I tried to make each section readable in and by itself. So skim over the headlines, pick a topic, read a bit, get upset (because "I defend the orange monster") and think: what if?
There's plenty of topics. I selected the following (and might address others if there's enough interest).
- Medical Care
- Foreign Interventions
- Tax Cuts
- Lobbying
- "Fake News"
- Immigration
- BLM
- Deportations
- Border Wall
- Trade Wars
- Misogyny
- Environment
- Conceding Elections 2020
"I've been studying the news media and elections for more than 35 years. Trust me — there's never been anything like it." Rich Noyes, research director for a (Conservative) press watchdog.The Bulleted List of Trump's Good Side
Medical care
"Obamacare", the Affordable Care Act or ACA is often featured in the press as if it were in any way the kind of "universal healthcare" most of Europe has. Yet Trump is right to insist on changes to it. ACA has been a boon to insurance companies and the pharmaceutical companies. Not so much to the average American.
ACA 'offered' the obligation for each and every American to get health insurance with private companies. It is not in any way 'affordable' to the average family, with charges up to $1,500 a MONTH for quite basic insurance. A single person easily pays $400-$500 for that same Bronze tier coverage that doesn't include a lot of common ailments. You can ramp up to Silver, Gold and Platinum tiers, eventually paying, as a single person, above $800 a month. As a result, it has brought many Americans to the brink of bankruptcy and homelessness.
If you forego enrollment in Obamacare, you pay an additional 2.5% income tax or an amount which "can't be more than the price of the bronze plan". In other words, you would pay either way. Trump abolished this additional tax in the Tax Cut and Jobs Act. Which is to say that Trump didn't change Obamacare at all, he merely got rid of the fine people would pay if they were not able or willing to subscribe to the health care plan.
Trump didn't stop with trying to address this wrong. He took further action with the aim of reducing health care costs and drug prices. He signed two Executive Orders to that effect in the past two months alone. Apparently, the second one was needed because the first one had loopholes which were easily found and exploited by big pharma.
Foreign Interventions
Reluctance to Start New Wars
The MSM has spun this positive into a negative by claiming that "he started an internal ("BLM") war", but let's get back to that later. This is about international military interventions. The fact is, Trump didn't start any. None. Not a single one. Research it and you'll find that this is the first president to have done so since at least World War II. Full stop. End of story and let it sink in. How can you spin this as negative? Unless you are a mainstream presstitude? You might think about Carter, but he oversaw the destabilization of the entire Middle-East by supporting the removal of the Shah. Gerald Ford might be the other exception. Still, what Trump is doing here is pretty exceptional and I can't but think that this refusal to start new wars is praiseworthy.
But how is Trump's war record covered by the mainstream? Let's use CNN, which is very, very anti-Trump, as the reference here. The only praise Trump received for his foreign policy was from veteran reporter Fareed Zakharia when he boasted that "Trump just became president of the United States" because he launched 59 Tomahawks on Syria, each costing $1.8 million. That should tell you a lot about CNN and the left-wing media.
Or remember the backlash when Trump announced that he'll pull out the troops from Northern Syria. The press was up in arms, writing one story after another how the Kurds would be massacred. Did it happen? No. Northern Syria is more peaceful now than it has been in the last 9 years of CIA-backed civil war. Go read the section "In it for the oil" a bit further down the page for more information.
In all, it looks like the mainstream media likes perpetual war and Trump doesn't give it. I think we should all appreciate that.
North-Korea
Kim Yong-Un experiments with nuclear weapons, but what choice does he really have? Iraq didn't have them. Libya didn't. Syria does not. Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, Venezuela... They all do not. But by now you know what happens to countries that don't have WMDs when the CIA claims they do.
Trump's rhetoric toward N. Korea was strong-worded and strange, but he also was the first president since 1953 to set a foot in the mysterious North-Asian country, and relations turned better.
What's the.alternative? I wonder.
Russia
Surely a contentious topic. Since Trump's first campaign he's been saying he'd mend ties with Russia. Again one wonders what the alternative would be. Increasing tensions to the point of war, and a very destructive one at that?
The DNC has been touting "Russian Collusion" ever since Trump was elected (before in fact). We should remember that the Obama administration started the public anti-Russian vibe at the end of 2013. It jacked up the feigned outrage in 2014 over Ukraine. Never mind that Hunter Biden was involved with Burisma and was being investigated for corruption by the Ukrainian prosecutor's office. Never mind his father, presidential hopeful Joe Biden, demanded from the newly instated president Poroshenko that he fire the prosecutor general "before he boarded the plane". That's not Fake News of course: Joe Biden is on record saying so during a panel discussion at the Council of Foreign Relations.
If the media's job was to objectively inform the population, they would be applauding Trump's attempts at a reproachment with Russia. But they do not. Instead, they've been demonizing Trump because of it. When the White House and the Kremlin issued only their second joint statement back in early May, the media imposed a virtual blackout on the story, despite the fact (or because of the fact) that the message was one of hope, as I noted in this article.
I'll write it again: what's the alternative to mending ties with Russia? I don't see a good one.
China
Trump has gone all-in on renegotiating China-US trade. He's right to do so. China's production prowess at such low cost undermines the United States. It undermines domestic jobs. In fact, Europe should really follow what Trump does against the Eastern mastodon. European workers would be delighted. The international companies, on the other hand, wouuld not be, because they don't want to see cheap production replaced with the obligation to invest massively into more expensive local production.
In it "For the Oil"
When Trump announced he'd pull back all troops from Syria, he was lambasted for it. Remember that the US, according to ALL international laws, has no legal ground to be there. So Trump said he'd pull out. After the media backlash, he announced he would keep a few battalions. The media were sounding the alarm about the threat to the Kurdish "Rojava"movement. They stupidly predicted a massacre, despite the fact that it was in no one's interest to attack the Kurds (except maybe Turkey).
After the backlash against his decision to leave Syria, Trump changed course slightly and became the first president to admit exactly why US troops were in a foreign country. In his own inimitable style, Trump said words to the effect of: "Look. We like oil. The US likes oil. I like oil. Oil's the best." Do you remember any US president being this honest about foreign policy? Weren't we led to believe that the US "exports democracy" and fights for "freedom" and against "tyrants"? A US president being frank, direct and honest is not praised by journalists these days; they attack him for it. En masse.
Tax Cuts
Regularly repeated in the mainstream is the myth that Trump's tax cuts benefit the rich. They do not. They benefit the working class who have seen their tax bill decrease by thousands of dollars a year since 2017. In all reality, it was the DNC who insisted that tax deduction should have a steeper threshold benefiting the already rich. Not the other way around. Furthermore, they want to abolish Trump's tax relief which, as linked above, would result in the average American losing $26,000 an estimated in a decade.
The DNC, backed by its supporting media, have claimed that Trump's tax cuts on corporate profits are evidence of him favoring the huge conglomerates, but they fail to mention that the reduction from 35% to a one-time rate of 15.5% on cash and 8% on other assets made companies like Apple bring that cash "back home", half of the $250 billion parked overseas in Apple's case! Here's another take.
Lobbying
One of the first Executive Orders Trump signed was about lobbying. He outlawed it and had all members of his administration sign a pledge that they would not join a lobbying firm for five years after finishing their government job. Since lobbyists largely work for big, multinational companies (or their "think tank" groups), lobbying can easily creat an imbalance to governmental regulation in favor of these huge companies. This goes against what "democracy" stands for because government officials are, or should be, representatives of the people.
In other words, creating regulations making it more difficult to lobby is a good thing for the average American. Did you read this take anywhere in mainstream news media? I doubt it.
"Fake News"
Almost literally the moment Trump got elected, the term "fake news" become a household term as Trump took aim at the leftist media. Both 'sides' use it now, including the DNC backed by their corporate mouthpieces, the mainstream media.
At the same time, and as if out of nowhere, "fact checkers" galore rose to prominence. They are now seen by many as the guardians of objective truth when in reality most of them "fact check" only in the interests of the democrat party; they favor, nay, uniquely select the mainstream narrative as "true" although plenty of questions are left open and unanswered. The topic is well explained in this article.
Trump still uses the term; he does so to address mainstream bias. Given that coverage about him is around 95% negative (which is absurd if you ask me), doesn't he at least have a point? If the claim that he used the term "shithole countries" is based on a WaPo article citing "sources who knew persons who attended a meeting where the president allegedly said..." and that is unmistakable proof he did say so, doesn't Trump have a point about 'fake news'?.
Or take the recent "bleach injection" as another example. The media wrote that Trump called for people to inject themselves with bleach. But it you run through the complete footage, you realize that he really never said anything of the kind. The same is true of the whole "Russian Collusion" story, which prompted a 3 year long Mueller investigation that turned up precisely nothing against Trump. Still, the media, to this day, write about it as if Trump was found guilty. The list of questionable claims in mainstream media is endless. You can wonder about the Skripals, about Navalny, about the White Helmets, about Maidan, about Belarus, about North-Korea and so on.
By repeating "you're fake news" Trump is warning people that claims made by the mainstream media should be taken with a large grain of salt. Anyone with any sense cannot disagree with him. Mainstream media coverage is polarizing the entire Western hemisphere to a dangerous extent. It should stop. The media needs to act like the fourth pillar of democracy they are supposed to be.
But, it might all be too late. Back in the 19th century, Mark Twain warned us already about media bias. Gramsci and Freud did so again in the early 20th century. Orwell was also very vocal about it. And of course, Hitler wrote a field manual promoting its use.
The question thus becomes: do you think that bias, that use of propagandist language to move public opinion in a certain direction, has been reduced? Has it stayed the same? Or has it been tweaked to perfection? My opinion is the latter.
Immigration and "Illegal Aliens"
BLM
Although African-Americans have (mostly) been in a difficult situation ever since they were "imported" to the States (pardon the language but bear with me), I wonder why BLM became so prominent almost overnight. George Floyd wasn't an exception. That kind of abuse by the police force has been going on for decades and (mostly) nobody cared, until now.
So, with BLM, I started wondering why a "standard" (but no less despicable) abuse of force suddenly became the focus of attention for months. Why did the mainstream media continue to report about "peaceful protests" while they literally aired footage of burning buildings at exactly the same time? Looting and arson is not defined as "peaceful" in any of my dictionaries.
Why did the (Democratic) mayors not react in time? Why did they allow a continuation until Trump put a stop to it? Why did Twitter label a Trump tweet as "inciting violence" while tweets many times more inflammatory (but "pro-BLM") were left unchecked?
Trump didn't start BLM; it was started by way of a media campaign and, no doubt, some well-heeled donations from left-leaning political groups. Trump wasn't being racist or defending "white supremacy". He merely did what any president would do: stop the riots! Reflect on how the Yellow Vests were disparagingly addressed by French President Macron for example, or how the media portrayed those protesting against the murderous covid-measures as "covidiots" and "right-wing conspiracy theorists". Both the Yellow Vests as well as the anti-lockdown "covidiots" were a lot more peaceful than BLM, but did not receive the kind of praise given to BLM. Why is that?
Trump has done more to try to unite Americans than his predecessors. He did more for the African-American (and Asian, and Hispanic...) communities than most other Presidents. I believe BLM is being exploited to portray Trump as a racist and to stoke social divisions so that, when he responds to further rioting, he can also be portrayed as a tyrant. The fanatical campaign to demonize Trump in the minds of a section of the US population ultimately seeks to divide, and thereby conquer, all Americans.
Deportations
Much brouhaha has been made of Trump's approach to immigrants. The reality is that he didn't change much of the legislation from previous administrations. The reality is that he deported less "illegal aliens" than his predecessor did. This might come as a surprise to many who saw Barack as a representative of minorities, although he certainly was not. Despite his attempt to present himself as a man of the people, Obama was (and is) much more a "part of the establishment" than Trump is.
Europeans often are confused with the "illegal alien" moniker. Some might think this is a derogatory term but it has been used, at least, since Bill Clinton's presidency.
Immigration and Walls
Trump has been targeted for the wall he's building and his claim that he'd "make Mexico pay for it". The fact of the matter is that it wasn't Trump that started building the wall but Clinton back in the nineties. Both Bush and Obama continued the effort, so Trump is just continuing the massive project.
What Trump-haters also seem to turn a blind eye to (helped by mainstream media hardly addressing it) is that walls are built in many places. Turkey has a huge one over 764km long. Even the EU has fenced of their outside borders from "illegal aliens" (the EU calling them "immigrants" of course). In other words, why is there such an outrage against Trump doing so when half of the Western world is doing exactly the same thing? Doesn't that reek of double standards and hypocrisy?
Trade Wars (China)
The Trump's administration is taking a tough stand on China and the Western press does not know how to react to it. It can't defend China too much, but it does not want to support Trump (on anything).
Now here's the deal. China has been used for the last couple of decades as one big factory by companies both big and small. Doing so, it has been undermining local production and local employment. China's rise on the back of this outsourcing has been astounding, while the Western world has been left in the dust. Furthermore, a lot of production know-how has been lost to the Eastern giant and production secrets have been willfully handed over to Chinese tech corps. It's now clear that the Western world in and of itself is unable to manufacture many of the goods that have been built in China for decades. It has become wholly dependent on Chinese acumen.
In a way, Trump is right to address that imbalance as much as he does. When he got elected on the campaign promise to "Make America Great Again", it's the efforts to bring manufacturing jobs back home that helps him do so. When domestic production is up and running again, he'll also have done a lot environment-wise. Hundreds of thousands of tons of cargo will not need to be shipped anymore from the other side of the world.
The initiative is praiseworthy and the EU would do well to follow Trump's lead taking a more aggressive stance on Chinese goods flooding its markets.
Misogyny
When I discuss Trump with women and "defend" him more than they expect, one of the first topics they bring up is his "grab them by the pussy" comment. Missing from reporting on that story was the context in which it was said. Back in 2005, Trump was tailed by a reporter during an evening out. One of his stops was a reception. While leaving, and getting into a limo, the reporter, Billy Bush, asked Trump: "Incredible. The moment you arrived the prettiest of ladies flocked to you. How do you do it?" Trump's answer was in line with: "You can not imagine what money and power do to some women. They offer themselves almost completely. It's as if you can just 'grab them by the pussy'".
That is not a motto he broadcast like mainstream would have us believe; it's a reflection of our world. Some women are willing to give up their bodies in return for wealth. If that were not so, then the concept of "gold diggers" and "sugar daddies" would not exist.
Trump is not a misogynist. He's a man of the world. You could argue that his words were ill-chosen for a president but that would be to ignore the fact that they were said in a one-on-one between two adults, as an answer to a direct question and, obviously, years before he thought about running for president or at least, a decade before he did so. I'll allow you all to imagine the words that surely have been spoken in private by former presidents or VPs such as Bill Clinton, George W Bush, Dick Cheney, or Joe Biden.
Environment
Much has been said about Trump's alleged anti-environmental stance. Often, it is immediately followed by the reference to his withdrawal from the Paris Accord of 2016. In reality, the Paris Accord was an empty vessel. The US staying or not staying in it will not make a difference. The complete accord, hailed as being a huge step forward by all mainstream outlets, is worth as much as the paper it's printed on.
There's more to Trump's environmentalism than an accord that no government actually adheres to anyway. Remember how he wants to "make America great again"? In part he's doing so by getting multinationals to invest in production factories back in America. GM invests $1 billion for example. So does Apple. Toyota goes in for $13 billion. Foxconn, a Chinese company, is building a display manufacturing plant and will pay $10 billion for it. Taiwan's TMSC $12 billion, and so on. All of that is a boon for America's employment and know-how of course, but I am writing this under the "environment" topic. The logic is as follows: with all these corporations bringing manufacturing back to the US, a lot of current container ship traffic will (eventually) be taken out of the equation. Trump does so by deploying the trade war with China which leaves these multinational companies without any excuse.
Trump's latest initiative is to enroll in the World Economic Forum's "One Trillion Trees" initiative. He signed the Executive Order a few weeks ago.
Election 2020 and Conceding It
The mainstream media has been rife with stories about how Trump will not concede the election. In reality, it's the Democrats who have explicitly made this statement. Trump, when he approaches the subject, does so because he believes the mail-in ballots are prone to fraud. He's right. Both Pennsylvannia and Ohio are already reporting issues with it.
Then we have Hillary Clinton - who never really conceded losing the election in the last four years! - stating that Biden "should not concede election under any circumstance", that he [Biden] "should not give in an inch". That comes after Harris, the nominated VP under candidate Biden, is on record supporting (often violent) protests and saying they should "not stop, not now, not even after election day".
Other Topics Left Unaddressed
Other topics which I could address are his response to Covid, to Venezuela, to Ukraine, Iran, to his tax returns, to his position on Ukraine, the UK, the EU, his nomination for the Supreme Court etc but the article is long already as it is. Given enough feedback I'll certainly consider it. Hit the comments!
Reader Comments
Additional info regarding Iran, Venezuela, Ukraine would be terrific. Thank you!
Oh.
This author seems to think his life is much improved under Trump. Hmm. One wonders what he thinks of Trump's mealy-mouthed responses to the biggest false flag in the history of the world, the massive lie that sees the country he ostensibly cares so very much about descending into technocratic fascism? Trump didn't need to appoint his super-slick VP as the CV 'czar'. He didn't need to provide Dr. Conflict-of-Interest Fauci a podium to fear-monger the country into virtual mass psychosis. But he did. And now he makes little insipid, whining gestures of opposition whenever it's time to reassure his base, and lets the whole agenda march right along unimpeded. Just like he does with everything else that is fundamental to the oligarchic agenda.
That's our illustrious public servant. That's Trump. The author of this pathetic whitewash should be ashamed.
You are not wrong; opinions are not.
I do think I have been clear as to the intent and set-up of the article right in the opening paragraphs: 95% negative coverage is absurd. Even if just by luck, there's bound to be some good things Nr. 45 did. I tried to list some. As a counter-balance and something to think about more than anything else.
About Covid-czar Fauci. I believe Trump was not able to dismiss the guy but I am not sure. I do believe you are aware that reactions to covid are organized more by the governors than by the orange baboon, yes?
As for your last line. I am not at all "qanon" or "white supremacist" or whatever. I am quite an independent thinker. Quite left-leaning in reality and still I wrote what I wrote and far from ashamed of trying to fight the increasing polarization in this society. In fact. I think it really is necessary to do so against the onslaught of mainstream narrative.
@Joris:
You do understand that the Pharmacy (a division of HT) is apriori and that close communication (one-to-one reader/writer exchange) here at Sott or anywhere is a gross violation of present day social-distancing codes?
There is a covid battle going on and we must win it.
Please do additional drugging and roboticization to yourself IMMEDIATELY (or we can do it for you....you DO need another dose....).
Or else you lose your vital protection against the COVID STRAIN
DO NOT ATTEMPT ANY FURTHER NORMAL AND/OR TRADITIONAL HUMAN ACTIVITY.
SHOULD YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTION, YOU WILL RECEIVE IT VIA FACEBOOK, A SOURCE THAT IS BEING UPDATED CONSTANTLY IN 'REAL' TIME.
Do not attempt to remember or retain any kind of life that existed before covid (or 911)...IT IS DEFUNCT.
Thank you.
And thank you for voting for Trump.
He is being updated regularly too.
As part of the present and MUCH needed administration.
signed,
your 'friends', who are in the know and who are everywhere...
under Russia
"reproachment with Russia. Byt they do not". should be " rapprochement with Russia. But they do not"
under Immigration and walls
"that it was Trump" should be "that it wasn't Trump"
btw, no mention of Israels wall?
under Trade Wars (China)
"t's now clear that the Western world " should be " It's now clear that the Western world"
Thanks for the article Joris De Draeck. It was good to read something that can provide a little balance to the bigger picture.
Bringing that balance is the sole reason I wrote it. Not saying none of it is disputable. Of course some of it is. These debates should have been done by the media but they have not been had.
They are one-sided; I took liberty in doing so as well.
Every single person who disapproves of him.
My car has a 12 cylinder engine and a great paint job. I mean super great!
And I got a racetrack out back.
It (my car) goes 'round and 'round and 'round, fast as I want. Fast as anyone could EVER want.
Everything is cool in the Land of Plenty.
Now don't bother me with nothing else.
I've said all that there is to know.
If you got a problem, that's your fault.
signed,
Executive Branch
If you had to vote, you should've voted for Trump.
If you're that stupid I guess.
But you might lose it.
Actually, either way, people lose. And lose and lose.
How do you think we got here (2020)?
Duh.
Oh, well there's always those friendly folks over at the Pharmacy.
They'll help you cope.
ned,
OUT
While looking at the 'bright side'of Donald Trump, we should all be aware that Trump's 'life form' (that of extremely wealthy egotist) had nothing to do with 9-11.
He was an innocent bystander.
Wealth, by itself, has nothing in common with evil or historic deception.
That is a misconception parlayed by poor people.
Who are just jealous.
ned,
OUT
OUT
OUT
"Are we crystal clear Mr. President?"
“The Elite”
[Link]
For TrumP to get this election stolen from him it's one of the greatest misuse of justice and the ewish elites power grab the 2% has won America will never be great again..this site could be purged I doubt it it's very liberal a basic conservative skin mask is what you wear mockingly.
Let's get smiley for +700% in open borders. & daca 12+ million legalized within 2 months..the dems will pack the courts etc..the final nail in white countries have been driven in..and I truly hope you white liberals get flooded with diversity and lose your jobs and lively hood oh and don't forget 6 dollar gas and wearing diapers oh oh and even better no cash..you people make me sick..TRUMP was too godly for the sick freakshow that is America..but orange man bad naw you just are dying a slow painful death.
i just hope you americans will be happy about the result of your votings 😉
consider it an early warning 😎
You ve got songs to listen to my friend
the most ugly post that I have ever seen on sott.net.
my post was to the guy with a pig strapped to his ass.
I know what you meant, and i responded to that. I think you are over-reacting as many more today (USAers)
and yes, Trump is probably in on it. the destruction of my country is nearly complete.
have a nice day!
NN Sir.
Nov 12, 13, 15, 28 will be nice energy shifts. 2020 aint done yet
[Link]
(He has listened to you, always under 10 mins and i promise i didnt ask him, but HIM 💁♀️)
FUNNY... a couple of hours ago Jolie and I posted at same instant as well
for me it is not possible, but it might be for you. [Link]
Dreams dream us not the other way around.
Love Wham 1985 Loved Wham all over NORWAY n her neighbours
Some for you
[Link]
Are we going to witness the worst national emotional meltdown in US history once this election is over?
Right now we are experiencing the calm before the storm. Many Biden supporters believe that a Trump victory would literally be the worst thing that could possibly happen to our country, but at the...That song I do recognise. I don’t really do Christmas but I still enjoy all Christmas music: church carols and pop.
In other words, are you in prison?
Well we theoretically have the right to leave, BUT (and but for one example) a friend of mine booked trips to a Central American/Caribbean surf location, (a true deal) BUT he had to lockdown for 14? days once there or some shit - so even here in the facially 'free' USA it still ain't quite freedom.
We are looking at buying a boat and sailing away.
RC
And yes I am in prison. Can travel to some states but not Victoria where I have a lot of family. Can’t come back into Queensland without 14 days quarantine. Hoping it will change before Xmas.
ARGH!
RC
If God wants it.... well, you know the rest God will have a barn all set up for y'all .
Scarcity consciousness only lives in the monkeymind and karmically, for whatever offering or balancing of the liabilities vs assets .
But it is just f*cking stupid when you know that the restrictions actually cause more problems: more cases more illnesses and more deaths.
Our Queensland premier just got re-elected last weekend. And Daniel Andrews’ states goal is 28 day shift with no new cases and no deaths. (They have just had 3). But given that everything is false I do not know what is achievable. O
Real... means God.
here lolll i throw you my shovel
Take a peek at The Four Agreements if you wish. Loving thy self FIRST aka above-all-else , is treating God with TLC aka RESPECT.
n.b. i pray even whilst kicking ass
Interesting that the four agreements also gives a high priority to love of self, because most don’t. I am still a work in progress on All these priorities.
Good luck.
RC
BUt we may very we'll see National guards sent to major cities to enforce mandatory vaccinations for a non-existent pandemic.
Georgia Guidestones must be carried out.
Revolt against this bizarre CIA construct called the "left" replete with crazed hired foot soldiers know as antifa or BLM.... Now topped off with a dollop of chocolate communist and a senile creepy old man as the cherry.
The past covid1984 year has dived so deep into an obvious farce there can't be any other explanation.
RC
*Granted, Vanessa Williams types . . .
RC
R.C.
There's a clear reason they want the archaic voting process to be the complete illusion it is now....
Some Ketch-up is happening in this thread.
SOTT Focus:A Biden Presidency Means 'The Return of the Blob'
What happens on November 3rd? It's like a larger than life replay of the famous Hollywood adage: "No one knows anything." The Dem strategy is crystal clear, spawned by the gaming of election...Oh no, they were from Florida ...
But honestly, it was after 9/11, when I started to dig into the fake Western political reality. And heard of massive voting fraud in the US. One could add 2 + 2, and conclude in retrospect they wanted Bush at the helm for all the crap that followed - by all available means.
Not sure if they want Biden/Harris now, or they are just the means to another end (were the POTUS does not matter). I fear it's the latter.
Not sure if it makes a difference when he drops over ...
I think they are in on the plan. I mean, on the plan to create an election chaos with riots and civil war, as antecedent to their "Reset" of the whole Western society. The US under Trump is an obvious obstacle.
It is not only the Democrats and Soros' that provide resources for the agent provocateurs...