Puppet MastersS


Control Panel

The new authoritarian agenda revealed (globalism rebranded)

meeting
In July of last year as the hype surrounding the Covid pandemic was finally dying out, I came across a video promoting a barely publicized project called the "Council for Inclusive Capitalism." The group, headed by Lynn Forester de Rothschild, is the culmination of decades of various globalist agendas combined to represent the ultimate proof of conspiracy.

Remember when people used to say that global governance by elitists was a paranoid fantasy?

Well, now it's openly admitted reality.


Sheriff

Shivanthi Sathanandan, police hater, just got carjacked by reality

shivanthi savanandan
© shivanthi sathanandan/FacebookShivanthi Sathanandan.Shivanthi Sathanandan claims she was severely injured after being carjacked in front of her house.
For woke pols, violent crime's only a problem when it affects them personally: Meet Shivanthi Sathanandan.

A bigwig in Minnesota's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, she vowed in the aftermath of the George Floyd killing to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department.

"Say it with me. DISMANTLE The Minneapolis Police Department," she urged: It has "systematically failed the Black Community," so it's "time to build a new infrastructure that works for ALL communities."

Comment: See also:


Question

Russia questions behavior of defense treaty ally Armenia

Lavrov
Joint drills between Armenia and the US look "strange" as Yerevan avoids exercises with allies, Sergey Lavrov has said

A decision by Armenia to hold joint exercises with US troops "looks strange," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told journalists on Sunday. Yerevan is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) - a six-member defense alliance that includes Russia and Belarus. However, Armenia has been avoiding any drills with its allies of late, the minister added.

Moscow "regrets" the actions of the Armenian government, Lavrov said at a news briefing on the sidelines of the G20 meeting in New Delhi. An "aggressive NATO nation's attempts to set a foothold in the South Caucasus" would hardly benefit the region's security, the foreign minister said.

"I do not believe it will be any good for anyone, including Armenia itself," he told the briefing. "Wherever the Americans arrive, it always means trouble," the minister said, adding that, although US troops do sometimes just "sit quietly" on their military bases abroad, Washington "very often seeks to dominate all the developments" - including political ones - in the regions where its forces are present.

Comment: The situation with Armenia is complex and the US has a keen interest in fanning the flames of conflict and discord. Inviting NATO in for joint exercises is unlikely to be one of Armenia's smartest moves.




See also:


Info

Donald Trump and Megyn Kelly set for first interview in seven years

donald trump megyn kelly
Megyn Kelly announced she will interview former President Donald Trump for the first time in seven years next week.

During her SiriusXM Megyn Kelly Show on Thursday, Kelly said she is "really looking forward to this."


Eye 1

Elon Musk's father fears his son might be "assassinated".

Elon Musk
Elon Musk had also joked about the threat he received from former Russian space agency chief.
Elon Musk had received a lot of criticism when he bought Twitter for $44 billion in October last year.

Elon Musk had also joked about the threat he received from former Russian space agency chief.

Elon Musk's father has said that his billionaire son could be assassinated. Errol Musk, 77, criticized a recent article in The New Yorker, which claimed that the Tesla CEO's influence weighs on government decisions around space, Ukraine, social media, and electric vehicles. The report also highlighted how crucial SpaceX's Starlink satellites had been in war in Ukraine. After Mr Musk's acquisition of Twitter last year, US President Joe Biden said his relationships with other countries are "worthy of being looked at".

Comment: See also:


Red Flag

The Neocons are back

bushbill
© oilempire.us/pnac
If the obvious impacts of America's proxy war in Ukraine are lives lost and debt accrued, a quieter impact is the neoconservatives' revival. A few weeks ago, the Biden administration conferred the deputy secretary of state position on Victoria Nuland, a policymaker in almost every 21st-century American intervention abroad and an ardent supporter of our involvement in Ukraine. Recently, William Kristol, who along with Nuland's husband Robert Kagan co-founded the Project for the New American Century, which drove the push for the Iraq invasion, launched a $2-million organization, Republicans for Ukraine, encouraging congressional Republicans to fund the proxy war despite a majority of the public turning against it.

Even if history truly does come as tragedy and repeat as farce, the neoconservatives' re-emergence is extraordinary, because Iraq isn't the only tragedy, or farce, on their sixty-year record. This record has nothing to do with the hard-nosed, practical, anti-communist, and anti-Iranian outlook with which it's sometimes associated — one shared by many Republicans. Instead, it flows from a broader foreign and domestic project of power accrual and social control driven by ideologues and administrators in Washington, D.C. The project's effects reach wide and deep: though the Center for American Progress and Democracy: A Journal of Ideas feed the Biden White House personnel and policies, their insider playbook was created by the neocons, whose think-tanks and magazines laid the groundwork for an insulated class of political ideologues to wreak their will on the rest of us.

Why do their moves keep working? And how can we minimize their influence?

Stop

Here's why NATO isn't able to help Ukraine win

fire howitz
© AP/Libkos, FileUkrainian soldiers fire at Russian positions from a US-supplied M777 howitzer
Kherson region, Ukraine • Jan. 9, 2023
Russia has the upper hand on the front lines as the bloc is no longer able to meet Kiev's needs...

More than 18 months into the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, NATO military aid to Kiev remains a constituent part of the war. This factor seeps into public consciousness, influences the political perception of the conflict, and affects the situation on the battlefield, whichever side of the hostilities people find themselves on. All these aspects are important in their own right, and each will influence the course of the conflict and its eventual outcome. But how long will NATO be able to provide military assistance to Ukraine?

Gloomy prospects for Ukraine

NATO began providing assistance to Kiev as soon as the conflict started in 2022, and the volume of aid increased throughout the course of last year. This assistance largely influenced the attitude of ordinary Ukrainians toward the hostilities and reinforced the myth of a speedy and inevitable "victory" for Kiev, certain to happen "because the whole world supports us."

The same attitude prevailed in the area of public policy - the aid provided by a particular country indicated whose side it was on: Ukraine's "allies" in NATO (primarily the US) provided direct military assistance, while "neutral" countries offered only financial and organizational assistance, or no help at all.

On the battlefield, NATO aid is fully responsible for the combat capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (UAF). If this aid is discontinued, the Ukrainian army will lose its combat capability within a few weeks, or as soon as the current ammunition stocks run out.

How likely is it that NATO assistance will continue? To answer this question, we need to understand the stocks of weapons and military equipment among members of the bloc - and it is important to note that many are lacking in this regard.

Arrow Down

The glory years of the G20 are over

G20 traffic
© Manish Swarup/APG20 Summit traffic • New Delhi, India • Aug 25, 2023
As both Xi and Putin skip this year's summit in India, it's clear the status of the forum has diminished. It will not disappear, but the veneer of 'world government' attached to the group will dissipate...

The annual G20 summit is taking place in India this weekend. Any gathering of leaders of this caliber (and the 20 largest economies are the ones that really run the world) is a major event. All the more so because, in the context of the apparent weakening of traditional institutions in recent decades, the G20 has been seen as the prototype for a new structure of international governance. Without detracting from the importance of the forthcoming forum, it can be suggested that the group has already passed its peak and that the further evolution of the world system will contribute to the strengthening of other structures.

The G20 is the product of the economic setbacks of the advanced globalization era of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. It emerged at the level of finance ministers and central bank governors in response to the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998. But it really took off ten years later, when member states came together in emergency mode to quell the panic caused by the collapse of US financial institutions and the ensuing global financial crisis. Since then, the G20 has been at the center of the international political-economic architecture.

Comment: Look how a little US financial banking woopsie turned into globe-steering dominance now in semi-dissolve and destined to fade.

See also: China's Xi Jinping likely to skip G20 summit in India, Putin has already declined invitation


Document

Biden administration violated First Amendment over COVID-19 content on social media, court of appeals rules

Biden thumb
© The Free Thought ProjectUS President Joe Biden
The Biden administration "ran afoul" of the First Amendment by trying to pressure social media platforms over controversial COVID-19 content, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans ruled Friday.

In its 75-page ruling, the appeals court panel, made up of two George W. Bush nominees and one Trump nominee, said that President Biden, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the FBI and the surgeon general cannot "coerce" social media platforms to remove content it deems problematic.

However, in its ruling, the court threw out language from a Louisiana judge in July who had ruled that the government could not contact social media platforms to urge them to take content down.

Under the new ruling, the administration has 10 days to seek a Supreme Court review.


Sherlock

US spies see new Ukrainian defense minister as 'even more corrupt' - Seymour Hersh

Umerov
© AP/Sergei KholodilinRustem Umerov attends peace talks with a Russian delegation
Gomel region, Belarus • February 28, 2022
Rustem Umerov "made a fortune" supervising the sale of government property, the American journalist has reported...

Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov is "even more corrupt" than his predecessor Aleksey Reznikov, American journalist Seymour Hersh reported on Thursday, citing an anonymous US intelligence official.

Reznikov was dismissed by Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky earlier this week, with Umerov confirmed as his replacement on Wednesday.

Reznikov and his subordinates have been implicated in numerous graft scandals, including a scheme by which his ministry purchased substandard winter uniforms for inflated prices from a Turkish supplier owned by a Ukrainian contact.

"The new guy is even more corrupt," Hersh quoted a "knowledgeable US intelligence official" as saying. "He ran the sale of government property and made a fortune. Has a huge villa in Majorca."

The source claimed that Umerov's name was not on a list of 35 corrupt officials allegedly presented to Zelensky by CIA Director William Burns in January. Zelensky fired a host of senior officials and administrators after meeting Burns, although Reznikov defied media speculation to stay in his post. The existence of Burns' list was first revealed by Hersh in April.

Comment: See also: Ukraine's Zelensky says he'll replace Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov