Rudy Giuliani Drops Bombshell, Says "Dominion" Whistleblowers Are Coming ForwardThey knew about the vulnerability of these machines over a year and a half ago (if not longer), yet they were still used in the current election. There is no way this was by mistake.
November 11, 2020
During an interview on Wednesday with Steve Bannon on War Room, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani dropped a bombshell where he announced that whistleblowers would soon be coming forward about the Dominion election software.
"Coleman has the community people and he's got the Dominion people," Giuliani said. "And they were the ones who were the actual, not poll watchers, the actual observers who were excluded, who were lied to, two of whom stayed behind after all the Republicans had left out and they're the ones who got the evidence of the 100,000 votes coming in. And they have some photographs also."
WATCH:
Teachers in Norway say they're afraid to show Prophet Mohammed cartoons to students, and worry about personal consequencesSee also:
12 Nov, 2020 13:47
The majority of teachers who responded to a survey in Norway say they value freedom of speech but claim to be concerned that there may be personal consequences for showing cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, a poll suggests.
The anxieties among Norwegian teachers were reported by the industry publication Utdanningsnytt, which surveyed people in the aftermath of last month's beheading of French teacher Samuel Paty.
Some teachers had earlier spoken publicly about their fears and the outlet wanted to probe how widespread those sentiments were. Of the 2,000 teachers asked, only 239 responded to the survey questions, most of them women.
Among those who shared their opinions, 37 percent agreed to a large or a very large extent with the statement that they were "afraid of the consequences", should they show the cartoons in their classroom. When asked if they planned to use the images as a teaching material, over 60 percent said 'no' and less than 8 percent said 'yes'.
Four in five of the people surveyed said their teaching had something to do with the freedom of expression. Almost 64 percent said as long as a topic is relevant to freedom of expression, they would teach it regardless of risking offending students. Less than 8 percent said they "totally agree" with the idea that topics that individual students may find offensive should be avoided.
But self-censorship is not uncommon in Norwegian classrooms, the survey indicates. Over 34 percent of the respondents said they did avoid bringing up certain issues once or several times because they thought students might find them shocking. Religions in general, and Islam in particular, sexuality and suicide were the ones mentioned most.
About 13 percent said there had been a negative reaction from students or their parents to something they said when teaching about freedom of expression, while 3.4 percent reported receiving threats.
The Prophet Muhammad cartoons have become a signature matter of national politics in France after the murder of Samuel Paty. President Emmanuel Macron declared that Islamists wanted to deny the French people the cherished right to show the pictures and that his government will not allow that to happen. Many Muslims consider the cartoons blasphemous, leading anti-French protests to erupt in some Muslim-majority countries after Macron's remarks.
Some activists argue that showing the cartoons to students is pretty much a civic duty for European teachers, if they value secularism. Ingunn Folgero, who heads the ethics council of the largest Norwegian teachers' trade union, disagreed, saying such an expectation should not be encouraged.
"I urge teachers to rely on professionalism," she told Utdanningsnytt. "The classroom is not a place for activism".
I found a vendor user guide with images showing how the Dominion 5.5 central tabulating software works and transmits results from your ballot to the county. Do you trust your election workers to copy and paste files and folders to USB without tampering? https://cms5.revize.com/revize/calhoun
"There is no authority in the Pennsylvania Election Code for a 'secondary review' of absentee and mail-in ballots after those ballots are rejected during the canvass," the campaign claimed.Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh has called the PA election unconstitutional:
In a series of filings, the campaign pointed to a total of more than 8,000 ballots that were incomplete for various reasons, such as missing printed names, dates or addresses.
The Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia County will be holding a hearing on all of the appeals Friday at 10 a.m. local time.
"What they did in Pennsylvania was conduct, basically, an unconstitutional election," Murtaugh said. "Depending on where you were in the state and when you voted, you were treated differently."
Murtaugh claimed Tuesday that Democrat voters in Philadelphia who had problems with their submitted mail-in ballots were contacted by election officials and told to "come in and cast a provisional vote before Election Day."
"That is not allowed," Murtaugh said, adding that Republican voters "were not given that same opportunity."
"You cannot have an election and treat different voters differently within the same state," Murtaugh said. "That is a violation of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution and it's a very, very, serious offense."
"And absolutely, we believe they are going to prevail on that suit, otherwise we wouldn't have filed it," he added.
The Trump campaign on Monday filed a lawsuit (pdf) against Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar and seven county boards of election — Allegheny, Centre, Chester, Delaware, Philadelphia, Montgomery, and Northampton, claiming that "almost every critical aspect" of the state's election was "effectively shrouded in secrecy."
It alleges that the Pennsylvania election process violated the Constitution by creating different standards of verification and transparency for mail-in and in-person voters, as well as disparate treatment of Republican and Democrat voters and poll watchers.
Trump campaign legal counsel Matt Morgan told reporters Monday that in Philadelphia and Allegheny, there were over 682,000 ballots that were tabulated outside the view of GOP observers who were entitled by law to review them.
He also said the razor thin margin in Pennsylvania is "very close" to the state's automatic recount rules, and that the lawsuit could "swing that."
David Shestokas, a Chicago-based lawyer who joined several dozen other lawyers and Allegheny County residents to poll-watch in Pittsburgh on Tuesday, told Just the News that ballot monitors "had no input and no ability to watch anything."
Shestokas described the setup to Just the News at what he said was a massive warehouse in downtown Pittsburgh.
"It was a huge warehouse facility," he said. "My guess is the whole place was 40,000 square feet. Poll counters were doing their work in an area of about 15,000-20,000 square feet."
At some point during the process — out of sight of poll watchers — the ballots were checked for "sufficiency," with workers ensuring that the addresses, dates and signatures were properly affixed to each ballot, Shestokas said.
Eventually ballots made their way back to a central processing area, but watchers were placed far enough away that they were more or less incapable of properly observing the process, he added.
"All of the folks who were observers for campaigns were maybe 15, 20 feet from many of the tables, in a coral," he said. "Other tables may have been 100-150 feet away. We were not allowed to go outside the corral in the one huge room."
Shestokas said ballots were eventually fed into scanning equipment in another, smaller room. Overall, he said, poll watchers were effectively unable to give the oversight for which they were present.
"We literally had no input and no ability to watch anything," he said. "As far as I'm concerned, each and every one of those ballots was opened illegally."
See also:
Comment: RT reports: Are we seeing a pattern here? Moderna executives also dumped stocks following a public announcement of vaccine success, pocketing $millions from the sales:
- 'Bad optics'? Why are Moderna executives dumping stock while developing a Coronavirus vaccine?
- CROOKS: Two Moderna executives sold $30 million of stock before truth about vaccine trial failure was uncovered
For more on Pfizer's murky history, see the articles below: