
© Social Media
The allegory is one in which a scorpion depends on the frog for its passage across a flooded river, by hitching a lift on the frog's back. The frog distrusts the scorpion; but reluctantly agrees. During the crossing the scorpion fatally stings the frog swimming the river, under the scorpion.
They both die.It is a tale from antiquity intended to illustrate the nature of tragedy. A Greek tragedy is one in which the crisis at the heart of any 'tragedy' does not arise by sheer mischance. The Greek sense is that tragedy is where something happens because
it has to happen; because of the nature of the participants; because the actors involved make it happen.
And they have no choice but to make it happen, because that is their nature.It is a story that was
deployed by a former senior Israeli diplomat, well versed in U.S. politics. His telling of the frog fable has Israel's leaders desperately fending off responsibility for the 7 October débacle, with a cabinet furiously trying to turn the crisis (psychologically) from culpable disaster - to present the Israeli public instead with an image of epic opportunity.
The chimaera being presented is one that by reaching back to earliest Zionist ideology, Israel can turn the catastrophe in Gaza - as Finance Minister Smotrich has long
argued - into a solution that once and for all 'unilaterally resolves the inherent contradiction between Jewish and Palestinian aspirations -
by ending the illusion that any kind of compromise, reconciliation or partition is possible.This is the potential scorpion sting: the Israeli cabinet betting all on a hugely risky strategy - a new Nakba - that could draw Israel into major conflict, but in so doing also sink what remains of western prestige.
Of course, as the former Israeli diplomat underlines, this ploy is essentially constructed around Netanyahu's personal ambition - he manoeuvres to alleviate criticism and to stay in power as long as he can. More importantly, he hopes this will enable him to spread the blame, shedding all and any responsibility and accountability from himself. [Better still],
"it can place Gaza in an historic and epic context as an event that might render the PM as a formative wartime leader of grandeur and glory".Far-fetched? Not necessarily.
Comment: See also: