Welcome to Sott.net
Thu, 04 Nov 2021
The World for People who Think

Puppet Masters
Map

Stock Down

Putin plans to cut military spending, boost infrastructure, education, and healthcare

putin
© Alexei Druzhinin / Sputnik
Russia may see a hike in health care, education and infrastructure spending by around $162 billion in the next six years, with cuts in its military spending, according to a report on Vladimir Putin's plan for his term in office.

The 10 trillion rubles ($162 billion) spending plan has been under consideration for several months now and is expected to become a decree shortly after Putin's inauguration on May 7, sources familiar with the issue told the Bloomberg agency, on condition of anonymity.

The measure is aimed at achieving the "decisive breakthrough" in raising the living standards of the Russian population, which was promised by the President in his annual address last month. It's also an attempt to stimulate the growth of the country's' economy amid its slow recovery from recession and from Western sanctions, the sources said.

The funds allocated for construction and maintenance of roads, as well as other transport infrastructure, will increase by about a third, the people said. A 20 percent increase in spending on health care and education is also part of the plan, they added.

This means that Russia will be investing around 11.3 percent of its GDP in infrastructure, health care and education over the next six years, compared to the 9 percent it currently invests.

The increased spending in those areas will be compensated by cuts in others, including defense, as well as by possible tax hikes, according to the sources. A new 4 percent sales tax may be among the options, they said, adding that this measure hasn't yet been approved.

Comment: Trump must be jealous (if he's capable of such a feeling). During the Putin years, Russia has managed to upgrade their military to the point of achieving strategic parity with the U.S., ensuring deterrence, at a fraction of the cost. While Russia can maintain such a balance of power with budget cuts, the U.S. must spend billions just in the attempt to stay relevant. No wonder the West hates Putin.


Star of David

Impunity of the chosen: Israeli MoD threatens to 'retaliate' if Syria uses Russian S-300s to retaliate against Israeli attacks

S-300 Favorite
© Sputnik
S-300
Earlier this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated that Moscow had not decided yet if would supply its S-300 long-range surface-to-air missile systems to Syria.

"What's important to us is that the defensive weapons the Russians are giving Syria won't be used against us. If they're used against us, we'll act against them," Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman told the Ynet media outlet, reflecting upon the possibility of Syria's acquisition of S-300 missile defense systems.

The defense minister elaborated that Israel "doesn't interfere in Syria's internal affairs, but on the other hand we won't allow Iran to flood [the country] with advanced weapons systems that would be aimed against Israel."

"If anyone attacks us, we will retaliate, regardless of S-300, S-700 [sic] or any anything else's presence there," Lieberman said.


Comment: The first three letters of Lieberman's name are LIE for a reason; he's pathological liar and a thug. Yes, Israel does interfere in Syria's internal affairs - regularly. It permanently occupies Syrian land - the Golan Heights - supports ISIS and al-Qaeda occupying Syrian land, and periodically launches military attacks on Syrian infrastructure. The Israelis are just upset they won't be able to attack Syria with impunity any longer if Russia indeed supplies Syria with S-300s.


Safe

Backroom deal? US Senate was poised to vote against Pompeo SoS nomination, but then approved him at last minute

Mike Pompeo
© Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
CIA Director Mike Pompeo is on track for a negative recommendation Monday from the Senate committee considering his nomination as secretary of state, a vote that would mark an unusual rebuke to a central member of President Donald Trump's foreign policy team.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is scheduled to vote on Mr. Pompeo's nomination on Monday evening. All of the panel's Democrats have said they would oppose the former congressman's nomination, and they have been joined by one Republican, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky.

That gives Mr. Pompeo's opponents a majority on the committee, which is composed of 11 Republicans and 10 Democrats.

Under Senate procedures, the nomination can still be brought to the chamber's floor, where the math is more favorable for Mr. Pompeo and most senators believe he is likely be confirmed. Still, Mr. Pompeo would be the only secretary of state in modern history to be confirmed by the full Senate without winning a committee endorsement.

One Democrat who is not on the foreign relations panel, Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, has said she would support Mr. Pompeo, and she could be joined by other red-state Democrats, especially those facing re-election this year.

Mr. Pompeo would replace former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who had a difficult relationship with the White House and with his own department.

Comment: The Senate panel ended up approving Pompeo yesterday as Rand Paul gave up his opposition at the last minute.
"After calling continuously for weeks for Director Pompeo to support President Trump's belief that the Iraq war was a mistake, and that it is time to leave Afghanistan, today I received confirmation that Director Pompeo agrees with President Trump," Mr. Paul wrote. "President Trump believes that Iraq was a mistake, that regime change has destabilized the region and that we must end our involvement with Afghanistan. Having received assurances from President Trump and Director Pompeo that he agrees with the president on these important issues, I have decided to support his nomination."

Mr. Trump told reporters last week that Mr. Paul has "never let us down" and that "he's a good man."



Gold Seal

Craig Murray: Complete disillusionment with the UK Establishment

Theresa May
© Reuters
The second half of my life has been a continual process of disillusionment with the institutions I used to respect. I suppose it started with the FCO, where I went from being Britain's youngest ambassador to being sacked for opposing the use of intelligence from torture, at the same time having an insider view of the knowing lies about Iraqi WMD being used as a pretext for invasion and resource grab.

I still had some residual respect for the BBC, which respect disappeared during the Scottish independence referendum where BBC propaganda and disregard for the truth were truly shameless. My love of the universities was severely tested during my period as Rector of Dundee University, when I saw how far the corporate model had turned them from academic communities developing people and pursuing knowledge, to relentless churners out of unconsidered graduates and financially profitable research, with nearly all sense of community gone.

My respect for charities vanished when I discovered Save the Children was paying its chief executive £370,000 and had become a haven for New Labour politicos on huge salaries, which was why it was so involved in pushing a pro-war narrative in Syria. When Justin Forsyth and Brendan Cox - both massively salaried employees who came into Save the Children from the revolving door of Gordon Brown's office - were outed over sexual predation, that seemed a natural result of "charities" being headed by rich party hacks rather than by simple people trying to do good. As for respect for parliament, well the massive troughing expenses scandal and all those protected paedophiles...

War Whore

Activist explains how French weapons end up in Saudi hands committing genocide in Yemen

Macron Bin Salman France Saudi
© AP Photo / Saudi Press Agency
Yemeni human rights activists have charged Mohammad bin Salman, accusing him of aiding in "acts of torture" during the campaign in Yemen. Paris is being put under pressure, due to the fact that French weaponry is used in the conflict by the coalition. Tony Fortin, member of the board of the Observatory for Arms told Sputnik how this happened.

Fortin said that one of the most controversial deals is the selling of French arms on the DONAS contract. According to it, Saudi Arabia paid for weapons that must have been delivered to Lebanon.

"Part of the weaponry, which was delivered to Saudi Arabia and its coalition partners, were originally intended for Lebanon. Companies that created it worked under the DONAS contract," Fortin said. "In 2015 [the government] asked them to adapt their weapons to Yemeni conditions. Some of the companies were surprised that the weaponry they were creating would be used in the bombing of civilians," he added.

Comment: Business as usual. A Western country such as France gives weapons to the Saudis and the Saudis murder Yemeni civilians.

Saudi strikes kill 20 civilians in Yemen




People 2

Trump & Macron's political 'bromance' blossoming after attacks on Syria

Trump Macron
© Kevin Lamarque / Reuters
US President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron
Long gone are French snorts at the US. Despite disagreeing on the Iran deal and climate change, Emmanuel Macron is the first foreign leader to be indulged with a full state visit by US President Donald Trump in the White House.

United in their recent crusade against Syrian President Bashar Assad, the two leaders are expected to iron out their differences on other international policy questions, including Trump's threats to ditch the landmark nuclear deal with Iran.


Comment: Looks like a match made in heaven.




Propaganda

Kremlin denies Putin boasted to Trump about 'beautiful Russian hookers'

women legs
© Andrey Arkusha / Global Look Press
An exchange about "beautiful Russian hookers" between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, implied in ex-FBI Director James Comey's memos, never happened, the Kremlin says.

The headline "Putin told Trump Russia has some of the most beautiful hookers in the world," with various modulations and levels of attribution, has been doing the rounds in the Western mainstream media, after AP obtained 15 pages of memos by former FBI chief James Comey. In the papers, Comey describes meetings with US President Donald Trump in early 2017 - including the quote, "we have some of the most beautiful hookers in the world," attributed to Trump, who attributed it to Putin.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov was asked about the supposed exchange in a Friday news briefing. "No. If it says so in the book [Comey's recently released memoir about Trump], then at least that part is not true. President Putin could not and did not say that to President Trump," Peskov replied. "Especially considering that before Trump became president, they never spoke."

Comment: Cheap made up gossip is all they have to support their 'Russiagate' case. Pathetic!


Bad Guys

With NATO's help Ukraine continues its military assault on Donetsk Peoples Republic

donetsk
© Sputnik/ Irina Gueraschenko
Fort Russ publishes a complete summary of the military situation in the Donetsk People's Republic over the past day as a result of today's briefing by the deputy commander of operations, Eduard Basurin.

The situation on the battle line remains tense.

Over the past day in the Donetsk area Ukrainian occupation forces shelled the districts of eight settlements. The enemy fired 60 mines from mortars of various caliber, and also fired from the arms of infantry fighting vehicles, grenade launchers and small arms.

Five settlements were attacked in the Gorlovsky area. During the shelling, mortars of 82 mm caliber, BMP armament, grenade launchers and small arms were used.

In the Mariupol area, the enemy fired at areas of five settlements, firing 80 minuntes from mortars of various calibres, and also used BMP armament.

Comment: Ukraine continues to blacken its name thinking it can get away with anything it wants thanks to its support from the Western establishment:


TV

Keep Calm & Blame Russia: RT Documentary on Inconvenient Facts in Skripal Saga

salisbury chemcial hazmat suits
If countless Russia-bashing pieces don't help you get the big picture of the lingering Skripal saga, a report by RT's Murad Gazdiev may. He scrutinized the major slipups in the UK government's (and their pundits') narrative.

It is "highly likely" that Russia deployed a deadly weapons-grade toxin to poison former double agent Sergei Skripal. Porton Down, the UK's leading chemical research lab, says there is "no doubt" the toxin was Novichok-class nerve agent developed by the Soviet Union. And Russia surely did it, because the very word 'Novichok' is Russian for 'newcomer.'

RT's Murad Gazdiev examines the stunning discrepancies that emanate from the Skripal case, as the blame game against Moscow continues.

The report includes commentary from renowned chemical weapon experts, both Russian and Western-based, who told RT the formula of Novichok-class agents is actually an open secret as any - yes, you heard it right - laboratory in the world may produce the same substance with the same degree of purity. Moreover, the pace at which the UK authorities identified the poison used on the Skripals raises even more questions.

Watch RT's report in full here:


Comment: Given that it wasn't Russia, suspicions naturally fell on the British security services. But the choice of location for poisoning the Skripals is highly odd - Salisbury, home of British chemical weapons manufacturing for a little over a century. Why would the British paint a target over themselves in this way?

Combined with the British government's utterly bizarre handling of this incident - while being utterly convinced that this was done to them 'from without' - we are led to suspect a 'third force' was behind this.

As former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray wrote one week after the incident in early March:
Israel has the nerve agents. Israel has Mossad, which is extremely skilled at foreign assassinations. Theresa May claimed Russian propensity to assassinate abroad as a specific reason to believe Russia did it. Well, Mossad has an even greater propensity to assassinate abroad. And while I am struggling to see a Russian motive for damaging its own international reputation so grievously, Israel has a clear motivation for damaging the Russian reputation so grievously. Russian action in Syria has undermined the Israeli position in Syria and Lebanon in a fundamental way, and Israel has every motive for damaging Russia's international position by an attack aiming to leave the blame on Russia.



Eye 1

West impeding restoration of historical monuments in Syria while Russia helps clear land mines and rebuild 8th century mosque

syria monument
© Russia's Defense Ministry press service/TASS
MOSCOW, April 24. /TASS/. Western countries are impeding the efforts to restore the destroyed monuments in Syria as they are turning down the contacts with Damascus, the Russian envoy to UNESCO, Alexander Kuznetsov old Izvestia daily.

"We're calling on this organization all the time to throw its shoulder in the restoration of monuments in Syria, for instance, in Palmyra and Aleppo," he said. "These sites are invaluable and their restoration acquires assistance from the international community, including financial aid."

Comment: So the West presides over their destruction and then hinders their reconstruction, anyone would think they wanted the Syrian sites to fall into ruin: