Puppet MastersS


Pistol

Flashback Gaddafi was killed by French secret service on orders of Sarkozy, sources claim

Peter Allen
Daily Mail
Sun, 30 Sep 2012 07:43 UTC
Gaddafi/Sarkozy
© Getty ImagesLibyan Colonel Muammar Gaddafi • Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy
A French secret serviceman acting on the express orders of Nicolas Sarkozy is suspected of murdering Colonel Gaddafi, it was sensationally claimed today. He is said to have infiltrated a violent mob mutilating the captured Libyan dictator last year and shot him in the head.

The motive, according to well-placed sources in the North African country, was to stop Gaddafi being interrogated about his highly suspicious links with Sarkozy, who was President of France at the time.

Other former western leaders, including ex-British Prime Minister Tony Blair, were also extremely close to Gaddafi, visiting him regularly and helping to facilitate multi-million pounds business deals.

Sarkozy, who once welcomed Gaddafi as a 'brother leader' during a state visit to Paris, was said to have received millions from the Libyan despot to fund his election campaign in 2007.

The conspiracy theory will be of huge concern to Britain which sent RAF jet to bomb Libya last year with the sole intention of 'saving civilian lives'.

Comment: See also: Sarkozy indicted for illicit Gaddafi-Libyan financing of 2007 election campaign

Read More...
Briefcase

Sarkozy indicted for illicit Gaddafi-Libyan financing of 2007 election campaign


RT
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:04 UTC
Sarkozy
© Frederick Florin/AFPFormer French President Nicolas Sarkozy
Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy is reportedly under formal investigation over allegations that his 2007 election campaign received funding from the late Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

According to a source in the judiciary, Sarkozy is being investigated for illicit campaign financing, misappropriation of Libyan public funds and passive corruption, Reuters reports. According to Le Monde, several former senior figures in the Gaddafi regime have provided new evidence confirming the allegations of illicit financing.

Sarkozy, who was president of France from 2007 to 2012, denies the allegations. The former French president faced two days of questioning before being released from judicial detention on Wednesday afternoon.

The allegations against Sarkozy emerged in 2012 and a judicial inquiry was launched in 2013. In November 2016, middleman Ziad Takieddine said he transported €5 million from Tripoli to Paris in late 2006 and early 2007.
Read More...
Attention

Russia leak prompts questions concerning staff undermining Trump

Jordan Fabian
The HIll
Wed, 21 Mar 2018 05:02 UTC
Trump
© Yahoo
A furor erupted at the White House on Wednesday over a damaging leak that revealed President Trump defied his aides' advice during a congratulatory phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The White House raised the prospect of a staff purge over the disclosure, saying in a statement that it would be a "fireable offense and likely illegal" to give Trump's briefing papers to the news media.

Chief of staff John Kelly was "frustrated and deeply disappointed" by the leak, a White House official told The Hill. The official refused to say whether the White House has launched a formal investigation into the incident.

Comment: See also: CNN: Trump, Kelly furious over leak that Trump was not to congratulate Putin

Read More...
Briefcase

Trump: 'I would like to testify', Mueller probe


RT
Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:33 UTC
Trump
© Leah Mills/Reuters
President Donald Trump said that he wants to testify before Robert Mueller as part of his Special Counsel investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election

"Yes. I would like to," Trump said on Thursday when asked about an interview with Mueller during an event on trade.

The president's pronouncement comes after the sudden resignation of John Dowd, his top lawyer who was leading Trump's handling of the Mueller probe. Dowd had opposed Trump's desire to be interviewed by Mueller.

Despite denouncing the investigation as a "witch hunt," Trump had previously said that he would like to testify under oath. "I'm looking forward to it," Trump told the press in January. "I would do it under oath," he also reportedly vowed.

Trump has consistently denied any collusion with Russia.

The House Intelligence Committee voted on Thursday to formally end its Russia probe, after lawmakers found no evidence of collusion between Trump associates and Russia.

Comment: See also:

Read More...
2 + 2 = 4

House Intel Committee votes to end Russia probe - no collusion found


RT
Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:31 UTC
capitol
© Reuters
The House Intelligence Committee has voted to formally end its Russia probe. Lawmakers found no evidence of collusion between associates of President Donald Trump and Russia.

The committee also voted to release the report, which was authored by Republicans. It will first be sent to the intelligence community so that classified material can be redacted, but is expected to be made public within weeks.

The report recommends a crackdown on administrative leaks including the introduction of "mandatory polygraphs" for officials who have top secret security clearance. It also accuses former Obama administration intelligence director James Clapper of providing "inconsistent testimony" regarding his contacts with the media.

In a summary of its findings, the committee said that some Trump associates had "ill-advised" contact with WikiLeaks but concluded that there was "no evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump's associates and the Kremlin."

The committee spoke to more than 70 witnesses during the course of the investigation, which was launched in January last year. It heard from many prominent Trump administration figures including Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon. It also reviewed more than 300,000 documents.

Comment: 70 witnesses, 300,000 documents, all to tell us what we all already knew. That's government for ya.

See also:

Read More...
Laptop

Kaspersky's 'Slingshot' report exposed an active, US-led counterterrorism cyber-espionage operation

Chris Bing and Patrick Howell O'Neill
Cyberscoop
Tue, 20 Mar 2018 20:06 UTC
An employee works at the headquarters of Kaspersky Lab
© ReutersAn employee works at the headquarters of Kaspersky Lab, a computer security company, in Moscow, Russia, July 29, 2013
The U.S. government and Russian cybersecurity giant Kaspersky Lab are currently in the throes of a nasty legal fight that comes on top of a long-running feud over how the company has conducted itself with regard to U.S. intelligence-gathering operations.

A recent Kaspersky discovery may keep the feud alive for years to come.

CyberScoop has learned that Kaspersky research recently exposed an active, U.S.-led counterterrorism cyber-espionage operation. According to current and former U.S. intelligence officials, the operation was used to target ISIS and al-Qaeda members.

On March 9, Kaspersky publicly announced a malware campaign dubbed "Slingshot." According to the company's researchers, the campaign compromised thousands of devices through breached routers in various African and Middle Eastern countries, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Kenya, Sudan, Somalia, Turkey and Yemen.
Read More...
Info

Here's what the Senate Intel Committee thinks US needs to do to stop Russia from influencing elections

Katie Pavlich
Townhall
Tue, 20 Mar 2018 18:15 UTC
senate intel
After a year of investigation, the review of hundreds-of-thousands of documents, multiple hearings on Capitol Hill and interviews with key witnesses behind closed doors, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a series of recommendations Tuesday about how to bolster election security in the United States.

"We're now at a point where we have wrapped up one piece of our investigation which deals with election security," Chairman Richard Burr said during a press conference on Capitol Hill. "Let me say this with a great deal of confidence. It is clear the Russian government was looking for the vulnerabilities of our election system and highlighted some of the key gaps. There is no evidence any vote was changed."

"Russia attempted to penetrate 21 states. We know they were successful in penetrating at least one voter database. The Department of Homeland Security and FBI alerted states to the threat. The warnings did not provide enough information or go to the right person in every case," Burr continued. "We need to be more effective at deterring our adversaries. The federal government should partner with the states to truly secure their systems."

Comment: A fairly drab recommendation for a fairly humdrum accusation. All major powers probe the cyber security of their competitors, whether during elections or not. So naturally, U.S. officials will recommend beefing up security. But there's a reason the U.S. will never sign an agreement laying out the rules of cyber "engagement": they like doing all this and more with impunity. So they don't have much of a leg to stand on when accusing other countries of "penetrating databases". That's kid stuff.

Read More...
War Whore

The untold story of John Bolton's role in US-Israeli strategy to start war with Iran

Gareth Porter
The American Conservative
Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:11 UTC
John Bolton
© Gage Skidmore/FlikrJohn Bolton
Everyone knows Bolton is a hawk. Less understood is how he labored in secret to drive Washington and Tehran apart.

In my reporting on U.S.-Israeli policy, I have tracked numerous episodes in which the United States and/or Israel made moves that seemed to indicate preparations for war against Iran. Each time-in 2007, in 2008, and again in 2011-those moves, presented in corporate media as presaging attacks on Tehran, were actually bluffs aimed at putting pressure on the Iranian government.

But the strong likelihood that Donald Trump will now choose John Bolton as his next national security advisor creates a prospect of war with Iran that is very real. Bolton is no ordinary neoconservative hawk. He has been obsessed for many years with going to war against the Islamic Republic, calling repeatedly for bombing Iran in his regular appearances on Fox News, without the slightest indication that he understands the consequences of such a policy.

His is not merely a rhetorical stance: Bolton actively conspired during his tenure as the Bush administration's policymaker on Iran from 2002 through 2004 to establish the political conditions necessary for the administration to carry out military action.

Comment: See also:

Read More...
Mr. Potato

Boris Johnson admits British Government has stocks of nerve agent used to poison Skripal


Sott.net
Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:18 UTC
Boris Johnson Deutsche Welle interview
In an exclusive interview with DW's Zhanna Nemtsova, UK Foreign Secretary Johnson waffled on about the evils of Russia and why Putin is responsible for the attack on ex-spy Sergei Skripal. In the course of the interview, he let something very significant slip.
Read More...
Cloud Lightning

Washington and FBI insiders fear: "General Flynn might take a flamethrower to this town before he's done"


True Pundit
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00 UTC
Flynn is back
The biggest, baddest dude in Washington D.C. might be President Trump but Gen. Mike Flynn is running a close second, according to FBI insiders who fear he may start talking soon.

And talking about the FBI and what exactly went down during his ordeal with the Bureau's Andrew McCabe-infused investigation of Flynn. Those unflattering details, insiders reveal, would bring more unwanted turmoil and public scrutiny to the embattled agency. Especially the FBI's actions wielded against Flynn which likely involve illegality and corruption.

Worry quickly swept through the Beltway this weekend after Flynn appeared at a political rally days ago to support a California underdog running for Congress; Flynn's first public appearance since he was sacked as national security adviser in 2017.

That surprise appearance clearly put the D.C. establishment on notice.

Flynn is back.

Comment: Mike Flynn may have been one of the few really knowledgeable, capable and willing enough to truly help Trump drain the swamp - so he had to be taken out. But is he back in the sense that the article conveys? We'll have to wait and watch. See also:

Read More...