Puppet MastersS


Bad Guys

Finally? 1,295 days after referendum, Brexit deal passes Commons vote, goes to EU

boris johnson house commons
© AFP / PRU / HOBritain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks during Prime Minister's Question time (PMQs) in the House of Commons
The EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill passed a vote in the House of Commons Thursday afternoon, three and a half years, three Prime Ministers, and three national elections after the British people voted to leave the European Union in June 2016.

The bill, which will sign into law Boris Johnson's hastily-concluded withdrawal agreement with the European Union struck at the end of 2019, was passed in the House of Commons by a margin of 330 to 231 votes, a majority of 99. This means the bill has completed its third reading, will continue to Parliament's upper chamber — the House of Lords — for review before becoming UK law, in time for the official withdrawal day of January 31st.


Comment: Ok, and then what?


Comment: So what happens at midnight on January 31st?...

The UK is no longer in the EU?


Gear

SOTT Focus: Clausewitz, Trump And Soleimani: American Politics is a Continuation of Israel's Wars by Different Means

Soleimani, Clausewitz,Trump and AIPAC
The 19th century military philosopher Carl von Clausewitz observed that war is the continuation of politics by different means. This is an apt description of Iranian military strategy and geo-political affairs. It is consistent with the rationale that guided General Qasem Soleimani for the last two decades.

As a superb military strategist Soleimani grasped that the distance between A to B isn't necessarily identical to the distance from B to A. Iran and Israel do not share a physical border, Tehran and Tel Aviv are about 1,000 miles apart. Despite Israel's relentless threats to attack Iran, it has never been clear whether Israel has the military capacity to cause significant damage to Iran. It isn't clear how Israeli pilots are supposed to cover the distance and fly undetected over Jordan, Syria or Iraq. Where, or how, would the Israeli plane refuel, and so on. Israel has not managed to solve this logistical military riddle. But it has been clever enough to grasp that pushing America into an all out conflict with the Islamic Republic may provide a solution to the riddle. Despite the competition (with Britain, France and Germany), the USA is Israel's most subservient colony. It has been happily sacrificing its sons and daughters on the Zionist altar for years.

Comment: See also:


Light Sabers

Trump stands down against Iran, US still in denial of the 'New Middle East'

Khamenei and trump
Well, here we are. We're told the White House just pulled us back from the brink of World War III. Make no mistake, what happened this week was historic, but not in the way that Washington and its punditry class are spinning it. For the first time ever, a state actor has attacked the United States, and the US did not strike back. The region, and the world, may never be the same. Welcome to the New Middle East.

In the early hours of Wednesday morning, the Islamic Republic of Iran fired some 22 missiles, hitting two US military installations located in Iraq's Anbar province and in Erbil, Iraqi Kurdistan. According to US and Iraqi officials, the missiles caused no casualties. US reports claim the American troops were hiding in bunkers before the missiles landed, following a tip off from their "early warning" missile detection system, although it's more likely that the US received a phone call giving a 30 minute warning from officials in Iran via Washington's intermediary channels in Baghdad and Switzerland. Still, CNN reported with typical national security gusto, "US intelligence satellites had picked up signs of a heat signature from Iran, suggesting the country had just launched short-range ballistic missiles."

It seemed like a wider war was well and truly on. And then suddenly it wasn't.

When news of the Iranian missile strike hit the headlines Tuesday evening east coast time, US President Donald Trump went silent for most of the evening, giving no press conference or televised address to the nation. All he could manage on this occasion was a typically glib remark followed by the usual tub-thumping on Twitter.


Later that morning, Trump stood behind the White House podium. Many were expecting him to announce that the US would respond to Iran's attack on US assets by retaliating in a "disproportionate manner" - just as he had promised only days earlier. Instead Trump stood down, announcing that the US would not respond militarily.

Comment: See also:


Light Saber

Best of the Web: Iranian airstrikes on US bases in Iraq provide a window for peace

missile attack iraq
© reuters
There is this morning a chink of light to avoid yet more devastation in the Middle East. Iran's missile strikes last night were calibrated to satisfy honour while avoiding damage that would trigger automatically the next round. The missiles appear to have been fitted out with very light warhead payloads indeed - their purpose was to look good in the dark going up into the night sky. There is every reason to believe the apparent lack of US casualties was deliberate.

Even more important was the Iraqi statement that "proportionate measures" had been "taken and concluded" and they did not seek "further escalation".

I agree their response was proportionate and I would say that I regard the Iranian action so far, unlike the assassination of Soleimani by the US, legal in international law.

The entire world should congratulate Iran for its maturity in handling the illegal assassination of its General, who was on a peace mission, travelling as a civilian on a commercial flight, carrying a mediation message the US had been instrumental in instigating. If as seems possible the US actively manipulated the diplomatic process to assassinate someone on a diplomatic mission and traveling on a diplomatic passport, that is a dreadful outrage which will come back to haunt them. Life insurance rates for US diplomats no doubt just went up.

Comment: See also:


Heart - Black

President and Pimp: Bill Clinton poses with Ghislaine Maxwell on 'Lolita Express'

BILL Clinton poses side-by-side with suspected pimp Ghislaine Maxwell - as the pair board pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's notorious private jet.

Bill Clinton and Ghislaine Maxwell
© The Mega AgencyBill Clinton and Ghislaine Maxwell pose at the door of Epstein's private jet
The former US President is seen smiling on the steps of the plane - dubbed the Lolita Express - next to Maxwell, in astonishing pictures exclusively obtained by The Sun.

In another image he has his arm round Epstein's personal masseuse and sex slave Chauntae Davies - who had been ordered to wear a 'pilot' shirt to look professional.

Comment: It is interesting to note that Chauntae Davies felt obliged to go on a trip, despite the trauma of abuse and rapes by Epstein and she felt that she "had to cover it up for everyone". Does her praise of Bill Clinton as "Genleman" meant to make him innocent in the eyes of public?


Stop

"Presidential harassment": US House passes bill to restrict Trump's ability to wage war on Iran, but it will not become law

Nancy Pelosi war powers resolution
© Reuters / Tom Brenner"Crazy Nancy Pelosi" delivers a press briefing ahead of the war powers resolution vote.
The US House of Representatives has voted in favor of a bill restricting President Donald Trump's ability to wage war on Iran. The vote comes a day after escalatory strikes nearly brought both the US and Iran to the brink of war.

Despite its passage, the bill lacks the teeth to actually curb Trump's warmaking powers, should he decide to take military action against Iran. As a 'Concurrent Resolution,' it does not need Trump's signature, will not go on to the Republican-controlled Senate for approval, and will not become law. Instead it simply expresses the position of the House.


Comment: So basically just more hot air from the Democrats.


The bill was sponsored by former CIA analyst and Democratic Rep. Elissa Slotkin (Michigan), and calls on Trump to "to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces to engage in hostilities in or against Iran," unless Congress formally declares war on the Islamic Republic. The bill was written in the aftermath of the American assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani, who was killed at Baghdad airport on Friday in a drone strike.

Comment: Republicans and Democrats agree: No war on Iran (without Congress at least)


Airplane Paper

Iraqi leader Moqtada al-Sadr announces Iran-US War crisis is over, restrains Iraqi militias, says new govt to be formed shortly - UPDATES


Comment: Remember this guy? He's a big deal. He effectively led the Iraqi insurgency against US occupation in the 2000s, and today he's a fierce Iraqi patriot and kingmaker of Iraqi govts...


Moqtada al-Sadr
© Reuters/Alaa al-MarjaniIraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr
Influential Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has declared the "crisis" between the US and Iran over, following statements from the two countries' leaders in the wake of Tuesday's Iranian strikes on US bases in Iraq.

Al-Sadr made his pronouncement on Wednesday after US President Donald Trump gave a relatively subdued speech praising Iran's restraint. Rather than call for retaliation against Iran over a strike that didn't kill any Americans, Trump merely vowed to impose even more sanctions on the Islamic Republic "until Iran changes its behavior."


Comment: Merely vowed! We presume that was written with tongue firmly planted in cheek.


Iran's President Hassan Rouhani in turn vowed to eventually kick all US troops "out of the region" as the "final answer" to the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani, killed in a US airstrike last week.

Shia religious leader al-Sadr also called on Iraqi militias to be "patient" and not begin any military actions, claiming that a new "strong" government capable of protecting Iraq's sovereignty would be formed in 15 days and hold early elections. However, Iraq should still evict the foreign troops inside its borders, he said.


Comment: Interesting. This series of events is shaking things up in Iraq too.


Comment: UPDATE 9th Jan 21:00 CET

Former Congressman Ron Paul comments on the current state of the situation:
It's "not totally unlike Trump to make a lot of noise" and then ultimately "back off a bit" when it comes to handling international conflicts — but that doesn't mean the dangers have passed, former congressman Ron Paul told RT.

Trump backed away from the idea of striking Iran in a much-anticipated address on Wednesday, as the two nations seemed to be on the brink of war over the US killing of top Iranian general Qassem Soleimani. He did, however, double down on promises of more crippling sanctions.

Paul told RT that while Trump's decision not to escalate militarily was positive, problems and dangers still exist because the president has "too many neocons around him trying to aggravate things."

He also called US sanctions on Iran an "act of war" in themselves, and said that Americans would be outraged if another country engaged in economic warfare and blockades against Washington. "There's a war going on" already through sanctions, he said.

Paul reiterated his long-standing view that the US should pull its troops out of Iraq and said that the US's "monstrosity of an embassy" in Baghdad was just "provoking" people into attacks on US personnel.

The former congressman and libertarian said that the US should be "very engaged" in the world, but through diplomacy and trade, rather than military aggression.

He also said the narrative of Iran as the aggressor or initiating force behind recent tensions is misleading, because in its position it simply "can't afford to be" an aggressor.
RT reports that, although Iran gave the US advanced warning of its intent to strike particular US bases - notably those holding arms, and not troops - a US general is still claiming that Iran was 'shooting to kill':
Although no one died in the Iranian missile strikes on US bases in Iraq, in part due to advance warning from Tehran, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said he personally believed that Iran intended otherwise.

"I believe, based on what I saw and what I know, that [the strikes] were intended to cause structural damage, destroy vehicles and equipment and aircraft, and to kill personnel," Army General Mark Milley told reporters on Wednesday.

"That's my own personal assessment," he added. "But the analytics is in the hands of professional intelligence analysts. So they're looking at that."

Milley did not elaborate whether those were the same analysts who "assessed" the truthfulness of the now-debunked 'Russiagate,' or the equally phantom existence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, used to justify the 2003 invasion.

The overnight attacks on Al-Asad airbase and Erbil involved over a dozen ballistic missiles, fired by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in revenge for the US drone strike that killed General Qassem Soleimani, one of the IRGC's top commanders.

The Iraqi government confirmed that it had received advance warning about the strikes from Iran, enabling US troops to take precautionary measures and activate their "finest in the world" air defenses. No lives were lost as a result.

Both Iran and the US declared victory and stood down on Wednesday morning, with US President Donald Trump describing the outcome as "a good thing for all parties concerned."

It was a stunning turn from Tuesday's hard line championed by Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and not everyone at the Pentagon seems happy about it, if Milley's comments are anything to go by.

'Worst military briefing ever'

Pentagon officials sent to Capitol Hill to brief lawmakers on the almost-war apparently didn't do too well either. Emerging from the classified briefing, Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) gave a blistering denunciation of what he heard as "probably the worst briefing I've seen, at least on a military issue," adding that the military could not name a single instance in which they would feel it necessary to ask for congressional approval.

Exact details of the briefing are classified, but Lee hinted that the military apparently told lawmakers that they could not debate or discuss the strike that killed Soleimani, or whether a military intervention against Iran was legal, as that would signal division and weakness to Tehran.

"It is not acceptable for officials within the executive branch of government...to come in and tell us that we can't debate and discuss the appropriateness of military intervention against Iran," Lee fumed afterward. "It's un-American. It's unconstitutional and it's wrong."

Lee and fellow Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said the briefing convinced them to change their mind and support the War Powers resolution proposed by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Virginia), Hillary Clinton's 2016 running mate.
Iraq's Foreign Ministry intends to summon the Iranian ambassador over the missile strikes:
"The foreign ministry rejects these attacks and considers them a violation of Iraqi sovereignty. It stresses that Iraq is an independent state and that its internal security is its priority. We will not allow it to become a battlefield," the ministry said in a statement.

Commenting on the attacks, the office of Iraqi President Barham Saleh condemned the missile strikes, while saying in a statement that Iraq "has previously declared its refusal to be a starting point for aggression against any country, and also refuses to be a source of threat to any of its neighbours.
In an interview Mike Pence claims that Iran has asked militias not to target Americans - which is odd because Iran has not and never intended to create American casualties:
Vice President Mike Pence in an interview said the United States has received intelligence indicating that Iran has asked militias not to target Americans in the wake of the killing of commander Qesem Soleimani.

"We're receiving some encouraging intelligence that Iran is sending messages to those very same militias not to move against American targets or civilians. And we hope that that message continues to echo," Pence told CBS News on Wednesday.
See also: Iran vows to expel US but not kill its soldiers, Trump wants NATO to replace US troops and has suspicions about Ukrainian plane crash


Wolf

Haftar's LNA in control of most of Libya - rejects Putin-Erdogan ceasefire call

GNA military cadets killed funeral
© REUTERS/Ismail ZitounyLibyan security members carry a coffin during the funeral of people who were killed in an attack on a GNA military academy in Tripoli, Libya January 5, 2020.
General Khalifa Haftar, leader of the Libyan National Army, has rejected the ceasefire proposed by the Russian and Turkish presidents as a way to de-escalate the hostilities with the government in Tripoli.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan called for a truce in Libya during their meeting on Wednesday in Istanbul, after Turkey sent troops and equipment to Tripoli in support of the internationally recognized Government of National Accord (GNA).

Haftar's LNA controls most of Libya, however, and has been advancing on Tripoli in recent days. He rejected the idea of a ceasefire on Thursday, after returning from Rome, where Italy tried without success to mediate a deal between the LNA and GNA head Fayez al-Sarraj.

Comment:


Bad Guys

Trudeau wants Canada to take part in probe to ensure 'proper' investigation of Ukrainian jet crash in Tehran

Ukrainian plane crash baghdad
© Nazanin Tabatabaee / WANA via ReutersRescue team works among debris of a plane that crashed after take-off from Iran's Imam Khomeini airport
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has called for a "proper" investigation into the crash of a Ukrainian airliner in Iran's capital, noting that the bulk of the plane's passengers were en route to Canada.

Trudeau said Canada's foreign minister would speak with his Iranian counterpart to discuss the need for a probe, but added it would be "dangerous" to speculate about the cause of the crash at this early stage. Nonetheless, he said he expected Canada would have a role in any investigation into the incident.

Comment: Britain is weighing in on the matter, and appears to have already made up its mind by giving emphasis to the missile hypothesis:
The UK government says it is looking into "very concerning" reports that the Ukrainian Boeing passenger airliner that crashed near Tehran this week, killing all 176 on board, may have been hit by a missile.

Johnson has said that there needs to be "a full, credible and transparent investigation into what happened," according to his spokesman.

The remarks come after Oleksiy Danilov, secretary of Ukraine's Security Council, told Ukrainian media that officials were working on a number of theories regarding the crash, including that of a missile strike "as information has surfaced on the internet about elements of a missile being found near the site of the crash."

Ukraine had initially suggested that the crash was due to an engine fire or another technical issue, but later retracted the statement. President Zelensky cautioned the public against spreading conspiracy theories and speculating on what could have caused the crash - which has already been named the deadliest in the history of modern Ukraine.
Iran is arguing against the missile story:
Iranian civil aviation authorities rejected as 'scientifically impossible' the media reports that the Ukrainian passenger jet departing Tehran was shot down by a missile, and called the scenario 'illogical rumors'.

"Scientifically, it is impossible that a missile hit the Ukrainian plane, and such rumours are illogical," Ali Abedzadeh, head of Iran's of Civil Aviation Organization, said on Thursday, according to the news agency ISNA.

Iranian civil aviation authorities considered the possibility that the plane was shot down, but dismissed it because the plane attempted to return to the airport. Ukrainian officials cited a photo of missile debris that "was published on the internet" as possible evidence of an attack, but Iranian authorities say the photos do not match physical evidence.

"No parts of a missile were found at the scene of the crash," civil aviation inspector Hassan Rezaeifar told the IRNA news agency, describing the missile scenario as "off the table."
Not to mention the fact that Iraqi airspace is some of the most surveilled in the world from all sides. How would such a launch be hidden?


More:
Eyewitnesses observed a fire on the Ukraine International Airlines Boeing 737-800 while it was still airborne, Iran's civil aviation organization noted. The aircraft attempted to return to Tehran's Imam Khomeini airport before crashing, killing all 176 people on board, the organization said. The Iranian investigators confirmed that no distress calls or messages were received from the pilot before the plane hit the ground.



Security cameras captured the very first seconds of a Ukrainian Boeing 737-800 crash near Tehran, showing the site being strewn with burning debris.


Ukraine is taking the lead in the investigation but is following the West's lead in proposing a Russian-made missile:
Kiev will establish if its airliner, which crashed near Tehran with 176 on board, was hit by a 'Russian-made' missile, collided with a drone, or was targeted by terrorists, a Ukrainian security council official has said.

Ukraine has sent dozens of investigators to Iran to look into possible causes of the crash, including "an explosion inside the plane following a terrorist attack," collision with an unmanned aerial vehicle, or a direct hit by "a surface-to-air missile," Oleksiy Danilov, secretary of the security council, told Censor news outlet.

Kiev is now in talks with Tehran regarding access to the crash site, the official added. They said investigators will search it for any "wreckage of a Russian-[made] Tor missile," referring to allegations that popped up on social media.

Iran has acquired 29 Tor-M1 missile systems over a decade ago, receiving delivery of the final batch in 2007. Developed back in Soviet Union, the all-weather, short-range system has been immensely popular with armies across the Middle East, North Africa and Asia.

That claim may not sit well with Iran's preliminary findings, which it disclosed earlier in the day. The country's civil aviation authority said the Boeing 737-800, operated by Ukraine International Airlines, caught fire when it was airborne. Pilots tried to return to Imam Khomeini airport from which they departed, but to no avail. They made no distress calls during the emergency, it has emerged.

On Wednesday, Ukraine had initially suggested that the crash was due to an engine fire or another technical issue, but later retracted the statement. Meanwhile, President Volodymyr Zelensky cautioned the public against spreading conspiracy theories and speculating on what could have cause the crash - which has already been named the deadliest in the history of modern Ukraine.
Wonder who asked for the retraction . . . .


Attention

Several Senate Republicans weigh in: Pelosi's choice to respect impeachment docs deadline or move to dismiss

HawleyPelosi
© UnknownSen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) • Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) announced on Friday if Democrats DO NOT deliver their articles of impeachment to the US Senate as is required by the US Constitution he will introduce a measure to dismiss Pelosi's slapdash articles of impeachment on Monday January 6th.

Nancy Pelosi was on notice
She had three days to decide but did not act.

Senator Hawley, the former Attorney General in Missouri, tweeted this warning out on Thursday: Dems said impeachment was URGENT. Now they don't want to have a trial, because they have no evidence. In real world, if prosecution doesn't proceed with case, it gets dismissed. So on Monday, I will introduce measure to dismiss this bogus impeachment for lack of prosecution. This will expose Dems' circus for what it is: a fake impeachment, abuse of the Constitution, based on no evidence. If Dems won't proceed with trial, bogus articles should be dismissed and @realDonaldTrump fully cleared.

Comment: See also: