
© Image adapted from Dai H et al., Science (2020)Image of transplanted mouse kidney tissues showing recipient immune cells (blue) in normal (left) but not genetically modified mice (right).
PITTSBURGH - Chronic rejection of transplanted organs is the leading cause of transplant failure, and one that the field of organ transplantation has not overcome in almost six decades since the advent of immunosuppressive drugs enabled the field to flourish.
Now, a new discovery led by researchers at the
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and
Houston Methodist Hospital suggesting
the innate immune system can specifically remember foreign cells could pave the way to drugs that lengthen long-term survival of transplanted organs. The findings, based on results in a mouse model, are published today in the journal
Science.
The rate of acute rejection within one year after a transplant has decreased significantly, but many people who get an organ transplant are likely to need a second one in their lifetime due to chronic rejection," said Fadi Lakkis, M.D., who holds the Frank & Athena Sarris Chair in Transplantation Biology and is scientific director of Pitt's
Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute. "The missing link in the field of organ transplantation is a specific way to prevent rejection, and this finding moves us one step closer to that goal."
The immune system is composed of innate and adaptive branches. The innate immune cells are the first to detect foreign organisms in the body and are required to activate the adaptive immune system. Immunological "memory" — which allows our bodies to remember foreign invaders so they can fight them off quicker in the future — was thought to be unique to the adaptive immune system. Vaccines, for example, take advantage of this feature to provide long-term protection against bacteria or viruses. Unfortunately, this very critical function of the immune system is also why transplanted organs are eventually rejected, even in the presence of immune-suppressing drugs.
Comment: And we're somehow meant to believe (by the neo-Darwinsists) that all these ingenious and higly advanced biological-technological designs found in nature somehow formed as a result of "random mutation" or happy accidents that came of a need to fulfill an ability?! What a load of huey!
If scientists are doing so much work in just trying to understand and replicate the mechanisms listed in the above article, wouldn't it then make sense that some higher form of intelligence had a hand in creating the 'blueprint' for these abilities - and somehow introducing these forms and capabilities into the environment? The probablity being literally astronomical that what we're seeing just formed "on its own".
Watch this entertaining scientist explain the probabilty involved: