© BBCDamaged aircraft hangar at Shayrat airbase.
Don't be confused by the diplomatic games and the Pied Piperism of the major medias. What happened this morning [April 7] in Syria
has no connection with the story you are being told about it,
nor the conclusions which are being drawn for you.
This morning, the United States are said to have fired 59 cruise missiles from the Mediterranean in order to destroy the Syrian military air base at Sha'irat. The attack was intended as a unilateral action aimed at punishing the chemical weapons attack which the US attributes to the Syrian Arab Army.
Stunned by the amplitude of the reaction by the US,
all commentators concluded that the Trump administration had made a 180° turn concerning the Syrian question. The White House was claimed to have finally adopted the position of its US opposition and its British, French and German allies. Really?
The reality does not correspond to the storyWithout hindrance, the
US cruise missiles crossed the zone controlled by the
new Russian weapon which inhibits NATO communications and commands. According to General Philip Breedlove, ex-Supreme Commander of NATO, this weapon enabled Russia to gain the advantage over the United States in terms of conventional warfare.
It should normally have upset the guidance systems of these missiles, but apparently did not function. This indicates either that the
Pentagon has finally found a technical riposte, or that the weapon had been de-activated by the Russians.
Comment: See also: