Puppet MastersS


V

Best of the Web: Bolsonaro supporters storm three branches of power in Brazil (VIDEOS)

Supporters of Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro storm the the National Congress building in Brasilia, Brazil,
© AP / Eraldo PeresSupporters of Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro storm the the National Congress building in Brasilia, Brazil, January 8, 2023
The rioters targeted the National Congress, the Supreme Court and the presidential palace.

Supporters of right-wing former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro have swarmed the country's Three Powers Plaza, climbing the roof of the National Congress and ransacking multiple government buildings, following weeks of unrest and claims of election fraud.

Chaotic scenes erupted in the capital Brasilia Video on Sunday, with videos posted to social media showing the rioters also attacking the Supreme Court building as well. Water can be seen pouring out of a broken window and makeshift lettering pasted on another window as demonstrators, many clutching or wearing Brazilian flags, survey the damage. The court had slapped Bolsonaro with a hefty fine in November over his efforts to challenge the results of the presidential race, accusing him of acting in bad faith.

Comment: See also:


Bad Guys

'We're carrying out NATO's mission, we shed our blood, we expect weapons in return' - Ukraine's defense minister

Alexey Reznikov
Ukraine's defense minister Alexey Reznikov
Kiev is shedding blood to carry out the mission NATO set for itself and expects the "civilized West" to provide weapons and ammunition in return, Ukrainian Defense Minister Aleksey Reznikov has said in an interview for a domestic TV channel.

Appearing on the 1+1 network's TSN channel on Thursday evening, Reznikov pointed out that at the Madrid summit last summer, NATO declared Russia the greatest threat to the US-led bloc.

"Today, Ukraine is addressing that threat. We're carrying out NATO's mission today, without shedding their blood. We shed our blood, so we expect them to provide weapons," he said.

Comment: The defense minister is just about admitting that this is not only a NATO directed conflict, but also that this 'mission' has been in the works for some time; it was just a matter of when Russia be forced to retaliate to NATO and Ukraine's provocations.


Snakes in Suits

"We don't do this": Adam Schiff and the underbelly of American censorship

schiff
© AP/Susan WalshIntel Committee Chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Cal)
Below is my column in The Hill on the recent disclosure of efforts by Rep. Adam Schiff (D., Cal.) to pressure Twitter to censor critics, including a columnist. This effort occurred shortly after Schiff's office objected to one of my columns accusing him of pressuring social media companies to censor those with opposing views. While publicly denying that he supports censorship, Schiff was secretly pressuring Twitter to censor an array of critics.

Here is the column:

"We don't do this." That response from Twitter to Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) is a singular indictment, coming at the height of Twitter's censorship operations. Apparently, there were some things that even Twitter's censors refused to do.

One of those things was silencing critics of Schiff and his House committee.

Comment: The more lies accumulate, the more truth stands out.


Whistle

Key US allies collaborate on espionage laws considered harmful to whistleblowers and journalists

PatelLewis
© ASIOFormer Home Secretary Priti Patel • Former Dir. Australian Security Intel Org. Duncan Lewis
Ministers and security officials in Australia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom have coordinated with the United States to develop new espionage laws.

Each of the countries have faced criticism from news media and civil society organizations for proposing laws that will harm journalists and whistleblowers' ability to report on abuse and corruption in their own and each other's countries.

These states have close intelligence ties to each other and the United States, and they have played some role in the extradition of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, whose prosecution is widely recognized as a threat to global press freedom. In fact, disclosures of the kind that Assange published have been cited as what the laws aim to make illegal.

FBI Director Christopher Wray had several days of meetings with "law enforcement partners in the United Kingdom" during July 2022. After these meetings, MI5 chief Ken McCallum promoted the "National Security Bill," the first change to UK espionage laws since 1989.

The law would purportedly address the perceived threats Wray and McCallum discussed.

Comment: Assange is ground zero, the primal warning.


X

Media silent as latest Twitter files expose flagrant misconduct in govt. & journalism

Schiff
© System UpdateDemocratic Congressman Adam Schiff
In this episode, we take a look at the new installment of the Twitter Files from independent journalist Matt Taibbi, undoubtedly one of the most important and revelatory yet.

Among other things, it shines a brand new light on how aggressively and constantly the FBI and other Security State agencies were bombarding Twitter with censorship demands of dissidents, journalists, and critics almost on a daily basis.

Taibbi also published highly incriminating documents on how Democratic Congressman, Adam Schiff, abused his power as chair of the House Intelligence Committee to try to have journalists he disliked banned from Twitter and other platforms. But very few shows will cover these self-evidently significant stories because of a corporate media blackout, all but explicit, that arose on the very first night of this reporting and has only strengthened since.

So, in addition to the substance of the new revelations, we will also dissect how this media blackout was imposed and what it says about the state of corporate journalism in the United States. Hint: It's nothing good.


Comment: See also:


Padlock

Ousted Myanmar leader gets seven more years in prison for corruption

Aung San Suu Kyi
© National Democratic InstituteAung San Suu Kyi
The ousted leader of Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi, has been sentenced to seven more years in prison as the final verdict in her case wraps up Thursday.

Myanmar correspondent Leong Wai Kit tweeted that "her latest sentence for 'corruption' means she'll be jailed for a total of 33 years." Suu Kyi, 77, was convicted in December 2021 for charges of breaking COVID-19 rules and another charge of inciting public unrest. She was initially sentenced to four years in prison, but that sentencing was subsequently cut down by two years. In January of this year, the former Nobel Peace Prize winner was found guilty of violating the import-export law and its telecommunications law for possessing walkie-talkies.

Suu Kyi was elected in 2020 in a landslide. However, in February 2021, the country's military forces took control of the country in a coup, overthrowing Suu Kyi and detaining her, among other politicians. Her defenders have claimed the charges against her are politically motivated.

Comment: See also:


SOTT Logo Radio

SOTT Focus: NewsReal: MAGA Congress? Speaker House Fight Signals Shift Towards US Isolationism

maga congress trump newsreal
© Sott.net
After a contentious opening to the US Congress 2023-2024 that saw Republican rebels force 15 (FIFTEEN!) votes for Speaker of the House, it's likely that Trump loyalists have stamped their influence on what is now a GOP-majority House of Representatives.

While it's too early to know for sure, Joe Quinn speculates that this signals a sea-change in overall US government policy - one that will bring it in line with the direction President Trump had attempted to steer it towards: significantly increased US economic protectionism, coupled with reduced spending on foreign wars and client governments.

Never-Trumpers will be loathe to admit it, of course, but they're coming around to realizing that both Trump's diagnosis and solutions for US problems were correct. Alas, it may now be too late to save the US from economic chaos...


Running Time: 01:31:59

Download: MP3 — 63.2 MB


Briefcase

Kevin McCarthy becomes US House Speaker after late-night drama with holdout Matt Gaetz

Kevin McCarthy and Matt Gaetz house speaker vote
© Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesU.S. House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) (L) talks to Rep.-elect Matt Gaetz (R-FL) in the House Chamber after Gaetz voted present during the fourth day of voting for Speaker of the House at the U.S. Capitol Building on January 6, 2023, in Washington
California Republican Kevin McCarthy finally managed to become Speaker for the newly elected Republican House majority following some late-night drama involving Matt Gaetz after the GOP lawmaker from Florida voted "present," initially denying McCarthy's victory by a single vote.

"It took a loss by a razor-thin margin in a late-night Round 14, a heated exchange with one of his sternest opponents, and a near-adjournment of the House till Monday to break a logjam unseen since before the Civil War," the Associated Press reported after the 15th round of balloting.

"The final tally that put him over the top: 216 for McCarthy, 212 for Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries and 6 simply 'present,'" the outlet reported.

A video clip of a frustrated McCarthy confronting Gaetz after his first "present" went viral online late Friday:

Comment: ZeroHedge reports on what McCarthy's position will cost him:
After four grueling days and 15 votes, Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is finally Speaker of the House - but not without having made a pile of concessions to a group of hard-line Republicans who think he'll be too accommodating to uniparty interests.

The last vote came after a dramatic scene, where during the 14th vote Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) threw a wrench in the gears - voting 'present,' which left McCarthy just one vote short of victory.

During the final, 15th ballot, enough holdouts voted 'present' to bring the total required number of votes low enough for McCarthy to finally win around midnight.

Here's what McCarthy had to give up for the votes, according to The Epoch Times' Roger L. Simon, who interviewed first-year Congressman Andrew Ogles (R-TN), who has yet to be sworn in;

I spoke with Ogles by phone the night of Jan. 6, 2023, before the roll call vote during which, it was said, two of the remaining rejectionists who couldn't accept McCarthy personally would absent themselves so that the magic number would be lowered and the new Speaker could go over the top.

Apropos, Ogles informed me that what many had guessed was true. His absence from voting in a previous round was also planned. He waited to see that all was going according to plan before stepping forward to flip his vote to McCarthy after the initial round.

For Ogles, the basis of all the negotiations was to establish the rules of the game in Congress that had been altered over the years beyond recognition. As he pointed out, the rules of a game almost always determine the winner.

He shared with me a list of some of what has been roughly negotiated to date. The devil, as always, is in the details.
  1. As has been reported, it will only take a single congressperson, acting in what is known as a Jeffersonian Motion, to move to remove the Speaker if he or she goes back on their word or policy agenda.
  2. A "Church" style committee will be convened to look into the weaponization of the FBI and other government organizations (presumably the CIA, the subject of the original Church Committee) against the American people.
  3. Term limits will be put up for a vote.
  4. Bills presented to Congress will be single subject, not omnibus with all the attendant earmarks, and there will be a 72-hour minimum period to read them.
  5. The Texas Border Plan will be put before Congress. From The Hill: "The four-pronged plan aims to 'Complete Physical Border Infrastructure,' 'Fix Border Enforcement Policies,' 'Enforce our Laws in the Interior' and 'Target Cartels & Criminal Organizations.'"
  6. COVID mandates will be ended as will all funding for them, including so-called "emergency funding."
  7. Budget bills would stop the endless increases in the debt ceiling and hold the Senate accountable for the same.
* * *

In response to the outcome, Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), one of the holdouts, said in a statement that the anti-McCarthy Reps. "changed the way the government will be funded," and "changed the way committees will be formed."

"We secured votes on term limits, the fair tax, the Texas Border Plan, and so much more."

Bobert goes on to slam President Biden for calling the speakership process 'embarrassing for Republicans.

"How sad is it that us governing as the founders intended looks embarrassing to Democrats?" Bobert asked, adding "I'll tell you what's embarrassing. 40-year high inflation is embarrassing. 5 million illegals crossing our southern border is embarrassing/ Surrendering to ISIS and fleeing Afghanistan is embarrassing. Having a president that cant' finish his sentences is embarrassing."


"It's safe to say that we believe there ought to be specific, concrete limits on spending attached to a debt ceiling increase," said Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) on Thursday.

"There will be no clean debt ceiling increase, that's for sure," said Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA), another anti-McCarthy lawmaker who was convinced to switch his vote due to the concessions.

No word from Ogles on committee assignments or agreements, however there are discussions on positions for members of the Freedom Caucus.

Also no word on whether the House will hold a different kind of Jan. 6 investigation, unless it's going to be part of the new "Church" committee.

Meanwhile, The Hill notes that chairmanships on subcommittees are still going to need to be earned.
Another major concern for centrist Republicans throughout the week's marathon negotiations was the conservatives' push to win more subcommittee gavels for themselves — an idea that infuriated those already in line for those seats.

Bacon had called it "a non-starter," particularly among the more moderate Republicans who have worked their way up the ladder into those seats.

"If you're talking about chairmanships and things like that, they're gonna have to still earn it," Bacon said. "I call it affirmative action for [the] smallest of the caucuses to put them in leadership roles when they've not earned it. We believe in a merit-based system on the GOP side."

Rep. Ann Wagner (R-Mo.), who has served in the House since 2013, also highlighted the "seniority process" for chairmanships.

"Everybody has to work their way through the seniority process and earn positions on both committees and gavels and things of that nature," she said. — The Hill
"These concessions have been agreed to by our conference, and ultimately I believe it's going to lead to a more people-driven legislative process," said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA). "It's about restoring more power and decision making to the members."

Democrat Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland says McCarthy gave up too much.

"I think he gave away much more than I wish he'd given," he said, adding "I think it does give to a small, willful faction of his caucus, a negative faction of his caucus, a faction of his caucus that has been almost uniformly obstructionist, more authority than they ought to have."
The affair was not without its farcical elements. From the Gateway Pundit:
hudson rodgers gaetz house vote threat attack
© Associated Press"Negotiations" on the House floor Rep. Richard Hudson holds back Rep. Mike Rogers who had lunged at Rep. Matt Gaetz
As reported earlier by 100 Percent Fed Up - After four days of voting on the House floor for the next speaker, tempers flared tonight when Republican Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama lunged at Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), the congressman who's been leading the effort to prevent Kevin McCarthy from becoming the next Speaker.

Chaos ensued on the House floor as the 14th vote for Speaker fell short by one vote for McCarthy.

Daily Mail reports - McCarthy immediately walked up to Reps. Matt Gaetz and Lauren Boebert, presumably with the intent of persuading them to change their 'present' votes to 'yes.'


Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama then lunged at Gaetz and had to be held back by Rep. Richard Hudson before an all-out fistfight could break out on the House floor.


The Republican lawmaker from Alabama, a member of the House Steering Committee responsible for making committee chair recommendations, recently threatened the holdout Republicans who don't vote for McCarthy that they will be stripped of committee assignments.

On Saturday we learned that there may have been some drinking involved before the fracas.

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) spoke with Kate Sullivan from CNN. According to Burchett, who was standing next to Rep. Rogers during the heated exchange, had this to say, via Mediaite,.





Magnify

Wagner boss says he wants Bakhmut in Ukraine for its 'underground cities'

Wagner Group head Yevgeny Prigozhin
© APWagner Group head Yevgeny Prigozhin at the Beloostrovskoye cemetery outside St Petersburg, Russia on December 24.
The founder of Russia's most high-profile mercenary group said on Saturday he wanted his forces and the regular Russian army to capture the small city of Bakhmut in eastern Ukraine because it possessed "underground cities" that can hold troops and tanks.

Russia's grinding more than five months-long push to try to take Bakhmut has puzzled some Western military analysts who have said that heavy losses incurred on the Russian side and the fact that Ukraine has built defensive lines to fall back to nearby mean any Russian victory there, if it happens, would be pyrrhic.


Comment: These analysts might be less puzzled if they asked themselves why NATO-Ukraine was sacrificing so many of its forces in their failing attempt to retain Bakhmut; evidently whatever is there is deemed worth the battle.


Yevgeny Prigozhin, founder of Russia's Wagner mercenary group which is fighting in the battle of Bakhmut, set out in detail on Saturday why he thought its capture would be significant.

Comment: Other analysts have highlighted that, should Russia take the region it will be one of the last major industrial hubs that Ukraine has lost, as well as it will pave the way to the Dneiper river whereby Russia could 'split the country in half'. Even so, there's no reason for the Wagner boss to make such claims unless there's substance to them, more so when Ukraine has utilized such fortifications elsewhere.




Snakes in Suits

Boris Johnson was secretly 'nudged' into wearing a Covid mask by government scientists

boris johnson flag mask
© Phil Noble/APProf Halpern describes how he helped nudge Mr Johnson to wear a mask.
Behavioural scientist turned his subliminal powers of persuasion on the PM himself after it became apparent he was not leading by example.

Boris Johnson was secretly 'nudged' into wearing a facemask during the pandemic, according to the head of the government's Behavioural Insights Team.

In an interview for the Reckitt Global Hygiene Institute published today by The Telegraph, Professor David Halpern says he turned his subliminal powers of persuasion on the prime minister himself after it became apparent he was not leading by example.

Comment: See also: