Puppet MastersS


Quenelle

Pakistan responds angrily to Trump tweet accusing of 'lies & deceit', summons US ambassador

Pakistani Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif
© Roman Pilipey EPA/ShutterstockPakistani Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif speaks during a news conference in Beijing on Dec. 26.
Pakistan lashed out Monday after President Trump accused its leaders of "lies & deceit" and suggested the United States would withdraw financial assistance to the nuclear-armed nation it once saw as a key ally against terrorism.

U.S. Ambassador David Hale was summoned to the Foreign Ministry to discuss the president's statement, U.S. Embassy spokesman Richard Snelsire said. Pakistan lodged a strongly worded protest and asked for clarification about Trump's comments, according to two foreign office officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

Pakistan's prime minister, Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, called a Cabinet meeting for Tuesday and a meeting of the National Security Committee on Wednesday to discuss Trump's New Year's Day tweet.

Comment: And while the US and Pakistan blame each other for the situation in Afghanistan, ISIS is resettling into that country:

US-Created Chaos in Afghanistan May Use ISIS to Target Russia in Great Game of Global Control


Propaganda

WaPo says "some" are concerned Nunes is planning corruption exposé on the FBI

Devin Nunes and Paul Ryan
© Jim Watson/Getty ImagesRep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif. speaking with Rep. Paul Ryan
Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., is now allowed to serve a leadership role in the Russian investigation, a fact that concerns some as he directs it toward the potential impropriety in FBI special counsel Robert Mueller's probe, according to The Washington Post.

Most of the fears lie in dangers of discrediting of the nation's top law enforcement office, according to the report.

Nunes is reasserting himself as the panel's chairman after he has been cleared this month by an ethics investigation that alleged he disclosed classified information provided to him by the White House, which included accusations of Obama administration officials improperly unmasking Trump campaign affiliates.

Comment: It seems that right now, Nunes is one of the most important figures attempting to investigate collusion between the FBI/DOJ and the DNC. The idea that some are concerned he may discredit the "nation's top law enforcement office" seems a trifle. As Gowdy says, it's about the facts, not the drama, so if the facts point to the FBI/DOJ acting in partisan interests, then who cares if that will break his heart?

See also:


Alarm Clock

Time is running out for Israel and Saudi Arabia

Trump, Netanyahu i Bin Salman: Razarači neoliberalnog svjetskog poretka
Through its top official, Prince Mohammad bin Salman (MBS), Saudi Arabia continues a wave of internal arrests, having seized nearly $800 billion in assets and bank accounts. A few days later, MBS attempted to demonstrate his authority by summoning Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri to Saudi Arabia, where he was forced to resign on Saudi state TV.

Trump tweeted support for Bin Salman's accusations against Iran and Hezbollah, and the future Saudi king even obtained Israel's secret support. Iran, meanwhile, denies any involvement in Lebanon's domestic affairs or involvement with the ballistic missile launched by Houthi rebels towards Riyadh's King Khalid International Airport a few days ago. Meanwhile, Trump, Putin and Xi met recently and seem to have decided the fate of the region in an exercise of realism and pragmatism.

Propaganda

Best of the Web: Adjusting the narrative: New York Times, struggling to save its collusion tale, pivots from Page to Papadopoulos

Trump speaking 2016
© Reuters/Eduardo MunozA Secret Service agent stands nearby as Donald Trump speaks at a campaign stop in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., April 2016.
The totality of the evidence undermines the Times' collusion narrative.

"Trump Adviser's Visit to Moscow Got the F.B.I.'s Attention." That was the page-one headline the New York Times ran on April 20, 2017, above its breathless report that "a catalyst for the F.B.I. investigation into connections between Russia and President Trump's campaign" was a June 2016 visit to Moscow by Carter Page.

It was due to the Moscow trip by Page, dubbed a "foreign policy adviser" to the campaign, that "the F.B.I. obtained a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court" in September - i.e., during the stretch run of the presidential campaign.

Comment: @TheLastRefuge2 put together an epic tweet storm tearing apart the NYT story. He asks,
If George Papadopoulos was so important to the FBI "investigation" why did all "intelligence" agencies released their final JAR report without ever speaking to him? Not even once?

No @maggieNYT what you have in your article is a well constructed and brutally familiar pattern of what journalism looks like when the IC use reporters to cover their tracks and create a justification based on a false premise.
...
USE COMMON SENSE: If a Papadopolous conversation in May 2016 was the origin, the source material, of the FBI counterintelligence operation, then why were they denied a FISA application in June/July 2016 ?
As one narrative completely falls to pieces, the New York Times tries to switch to a new one, and act like the previous one never existed, despite the fact that it's the narrative they were pushing in the first place. This goes so beyond Fake News it's jaw-dropping. How this news outlet has any credibility left at this point is the ultimate mystery. See also: Just look at the timeline of events. This new angle is so desperate it's pathetic.


Magnify

Trump knows what he's doing: Cutting the Gordian Knot of foreign entanglements

trump
© Win McNamee/Getty Images"By the time I've rattled every capital on Earth, y'all will have this much desire for the US to get entangled with y'alls issues."
President Trump is a new phenomenon on the American political scene. Not a professional politician begging for funds but a rich man who spent his own money and raised money on his own name: he arrived in office unencumbered with obligations. Free from a history in politics, he owes nothing to anyone. Add in his personality, grandiosity and late-night tweets and the punditocracy is in a state of angry incomprehension. Even more offensive to their notions of propriety is that this "dangerously incompetent", unqualified, mentally ill man beat the "most qualified presidential candidate in history". No wonder so many of them believe that only cunning Putin could have made it happen - even if they don't know how. But the punditocracy is as befuddled about him today as it was last year and the year before. (Scott Adams, who got it right, reminds us just how clueless they were.) The very fact that Trump won despite the opposition of practically every established constituency in the United States shows that there is more to him than readers of the NYT and WaPo or watchers of CNN and MSNBC (can) understand.

What follows is an attempt to divine Trump's foreign policy. It proceeds from the assumption that he does know what he's doing (as he did when he decided to run in the first place) and that he does have a destination in mind. It proceeds with the understanding that his foreign policy intentions have been greatly retarded by the (completely false) allegations of Russia connections and Russian interference. There was no Russian state interference in the election (the likelihood is that Moscow would have preferred known Clinton) and, as I have written here, the story doesn't even make sense. I expect when the Department of Justice Inspector General completes his report that the Russiagate farrago will be revealed as a conspiracy inside the US security organs. We do not have a date yet, but mid-January is suggested. Readers who want to follow the story are recommended to these websites: Dystopiausa, CTH and Zerohedge.

Comment: Alright then, let's wait and see.

So far, no new wars. All existing 'theaters' were opened before his time.

But what about threatening North Korea with nuclear oblivion?

All bluff and bluster so far.


Snowflake Cold

Remember Al Gore's claim that in 5 years the polar caps would be free of ice? (VIDEO)

al gore
© IMDB"An Inconvenient Truth" by Al Gore, 2006.
Why does anybody even listen to Al Gore anymore? Almost nobody in the world has been so wrong, so consistently, yet still been seen as some sort of guru by so many followers.

Case in point: Nine years ago this month, the former vice president made the bold prediction that the north polar ice cap would be completely ice-free in five years.

Yes, back in 2008, the failed presidential candidate told a German audience that "the entire North Polarized cap will disappear in 5 years," according to Gateway Pundit.


Comment: Also See:


Bullseye

Iranian General says Trump's support for rioters shows new 'anti-Iran sedition' scheme

Deputy Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces Brigadier General Massoud Jazayeri
Deputy Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces Brigadier General Massoud Jazayeri
A senior Iranian military commander says US President Donald Trump's support for rioters in Iran shows Washington's scheme to hatch a new act of sedition against the Islamic Republic.

Deputy Chief of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces Brigadier General Massoud Jazayeri added on Monday that the support of the highest-ranking US official along with some arrogant countries and media outlets for rioters revealed that Washington had been planning to incite new sedition in Iran.

However, all such attempts resulted in nothing but the humiliation of the Islamic Revolution's enemies, he said.

Comment: These are the evil plots Jazayeri is referring to:
Israel's Channel 10 has revealed that a secret agreement was reached on 12 December, following talks between Israeli national security advisor Meir Ben-Shabbat and his US counterpart H R McMaster, for the two sides to take action and devise scenarios against Iran on several fronts. This reportedly entails measures aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities, rolling back its presence in Syria, and confronting its ally Hezbollah in Lebanon. The White House later confirmed the existence of the agreement after news it of it was leaded to media.



Binoculars

The US and Israel's secret new anti-Iran plans are unlikely to succeed

Trump and Netanyahu bro shake
© Ronen Zvulun / ReutersU.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
While Russia strives to move Syria on from a stage of war and bloody anarchy to one of peace, stability and reconstruction - by inviting all parties to next month's Sochi conference to agree a roadmap including a new constitution and presidential and parliamentary elections - the US and Israel are drawing up plans to detonate the region and plunge it into new wars on the pretext of confronting the Iranian threat.

Israel's Channel 10 has revealed that a secret agreement was reached on 12 December, following talks between Israeli national security advisor Meir Ben-Shabbat and his US counterpart H R McMaster, for the two sides to take action and devise scenarios against Iran on several fronts. This reportedly entails measures aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear and missile capabilities, rolling back its presence in Syria, and confronting its ally Hezbollah in Lebanon. The White House later confirmed the existence of the agreement after news it of it was leaked to media.


Comment: It is clear that the new anti-Iran rhetoric has nothing to do with the recent protests and everthing to do with the agreement between the US and Israel.


Two major developments are expected to unfold in the region in the new year. First, the collapse of the Islamic State (IS) and its loss of most of its territory in Syria, and secondly, the defeat of the American project in Syria. This was based on using armed opposition groups to topple the regime of President Bashar al-Asad, and was thwarted by the Syrian Arab army's steadfastness, the intervention of Russia, and the support of allies like Iran and Hezbollah, putting Syria on the threshold of a new phase of national reconciliation and renewal.

Comment: Alexander Mercouris also thinks that the recent wave of protests in Iran are very unlikely to result in regime change:

Regime change very unlikely


Newspaper

Proof of New York Times collusion with Hillary Clinton dropped by Wikileaks

Hillary Clinton
© Boston Globe / Contributor / Getty Images
You thought 2017 was going to end without a bang - other than the fireworks?

Think again.

After The New York Times on Saturday published a story headlined "Republican Attacks on Mueller and F.B.I. Open New Rift in G.O.P.," WikiLeaks couldn't stand it anymore. In a late-night post on Twitter, WikiLeaks revealed that a Times reporter used to feed State Department email updates of the stories the paper would be publishing DAYS before the stories appeared.

At the time, Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State.

Comment: So not only has it been shown the FBI/DOJ have been helping Hillary behind the scenes, now we've got the MSM helping her too. It's amazing that with all this behind the scenes meddling, she still lost the election.


Light Saber

Iran's ambassador to the UK tells Trump to mind the 42 million hungry Americans - not the Iranians

Iran protest Teheran
© ReutersThe picture obtained from social media shows a violent gathering in Tehran, Iran, December 30, 2017.


Iran's ambassador to the UK has blasted US President Donald Trump for using his Twitter page to post insult after insult against the Iranian nation, urging him to concentrate on his own people's woes rather than interfering in other countries' affairs.


In a post on his official Twitter account on Monday, Hamid Baeidinejad reacted to Trump's multiple tweets over the past few days in support of the violence which has followed scattered protests against economic issues in some Iranian cities.

Trump had tweeted earlier in the day that Iranian people "are hungry for food & for freedom. Along with human rights, the wealth of Iran is being looted. TIME FOR CHANGE!"

Hours later, Baeidinejad said that after insulting Iranians by calling them "terrorists," the US President has now described them as "hungry."

Comment: Obviously, the reason for Trump's recent focus on Iran and the 'hunger' of their people is that the country has suddenly become the new target for regime change: