
© AFPUS troops on patrol in Syria, December 2020
Billboard portrait of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in Golan Heights, February 2021
US President Joe Biden White House speech March 2021
In the history of post-World War II US imperialism, there have been various cases of aggression against countries and regimes that many anti-imperialist, socialist leftists around the world
have considered reactionary, or at least not worthy of their support.In some cases, there was a consensus that while the regime in question was not to be defended, the imperialist aggression against it
was not intended to save people from its dictatorial predations, but rather to secure imperialist hegemony and economic profits that would continue to oppress people. Even in cases when anti-imperialists thought the targeted regime deserved defence, their efforts mostly focused on opposing intervention.
Yet,
opponents of US aggression in Southeast Asia in the 1960s and 1970s were often branded by American "patriots" as Soviet agents, apologists for the Viet Minh, communists, pinkos, traitors, etc.
Perhaps the most notorious recent cases were the US-led invasions of the Arabian Peninsula in 1991 and Iraq in 2003. None of the anti-imperialist leftist, let alone liberal, opponents of the invasions had any love for Saddam Hussein's tyrannical regime,
but they all understood that the invasions were concerned with imperial interests and had nothing to do with ending dictatorship - especially as Saddam had been a western ally since he heeded the call to invade revolutionary Iran in 1980.
Comment: Sputnik provides more detail on the talks: See also: