
© Pfizer
Pfizer cannot use the government as a shield from liability for making false claims about its
COVID-19 vaccine, lawyers for a
whistleblower argued in response to Pfizer's motion to dismiss a False Claims Act lawsuit.
"Respondents claim fraudulent certifications, false statements, doctored data, contaminated clinical trials, and firing of whistleblowers can be ignored based on the theory that they contracted their way around the fraud," lawyers for Brook Jackson, who worked as regional director at one of the clinical trials used to develop the Pfizer vaccine, wrote in their Aug. 22
response.
"A drug company cannot induce the taxpayers to pay billions of dollars for a product," they countered, "that honest data would show poses more risks than benefits, and that ignores the actual contract and the law itself."
Jackson's lawsuit alleges that Pfizer and two of its subcontractors violated the False Claims Act by providing bogus clinical trial results to garner the FDA approval of its COVID-19 vaccine.
Comment: Are your heartstrings sore yet? Bryant and the execrable Mark Townsend have certainly been pulling hard enough on them.
Clueless British MP's review 'two-tier' asylum system that leave refugees homeless and destitute
View the contrast between the feckless British government and those mean Ruskies: