Puppet MastersS


Star of David

New Israeli airstrike targets resistance post SW of Gaza

GAZA airstrike
© Unknown
The Israeli occupation army at dawn Tuesday launched an aerial attack on a Palestinian resistance post to the west of Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip.

A reporter for the Palestinian Information Center (PIC) said that a military helicopter fired at least two missiles at a site belonging to al-Qassam Brigades of Hamas, with no reported casualties.

He added that resistance fighters responded by opening fire at the chopper as it was overflying the area. The same site had been bombed several days ago, on December 13, 2017.

For its part, a spokesperson for the Israeli army said that the airstrike was in response to a rocket attack from Gaza last night at Eshkol Regional Council in the Negev.

Russian Flag

2 Russian military personnel were victims in shelling of Khmeimim air base, Syria

Khmeimim air base
© Dmitriy Vinogradov / Sputnik
Two military personnel died in a mortar attack on Russia's Khmeimim airbase in Syria's Latakia Province on December 31, the Russian Defense Ministry has said, adding that reports of seven jets being destroyed were "fake news."

"[Russian newspaper] Kommersant's report on the alleged 'destruction' of seven Russian military aircraft at Khmeimim Airbase is fake," the ministry said in a statement. The MoD reasserted that the Russian Air Force deployed to Syria retains its combat readiness and continues to fulfill its duties.

Earlier, Kommersant newspaper reported citing two unnamed military and diplomatic sources that militants linked to a terrorist group shelled the airbase and destroyed seven Russian military planes, specifically four Su-24 bombers, two Su-35C fighter jets and an Antonov An-72 transport aircraft on December 31. The report also claimed that more than 10 military personnel were injured in the mortar attack.

Earlier on Wednesday, the ministry reported that two pilots had died and a technician had sustained injuries when a Mi-24 helicopter crashed near the Syrian Hama military airfield on New Year's Eve.

Comment: See also:


Star of David

Netanyahu proposes African 'infiltrators' to be forcibly removed from Israel

Black guy IDF
© Breaking BrownEthnic removal or imprisonment
Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has reportedly asked officials to examine the feasibility of forcibly deporting thousands of African migrants, in the latest escalation of an anti-migrant campaign.

According to a report in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Netanyahu instructed the national security adviser, Meir Ben Shabbat, to look into forced expulsion as his cabinet met to approve a plan to offer 40,000 people the choice of being deported with a cash payment or being incarcerated indefinitely.

Despite controversy around the existing plan, Netanyahu, following concerns over cost and prison space, asked officials to go a step further and ask if the migrants could be expelled by force - a proposal that would almost certainly be challenged in the courts.

On Tuesday, details were disclosed of a much-criticised scheme starting in April to persuade people to leave through a combination of the threat of prison and the incentive of a cash payment of $3,500. Most of the migrants in question - largely Sudanese and Eritrean people - arrived in Israel in the second half of the last decade, crossing from Egypt before new security on the border sealed the route.


Comment: On one hand, Netanyahu is appealing to his constituency with bold, brash popular moves to lessen negative public opinion in his corruption cases. On the other hand, Israel has always been about keeping Israel for its Jewish population to the exclusivity of all others. Just ask the Palestinians.

More from The Blaze:
As many as 42,000 African migrants or "infiltrators" have entered Israel illegally, BBC News reported. Of those, nearly 1,500 are currently held at the Holot detention center for attempting asylum. Many of the immigrants, who are mostly from Eritrea and Sudan, fled to Israel seeking asylum from persecution and conflict.

Infiltrator is a term the Israeli government uses to describe people who entered the country illegally. The government currently considers most of the "infiltrators" to be economic migrants.

Those who leave within the allotted time will receive up to $3,500, airfare, and other incentives, according to Ynet. They also can choose whether to return to their home country or a third country.

Last month, the government approved a bill to close the detention facility and expel its inhabitants to Rwanda, which has caused concern among some human rights groups. Israel and Rwanda also recently signed an agreement whereby asylum-seekers can be sent to Rwanda even without their consent. The advocacy group, Hotline for Migrant Workers, told Ynet that the expulsions "put the refugees' lives in danger."

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the African migrants threaten the nation's Jewish character.



Arrow Up

Who's nuclear button is really the biggest?

Nuclear chart
© Statista
Currently, there are an estimated 14,555 nuclear warheads in the hands of just nine countries.

Statista's Martin Armstrong points out that at the top of the list, as compiled by the Federation Of American Scientists (FAS), are of course Russia and the U.S. With a combined arsenal of over 13,000, this particular hangover from the Cold War is still plain to see.

Up to now the two have been undergoing programs of disarmament - of this 13,400, over 5,000 are officially retired and awaiting dismantlement.

In Kim Jong-un's New Year's Day speech, he claimed that North Korea's nuclear forces are now "completed", stating that the nuclear launch button is always within his reach. The FAS does indeed estimate that the country is in possession of between 10 to 20 warheads.

In response to the claim, U.S. President Trump fired back, pointing out that his button is "much bigger & more powerful" - something which can not be disputed, as the infographic [above] shows...

Comment: How many warheads will it take to obliterate most of humanity? And a better 'big button question' might be...who is insane enough to push it?

See also: 'Mine's bigger', Trump dares Kim Jong-un to compare nuclear buttons


Ornament - Blue

White House says Trump's mental fitness is better than Kim's

Donald Trump
© Brian Snyder / Reuters
Reporters have directly challenged US President Donald Trump's "mental fitness" after his boasts of having a bigger nuclear button than North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. It's Kim they should worry about, the White House replied.

The US mainstream media's notorious feud with Trump saw a new skirmish Wednesday, as an NBC reporter bluntly asked White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders if the American public should be "concerned about the president's mental fitness," considering that Trump is "speaking so lightly about threats regarding nuclear button."


He was referring to Trump's recent tweet in response to North Korea's leader. The US president said, "I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!"


Christmas Tree

Weed war: Justice Dept. rescinds Obama-era policy, will crackdown on states allowing marijuana sales and use

marijuana
© Luiz Rampelotto / Global Look Press
The Justice Department is revoking an Obama-era policy that discouraged US attorneys in states where marijuana had been legalized from bringing charges in marijuana-related crimes.

"It is the mission of the Department of Justice to enforce the laws of the United States," Attorney General Jeff Sessions said in the announcement Thursday. "Therefore, today's memo on federal marijuana enforcement simply directs all US Attorneys to use previously established prosecutorial principles that provide them all the necessary tools to disrupt criminal organizations, tackle the growing drug crisis, and thwart violent crime across our country."

The move is likely to lead to confusion about whether it is legal to grow, buy or use marijuana in states where it has been decriminalized. Long-standing federal laws prohibit the practice, and still classify marijuana it as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act, akin to heroin and cocaine. It is considered to have no medical use.

Sessions has been a vocal critic of marijuana legislation, comparing the drug to heroin and blaming it for spikes in violence. He has hinted that he would crack down on the growing cannabis market.

Star of David

Israelgate: Michael Wolff book reveals the foreign leader running Trump's ME agenda - Netanyahu

trump netanyahu
© REUTERS/ Ariel Schalit
With everyone talking about the Russia story again, fed by Michael Wolff's bombshell new book on the Trump White House, it must be pointed out that the book documents that a foreign leader not Vladimir Putin pushed one of the Trump administration's most grievous foreign policy moves, the decision to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, as the supposed capital of the Jewish people. Benjamin Netanyahu influenced that decision, and so did Trump mega-donor Sheldon Adelson. And they are also pushing Trump to end U.S. policy of opposing the Israeli occupation.

In his new book, Fire and Fury, excerpted in New York Magazine, Wolff reports on a meeting between Trump adviser Steve Bannon and the late Fox News boss Roger Ailes at a dinner party in Greenwich Village a year ago, during the transition after the 2016 election.
Bannon plunged on with the Trump agenda. "Day one we're moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Netanyahu's all-in. Sheldon" - Adelson, the casino billionaire and far-right Israel defender - "is all-in. We know where we're heading on this ... Let Jordan take the West Bank, let Egypt take Gaza. Let them deal with it. Or sink trying."

"Where's Donald on this?" asked Ailes, the clear implication being that Bannon was far out ahead of his benefactor.

"He's totally onboard."

"I wouldn't give Donald too much to think about," said an amused Ailes.
Let's be clear that this is a major change in U.S. policy they were talking about (and that Ailes raised an eyebrow about). This week brings new reports that the U.S. is not going to call the occupation an occupation - well, here are the fingerprints. Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly interfered in U.S. matters of state, without an outcry. Sheldon Adelson - who is very close to Netanyahu and a major player in Israeli politics - has been personally pushing the unification of Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty since Camp David threatened to divide Jerusalem, in 2000, and using his wealth to do so. George W. Bush reportedly put Adelson off his agenda at that time by saying that he supported Israel but he couldn't be more Catholic than the pope.

Comment: Unfortunately, the Israel Lobby has been so successful that this revelation won't even make a dent in popular opinion. U.S.-Israel collusion is all fine and good, because "Israel good". Russian collusion is bad, because "Putin evil". Never mind the fact that Israel only got to the position it has today through bribery, blackmail and terror. Israel can spy on Americans, steal American nuclear technology, threaten American politicians, extort billions in American "aid", and give nothing back. If Trump really wanted America to be sovereign again, he would ditch Israel as a "partner". But if he did that, he'd be toast.

More coverage of Wolff's new book, and the Trump-Bannon fall-out:


Wolf

'Fools, but talks are a good thing': Trump claims credit for N Korea talks with Seoul

Donald Trump
© Jonathan Ernst / Reuters
US President Donald Trump is taking credit for the apparent thawing of diplomatic tensions between South Korea and North Korea, stating that his "firm and strong" stance has enabled talks.

The governments in Seoul and Pyongyang have technically been at war for nearly 70 years since the end of the Korean conflict divided the peninsula. But the warring nations exchanged messages for the first time in two years via a hotline on Wednesday.

A 'hotline' communication channel between the two administrations was reopened this week, having fallen silent in January 2016. It follows Kim Jong-un's New Year address, in which he said that the two countries should "lower the military tensions on the Korean Peninsula to create a peaceful environment."


Better Earth

US seeks emergency UN meeting on Iran protests - Russia reminds them about Ferguson and Occupy

ferguson protest
© Lucas Jackson / ReutersSt Louis County police officers hold an anti-police demonstrator in Ferguson, Missouri August 10, 2015.
The US has said it will call an emergency UNSC meeting to discuss the unrest in Iran, citing the need to support the protesters. Moscow says the move is hypocritical, given Washington's own history of cracking down on protests.

America's UN envoy, Nikki Haley, said Washington would call for an "urgent" UN Security Council (UNSC) meeting on Iran Monday, but there's been no word yet from the UN on such a meeting being scheduled. Kairat Umarov, Kazakhstan's envoy to the UN, who is now holding the rotating presidency of the UNSC, said Tuesday the council has not yet added Iran to its agenda and no decision has yet been taken on the issue.

Haley was emphatic in her support of Iran's anti-government protesters, praising their "great bravery" and calling on the international community to support them. "The people of Iran are crying out for freedom," Haley told journalists at a news conference. "All freedom-loving people must stand with their cause," she added, while promising to also seek an emergency session of the UN Human Rights Commission.


Comment: Haley's display (and that of all the other Western pundits and hacks echoing her words) really is shameless. The Iranians aren't crying out for (American style) "freedom and democracy". They are protesting against conditions common to both Iran and Western-style democracies (e.g. Spain), like unemployment and food prices. Many of the protesters would prefer a hardliner like Ahmedinejad. And the majority of Iranians hate America (with good reason). See:


Washington's latest attempt at masquerading as a global human rights defender was met with ridicule in Moscow, which reminded the US about its own approach when dealing with protests whenever they occur on American soil. "There is no doubt that the US delegation to the UN has something to tell the world," Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova said on Facebook.

"Haley can, for example, share the US experience of putting down protests, tell [the Security Council] about the mass arrests and crackdown against the Occupy Wall Street movement or about the "clean-up operation" in Ferguson," she sarcastically added.

Comment: Russian Deputy FM Ryabkov told Sputnik:
"We do not see any UNSC role in this issue... [In Iran] there are certain domestic processes, the UNSC is a certain body, which is responsible under the UN Charter for maintaining international peace and security, Iran's internal issues have nothing to do to this UNSC function," Ryabkov said.

"Of course we cannot predict the developments of the situation as for a call of this hypothetical session, but I am sure that in contrast with this harmful and destructive US idea, we will set out our position, which is very consistent and is fully based on the adherence to the norms of international law," Ryabkov said.

Possible Sanctions

The Russian deputy foreign minister has also touched upon the issue of possible sanctions against Iran over the social unrest in the country.

"Our position is well known, unilateral sanctions, as a way to resolve problems relating to foreign policy, are unacceptable, they are illegitimate. The problem is that the oversimplification of the US foreign policy has gone too far. [The United States], in my opinion, has no other tools apart from sanctions in their arsenal of doing business with other members of the international community that are not ready to stand in line and follow the United States," Ryabkov said.

"We will counter Washington's sanctions pressuring as we used to. And our position fully applies to the situation in the US-Iranian relations. We categorically reject such tricks and insist that the threats to impose sanctions are also illegitimate," Ryabkov added.
Ryabkov also told TASS that there are additional motivations for the U.S.'s recent stance:
"The current situation, when Washington falls to temptation to use the moment to raise new issues regarding to the JCPOA, shows the deliberate attempt to undermine and shatter the international community's commitment the JCPOA," Ryabkov told TASS on Thursday. The diplomat also stressed that what is going on in the Islamic republic is a domestic issue, and urged the US to refrain from meddling.

The deputy foreign minister also reminded the US that the P5+1 initiative was no bilateral agreement, but the result of difficult and lengthy negotiations, which cannot be unilaterally amended.

"It is a destructive approach to arbitrarily snatch out of the total package only what suits the Americans and demand to change those provisions that Americans are not satisfied with for unknown reasons," Ryabkov stated. He also warned that such an approach could undermine the whole deal, which took years of hard work to finalize.
Iran's Ambassador to the UN Gholamali Khoshroo is similarly peeved:
Tehran has continued to fire back at the US stance. Khoshroo condemned the American administration's "acts of intervention in a grotesque way in Iran's internal affairs." The ambassador said that Washington had meddled in Iranian domestic affairs under the pretext of support for the rallies, "which in several instances were hijacked by infiltrators to include acts of senseless homicide."

"The current US administration has crossed every limit in flouting rules and principles of international law governing the civilized conduct of international relations," Khoshroo said in a letter to the UN, cited by Tasnim news agency on Thursday.
...
On Wednesday, French President Emmanuel Macron said that hostile statements on the ongoing protests in Iran by the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia could lead to a war. He also urged all parties to maintain balance in relations with the Islamic Republic, while seeking ways to "increase international pressure" on it.
...
Speaking to RT, some Iranians pointed to the unfair treatment of their country. Despite some praising American support, others said that demonstrations on the same issues could occur anywhere.

"In any country, people can protest against high prices. But whenever such demonstrations happen in our country, opponents of the establishment come out and support them," a woman told RT. Another local resident said that authorities' opponents use the riots "for their own purposes" each time demonstrations take place.
See also:
Denied! United Nations Security Council rebuffs absurd US request for emergency session on Iran protests


Vader

Deep State agent claims Obama didn't give support to Iranian protesters in 2009

Mike Mullen
Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen
Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen admitted that Obama didn't give as much support to anti-Iranian protesters in 2009 as compared to Trump in 2017-18.

Watch below, his comments come towards the end:


What's interesting again is the framing by the host. Martha Raddatz says that the protest didn't work in 2009 and asks him why it might work today - as if Obama did everything that Trump did, so there's no reason to believe anything will be different. Mullen shoots down her implication by drawing the opposite observation - Obama just didn't do anything to support the uprising.

Another interesting comment is that Mullen says the protesters are angry because they were told that they would benefit from the Iran Deal as the money "trickled down" society to them. But that didn't happen.

So Obama's "trickle down" attempt to help the Iranians failed, even as critics of Republicans praise the Iran Deal, and whine about our economic policies. Weird, huh?!

Comment: It failed in 2009 because the Iranians defeated the operation created by Western intel agencies. It had nothing to do with a lack of support from Obama administration.