OF THE
TIMES

British broadcast regulator Ofcom imposed a large fine on RT over an alleged breach of impartiality rules. Reporting on this story by the UK's majors met a cold reaction online, with users accusing the British media of bias.Meanwhile the Russian Foreign Ministry doesn't mince its words and rightfully accuses Ofcom of 'outright censorship:'
The move to impose the £200,000 fine on RT was announced by the British media watchdog on Friday, a decision based on an Ofcom report issued last December accusing RT of seven instances of breaching British impartiality rules while reporting on highly controversial stories in 2018, such as the Skripal poisoning affair.
RT has filed a legal challenge against the accusations and last month London's High Court allowed the case to proceed, despite Ofcom claiming that RT's case had no merit.
As the British media reported on the impressive fine, it was met by an angry online crowd, wondering when the watchdog would actually look into the country's own media - and bleed it dry financially over its alleged bias.
Others suggested Ofcom might have an unconventional understanding of what 'impartiality' actually means.
And some even pointed fingers at the not-very-subtle ties between the UK's media and the country's state authorities.
Still, a few users managed to dismiss the overwhelmingly negative reaction to the news about RT's fine, blaming it on the Twitter bogey of choice - the elusive Russian bots.
The Russian Foreign Ministry has condemned a heavy fine issued by the British media regulator Ofcom against RT. The move was part of "anti-Russian campaign" launched in the UK, the ministry said.See also:
"We witness a situation, in which the British authorities seek to restrict the activities of the Russian media in the UK, this time suing financial leverage," the ministry said in a statement, after Ofcom announced that it issued a £200,000 ($ 247.750) penalty to RT over its alleged breach of impartiality rules.
The ministry questioned the large penalty imposed on RT, stating that it "by far exceeds" the fines other media outlets have received, even in cases involving hate speech and incitement to violence. It also noted that the fine was issued ahead of a court case that is set to rule on the very legitimacy of the media watchdog's conclusions.
"We regard Ofcom's decision as an act of outright censure."
The statement also said that the British press has repeatedly involved itself in controversies and misrepresented facts in its own reporting. Most recently, when Italian police busted a neo-Nazi gang they claimed took part in the conflict in Eastern Ukraine, the whole range of British media - including Reuters and the BBC - rushed to report on the gang's alleged links to "pro-Russian separatists," even though Italian authorities never actually mentioned one.
"We closely follow the developments," the ministry said, adding that the British media operating in Russia should be ready to "face consequences of London's actions."


Comment: If anyone had said to you 10 years ago that the President of the United States would be fighting with Sweden for the release of a rapper, and that this would become a 2020 campaign issue, would you have believed them? The clown show continues...
See also: Trump 'very disappointed' Sweden won't embrace American exceptionalism & release US rapper