OF THE
TIMES
By postponing a vote on Boris Johnson's Brexit deal, MPs have only complicated Britain's divorce from the EU, and in the case of Labour, stacked their own "electoral funeral pyres," former parliamentarian George Galloway told RT.MPs had to be escorted by police to protect them from angry crowds (both pro- and anti-Brexit):
Opposition MPs and protesters in the streets of London celebrated the passing of the so-called Letwin amendment earlier on Saturday. The amendment to Prime Minister Boris Johnson's Brexit deal requires Johnson to seek an extension to the October 31 Brexit deadline from the EU, so that formal ratification legislation can be debated and passed in both Houses of Parliament.
For the 322 MPs who voted in favour of Letwin, their victory was "pyrrhic," Galloway told RT. The former lawmaker called the amendment a "childish, schoolboy jape" aimed at "frustrating the will of the British people," who simply want Britain's exit from the EU to be over and done with.
For Labour too, the decision to back an amendment authored by Tory MP Sir Oliver Letwin - an architect of Margaret Thatcher's much-maligned Poll Tax in the 1980s - "is now very clear for everyone to see," he continued.
...
"They said that Johnson wanted no deal, and then he got a deal," the former Scottish lawmaker said, referring to Remainers in parliament. "They said that they were holding out, because they could not countenance for a moment the threat to peace in Ireland, and then Ireland got behind the deal."
"Indeed, but for the backwoodsmen of the DUP, every party - including SInn Fein - are now fully behind the deal. Brussels and the EU are behind the deal."
With the tides in Johnson's favor, Galloway sees the British Parliament finding a way to pass the deal before October 31. Failing that, Remainers could be faced with the ironic result of leaving without a deal at all, "the very thing that today's parliamentary opposition always claimed they wanted least of all."

A Syrian Kurdish militia leader has said his forces will withdraw from a border area in northeastern Syria to comply with a U.S.-brokered cease-fire deal if Turkish-led forces allow remaining Kurdish forces and civilians to leave an embattled city there.The Turkish defense ministry says one more Turkish soldier has been wounded in fighting with the SDF. The Turks have also taken control of Ras al-Ayn after the SDF left the area. Meanwhile, restoration work is being carried out on the oil and gas fields in Raqqa/Hama/Homs.
The statement came with some reports alleging violations of a fragile truce along Turkey's border with Syria, two days after Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan agreed a temporary halt to fighting to allow Kurdish forces time to pull back from regions under assault in Ankara's military drive.
Redur Khalil of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which has been supplied U.S. weaponry in the fight against Islamic State (IS) militants in the region, said late on October 19 that SDF troops will move back 30 kilometers from the Turkish-Syrian border in a 120-kilometer stretch between Ras al-Ayn and Tal Aybad if the evacuations are permitted of those cities.
Even with its built-in contingency, the statement appeared to be the first public acknowledgement by the SDF that they might pull back.

The water over which Haryana's farmers have the right will not flow to Pakistan now.However, Pakistani Foreign Minister Muhammad Faisal had accused India of not just planning to utilize its water share to the max, but plotting to actually divert the rivers, and framed the PM's words as "another glaring example of the fact that the present government of India is bent upon making India an irresponsible and aggressive state that has no regard for human rights or international obligations." He stated that Pakistan has "exclusive rights" over three western rivers under the Indus Water Treaty.


Comment: See also: