A senior Iranian lawmaker has blamed the United States, Israel and Saudi Arabia for the recent attack on an Iranian tanker in the Red Sea and pledged to take the matter to the United Nations.

Abolfazl Hassan Beigi, a member of the national security and foreign policy committee in Iran's parliament, claimed on Wednesday that footage taken by cameras on the tanker points to the three countries, which are locked in a cold war with Iran.

"There are abundant documents and evidence of interference of certain governments in the attack against the Iranian oil tanker and they will be presented to the UN and the UN Security Council," the lawmaker said, as quoted by Fars News, adding that those behind the attack should "pay the price" for their actions.

Meanwhile, Iran's security chief Ali Shamkhani on Wednesday pledged to "give a response" that will make those behind the attack "regret their act."

A series of unexplained attacks against ships in the Gulf and Saudi oil installations between May and September increased already-boiling tensions between the United States and its major regional ally Saudi Arabia, on one side, and Iran, one the other side. Washington, which continues to pursue its "maximum pressure" campaign vis-a-vis Iran, was quick to lay the responsibility with Tehran in each case, which the latter staunchly denied.

• Attack on Iranian oil tanker in the Red Sea, UPDATES
• Who is behind the attack on Iranian oil tanker Sabiti?
• Iran releases new photos showing damage done to oil tanker Sabiti
• Playing Saudi Arabia and Iran against each other? Iran suspects Israel behind missile attack on its oil tanker in the Red Sea
• Was the recent Iranian tanker drama an inside job?

At a press conference on Wednesday, Trump batted away every attempt at criticism - calling out the media for faking footage from Syria; describing the Kurdish militias that worked with US troops against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) as "no angels"; and demanding one good reason why the US should be involved in a centuries-long dispute between Syrians, Kurds and Turks when they could work that out themselves. None was forthcoming.

He even chided the US military-industrial complex that wants to "fight forever," while making sure to note that he authorized a $2 trillion spending spree to rebuild the "depleted" US military. When reporters brought up the outspoken opposition by some Senate Republicans, Trump shot back that they ought to do their jobs, and he would do his. This was not a president worried about getting impeached, but someone confident in his position after 1,000 days in office.

While 2016 may seem like a long time ago, Candidate Trump did run on the platform of ending endless wars and entangling alliances. His daring to question the sacred cow of NATO, or the US presence in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq caused apoplexies across Washington.

After becoming president - and facing a coordinated effort from every quarter to block, sabotage and "resist" his agenda - he chose to go along with the military and political establishment. So the US did not withdraw from Afghanistan, and sent more troops to Iraq and Syria to fight IS. Trump even launched strikes against the Syrian government on two occasions - both prompted by alleged "chemical attacks" - in 2017 and 2018. Having hired neocon warmongers, he embraced their agenda for regime change in Cuba and Venezuela.

If this was done to appease his domestic critics, it obviously did not work. Neocons and establishment Republicans continued to denounce him and ally with the Democrats seeking Trump's impeachment. So at some point recently - perhaps when he fired the hawkish adviser John Bolton? - Trump appears to have decided he might as well do what he wanted all along.

Declaring IS defeated, he ordered the pullout of US troops from northern Syria, setting in motion a chain of events that have transformed the situation in the region practically overnight, while his critics could only wail and gnash their teeth in impotent rage.

Trump has always had the uncanny ability to force his foes to defend the indefensible - see the curious case of Democrats and open borders, to name just one example. Now that talent has been leveraged in the area where US presidents have the most influence, and where his critics appear the weakest: foreign policy.

Turns out that getting the US out of Syria was easy, so long as Trump let others do all the hard work. Mainstream media said Trump gave Turkey the "green light" to invade Syria, when he clearly didn't. They gleefully took up the cause of the "betrayed Kurds" until they got caught faking footage of the Turkish invasion. When it emerged that the "Turkish" troops involved were the very same "moderate rebels" they cheered on, back during the Obama administration - now denounced as "thugs and pirates" - the contortions they had to put themselves through were a sight to behold.

What if Barack Obama had called out the military-industrial complex, told off politicians who wanted to fight "endless wars," or declared that American soldiers should not be injured or killed in centuries-old sectarian conflicts? It is no stretch to say that he would have been applauded by the same people that now vilify Trump.

Yet Obama didn't do any of those things, even though he had the "hope and change" mandate. Instead, he allowed himself to be seduced by the promises of glory coming from his ambitious advisers. The result was the rise of IS, as Washington sponsored jihadists in Syria; the destruction of Libya and its transformation into a slave-market anarchy; the coup in Ukraine and the war in Donbass. The "geniuses" behind these fiascos are now shrieking that Trump's cleanup of their mess is somehow hurting America!

During the 2016 campaign, some of his supporters jokingly referred to Trump as their "God-Emperor," a science fiction reference that spawned a thousand memes. Yet here he is, single-handedly dismantling the American Empire because he believes it runs counter to the notion of the American Republic its founders had envisioned over two centuries ago.

Meanwhile, his critics are once again forced to defend the indefensible, and the only "argument" they have left is that all of this is somehow "helping Russia." Trump is either lucky beyond all probability, or truly a "stable genius," as he once put it himself. In the end, it doesn't matter.

• New evidence emerges about Ukraine's secret Nazi prisons
• Neo-Nazi mob boss pictured next to Ukraine President Poroshenko in church inauguration ceremony
• Ukraine's neo-nazi Svoboda party militants seize Orthodox Church
• Israel's ambassador to Kiev 'shocked' after seeing that region in Ukraine honors Nazi collaborator Bandera
• The real Ukraine: Americanized, nazi-dominated
• Atlantic Council admits Ukraine's Nazi problem, but upset RT reported on it
• Ukraine's far-right celebrates the Nazi SS but Western journalists are more concerned with how Russia will cover the event
• The US has installed a neo-Nazi government in Ukraine

Update (1900ET): President Trump has begun to respond to Chuck and Nancy's claims.

The Good...

The Bad...

And The Ugly...

• Arab media's full interview with Putin: Russia 'does not build alliances against anyone'
• MintPress interviews Russian Foreign Ministry's Maria Zakharova
• Putin's Direct Line appearance: After four hours, 81 questions, here are the top answers from his epic Q&A

• Die or ask the Syrian government to take them in: The Kurdish militias simply have no other options
• The Saker: Debunking the Putin and Netanyahu/Israel work together canard
• The economic entrails at the heart of the 'deal of the century'
• The purpose of Netanyahu's visit to Ukraine
• Putin endorses Netanyahu for re-election, Shoigu and Lavrov react

• Dollar disposition: Global economic uncertainties push central banks to boost gold holdings
• Restoring Glass-Steagall (without the Green New Deal) is the only way to avoid complete economic collapse
• Ice Age Farmer Report: Economic collapse 2020 - Cosmic "Perfect Storm" cause rising food prices
• The Next Economic Crisis, The Looming Post-Multipolar System And Hybrid War Forever
• Germany cuts economic growth forecast for second time as slowing world economy, trade disputes and Brexit uncertainty take their toll