Puppet MastersS


X

The Supreme Court just handed Donald Trump an important legal victory: Emoluments lawsuits are now dropped

USSCourt
© FindlawUS Supreme Court
It was a story that loomed over the Trump presidency throughout his four years, due to breathless reporting about every possible way that the billionaire real estate mogul might profit while in office.

The Supreme Court just put an end to such endless speculation by dropping the emoluments clause cases. The Associated Press reported:
"The Supreme Court on Monday brought an end to lawsuits over whether Donald Trump illegally profited off his presidency.

"The justices threw out Trump's challenge to lower court rulings that had allowed lawsuits to go forward alleging that he violated the Constitution's emoluments clause by accepting payments from foreign and domestic officials who stay at the Trump International Hotel and patronize other businesses owned by the former president and his family."

Comment: Check out Trump's stance on his business holdings, not under his control when President, and his generosity to America during his term of service:




Dollars

'Dark money' helped pave Joe Biden's path to the White House

Biden
© Access/Screenshot/Shutterstock.com/KJNUS President Joe Biden
President Joe Biden benefited from a record-breaking amount of donations from anonymous donors to outside groups backing him, meaning the public will never have a full accounting of who helped him win the White House.

Biden's winning campaign was backed by $145 million in so-called dark money donations, a type of fundraising Democrats have decried for years. Those fundraising streams augmented Biden's $1.5 billion haul, in itself a record for a challenger to an incumbent president.

That amount of dark money dwarfs the $28.4 million spent on behalf of his rival, former President Donald Trump. And it tops the previous record of $113 million in anonymous donations backing Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney in 2012.

Democrats have said they want to ban dark money as uniquely corrupting, since it allows supporters to quietly back a candidate without scrutiny. Yet in their effort to defeat Trump in 2020, they embraced it.

Comment: The takeaway: Dark money, dark election, dark times ahead - it can't be otherwise.


Broom

EU states no longer recognise Guaido as Venezuela's interim president

Guaido
© REUTERS/Manaure QuinteroFILE PHOTO: Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido speaks during a news conference in Caracas, Venezuela December 5, 2020.
Venezuela's Juan Guaido is a "privileged interlocutor" but no longer considered interim president, European Union states said in a statement on Monday, sticking by their decision to downgrade his status.

The EU's 27 states had said on Jan. 6 they could no longer legally recognise Guaido as after he lost his position as head of parliament following legislative elections in Venezuela in December, despite the EU not recognising that vote.

Following the disputed re-election of President Nicolas Maduro in 2018, Guaido, as head of parliament, became interim president. Guaido is still seen by the United States and Britain as Venezuela's rightful leader.

Comment: See also:


Syringe

Helsinki Committee: Israeli government's and Pfizer's illegal experiment on humans

Flag and syringe
© Unknown/KJN
The contract and attached agreement signed between the Israeli government and Pfizer shows clearly and unequivocally that this is a clinical study on humans. A senior official told Calcalist:
"Reading the contract signed between the Israeli government and Pfizer shows clearly and unequivocally that this is a clinical study for all intents and purposes, and thus, it had to be approved by the Helsinki Committee.

"There is nothing wrong with clinical trials, but clinical trials (human trials) must get the committee's approval, and of course, from the people on whom the trial is being conducted while giving them the right to refuse to be part of a trial. These are fundamental things."
The Supreme Helsinki Commission is expected to submit its opinion to the Ministry of Health stating that the immunization process, led by the Israeli government together with Pfizer, is fundamentally clinical research - the code name for human trials - and thus, had to receive explicit and detailed approval of the committee, according to Calcalist.

The opinion is expected to be handed over to the director-general of the Ministry of Health, Hezi Levy - possibly even today.

Comment: Why, indeed, would Israel want/need its population vaccinated before a proper testing guaranteed safety and positive results? Political ploy or something else? The contract can be found here.


Stormtrooper

Tulsi Gabbard asks Biden: 'Have you declared martial law?'

Troops on street
© NurPhoto/Getty ImagesTroops on the streets of Washington D.C.
"What is it that they are trying to accomplish now by creating an enduring presence?"

Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard asked Joe Biden if he had declared martial law after it was revealed that thousands of troops stationed in the capital will remain there until March.

As we highlighted earlier, at least 5,000 National Guard soldiers will remain in DC until the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump is completed, a process which won't be concluded for at least six weeks.

Comment: Gabbard is one of the few voices of logic and reason not afraid to call out and question what she sees.




Arrow Up

Rand Paul insists there is a 'great deal of evidence' of election fraud

R. Paul
© Tom L. Sandys-Pool/Getty ImagesSenator Rand Paul (R-Ky)
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on Sunday declared there was a "great deal of evidence of fraud" and illegal election law changes that merit a "thorough investigation."

In a contentious exchange on ABC News' This Week With George Stephanopolous, Paul called the host "a fool."
"You're forgetting who you are as a journalist if you think there's only one side. You're inserting yourself into the story. I want to look at secretaries of state who changed the law — it happened. You can't just sweep it under the rug. Nothing to see here. You're a fool to bring this up. A journalist would hear both sides."
According to Paul, Stephanopolous made a mistake, warning, that by
"coming from the liberal side like you, you immediately say everything's a lie, instead of saying there's two sides to everything... you insert yourself in the middle ... [saying] the absolute fact I'm saying is a lie."

Comment: News pawn Stephanopolous had one goal: Get Paul to admit no fraud was committed. Paul was having none of it!




Che Guevara

Sturgeon: SNP will hold another independence referendum if it wins Scottish election in May

Sturgeon
© Robert Perry/EPAScotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon
First minister says she will hold advisory referendum, whether Westminster consents or not!

Nicola Sturgeon has said she will hold an advisory referendum on independence if her Scottish National party wins a majority in May's Holyrood elections, regardless of whether Westminster consents to the move.

Her party is setting out an 11-point roadmap for taking forward another vote, which was to be presented to members of the SNP's national assembly on Sunday.

Scotland's first minister told BBC One's Andrew Marr show on Sunday morning:
"I want to have a legal referendum, that's what I'm going to seek the authority of the Scottish people for in May and if they give me that authority that's what I intend to do: to have a legal referendum to give people the right to choose. That's democracy. It's not about what I want or what Boris Johnson wants."
Signaling a new approach, which moves beyond the current impasse of Johnson's repeated refusal to countenance a second vote, the roadmap states that if the SNP takes office after May, it will request from the UK government a section 30 order, which under the Scotland Act 1998 allows Holyrood to pass laws normally reserved to Westminster.


Bullseye

CNN's Stelter fanboys over Jen Psaki: White House press conferences 'refreshing' (but he's still 'objective')

Stelter Psaki CNN white house press secretary
© AFP / Michael loccisano; Reuters / Tom Brenner(L) Brian Stelter (R) Jen Psaki
CNN's Brian Stelter finds White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki's promise not to lie "refreshing" and totally "reliable." To his detractors, it would be refreshing if Stelter admitted his bias.

After hammering Donald Trump for four years, Stelter is evidently ready to put his feet up and relax during Joe Biden's term.

When Press Secretary Jen Psaki pledged last week to share "accurate information with the American people," liberals were overcome with delight, and none more so than Stelter. "Yes please," he practically squealed with delight in an article last Thursday. "How refreshing," read a caption he wrote for his show Reliable Sources on Sunday.

Comment: Psaki's previous outing as a spokesperson under the Obama administration was equally fraught Independent journalist Glenn Greenwald gets the last word:




Bad Guys

Navalny: The West makes a mountain out of a dunghill

Navalny
© Vasily Maximov/AFP/Getty ImagesAlexey Navalny
U.S. cops murder one black man after another. Then George Floyd is asphyxiated, pinned to the ground with a cop's knee on his neck. Riots erupt. Meanwhile, publisher Julian Assange has been in jail for a year for revealing U.S. war crimes.

But the western world frets over Alexei Navalny in Russia?

Alexei Navalny is seen as all important to western elites as he is their only chip in their regime change war with Russia. Therefore the coverage is suddenly wall to wall. Just as it was wall to wall regarding the non-existent Uyghur genocide, just as it was with Syria's non-existent chemical attack in Douma, just as it was with Libya's imminent slaughter of rebels on their way to Benghazi. Just as non-existent babies were grabbed out of incubators and had their non-existent heads bashed onto hospital floors in Iraq. Just as non-existent weapons of mass destruction could be ready in 45 minutes to fire at non-existent targets. Just as the non-existent crimes reported by the infamous White Helmets. Just as. Just as. Just as.

Comment: Journalist Finian Cunningham agrees:
Navalny is a convicted felon, found guilty of fraud and embezzlement by a Russian court in 2014. But his jail sentence had been suspended with the condition that he report regularly to Russia's prison authorities. A normal condition.

For nearly five months, however, he had sojourned out of the country as a de facto guest of German authorities. That's a brazen breach of his parole conditions. And the Russian prison service was right in issuing him a warning at the end of last month that violation of his suspended jail term risked the sentence being converted into detention behind bars.

It's a sovereign matter of Russian laws that on returning to Russia at the weekend Navalny was arrested and is now in custody awaiting court proceedings in coming weeks on whether to revoke his suspended sentence.

The hue and cry from Western politicians and human rights groups over his arrest Sunday at Moscow's Sheremetyevo airport is predictable.

High level officials from the United States, Britain, Germany and France, among others, have all made strident statements demanding Navalny's release.

Britain's Foreign Minister Dominic Raab called the dissident figure's arrest "appalling".

For all these supposedly concerned advocates of human rights there are only two words: Julian Assange.

Assange is languishing in a British torture-dungeon, persecuted by the American and British governments for the "crime" of revealing to the world the truth about illegal wars and war crimes committed by the United States and Britain.

In all of the years of Assange's barbaric detention, there has never been a fraction of the official Western public outcry that has been expressed for Navalny.

That's because Navalny, unlike Assange, is a political asset for a Western agenda to undermine Russia.

There are good grounds to believe the Russian blogger-cum-media-activist is funded and directed by Western intelligence services. Everything about his gadfly campaigning smacks of orchestration as an agent provocateur.

The way that Navalny has coordinated closely with Western media and intelligence outfits like Bellingcat to peddle the story that he was allegedly poisoned with Soviet nerve agent Novichok is strong evidence of his provocateur function. And the way that Western media routinely "report" the alleged poisoning as if it is fact is demonstration of how such media are totally dominated by propaganda service to geopolitical agenda.

When Navalny was treated in a Russian hospital after apparently becoming suddenly ill on August 20 onboard a flight to Moscow from Siberia, the doctors found no poisons in his system. The medics said the apparent illness was due to metabolic shock from possible misuse of his own medicines for diabetes, depression and perhaps excess alcohol.

Conspicuously, days later after he was airlifted for further hospital treatment in Berlin, then the German authorities announced they had detected poisoning with nerve agent.

No evidence has ever been presented by the German authorities or other NATO laboratories in such a way that is independently verifiable.

Russia has been denied access to any of their alleged data in order to verify, yet Moscow is condemned for not carrying out a criminal investigation into the alleged poisoning.

Not only that but while Navalny was supposedly recuperating in Germany from a super lethal toxin he somehow had the media resources to purportedly set up prank calls to trick a Russian secret service member to confess to an assassination plot, a plot which the artful activist claimed was ordered by the highest Kremlin authorities.

Russia has dismissed that media stunt as a fake.

Clearly, there was something inordinately irregular going on - and it wasn't from the Russian side. How was it that a dubious figure with foreign sponsors could get away with making sensational accusations against the Russian government based on no verifiable evidence?

Accusations which were amplified without question by Western media and politicians.

And all the while this dodgy character Navalny is making a mockery of his parole for a suspended jail sentence. Not only that but there is patently supreme arrogance from him and his foreign allies that Russian sovereign laws can be mocked with impunity.

The Western overreaction to his rightful arrest on returning to Russia after five months of orchestrating a hostile foreign media campaign is proof of their arrogance.

And while Julian Assange is languishing in prison that is damning proof of Western deceit, duplicity and hypocrisy.



SOTT Logo Radio

SOTT Focus: NewsReal #34: Covid By Numbers

covid newsreal
Global panic over what the Sars-CoV-2 virus might do in terms of killing extraordinarily high numbers of people justified extraordinary 'lockdowns' in spring 2020, but 10 months into 'the new normal' most agree that it is not the 'killer virus' people once feared it was.

Nevertheless, the official position that Covid-19 constitutes a 'significant public health threat' remains unchanged, leading many to doubt what they are being told about the pandemic and opening a vacuum in public information that has been filled with conspiracy theories about deliberate skulduggery.

Using only official British government figures, Joe and Niall analyze the pandemic as it has played out in the UK - which official figures and media reporting suggest was both the 'worst hit' country AND the country where counter-measures were applied most stringently.

Based on published government statistics and peer-reviewed scientific papers on Covid-19, they draw the only logical and reasonable conclusion that can be drawn: governments have long since realized the virus does not constitute a public health threat, but other agendas have since hijacked the global containment effort.


Running Time: 01:05:18

Download: MP3 — 59.8 MB