On "intersectionality" and sexual politics.
© Wayne Taylor / Getty Images News / Getty Images Wayne Taylor / Getty Images News / Getty ImagesAn anti-Trump protest in 2016.
Among other virtues, the Book of Genesis is a repository of profound and accurate anthropology. Consider, to take just one refreshing example, this morsel from Book I: "So God created man in his own image, . . . male and female created he them."
Until recently, one could count on the vast majority of people in the West to take both parts of that pithy observation for granted. True, those exposed, without correction, to too rich a diet of thinkers like Darwin, Marx, Nietzsche, and Freud might cavil with the first part. But who, apart from a few kooks, disputed the second?
Comment: Although the author is making appearances of maintaining a neutral stance, it's obvious that she's drunk the "diversity" koolaid and is defending the 'oppressed' against the evil white patriarchy. While it's undoubtedly true that some of these diversity advocates are being harassed by being doxed to outside sites (trolls can be cruel), it's paranoid and disingenuous to say "this was their plan all along! To goad us into saying things and then exposing it to the world!"
See also: