Puppet MastersS


Dollar

The cost of war: The so-called 'war on terror' has killed over 801,000 people and cost taxpayers $6.4 Trillion

US soldier
© Capt. Charlie Emmons/U.S. Army/Flickr/ccA U.S. Army soldier fires an M4 carbine rifle during partnered live fire range training at Tactical Base Gamberi, Afghanistan on May 29, 2015.
"The numbers continue to accelerate, not only because many wars continue to be waged, but also because wars don't end when soldiers come home."

The so-called War on Terror launched by the United States government in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks has cost at least 801,000 lives and $6.4 trillion according to a pair of reports published Wednesday by the Costs of War Project at Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.

"The numbers continue to accelerate, not only because many wars continue to be waged, but also because wars don't end when soldiers come home," said Costs of War co-director and Brown professor Catherine Lutz, who co-authored the project's report on deaths.

"These reports provide a reminder that even if fewer soldiers are dying and the U.S. is spending a little less on the immediate costs of war today, the financial impact is still as bad as, or worse than, it was 10 years ago," Lutz added. "We will still be paying the bill for these wars on terror into the 22nd century."


Comment: The war on terror has also paved the way for a domestic police state where agencies of all stripes have effectively made the US citizenry the enemy - and have been preparing to treat them as such. A study on this development would be useful as well, and round out the picture.

See also:


Windsock

Guardian journalists are Kremlin and Qatari agents: Russian tycoon trolls newspaper after 'KGB agent' smear job

Alexander Lebedev
© Global Look Press / ZUMA Press / Ray TangAlexander Lebedev
After a sensational headline in The Guardian dished the dirt on UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson's meeting with an "ex-KGB agent" in Italy, the Russian businessman involved has hit back, with some trolling accusations of his own.

"Boris Johnson met an ex-KGB agent during a highly controversial trip to attend a party two days after attending a high-level Nato summit that focused on Russia," The Guardian reported on Sunday. No details of the meeting are revealed in the report, but through heavy use of context - the meeting took place last year, a month after the poisoning of the Skripals in Salisbury - it was nonetheless portrayed as a shady one. All that is put at the background of the delay in the publication of 'Russia interference report.'


Comment: Is this another bizarre attempt at throwing anti-Russian sentiment into the General Election mess? The report apparently, yet again, found no evidence of Russian meddling in British politics and Downing street delayed it's release until after the election; likely because the facts do not support their agenda.


The "agent" in question is billionaire Alexander Lebedev, but rather than some sort of secret agent of a long-defunct Soviet spy service, he is currently a British media mogul and an outspoken critic of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Comment: As for The Guardian, recent exposés detail who's running the show there: And the Independent: Editorial freedom? UK's 'Independent' partners with Saudi Arabia to expand international media influence


Broom

'We have our own problems': Ukrainian president says country is 'sick' of US impeachment drama

zelensky
© Reuters / Valentyn OgirenkoUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky
As impeachment mania grips the US, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky dismissed a question from CNN about whether he would open an investigation into the Biden family, saying people in Ukraine are "so tired" of the scandal.

Zelensky, who has found himself at the center of the seemingly never-ending political saga, was visibly annoyed when asked by a CNN reporter if he would launch an investigation over claims that former US Vice President Joe Biden had pressured a Ukrainian prosecutor to drop a corruption probe into the Burisma natural gas company where his son Hunter sat on the board.

"I think everybody in Ukraine is so tired about Burisma," Zelensky told the reporter, according to Politico.

Comment: See also:


Bulb

Let's stop pretending every impeachment witness is a selfless hero

Lt Col Alexander Vindman
It's become clear that some witnesses in the impeachment probe have their own agenda, and not all of them are courageous martyrs for the truth.

Throughout this impeachment charade we've been told by the media and House Democrats that a cadre of unelected career bureaucrats in the State Department and the National Security Council who are cooperating with the impeachment inquiry are heroes, patriots, and paragons of virtue and self-sacrifice for defying President Trump and proclaiming the truth about Trump corruption and self-dealing in Ukraine.

Last week, the media portrayed former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch as a courageous martyr recalled from her post by Trump for no reason and then viciously attacked by him on Twitter while she was testifying before the House Intelligence Committee. Trump's attack was immediately characterized as "witness intimidation" by House Democrats and the media, who played up the notion that Yovanovitch was a victim being punished for nothing more than her commitment to the truth.

Bullseye

Russia, Turkey and Arab League slam US decision to 'legalize' Israeli settlements in West Bank, say it damages peace process - Updates

Israeli settlement of Ramat Givat Zeev
© Reuters / Ammar AwadMoscow slams US decision to ‘legalize’ Israeli settlements in West Bank, says it puts spanner in the works for peace process
A general view shows construction of the Israeli settlement of Ramat Givat Zeev in the occupied-West Bank November 19, 2019
The US decision to recognize Israeli settlements in the West Bank as legal will aggravate the situation in the region, Russian Foreign Ministry said on Tuesday.

"We consider Washington's decision as another step aimed at scrapping the international legal base of the Middle East settlement," Moscow stated, adding the US move will only further undermine the "already tense situation in Palestinian-Israeli relations."

Russia's position remains unchanged, viewing Israeli settlement construction on the West Bank has no legal force and exists at odds with international law. It erodes the path to peaceful solution on a basis of the two-state concept, the ministry argued.

Russian diplomats urged all parties to refrain from steps that could provoke a new escalation.


Comment: Turkey had sharp words for the US decision as well:
Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu has blasted Washington over its decision to reverse the US's previous position on the illegal nature of Israeli settlements in West Bank.
"No country is above international law. Fait accompli style declarations shall have no validity with respect to international law," Cavusoglu wrote on his official Twitter account, referring to Secretary Pompeo's statement.
[...]

Turkish-Israeli relations have been poor for years, ever since the 2010 Israeli commando raid on a Turkish aid ship heading to Gaza, with Prime Minister Netanyahu and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan regularly engaging in a back and forth war of words, accusing one another of corrupt behaviour, of "occupying" stolen territories, and branding one another as a "dictator" or "Nazi." Earlier this year, President Erdogan declared that "whoever is on the side of Israel, let everyone know that we are against them."
And the Arab League made made a similarly strong condemnation of the decision:
The Arab League strongly condemns US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo's Monday announcement, in which he said that Jewish settlements established by Israel in the West Bank were no longer inconsistent with international law, the organization's head, Ahmed Aboul Gheit, said on Tuesday.
Aboul Gheit condemned in the strongest terms the statement, issued by US Secretary of State [Mike Pompeo], that his country no longer viewed the Israeli settlements in the West Bank to be contrary to international law and considered it as a very negative development," the head said in a statement.
He added that international law was formulated by the global community, "but not by a single state."

Comment: The US decision to recognize Israeli settlements has, predictably, emboldened the Israeli settlers to repeat their call for an all-out annexation of West Bank:
The effective endorsement of Jewish settlements in the West Bank by the United States on Monday became the latest in a string of explicitly pro-Israel moves by the Trump administration.

Mike Pompeo's bombshell announcement on Jewish settlements has invigorated settler leaders in Israel, who are now calling on their government to annex Palestinian territory.

Oded Revivi, a lawyer in charge of the settlement of Efrat and spokesman for the Yesha umbrella group, has urged Tel Aviv to extend its sovereignty onto the lands.
"Settlement is not a crime and it is not an obstacle to peace," he said, as quoted by The Times of Israel, adding that US envoy to Israel David Friedman had lobbied for the move.
Yisrael Gantz, chair of the Binyamin Regional Council, which governs 46 Israeli settlements in the West Bank, described the announcement as a "major step toward [Israeli] sovereignty [in the West Bank]."
He similarly called on the government to annex "Judea and Samaria", as the West Bank is officially designated in Israel.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a dramatic statement on Monday that the United States would no longer abide by a 1978 State Department legal opinion that Jewish settlements in the West Bank violate international law.

The United Nations, in a number of resolutions, has called those settlements illegal, pointing out that they were set up within territories which were occupied during a war. As much as 138 of the 193 UN member states have recognised Palestinian statehood, including the overwhelming majority of nations in Asia, Latin America, Africa and Eastern Europe. Palestinians, meanwhile, want the West Bank to comprise their future state, and argue that the sprawling Jewish settlements would effectively kill off this plan.

Despite objections from the UN, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long pushed for the establishment of more settlements in those territories, citing historic ties with the West Bank and security reasons, and campaigned on a pledge to annex parts of the West Bank. He said on Monday that the US move "rights a historical wrong" but didn't reaffirm his annexation promise.

The Trump administration has openly cast doubt on the viability of the two-state solution, which had been the core of American policy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for the past several decades, and has made a number of pro-Israel police decisions during the past two years. In a show of support for the Netanyahu government, Trump moved the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, thus recognising it as the capital of Israel, and declared the disputed Golan Heights as part of the Jewish State.

The new American policy has raised more questions about the success of Trump's plan for peace between Israel and Palestinians, which includes a series of economic and political measures, but excludes a two-state solution.



Pocket Knife

Boris Johnson pledges 'tough' new measures to fight knife crime in UK

Knife cuchillo
© Pixabay.com
Boris Johnson has promised a "tough new approach" to fighting knife crime and serious violence if he wins the election.

The prime minister has pledged to "come down hard on the scourge of knife crime" if the Tories return to Downing Street after 12 December.

Under the new plans:
  • The party is promising to speed up the handling of knife possession cases, claiming that anyone caught unlawfully with a knife will be immediately arrested, charged within 24 hours and in court within a week - three times faster than the current average;
  • Police will be "empowered" to target known knife carriers with what the Tories say will be a "new" court order, which will make it easier for officers to stop and search those known to have carried weapons in the past;
  • A £35m boost will be given to violence reduction units - multi-agency teams made up of the police, social services and other agencies - in order to "champion preventative work and stop violence from happening in the first place".

Magnify

Flashback US vs Wikileaks: Espionage and the First Amendment

Young Julian Assange
© WikipediaJulian Assange c. 2006
If the United States seeks to put on trial WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, what are the implications for freedom of speech, for protection of government secrets and for news organizations on the Internet?

Msnbc.com has convened a panel of legal specialists to explore questions raised by a prosecution.

As one of the panelists put it, "The WikiLeaks events tee up the question of defining 'media' in the new, Internet era like no previous case."

The Justice Department has said it is exploring possible charges against WikiLeaks and Assange in the release of diplomatic messages. Attorney General Eric Holder said charges may be brought under a World War I-era law, the Espionage Act of 1917 (text here), or other laws.

Comment: The extradition is not yet assured. Though late in the race, a group of Australian politicians have announced that they will advocate for Assange's return to Australia. How this will play out in the attempted extradition is yet to be seen. Assange is amassing support from around the world with many organizing events and rallies to raise awareness of his cause and support for his release sending a loud and clear message that the public will not tolerate Julian Assange and Wikileaks being silenced. The Australian Senate for Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee claimed in October, 2019, that Assange has refused Australian Consular services and has withdrawn consent for information to be shared with the Australian High Commissioner in the UK despite repeatedly being offered assistance. If true, this may indicate that Assange is wary of Australian assistance given that they are US allies and that they may support a charge of Espionage or at least not attempt to interfere with the extradition or the judicial process. The above prediction of Paul Rosenzweig, former Homeland Security official that "Some of Assange's supporting hacktivists are identified, arrested, extradited, tried and ultimately convicted: 70-80 percent" it seems almost certain that Julian Assange is courageously holding out to protect others. This will only increase the respect of his supporters and those that do not agree with any form of suppression of journalistic reporting.


Newspaper

UK government accused of covering up war crimes in Iraq

british army
The UK is very keen at reminding certain countries - Syria, Russia, China - of their human rights abuses and yet, when it comes to looking closer to home, this current government quite frankly prefers not to, and in some cases deliberately try to obfuscate the truth.

Leaked documents have revealed that not only was the UK army involved in war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan in the 2000s, but Conservative ministers succeeded in covering it up. Military detectives unveiled alleged 'daily' abuse dating back as far as 2003 by the Black Watch regiment in Basra as well as more recent crimes such as a 2012 raid on a compound in Helmund Province where three 'unarmed' children and a young man were shot dead.

Comment: See also: And check out SOTT radio's: Behind the Headlines: Perfidious Albion: If Russia is a Rogue State, What is the UK?


Marijuana

Biden defends position of not wanting to legalize marijuana because it may be a 'gateway drug'

Joe Biden
© epaFormer VP and presidential candidate, Joe Biden
Former Vice President Joe Biden defended his reasoning to not legalize marijuana on a federal level if elected president, saying there is not "enough evidence" as to "whether or not it is a gateway drug."

Speaking at a town hall in Las Vegas on Saturday, the 2020 Democratic presidential candidate said whether the U.S. should legalize cannabis on a federal level is still up for debate as far as he is concerned.

"The truth of the matter is, there's not nearly been enough evidence that has been acquired as to whether or not it is a gateway drug," Biden said, according to Business Insider. "It's a debate, and I want a lot more before I legalize it nationally. I want to make sure we know a lot more about the science behind it."

Star of David

Pompeo: U.S. policy U-turn now considers Israeli settlements as consistent with international law

Pompeo/Omar
© Annelies Verbeek/KJNOmar Arif Bisharat in front of the rubble of his home • US Sec of State Mike Pompeo
US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has announced a U-turn in policy toward Israeli settlements in the West Bank, declaring Washington no longer sees them as inconsistent with international law.

Pompeo said the US will no longer adhere to the 1978 State Department legal opinion on the settlements, and insisted that it would not lead to the US' isolation from the rest of the global community on the issue.

The US' top diplomat said the Trump administration will leave the status of the West Bank to Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate.

Pompeo said the decision came as a result of a "legal review" and was not intended to send any message, though the move is likely to anger the Palestinian side and human rights groups who have condemned the settlements and say they undermine peace efforts.

Comment: Update: RT, 18/11/2019: Outrage erupts over 'legalization' of still-illegal Israeli settlements in West Bank
Vermont Senator and Democratic presidential hopeful Bernie Sanders slammed Trump for "isolating the United States and undermining diplomacy by pandering to his extremist base" in a tweet.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini renewed calls for Israel to "end all settlement activity, in line with its obligations as an occupying power," following the announcement. An EU court ruled last week that all goods originating in Israeli settlements must be labeled as such.

Jordan's Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi warned the move would have "dangerous consequences" on the possibility of peace in the Middle East.

Others pointed out that aiding and abetting a breach of international law made the US complicit in Israel's crimes.


"Trump can't wipe away with this announcement decades of established international law that Israeli settlements are a war crime," Human Rights Watch's Kenneth Roth tweeted, adding "Trump doesn't read, but we do," and pointing to Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Some commenters wondered at who the move was supposed to appeal to, since "US Jews massively reject Trump." A few mused whether this might be the straw that breaks the camel's back regarding a backlash against Israel.

Others merely snarked at the mushy headlines US media used to cover the announcement.
Of course, not everybody was upset - Israeli settler leaders stepped up calls for annexing the West Bank.