Science & TechnologyS


Sun

Our Sun is surprisingly weak compared to other stars

sun flare
© (NASA/SDO)
We're pretty familiar with our Sun. We've even sent a probe to go study it; we haven't done that with any other star. Given how closely we study it, it would be tempting to think of it as a typical example of a G-type main-sequence star, or yellow dwarf.

New research suggests that this is not the case. After conducting a survey of stars similar to the Sun, scientists have discovered that our star is unusually subdued, at least at this stage of its life.

Compared to its peers, the Sun fluctuates in brightness much less, and has much lower sunspot activity, than the average. It's a curious result - and one that could have implications for the future of our life on this planet.

Comment: One important point that is strangely absent from the article is that many stars are known to have a 'twin', in fact a significant proportion of star systems seem to be in a binary configuration - although some have more than that - and so, with this in mind, could it be that the position of our Sun's own twin (that is speculated to exist) is effecting its output? In addition, perhaps there have been were events within our solar system, prior to 9,000 years ago, that have affected our Sun's rhythms?

It's also worth bearing in mind that scientists are at a loss as to explain why Betelgeuse has been flickering in brightness and why its temperature has been fluctuating, so is it because they're missing some significant factor? Could the Electric Universe also hold some of the answers?

See also: And check out SOTT radio's:


Fireball 3

Sky fall: Huge fireballs fall from space each year; new estimates say 40 million kilos of 'extra-terrestrial' material plummets to Earth annually

Manchester scientist Romain Tartèse meteorite Antarctica
© University of Manchester / Katie JoyManchester scientist Romain Tartèse with a meteorite in Antarctica
A NEW estimate of how must space rock is falling to Earth each year has been revealed and it's probably a lot more than you thought.

A team of UK scientists focussed on meteorites above 50g and think about 16,000kg's worth rains down on us annually.

This 16,000kg (17 ton) figure doesn't even take into account the space dust that regularly settles on our planet or the infrequent impacts of larger space rocks.

These are said to boost the figure up to 40,000,000 kg.

Comment: The reason the estimates have been revised is that the number of space rocks whizzing past earth has been steadily increasing in recent years: And they bring a few things with them:


R2-D2

NASA awards contracts to Blue Origin, SpaceX & Dynetics to begin work on lunar landers; Boeing left out

Full moon
NASA awarded contracts worth a combined $967 million to three teams of companies on Thursday to begin work on lunar landers toward the agency's goal of putting astronauts on the Moon by 2024.

Teams led by Blue Origin, SpaceX and Dynetics won awards under NASA's Human Landing Systems program. These awards are study contracts for the next 10 months, at the end of which NASA will pick one or more winners to begin building the spacecraft.

NASA awarded the Blue Origin team with $579 million, the Dynetics team with $253 million and SpaceX with $135 million. The wide range in award totals comes due to the differences in each team's bid and approach to achieving NASA's goal.

Boeing also bid on HLS but was not awarded with a study contract. The Boeing proposal included using an upgraded Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, which Boeing is currently building for NASA.

Comment: NASA's video announcement:




Telescope

Astronomers take unique photos of remote planet-forming disks

The protoplanetary disks around the R CrA (left) and HD45677 (right) stars.
© kuleuven.be / Jacques KluskaThe protoplanetary disks around the R CrA (left) and HD45677 (right) stars. The orbits of earth and Jupiter and star are added for reference.
An international team of scientists was able to capture images of planet-forming disks hundreds of light years away from Earth. The photos, which are an achievement in itself, shed new light on how planetary systems come to be.

Those protoplanetary clouds of dust and gas, shaped like vinyl music records, appear around young stars and astronomers believe the matter found in them eventually turns into planets.

Scientists previously struggled to properly capture planet-forming disks, as even the images from the largest telescopes weren't detailed enough. A new study, published in Astronomy & Astrophysics on Thursday, solved this problem by coming up with completely different observation techniques.


Microscope 1

A Disappointing Decade for the Study of Human Evolution

Foot of Homo naledi
© Lee Roger Berger research team [CC BY 4.0], Wikimedia CommonsFoot of Homo naledi
The 2010s was a bad decade for the study of human evolution. Smithsonian Magazine recently published an article titled "These are the Decade's Biggest Discoveries in Human Evolution." It opens by saying:
Human evolution is one of the most vibrant areas of scientific investigation. In the past decade we've seen many discoveries that add to our understanding of our origins. To mark the 10th anniversary of the Smithsonian's "David H. Koch Hall of Human Origins," here are some of the biggest discoveries in human evolution from the last 10 years.
What are the big discoveries of the decade? Did they reveal new and compelling evidence that humans evolved from lower primates? Some of these big discoveries actually turn out to be instances where the evidence for human evolution weakened, and the rest amount to slight revisions of previously held theories that don't say much about the core tenets of paleoanthropology.

Ancient DNA

Smithsonian's first big science breakthrough is the discovery of ancient DNA. Indeed, this is an exciting development for the burgeoning field of paleogenetics — and it has shown that there were various sublineages of very modern human-like groups such as the Denisovans that have existed in the past million years. Though a novel and intriguing form of evidence, at present ancient DNA is essentially silent on two crucial tenets of evolutionary paleoanthropology: (1) the hypothesis that modern humans are descended from decidedly non-human, subhuman, or otherwise primitive species, and (2) the claim that these newly revealed "species of early humans" were substantially different from us. Yes we have Denisovan DNA, but at present for all we know the Denisovans were as human as we are.

Fish

Fish evolve in a single generation? Not so fast...

goldfish
© Goldfish, by ぱたごん [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons.
First, the claim:
Evolution is usually viewed as a slow process, with changes in traits emerging over thousands of generations only. Over the recent years, however, research has indicated that adaptation in specific traits can occur more quickly. However, very few studies outside microorganisms were able to demonstrate empirically how quickly natural selection shapes the whole genome.

A research team led by Dr. Daniel Berner at the University of Basel's Department of Environmental Sciences has now provided evidence for rapid evolution within a single generation, using threespine stickleback fish as model organism. The five-year study combined lab work, field experiments, mathematical modeling and genomic analysis.

University of Basel, "Rapid evolution in fish: Genomic changes within a generation" at ScienceDaily
Paper. (open access)

Fireball 4

Rethinking the world's largest 'explosion': Tunguska event could have been caused by iron asteroid entering and leaving atmosphere

Tunguska trees
© Russian Geographical Society'At present, there are over 100 hypotheses about the nature of the Tunguska phenomenon', says Sergei Karpov. 'They include the fall of a small asteroid measuring several dozen metres consisting of typical asteroid materials, either metal or stone, as well as ice.'
For decades experts have been baffled by the shattering detonation which wiped out more than 80 million trees over a remote area of the then tsarist empire.

Explanations have focused on a meteor exploding in the atmosphere, a meteorite striking the surface, or a comet composed mainly of ice, yet apart from the wholesale destruction at ground level in an unpopulated area, there is only minuscule evidence of a space object.

In a major new contribution to the scientific debate, Dr. Sergei Karpov, leading researcher at Kirensky Physics Institute in Krasnoyarsk and his peers, argue 'that the Tunguska event was caused by an iron asteroid body, which passed through the Earth's atmosphere and continued to the near-solar orbit'.

It was 100 to 200 metres (328 to 656 feet) in diameter.

Comment: Scientists are still hanging on to the 'icy snowball' theory of comets. If one looks at comets as charged solid bodies, the effects become much more understandable


Comet 2

Rapidly brightening Comet SWAN (C/2020 F8) now visible with naked eye

Comet C/2020 F8 SWAN
© Gerald RhemannComet C/2020 F8 SWAN taken on April 27, 2020 @ Farm Tivoli, Namibia
Comet SWAN (C/2020 F8) is brightening rapidly. "I just came in from observing it with the naked eye," reports John Drummond of Gisborne, New Zealand. "It seems to have increased in brightness dramatically since I last saw it a few nights ago." Indeed, multiple observers have now pegged the comet at magnitude +5.5, just within the range of naked-eye visibility.

At the moment, the comet is little more than a dim fuzzball to the human eye. The view through a telescope, however, is stunning. Gerald Rhemann sends this picture from Farm Tivoli, Namibia.

"This is a 30 minute exposure through my 12-inch Astrograph," says Rhemann, who also made a magnificent animation of the comet. In only 40 minutes of tracking, it is possible to see complicated waves and tendrils of gas rippling down the comet's tail. Play the movie.

Comment: Trio of comets grace our skies


Info

Prof. Wickramasinghe and team share potential origin and predict progression of COVID-19

Map of Coronavirus spread
© EIN PressWireMap of Coronavirus spread.
Scientific researchers released their findings about the source and predicted direction of the coronavirus and proposed critical measures for the pandemic.

London, UK, — Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe and his team of researchers believe that the novel coronavirus arrived on meteorites in Oct 2019 and instantaneously infected hundreds of thousands of people through the atmosphere, as meteorites were reported in China, Northern Italy, Michigan in October 2019. This is somewhat at odds with the mainstream assertion that it originated in bats in WUHAN, China. Given this disparity, they went to great lengths to produce a timely research paper to back up their argument.

In the research paper released on COVID-19, Professor Wickramasinghe puts forward several thought-provoking arguments. Notably that: "our informed view is that many people were almost simultaneously infected and naturally inoculated with the same COVID-19 virus strain."

Jet2

Expensive junk: F-35 can't go supersonic without compromising critical stealth tech - Pentagon is fine with that

F-35B jet
© AFP 2019 / MARK WILSONA new F-35B Lightning fighter jet
The Navy and Marine Corps variants of the vaunted F-35 Joint Strike Fighter cannot maintain supersonic speeds without sustaining significant structural damage that compromises its stealth capabilities — and the Pentagon is reportedly just fine with that.

Defense News reports that the major deficiency — in which F-35B and F-35C variants experienced damage to their stealth coating after firing their afterburners — will go unaddressed by the F-35 Joint Program Office despite its risk of undermining the aircraft's critical stealth systems.

"This issue was closed on December 17, 2019 with no further actions and concurrence from the U.S. services," the F-35 Joint Program Office told Defense News in a statement. "The [deficiency report] was closed under the category of 'no plan to correct,' which is used by the F-35 team when the operator value provided by a complete fix does not justify the estimated cost of that fix."

As previously reported by Defense News, this deficiency was first discovered in November 2011 after a pair of F-35s sustained "bubbling [and] blistering" of its stealth coating after flying at speeds of Mach 1.3 and Mach 1.4 near their maximum service ceiling of 50,000 feet.

Subsequent tests the following December revealed "thermal damage" that reportedly compromised the overall integrity of both the inboard horizontal tail and tail boom, per Defense News.

Comment: You don't get what you pay for. No-bid contracts, revolving-door positions, overinflated prices, shoddy design - each one is bad enough, but together you get the massive failure that is the F-35. But while you don't always get what you pay for, you often get what you deserve, and the U.S. military greatly deserves a fighter jet of the F-35's quality.