."there was only one man at both crime scenes at 911 and 7/7..that man was rudi guiliani...coincidence maybe but guiliani visited yorkshire in england the day before 7/7 where the NSA are based at menwith hill..its hard to understand why they did 911,was it some sort of occult ritual..the numbers used suggest it was ie 11,175,93,77..shades of aliestair crowley...is it leading up to something else? considering they want mass depopulation what will happen to all the buildings on the planet not needed anymore? hence independence day scenario..dustify all the skyscrapers not needed anymore in the coming GREAT RESET
Intense fires causing key support beams to fail? So now, we are again facing the canard about steel melting at burning jet fuel temperature?
One more thing. The important matter is not how the crumbling happened, but rather determining WHO DID IT.
There is no physical law that would allow a collapsed floor, especially one where 90% of the weight has been ejected, to collapse a far greater mass below it
Re Guiliani - I only found out a couple of days ago that 9/11/2001 was the date of the NY mayoral election and Guiliani was expected to lose unless there was some "unforeseen" event
interestingly lee woudberg set up a 911 group in liverpool but dismissed dr judy wood's work in the early days...not sure if he has since changed his mind about her
Comment: For more on Dr. Judy Wood's work, see: