Puppet MastersS


X

MuzzleWatch: Context missing in coverage of Soleimani assassination

Screenshot CNN
© screenshot CNN
For this week of Muzzlewatch we have no choice but to examine the assassination of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani. As of this writing, Iran had launched missiles into two US bases in north and west Iraq and President Trump made a televised address from the White House to announce "Iran appears to be standing down." Events are proceeding at a very rapid pace.

There are two primary issues I want to look at: how this event is playing out in the mainstream media (MSM), and the coverage (or lack thereof) of Israeli state actors, U.S. based support, and individual Trump supporters who pushed for and/or were instrumental in implementing this blatant act of war.

The Soleimani assassination in the mainstream media

While the usual suspects and positions are being trotted out, there is an important difference when comparing this event to what has usually gone before. Specifically, the MSM is, relatively, far less trusting this time around, even the paper of empire, the New York Times, is publishing substantial pieces questioning basic, "rule of law" claims made by the administration as well as Secretary of State Pompeo's justification for the attack.
"I don't think the intelligence supports the conclusion that killing a top Iranian official is going to either stop (the) plotting or improve American security." ~ Rep. Adam Schiff
More directly, the Washington Post published an Op-Ed stating the obvious, Trump's rationales for the Soleimani killing are falling apart.

Arrow Up

TurkStream: A 'national and energy security' matter for Turkey and EU that the US can't derail

ErdoganPutin
© Reuters/Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/KremlinRussian President Vladimir Putin shakes hands with his Turkish counterpart Tayyip Erdogan during a ceremony in Istanbul to mark the completion of the TurkStream gas pipeline.
The TurkStream pipeline, supplying Russian gas to Turkey under the Black Sea, will boost energy security of the entire southern Europe and the US won't interfere with it, said Sakir Arikan, managing director of TurkAkim Gas.

The much-anticipated 930km pipeline was launched by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan, during a special ceremony on Wednesday. The massive infrastructure project was completed in less than three years, despite active resistance from Washington.

The US was alarmed that TurkStream would make Europe overly "dependent" on Russian energy supplies - and less eager to buy more expensive American LNG. When asked if he was expecting any further American attempts to derail the project, such as sanctions threats, Arikan said no.
"I don't think so, because the pipeline is already completed and started... Everything is done. The Turks have shown that they're willing to stick to their guns when it comes to matters of national security.... and Turk Stream is a matter of national security when it comes to energy."

Windsock

Shell-shocked pundits crawl back to Killary, forgetting she enthusiastically embraced US wars

Killary
© Reuters/Gerda StudioIf you squint really hard, it's ALMOST like she's in the Oval Office...
Social media sang praises of would-be US President Hillary Clinton as actual President Donald Trump seemed headed for all-out war with Iran - even though Clinton had been a much more enthusiastic participant in US wars.

After Iranian missiles struck several US bases Tuesday night, #Resistance twitter wasted no time disavowing the administration they blamed for the hostilities, running into the arms of his arch-rival with the #IVotedforHillaryClinton hashtag.


But claiming Clinton was the less warlike of the two candidates, or would have steered the country away from war with Iran, requires a serious divergence from history. The former Secretary of State once told an interviewer that "I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran."

Bad Guys

Best of the Web: Iran didn't want to kill US troops with its strike, it wanted to make point to Trump about its missile tech & resolve. It did that

Iran missile
© AFP / BBC Persian
Iran's anticipated retaliation for the US assassination of Qassem Soleimani sent a clear signal to Donald Trump that while the current round of violence may be over, Iran stands ready to respond to any future US provocation.

Tehran warned Iraq to spare US soldiers

On Tuesday night, the Iranian nation buried the body of Qassem Soleimani, the charismatic senior Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) officer assassinated by the US this past week. In the early hours of Wednesday morning, that task completed, Soleimani's IRGC comrades, acting on the orders of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, launched some 22 ballistic missiles from Iranian territory into neighboring Iraq, targeting the huge US air base Al Asad, in western Iraq, and the US consulate in the city of Erbil, in Iraqi Kurdistan.

Comment: Yes, it seems likely that Iran happy to display its high tech-missiles, but the fact that these attacks were coordinated with the US points to something more going on. See Joe Quinn's SOTT Focus: What War Was Trump Trying to Stop by Killing Iranian General Soleimani? and his appearance on PressTV:




Bizarro Earth

Iran vows to expel US but not kill its soldiers, Trump wants NATO to replace US troops and has suspicions about Ukrainian plane crash

Iran's Revolutionary Guards
© REUTERS/Morteza NikoubazlFILE PHOTO: Members of Iran's Revolutionary Guards march during a military parade
A senior Iranian military commander has promised further action against the United States, a day after Tehran launched missiles at two bases housing US troops in Iraq.

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander Abdollah Araghi said that Iran would take "harsher revenge soon," without specifying what that might entail, Tasnim news agency reported on Thursday.

The deputy head of the IRGC, Ali Fadavi, described Iran's missile attacks on US forces as a display of the Islamic Republic's military capabilities, claiming that the Americans "couldn't do a damn thing" about the strikes.

Comment: Iranian commander states that the strikes on US bases is aimed at damaging the military machine and is not intended to kill troops. Notably the US had sufficient warning of the location of the strikes that took place at two bases on Wednesday morning:
Speaking on Iranian state television on Thursday, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' (IRGC) aerospace commander, Amir Ali Hajizadeh, elaborated on the operation the previos day.

"We didn't seek to kill. We sought to hit the enemy's military machine."

Hajizadeh added that expelling American troops from the Middle East would be "appropriate revenge" for the death of IRGC Major General Qassem Soleimani, who the US assassinated in a drone strike at Baghdad airport on Friday.

He said that the attack would be the start of a series of similar strikes across the region.

Trump thanked an "early warning system" for tipping the US military off about the incoming Iranian missiles on Wednesday morning, averting casualties at the bases. However, the Iraqi government confirmed that it received advance warning of the strikes, enabling US troops to take precautionary measures and activate air defense systems. Nevertheless, the missiles struck with pinpoint accuracy, demonstrating the advancement of Tehran's military technology in recent years.
Below is The Saker's report on Iran's IRGC Aerospace Force General Amir Ali Hajizadeh statement regarding the steps they intend to take in their retaliation:
Transcript:

- We struck with our missiles areas in the American airbase (in Iraq) that was used for equipping attack helicopters

- We were able to target the barracks of US soldiers in airbase but we avoided that because our aim was to target the command center

- We struck the US command center of the Ain al-Assad base and images reveal the extent of its destruction

- US President Trump use to visit Ain al-Assad airbase when he visits Iraq

- Our aim was to create terror and panic in hearts of US forces (in airbase)

- US forces transported its injured soldiers to Zionist entity (Israel) using 9 airplanes

- We have not heard of any targeting of American military bases without subsequent US retaliation ever since WWII

- What we heard from Trump is nonsense, America could have attacked Iran yet it was focusing on media action

- There are many targets in Iran yet America is unable to carry out such operations

- The world now knows who is the one that lost the battle

- US forces will inevitably leave the region

- The Resistance Axis is the one that will kick out American forces from the region

- There is no doubt that there are dead & injured among the US forces even though we targeted the base's command centers

- The next step (of the response) will be carried out by the factions of the Resistance Axis

- The next response will not be merely a 'slap', but rather a step that will transform the situation of the region entirely

- Our first operation does not equal blood of the martyrs, the leader has announced that the retaliation will be achieved with the full withdrawal of US forces from region

- We are not criminals like the Americans, we could have targeted the residential buildings within the US base

- A new phase of the Revolution has begun with Soleimani's martyrdom

- What's important is we managed to break prestige of America

- We were expecting a response from US and we were prepared to respond to their response

- I tell the states overlooking Persian Gulf: America will not move to rescue you

- This is the first time that US bases are targeted since WWII

- During the operation targeting the US base we were expecting to receive a response, and we were prepared for all-out war

- We decided to target the largest US base and the furthest away from Iranian borders

- We could have designed operation to kill 500 in the 1st step, & if they responded, we could have killed 4,000-5,000 in 2nd & 3rd steps
Iran's ambassador slams Trump's offer of a new nuclear deal considering the events, including the threat of even more sanctions:
The American call for cooperation was "unbelievable" as long as the US persists on animosity, Majid Takht-Ravanchi said in what seems to be Tehran's first reaction to Donald Trump's address to the nation.

Donald Trump has taken a softened stance when addressing the nation after it emerged that Iran's missile strikes have caused only limited damage and inflicted no casualties to US bases in Iraq.

While habitually bashing "Iranian aggression," he announced that Iran will be slapped with "punishing economic sanctions" that will remain in place until it "changes its behavior."

Going on, Trump said that "the time has come" for five world powers which brokered the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran to break away from its "remnants," calling on them to "work together toward making a deal with Iran that makes the world a safer and more peaceful place."
Pakistan's Imran Khan has called for international dialogue to reduce US-Iran tensions:
The prime minister announced that he had instructed Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi to meet with his counterparts in Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United States to discuss growing tensions between Washington and Tehran. He also ordered General Qamar Javed Bajwa, chief of Pakistan's army staff, to consult with relevant military leaders about the situation.

"Pakistan is ready to play its role for peace but it can never again be part of any war," Khan wrote.

Islamabad also called on the UN Security Council to help resolve the crisis. Qureshi said on Wednesday that the standoff must be resolved through dialogue, and that the region "simply cannot afford another war."
Trump makes the curious claim that the Ukrainian plane crash may been because 'somebody made a mistake', and he confirms the sanctions are ready to be applied:
Trump also called for a NATO presence in the Middle East.

Trump told reporters on Thursday that a new round of economic sanctions on Iran are "done" and will be applied pending an announcement by the Department of the Treasury.

"It's already been done... They were very severe, but now it's increased substantially."

The president also addressed the crash of the Ukrainian International Airlines plane, which hit the ground shortly after takeoff from Tehran on Wednesday, killing 176 people on board. A preliminary Iranian report suggested that the Boeing 737-800 caught fire and tried to turn around before crashing, while Ukrainian authorities are investigating whether a terrorist attack or "surface-to-air" missile brought down the airliner.

Trump stopped short of accusing Tehran, saying that he has "suspicions" that "somebody could have made a mistake."

Tehran has yet to hand over the plane's black box, and in the meantime, the US media has reported anonymous US officials as saying the aircraft was"highly likely" brought down by Iranian air defenses. The Pentagon, however, is refusing to comment on the matter.

Trump suggested that NATO rename itself "NATOME," with "ME" standing for 'Middle East.' The alliance, he suggested, could send more personnel to the region, "as opposed to us."

"We can come home...and use NATO. This is an international problem. We caught ISIS [Islamic State, IS], we did Europe a big favor. "


A move which while far from ideal does hint that US troops would be out of the region.


Trump limited himself to saying the plane was "flying in a rough neighborhood."

Though Trump opted not to retaliate to the Iranian missile strike with military force, tensions between the US and Iran remain high. Iranian military officials warned on Thursday of further attacks, and as Trump spoke to reporters, the House of Representatives held a vote on restricting Trump's powers to declare war on Iran.
See also:


Info

The messages and consequences of Iran's strikes against US bases in Iraq

assad base damage
Just after midnight local time today, Iranian ballistic missiles "Fateh 313" hit two military bases in Iraq that host a significant concentration of US forces, along with other allies. The Iranian direct hit was the retaliation for the US assassination of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds brigade Sardar Qassem Soleimani and his companions, killed by a US drone at Baghdad airport last week. The Iranian retaliation carries several strategic messages to the Middle East for this year 2020 and for many years to come. What are these messages? What will come of Iran's open attack on the most powerful country in the world?

A high-ranking Iranian official contacted the Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi after midnight to inform him that Iran had decided to retaliate for the assassination of its General. Iran said it would hit a concentration of US forces in Iraq, without hitting any Iraqi forces.

Prime Minister Adel Abdel Mahdi - according to well-informed sources in Baghdad - answered that "this act may carry devastating results on the Middle East: Iraq refuses to become the theatre for a US-Iran war". The Iranian official replied: "Those who began this cycle of violence are the US, not Iran; the decision has been taken."

Prime Minister Abdel Mahdi informed the US forces of the Iranian decision. US declared a state of emergency and alerted all US bases in Iraq and the region in advance of the attack.

Comment: In other words, this attack showed the world that Iran is not helpless. The strikes on Ain Assad airbase were precise - specific targets were destroyed, and troop barracks were avoided. If Iran wanted to, it could have killed many US troops. Will this realization dawn on U.S. strategists? Sooner or later they must realize that they are not the only ones with the ability to threaten and coerce compliance. The Americans have to leave Iraq. If they don't, they will suffer. It's past time to (once again) declare "mission accomplished" and leave, for good.


Chess

Pepe Escobar: Trump to de-escalate - intel source

rouhani trump

Comment: Note that this was written before Trump's statement yesterday in which he did, in fact, avoid further escalating the situation militarily.


President Donald Trump will de-escalate the crisis with Iran when he speaks to the nation at 11 a.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, a U.S. intelligence source has told me.

Last night Iran retaliated for the assassination of Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani with missile strikes on two U.S. military bases in Iraq. So far there have been no casualties reported. Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said that the ballistic missile strikes launched from Iran completed Tehran's military action.


It is now up to Trump to determine whether the crisis will continue.

Comment: There's still a chance that poetic justice will prevail. By giving the Israelis what they want by killing Soleimani, the Americans have pretty much unified regional public opinion against them. The Iraqis want the Americans out. If the Americans are forced to leave, they will have to leave Syria too. And fewer Americans in the Middle East means less American human shields for Israel. Empires built on lies aren't sustainable. So with every dirty deal and mendacious act, Israel actually weakens its own position in the Middle East. As SOTT.net's Joe Quinn put it recently on PressTV (see below), they've going to have to answer some big questions in the near future.

See also:


Stop

State Dept. warns India over S-400: No 'special protection' from US sanctions

S-400 air defense mobile missile launching systems
© Reuters / Vasily FedosenkoRussian S-400 air defense mobile missile launching systems take part in a military parade during celebrations marking Independence Day in Minsk.
The US State Department has issued a not-so-thinly veiled warning to New Delhi, urging Indian officials to reconsider purchasing Russia's S-400 missile defense systems or face the wrath of American sanctions.

Asked about India's pursuit of the S-400s during a press briefing on Wednesday, a senior State Department official said the country enjoyed no special protection from US sanctions, which Washington has also threatened to impose on Turkey over its own purchase of the missile platform.

"There is not a blanket waiver. Congress certainly never designed that or anticipated that, nor did the administration," he said, adding:

Light Sabers

Bluster? Israel will shoot down rockets 'with space-age Laser Sword'


Comment: Israel IS a high-tech country, but this strikes us as empty 'fighting words' in light of Iran's impeccable military display earlier this week...


laser sword
© Israeli Defense MinistryA rendering of the Israeli laser defense system in action
Israel has unveiled a 'laser sword' defence system that can stop rockets and drones as tensions in the region continue to simmer.

The technological breakthrough, announced by the country's Ministry of Defence, means lasers can hit targets with a greater degree of accuracy, over longer distances, and through clouds and dust storms.

It is expected to be tested this year and deployed in the coming years, to help support the Iron Dome missile defence system.

The announcement comes after Iran launched a missile strike on US forces in Iraq and Tehran threatened to target Israel if it was attacked by their American allies.

Comment: It would appear that despite US-Israeli collaboration they're still lagging behind Russia in terms of weapons tech: Russia to deploy advanced weapons 'no other country has', US says it "must address" this

See also:


Chess

'Russia, help!' Baghdad revives deal to buy S-300 air defense systems following wild US behavior in Mid-East

s 300
© Sputnik / Sergey Pivovarov
Baghdad has reached out to Moscow again after it suffered American bombings on its soil, a high-ranked lawmaker revealed, saying the resumed deal focuses on the time-tested S-300 air defense systems.

The US attacks on Popular Mobilization Units (PMU), known in Arabic as Hashd al-Shaabi, prompted the Iraqi government "to resume negotiations regarding the S-300 deal," Mohammad Ridha, chairman of Iraqi parliament's Security and Defense Committee, told Sputnik on Thursday.

The US military have launched the air strikes against the PMU units in late December, blaming them for an attack that killed an American civilian contractor. The Shia militia force, backed by Iran, later said it lost 25 fighters.

Comment: Pretty soon, a Russian-made anti-USraeli protection shield will extend across most of the planet, protecting all species from the fire-breathing, depleted-uranium-spreading soul-eaters...