OF THE
TIMES


For me, a natural response to the challenge is to learn from the example of the biological differences that exist between males and females. The differences between the sexes are far more profound than those that exist among human populations, reflecting more than 100 million years of evolution and adaptation. Males and females differ by huge tracts of genetic material - a Y chromosome that males have and that females don't, and a second X chromosome that females have and males don't.See also:
Most everyone accepts that the biological differences between males and females are profound. In addition to anatomical differences, men and women exhibit average differences in size and physical strength. (There are also average differences in temperament and behavior, though there are important unresolved questions about the extent to which these differences are influenced by social expectations and upbringing.)
How do we accommodate the biological differences between men and women? I think the answer is obvious: We should both recognize that genetic differences between males and females exist and we should accord each sex the same freedoms and opportunities regardless of those differences.

Comment: This is what happens in a society based on boundless control. It's an effect of the criminal mind. We've become immobilized, disassociated from our centers of ability and talent. Essentially, our creativity is warped to churn out an endless assembly line of rules and regulation. This is part and parcel to the rise of the safetyism and perpetual victimhood. We've been gradually herded toward a traumatized, frozen landscape where slightly offensive jokes or comments (real or imagined) are seen as grave injustices in need of censure and control. At this point, the great threat to human kind is less the inter-species predator known as the psychopath, and more the commonly shared, all-too-human deficit that embraces our own destruction.