"We did not reject our past. We said honestly: 'The history of the Lubyanka in the twentieth century is our history...' - Nikolai Patrushev, director of the FSB, Excerpt from an interview in
Komsomolskaia Pravda, December 20, 2000.
The secret services of Russia have garnered an enduring reputation for ruthlessness.
Whether dealing with internal opponents (Think: Ivan The Terrible's Oprichnina, the Tsarist Okhrana, Felix Dzerzhinsky's Cheka and the NKVD terror orchestrated by the likes of Genrikh Yagoda, Nikolai Yezhov and Lavrenti Beria) or the external apparatus (Think: Viktor Abakumov's SMERSH, the role of the KGB in smashing anti-Soviet movements in Hungary and Czechoslovakia, as well as the exploits of the GRU, Soviet military intelligence), the apparatus' of espionage and counter-espionage have set unenviable standards in uncompromising brutality.
The extraordinarily repressive capacities of the gulag system was of course immortalised by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago and the Lubyanka has become synonymous with Bolshevik terror replete with a signature style of execution every bit as emblematic as revolutionary France's guillotine: a bullet to the back of the head.
Yezhov's name provided the label for the most brutal part of Stalinist terror in the 1930s, the Yezhovshchina. That term was the invention of a scared, scarred and cowed populace. But the protagonists of terror have not shirked from either publicly extolling the merits of the wielding of terror or in revealing the ruthless objectives of particular institutions created to promote the security of the state.
Comment: "Europe can go f*ck itself": Italy's right party leader sees rise in popularity
Also check out Sott radio's: The Truth Perspective: Weapons of Mass Migration: Interview with Michael Springmann on Europe's Migrant Crisis