Puppet MastersS


People

US, Iran head to Vienna for indirect nuclear deal talks

Iran
© REUTERS/Joe Klamar/Pool/File PhotoFILE PHOTO: Iran and six major world powers reached a nuclear deal on Tuesday, capping more than a decade of on-off negotiations with an agreement that could potentially transform the Middle East. U.S. Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Federica Mogherini, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and the head of the Iranian Atomic Energy Organization Ali Akbar Salehi and the Iranian delegation (L-R) meet during a plenary session at the United Nations building in Vienna, Austria July 14, 2015.
Iran and the United States said on Friday they would hold indirect talks in Vienna from Tuesday as part of broader negotiations to revive the 2015 nuclear deal between Tehran and global powers.

Tehran has ruled out face-to-face bilateral discussions, but the presence of both Iran and the United States in the Austrian capital - welcomed by Washington as a "healthy step forward" - will help to focus efforts to bring all sides back into compliance with the accord.

The aim is to reach an agreement within two months, said a senior official with the European Union, the coordinator of the deal. Iran holds elections in June.

Comment: Sputnik provides more detail on the talks:
Last month, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei announced that Tehran is in "no hurry" to return to its obligations under the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, and is prepared to wait until the US lifts its illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has stated that a possible US decision to rejoin the 2015 nuclear deal, also known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), does not require any talks.
Speaking to the deal's remaining signatories during a virtual meeting on Friday, Araqchi added that "Iran will suspend its steps [scaling back compliance with the deal's terms] as soon as [US] sanctions are lifted and this is verified".
The statement comes as Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif announced earlier on Friday that the US would not take part in talks on the JCPOA, scheduled for next week in Vienna.

German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, for his part, hailed the upcoming Vienna event, stressing in a statement that the sides "have no time to lose".
"An agreement that is once again fully respected would be a plus for security for the entire region and the best basis for talks on other important issues of regional stability", Maas pointed out.
The statement followed the JCPOA signatories agreeing to sit down for the Vienna nuclear talks in order to "clearly identify sanctions lifting and nuclear implementation measures, including through convening meetings of the relevant expert groups".

In last month's interview with the US news outlet Politico, Zarif reiterated Iran's readiness to adhere to the JCPOA "as soon as the United States comes to compliance".

The Islamic Republic started to scale down its JCPOA obligations, including those pertaining to uranium enrichment, in May 2019, exactly a year after then-US President Donald Trump announced Washington's unilateral withdrawal from the accord, also reinstating harsh economic sanctions against Tehran.
"Now we want to go back to compliance. The party that has started this process has to go back and Iran will immediately go back", Zarif told Politico, in an apparent nod to the US.
When asked why the Islamic Republic has not sat down with the US yet to discuss the matter, he said that "there is nothing to talk about", accusing Washington of seeking "to use pressure and coercion in order to extract new concessions from Iran" when it comes to the JCPOA.

In February, the White House expressed a willingness to revive US participation in the Iran deal, also demanding that Tehran return to its commitments under the 2015 agreement. Tehran, for its part, insists that it is Washington who should take the first step by scrapping all economic sanctions against the Islamic Republic.
See also:


Syringe

China aims to vaccinate entire city in 5 days after outbreak - 300k people

chinese city line vaccine
© APA Chinese border city hit by a fresh outbreak of COVID-19 began a five-day drive on Apr 2, 2021 to vaccinate its entire population of 300,000 people.
A Chinese border city hit by a fresh outbreak of COVID-19 began a five-day drive on Friday (Apr 2) to vaccinate its entire population of 300,000 people.

State broadcaster CCTV showed people lining up and getting vaccinated in Ruili, where 16 cases have been confirmed since Tuesday. Twelve of them are Chinese and the other four are nationals of Myanmar, which lies across the border.

A city Communist Party official told CCTV the previous day that 159,000 doses of vaccine had arrived in the city.

Television footage showed vacant streets as officials ordered people to home quarantine and closed non-essential businesses. The city has also said it would tighten controls around the porous border to try to stop anyone crossing illegally from Myanmar.

Heart - Black

Psycho nanny state: New UK govt campaign will urge everyone not to hug

grandma covid cartoon
© Bob Moran
The Government is planning a new social media poster campaign that will urge people - including those who have been vaccinated against Covid - not to hug. A source has said that the messaging will say that if you "hug your grandchildren there is a chance you are going to infect people you love". The Telegraph has the story.
Vaccinated Britons will be urged not to hug in a new Government campaign that comes amid fears people are more likely to ignore social distancing rules once they have been jabbed.

The Cabinet Office is preparing a social media poster campaign that will call on people who have been inoculated against Covid to abide by the rules as they are relaxed in order to allow more social contact.

"The messaging will be aimed at people who have been vaccinated to stop them going off-piste and ignoring the regulations, and particularly with the elderly who have had two jabs," said a senior source.

"It will be along the lines that it is great that you have been vaccinated, but if you are going to visit your family and hug your grandchildren there is a chance you are going to infect people you love."

A similar campaign has been run during lockdown, in which older vaccinated people were urged to stay at home to save lives.

The posters, featuring older Britons, warned that they could still transmit the virus even after having a jab. "There is still a risk you could spread coronavirus, even after you have been vaccinated," they said.
The Government fears that people who have received the vaccine believe they are safe from Covid.

Comment: Covid policy is psychopathic.


War Whore

The war in Syria: Who are the real anti-imperialists?

Army guy/Assad/Biden
© AFPUS troops on patrol in Syria, December 2020
Billboard portrait of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Golan Heights, February 2021
US President Joe Biden White House speech March 2021
In the history of post-World War II US imperialism, there have been various cases of aggression against countries and regimes that many anti-imperialist, socialist leftists around the world have considered reactionary, or at least not worthy of their support.

In some cases, there was a consensus that while the regime in question was not to be defended, the imperialist aggression against it was not intended to save people from its dictatorial predations, but rather to secure imperialist hegemony and economic profits that would continue to oppress people. Even in cases when anti-imperialists thought the targeted regime deserved defence, their efforts mostly focused on opposing intervention.

Yet, opponents of US aggression in Southeast Asia in the 1960s and 1970s were often branded by American "patriots" as Soviet agents, apologists for the Viet Minh, communists, pinkos, traitors, etc.

Perhaps the most notorious recent cases were the US-led invasions of the Arabian Peninsula in 1991 and Iraq in 2003. None of the anti-imperialist leftist, let alone liberal, opponents of the invasions had any love for Saddam Hussein's tyrannical regime, but they all understood that the invasions were concerned with imperial interests and had nothing to do with ending dictatorship - especially as Saddam had been a western ally since he heeded the call to invade revolutionary Iran in 1980.

Comment: Nothing is ever like it seems and rarely do we comprehend the whole picture - a calculated advantage for those who run counter-narratives. They bet on our ignorance and inattention.


Chess

Welcome to shocked and awed 21st century geopolitics

Lavrov/Yi
© AFP/Russian Ministry/Anadolu AgencyRussia's FM Sergey Lavrov • China's FM Wang Yi
Beijing, China • March 23, 2021
It took 18 years after Shock and Awe unleashed on Iraq for the Hegemon to be mercilessly shocked and awed by a virtually simultaneous, diplomatic Russia-China one-two. How this is a real game-changing moment cannot be emphasized enough; 21st century geopolitics will never be the same again.

Yet it was the Hegemon who first crossed the diplomatic Rubicon. The handlers behind hologram Joe "I'll do whatever you want me to do, Nance" Biden had whispered in his earpiece to brand Russian President Vladimir Putin as a soulless "killer" in the middle of a softball interview.

Not even at the height of the Cold War the superpowers resorted to ad hominem attacks. The result of such an astonishing blunder was to regiment virtually the whole Russian population behind Putin - because that was perceived as an attack against the Russian state. Then came Putin's cool, calm, collected - and quite diplomatic - response, which needs to be carefully pondered.

These sharp-as-a-dagger words are arguably the most devastatingly powerful five minutes in the history of post-truth international relations.

Comment: There is no 'saving face' for Biden (nor the West for that matter). That thin cover has been blown far and wide. For America it's 'Game Over'. It just doesn't think so.


Passport

Senior Tories join Jeremy Corbyn to oppose Covid passports ahead of trials

Iain Duncan Smith
© UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/PAIain Duncan Smith is one of four former Tory cabinet ministers to have signed a letter against the use of Covid-status certification.
More than 70 MPs including 40 Conservatives, the former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn and Liberal Democrat members have forged a parliamentary alliance to oppose Covid identity documents.

It came as Boris Johnson suggested the government would move ahead with the scheme and it was announced that pilots of mass testing at large events would take place this month.

Four former Tory cabinet ministers including Iain Duncan Smith and Andrew Mitchell are among the group, along with key Labour leftwingers such as John McDonnell, Clive Lewis, Diane Abbott and Rebecca Long-Bailey. The coalition of MPs is backed by the civil liberties groups Liberty, Big Brother Watch, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and Privacy International.

Johnson has noticeably warmed to the idea of the documents in recent weeks. Government sources have suggested the certificates could be used by businesses as a way to relax social distancing measures inside venues.

An interim report on the measure is due to be published on Monday but a pilot event is already planned for 18 April with residents near Wembley invited to apply for 4,000 tickets to the FA Cup semi-final between Leicester and Southampton.


Comment: 'Carrot and Stick'


Comment: The overall ploy, however, is: 'Stick' and then 'Carrot'! Refusing any portion of the population of the rights to peacefully assemble - be it even a football game - is a blight against human freedom. Worse yet, offering rewards to the 'obedient' is coercion. Those who promote this scheme have a different kind of game in mind. Bravo to those who recognize the trap.


Laptop

Hunter Biden finally admits laptop at center of Post exposé could 'absolutely' belong to him

Hunter BIden
© screenshotHunter Biden talks to 'CBS This Morning'
Hunter Biden has finally 'fessed up that the laptop at the center of The Post's explosive exposé last year "absolutely" could belong to him, he revealed in an interview Friday.

In a sitdown with CBS's Sunday Morning, President Biden's embattled son was pointedly asked "yes or no" if the MacBook Pro that was dropped off at a Delaware computer repair shop in April 2019 was in fact his.

"I really don't know what the answer is, that's the truthful answer," Hunter Biden said in an excerpt of the interview released on Friday, before adding, "I have no idea."

But asked whether it could have belonged to him, he replied,
"Absolutely. Certainly, there could be a laptop out there that was stolen from me. It could be that I was hacked, it could be that it was Russian intelligence. It could be that it was stolen from me."

Bullseye

Russia fines Twitter three times in one day for leaving up 'illegal' content

twitter in russia
© Kirill Kukhmar/TASS/dpa/picture allianceRussia is clamping down on microblogging social media site Twitter, following nationwide protests
Posts calling for rallies in support of jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny had "incited teenagers" to take part in "illegal activities," Russia's media watchdog said earlier this year.

A Russian court fined Twitter a total of 8.9 million roubles ($116,800, €99,300) on Friday over accusations that the service had failed to delete illegal content.

The fine is the latest move taken by Moscow against the microblogging site. It recently slowed its speed as well as threatened to ban it outright, accusing it of hosting content that it said ranged from child pornography to drug abuse.

Twitter did not immediately respond to the verdict.

Comment: The take from RT:
California-based social networking site Twitter will be forced to shell out more than a hundred thousand dollars in fines, after a Russian court ruled that it had breached its obligations to delete material banned in the country.

A judge handed the company three separate penalties, totaling 8.9 million rubles ($116,800) on Friday. The Moscow Court found that the service was guilty of breaching the terms of Russia's administrative code by failing to delete material flagged by authorities.

In March, media regulator Roskomnadzor announced that it would begin slowing Twitter's speeds in the country over allegations it had not complied with a number of deletion requests. Officials say that they had filed more than 28,000 requests for posts to be taken down but, at the time of the decision, "3,168 pieces of content containing prohibited information... remained not deleted." These reportedly include more than 2,500 calls for children to kill themselves and 450 involving child pornography.

Vadim Subbotin, Roskomnadzor's deputy head, told journalists that, if "Twitter does not adequately respond to our requests - if things go on as they have been - then in a month it will be blocked without needing a court order." However, he urged the American firm to comply with the orders and avoid a total ban. The regulator has also flagged concerns over the use of social media to promote unauthorized protests, such as those that followed the jailing of opposition figure Alexey Navalny.

In a statement at the time, the company said it was "aware of reports that Twitter is being intentionally slowed down broadly and indiscriminately in Russia due to apparent content removal concerns." The tech firm added that it was "deeply concerned by increased attempts to block and throttle online public conversation."

Earlier this week, President Vladimir Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said that he was optimistic foreign-owned social media giants could learn to live within the country's laws. "It is necessary to find a middle ground between the priorities of media freedom and regulation," he said. "More and more life flows into it. The more life there is, the more rules there need to be. And these should be the rules of the game for everybody, including foreign companies, because the internet has no borders."



Dollar

Ocasio-Cortez eyeing $10 trillion over 10 years for infrastructure

AOC mask cortez
© Greg Nash
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) late Wednesday called President Biden's $2.25 trillion infrastructure package "encouraging," but said the U.S. could need as much as $10 trillion over 10 years to invest in infrastructure and boost jobs and other priorities across the country.

"The vision that President Biden and the administration has laid out ... has surprised a lot of us in a positive way and in the detail and the thought that's here, the scope of it, is really encouraging," Ocasio-Cortez told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.

However, the progressive lawmaker added that she has "serious concerns that it's not enough," calling for officials to "go way higher."

Comment: See also:


TV

Repressive tolerance: NBC's Lester Holt incites Twitter mob with provocative monologue about 'journalistic responsibility' - 'fairness is overrated'

Lester Holt
© REUTERS/Brendan McDermidNBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt hosts an NBC News town hall event with US Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden in Miami, Florida, US, October 5, 2020.
NBC anchor Lester Holt has stirred up some serious social media drama after arguing that the media has no obligation to give two sides to each story.

In the speech he gave while accepting the Edward R. Murrow Award for Lifetime Achievement in Journalism, Holt criticized the notion that journalists must provide equal time to opposing viewpoints on an issue, insisting that some viewpoints are unworthy of airtime.

"I think it's become clearer that fairness is overrated," the host of NBC's Nightly News remarked. "Before you run off and tweet that headline, let me explain a bit. The idea that we should always give two sides equal weight and merit does not reflect the world we find ourselves in. That the sun sets in the west is a fact. Any contrary view does not deserve our time or attention."


Comment: He's actually right, it's just that his views (and his colleagues') are the ones that don't deserve time and attention.



He further argued that providing a platform for "misinformation," especially when discussing issues related to public health and safety, can be dangerous, adding: "Our duty is to be fair to the truth." Apparently anticipating criticisms of his stance, he stressed that refusing to cover "unsupported arguments" is not proof of some sort of agenda, and, in fact, "just the opposite."


Comment: Projection. We're living in a world of Marcuse's creation.