Society's ChildS


Pirates

City of Austin hires convicted thief, gets robbed of over $1.3M

austin library Whited thief
Investigators said Whited was caught on surveillance footage moving boxes of toner from the library to his car several times in 2019.
Local officials ineptly allowed one of the largest fraud cases on city government record.

During an affordability crisis in the city, local officials continue to disastrously mishandle citizens' precious money — this time allowing a convicted thief to casually steal over $1.3 million.

Randall Nelson Whited, a former employee of the Austin Public Library, is facing a criminal case after the city auditor's office investigated and alleged he used city credit cards to buy $1.3 million in printer toner — 10 times more than the library needed — so he could steal the extra and resell it online.

Whited is also accused of using city credit cards — of which he had access to more than 10 — to fund his apparent personal spending spree, buying at least $18,000 worth of electronics such as video games, robotic vacuums, virtual reality headsets, and even a drone.

The thefts spanned more than a decade, from 2007 to 2019, but officials believe most of it occurred within the last five years.

Comment: Heavy.com has this background report on Whited. Pity City of Austin wasn't so thorough. An excerpt:
Whited has been arrested on theft charges before. A search of online records on InstantCheckmate shows Whited was arrested in October 1984 for "theft by appropriation" and larceny. He was convicted in September 1985 and sentenced to six months probation. It's unclear how much he had to pay in fines; the record merely states "The Monetary Amount to BE Paid IS a Combination of Fine and Court Costs."

Whited was arrested on July 30, 1985, for burglary at a "non-residence." He was picked up again for burglary on February 28, 1986. He was convicted, but it's unclear how long of a sentence he served. The record shows the maximum jail sentence was 150 days and probation.

There was an arrest for aggravated theft of an item worth more than $750 on January 24, 1989, and another arrest for theft on November 19, 1993. Whited was convicted in both cases.

According to the Statesman, the city of Austin runs criminal background checks every two years on employees whose jobs involve "financial responsibility." A city spokesperson told the newspaper, "During Mr. Whited's tenure with the city, five criminal background investigations were conducted for financial responsibilities, showing no convictions within the last 10 years."



Fire

A recipe for carnage: As Portland burns, why are so many people arrested in the riots being let off?

portland riots
© Getty Images / Nathan HowardProtesters gather in front of a fire near the North police precinct during a protest against racial injustice and police brutality on September 6, 2020 in Portland, Oregon
It was recently revealed that nearly 70 percent of people charged with crimes during the constant rioting in Portland have had their charges dropped. With no obvious deterrent, this is an open invitation for more rioting.

Of all the cities in the United States that have suffered rioting over the past few months, there isn't one that has seen quite as much trouble as Portland, Oregon. The unrest in the city has stretched from the end of May all the way to this month. There doesn't seem to be an end to it either.

Not long ago, there was an exposé by the New York Times that alleged that these rioters were even considering murdering police officers. There were also reports of them going to residential areas to terrorize citizens.

Cell Phone

W.H. Spox: Scully tweet shows he isn't impartial, 'calls into question' 'the Debate Commission's judgment'

Steve Scully tweet
© Twitter / @SteveScullyScreenshot
On Thursday's broadcast of the Fox News Channel's "Fox News @ Night," White House Deputy Communications Director Brian Morgenstern reacted to a tweet from C-SPAN host and planned debate moderator Steve Scully's account asking Anthony Scaramucci if he should respond to President Donald Trump's criticisms of Scully by stating that Scully isn't impartial and "that really calls into question, again, the Debate Commission's judgment here."

Morgenstern said, "[I]f anybody's having a bad week, it's certainly the Presidential Debate Commission, with the way they've handled this. And now, their chosen moderator certainly seems not to be very impartial. The first one — Susan Page, of course, is writing the glowing biography of Speaker Pelosi and now, Mr. Scully, who interned for Joe Biden now colluding...with the Mooch. ... I think the cat's out of the bag. I don't think Mr. Scully is impartial. So, that really calls into question, again, the Debate Commission's judgment here."

Update: CPD Co-Chair Frank Fahrenkopf claims Scully was hacked.

Comment: More coverage of the alleged "hack":

'He was hacked, it didn't happen': Debate commission defends moderator Steve Scully after cryptic tweet about Trump sparks outrage
C-SPAN's Steve Scully, who was slated to host the next presidential debate, is under fire over a now-deleted cryptic tweet about Trump sent to Anthony Scaramucci. The debates commission has claimed he was "hacked."

The context-less tweet was posted on Thursday night sparking speculation that it was meant to be a private direct message, not a public tweet, as many called into question Scully's ability to fairly moderate the face-off between Trump and challenger Joe Biden.


"Should I respond to Trump" Scully tweeted to Scaramucci, former White House Communications Director, who has since become one of the president's most vocal mainstream media critics. Many instantly suggested the pair were in cahoots or "coordinating" against Trump.



Scaramucci's response only added fuel to the fire. He replied with his own mysterious tweet, telling the C-SPAN host to "ignore" Trump because he was having a "hard enough time" and that some more "bad stuff about to go down."


In a twist, however, Frank Fahrenkopf, co-chairman of the Commission on Presidential Debates, told Fox News on Friday morning that the host's account had been "hacked" prior to it sending the controversial tweet. "He was hacked. It didn't happen," Fahrenkopf told the network.

A statement posted by C-Span also stated that Scully did not send the tweeted and believed he had been hacked.


Given the fact that the tweet was online for more than 10 hours, however, quite a few commenters had already seized on it, with some suggesting it was "disqualifying" for a moderator to possibly be consulting with a fierce Trump critic.


Others simply mocked him for the Twitter fail.

"If you select me as your moderator, I promise to at the very least not be a sketchy boomer and tweet out my private [direct messages]," quipped conservative host Saagar Enjeti.



The Twitter backlash marks a second instance of Scully being accused of anti-Trump bias. It was previously revealed that the slated debate moderator had been an intern for Joe Biden when he was a senator in Delaware.

Judging by responses to the claims of hacking on Twitter, most were not buying the excuse, with many saying if he really was hacked, it should be easy to prove.

The second debate was scheduled to take place on October 15 in Florida, but was switched to a "virtual" format by the Commission on Presidential Debates on Thursday, due to Trump's diagnosis with Covid-19. Trump rejected the notion of a virtual debate, however, saying he wouldn't "waste his time" on it. It's unclear when, or even if, the second debate will now go ahead at all.



Shoe

NBA will stop pushing BLM message on the court after ratings plummet

NBA BLM
The NBA, amid suffering from record lows in their ratings, has agreed to leave all the recent social justice messages "off the floor" starting with the next season.

Adam Silver, the commissioner of the NBA, had during past months insisted in promoting a pro Black Lives Matter to support the leagues overwhelmingly African American players.

According to NBC Sports, "Adam Silver told them, 'Hey guys, this is what we're going to do to support our players. Our league is overwhelmingly comprised of African American players. This is important. This is a partnership. We need to work together to get through this season and into next year.'"

Comment: Money talks. See also:


Magic Wand

Silver lining? Students in Manchester hold 'Covid Positive' parties where only people with the infection are allowed to attend

covid positive party
Undergraduates confined to their halls of residence are throwing 24-hour parties as they remain under stringent restrictions.
University students are throwing 'Covid positive' parties as they desperately try to salvage their social lives amid draconian lockdown measures on campuses.

Freshers at the University of Manchester and Northumbria University say undergraduates confined to their halls of residence are throwing 24-hour parties as they remain under stringent restrictions.

Meanwhile the University of Exeter today confirmed a number of students had been sent home for breaching Covid guidelines.

Comment: What else can you do when faced with ludicrous restrictions and social isolation? The students have probably realized that the virus itself is a NothingBurger™, so why not have some fun within the limits of the authoritarian's diktats?


Megaphone

Christmas 'not a priority' for UK public amidst lockdowns, Twitter rejects poll results

Grinch
© Zuma Press via Global Look Press / Jay Shaw Baker(L) A person in a Grinch costume. Bryan Smith; (R) Christmas celebration in London in 2017.
More than half of Britons think fighting Covid-19 is more important than having a normal Christmas, Sky News has reported, citing a new poll. The news was met with mistrust and anger by the outlet's Twitter audience.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has sent signals that the notorious "rule of six", which bans larger gatherings during the coronavirus epidemic, could be lifted for Christmas Day. But the proposal runs contrary to the wishes of the "majority of the public" in the UK who "do not agree that Christmas is a priority", according to a Sky News report on Friday.

Britons are actually happy to sacrifice Christmas gatherings and support even tougher lockdown measures, the outlet said, citing an opinion poll conducted on its behalf by YouGov.

Comment: Sadly, there is still a significant proportion of the population that believe the government manufactured hysteria over the coronavirus, and so it's likely there is some truth to the poll, and, obviously, Twitter does not always reflect the thinking of average British citizens.

That said, there is clearly a shift of opinion afoot, and, although it may not yet be shared by the average person, it is held and discussed by those in society who often have more influence. And so, as the government continues to enforce irrational and tyrannical measures against the people, it may only be a matter of time before those usually unwilling to question authority are forced to do so - because they finally realise that their livelihoods are at stake. This pushback is already apparent in the reactions of numerous local leaders against unjustified government diktats from the UK to Italy, France, and Madrid.

See also: UK gov admits lockdowns aren't working but is mulling HARSHER measures and new lockdowns in northern England anyway


Brick Wall

'Lockdown is a terrible experiment': Interview with Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff

Martin Kulldorff
Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff
Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff on the Great Barrington Declaration and why lockdown harms public health.

The lockdowns around the world have been justified on the basis of 'The Science'. But now a group of eminent infectious-disease experts have come together to sign the Great Barrington Declaration, calling for an end to the lockdowns and for more resources to be devoted to protecting the vulnerable. One of the three main signatories is Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. spiked caught up with him to find out more.

Comment: See also:


Attention

Darren Grimes under police investigation after interviewing historian David Starkey

Darren Grimes
© Jeff GilbertDarren Grimes has described the investigation as 'an abuse of taxpayers' money'.
Darren Grimes is being investigated by police on suspicion of stirring up racial hatred over an interview with the historian David Starkey that he published, it has emerged.

Mr Grimes, a conservative commentator, has been asked to attend a police station to be interviewed under caution after publishing a podcast in which Dr Starkey said slavery was not genocide because there are "so many damn blacks".

It has been warned that the investigation, by the Metropolitan Police, will have a "chilling effect" on free speech, while Mr Grimes has described it as an "abuse of taxpayers money".

Comment:


7 years in prison for something your interviewee said. It's bad enough that an offhand comment, while arguably insensitive, has ruined the career of the historian, but that a journalist who is simply doing his job could be imprisoned due to the subject of his reporting is simply mind-boggling. The death of free speech is at hand.

See also:


Info

Yelp will flag businesses accused of racist behavior; conservatives point out major flaw in new policy

yelp
© Chris Goodney/Bloomberg via Getty Images
'Enabling this feature is a terrible decision for small businesses all across America'

Yelp, a website and an app where users rate businesses, will now flag businesses that have been accused of "overt" racism. Yelp announced on Thursday a new alert that will warn users when "someone associated with this business was accused of racist behavior."

"As the nation reckons with issues of systemic racism, we've seen in the last few months that there is a clear need to warn consumers about businesses associated with egregious, racially-charged actions to help people make more informed spending decisions," Yelp said on the company's blog. "Now, when a business gains public attention for reports of racist conduct, such as using racist language or symbols, Yelp will place a new Business Accused of Racist Behavior Alert on their Yelp page to inform users, along with a link to a news article where they can learn more about the incident."

Comment: As if the lockdowns haven't done enough to small businesses in the US, now this. Guilty until proven innocent is not a way to run a review site, and many businesses will never recover from an undeserved smear campaign. Americans will be lucky if any small businesses exist in their country in the next decade.

See also:


X

A failed experiment: The lockdowns must end

Masks sale
© Stephanie Keith/Getty Images
Lockdowns are typically portrayed as prudent precautions against Covid-19, but they are surely the most risky experiment ever conducted on the public. From the start, researchers have warned that lockdowns could prove far deadlier than the coronavirus. People who lose their jobs or businesses are more prone to fatal drug overdoses and suicide, and evidence already exists that many more will die from cancer, heart disease, pneumonia, and tuberculosis and other diseases because the lockdown prevented their ailments from being diagnosed early and treated properly.

Yet politicians and public-health officials conducting this unprecedented experiment have paid little attention to these risks. In their initial rush to lock down society, they insisted that there was no time for such analysis — and besides, these were just temporary measures to "flatten the curve" so as not to overwhelm hospitals. But since that danger passed, the lockdown enforcers have found one reason after another to persevere with closures, bans, quarantines, curfews, and other mandates. Anthony Fauci, the White House advisor, recently said that even if a vaccine arrives soon, he does not expect a return to normality before late next year.

He and politicians like New York governor Andrew Cuomo and British prime minister Boris Johnson profess to be following "the science," but no ethical scientist would conduct such a risky experiment without carefully considering the dangers and monitoring the results. After doing so, a group of leading researchers this week called for an end to the experiment. In a joint statement, the Great Barrington Declaration, they predicted that continued lockdowns will lead to "excess mortality in years to come" and warned of "irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed."

Comment: See also: