I've finished reviewing the Georgia filing and I have a few comments to share with the socialverse in my capacity as a 30-year registered Democrat, former Oregon state elections official (with policy and admin experience), and former CIO.

I will not comment on the legal claims because, while I have familiarity with the law and court filings, I'm not a lawyer. I am also going to mostly stay away from alleged behaviors, too, as I wasn't there and, anyway, they add color but are more open to dispute.

The original intent of the software code (acc'd to affidavits) was to manipulate votes without detection. When you start with one goal in mind, it's tough to pivot to the opposite goal later — no matter how hard you might try. Not that it seems anyone tried... Absence of secure audit log (to record every action in the software) is so indefensible that I LOL'd when I read it. This fact alone should be enough to negate the results when there is ANY question about fraud because it cannot be proven that fraud DIDN'T occur Elections administration.

Lawsuit alleges that many procedures required in state law — for good, common sense reasons to ensure the one voter, one ballot rule is adhered to — were not followed, including Receipt of absentee ballots in their return envelopes was not recorded (this reduces risk of ballot box stuffing, i.e., to ensure that only one real ballot has been submitted by one real voter). Signatures were not verified against voter registration on return envelopes (same reason as 6, above). There might be missing envelopes, too; it wasn't clear to me in my reading or I missed it. Ballot processing is not allowed before Election Day in Georgia (this varies by state); in this election, by rule inconsistent with state law, Secretary of State Raffensperger allowed counties to start 3 weeks early. Absent a rigid accountability processes, this risks double or counterfeit voting.

Conducting one election with INTEGRITY is hard enough; when you overlay what is, in effect, a 2nd election (by mail) that has to be reconciled with what happens at the polls ... this is very high risk this "2 concurrent elections" risk was a primary argument for all elections being conducted by mail in Oregon, which was adopted after 20 years of practice with dual polling/mail elections — practice that none of these states whose elections are in question have had Observers were not allowed during the original count or the recount. There is no defense for this and intrinsically implies that elections officials had something to hide. There are other things to pick on, but these I cannot think of a way to defend and probably are sufficient to meet the apparent (according to the lawsuit) standard of "preponderance of the evidence" to "doubt the result." Eager to read defendants' response!

The suit says over 500 ballot drop boxes were installed in 72 counties in the state in violation of the law, arguing the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) did not have the authority to approve their use. The commission's endorsement of drop-box use amounted to enacting a new elections law, the suit argues, noting that the U.S. Constitution accords such power only to Congress or state legislatures.

"By doing so, the WEC gave the newly created voting process of using ballot drop-boxes, the imprimatur of legality," the suit states. "But these ballot drop-boxes are part of a procedure and process that was never created through legislation by the Wisconsin legislature. By leaving election officials in all Wisconsin Counties the impression that the use of ballot drop-boxes was legal, members of the WEC violated Wisconsin election laws and encouraged county clerks to do so, also," it added.

Further, the lawsuit argued there may have been "one-sided partisan teams retrieving un-mailed and un-postmarked ballots from illegally placed ballot drop-boxes," which combined with "an alleged gross 'relaxation' of Wisconsin voter ID laws" undercut election integrity and was "a recipe for voter fraud."

"With all of these allegations and facts considered together, there is now a cloud of suspicion over the whole election process in Wisconsin," the suit argued, and called on the Supreme Court to reject all ballots submitted through drop-boxes.

However, identification of ballots cast via drop boxes may not be possible, with Urban Milwaukee reporting that Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall-Vogg said on several occasions ahead of the election that clerks had no way to mark ballots returned through drop boxes. It is unclear how many ballots were cast via drop-box in Wisconsin.

Hinting at the likely impossibility of identifying ballots returned via drop-box, the suit noted: "If the drop-box ballots were not segregated so that they could be identified to a legal certainty and removed, then the Petitioner asks the Wisconsin Supreme Court to nullify the results of this whole election in Wisconsin and notify that the legislature that it must choose 10 Electors" who would cast presidential votes.

According to our source on the ground: More than 2,000 fake votes were found at the Wisconsin Recount in Dane County on Friday!

* On Black Friday, there were so many Trump observers that two dozen of them had nowhere to sit, and had to back upstairs and watch on closed circuit TV.

* Thousands of fake votes were found!

The signature "MLW" was used on the the fake votes. These initials were found on thousands of "votes" by "indefinitely confined" people.

Staring from December 1, people will be urged to wear masks "outdoors on busy streets, within crowded indoor workplaces and in places of worship," Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin announced.

When asked to explain what was meant by 'busy streets', the PM urged everyone to use "common sense" in avoiding crowds.

Common sense in government seems to have been buried for good during the first lockdowns.

© AFP / Paul Faith ‌A shopper wears a mask in Dublin, Ireland. October 2020.

"You name all the busy streets in the run up to Christmas - they're going to be busy," Martin said, adding that the streets would turn into an "equivalent of the shopping mall" during the holiday season.

The new recommendations are more thorough than the guidelines issued in July, which dealt with mask-wearing indoors. Observing the guidelines would continue to be voluntary, which is different from the rules on covering one's nose and mouth on public transport and in shops where violations are punishable by fines.

"We don't envisage going down that route, that's not what we're at here," Martin said, noting that people have responded "magnificently" in terms of wearing masks on public transport and in shops.

The update came two days after Ireland's top World Health Organization official Michael Ryan encouraged everyone to make "small choices" like wearing a mask to protect vulnerable people at family get-togethers.

• Compelling Evidence That SARS-CoV-2 Was Man-Made
• Everything You Think You Know About Coronavirus...
• 7 disturbing questions AstraZeneca needs to answer about its Covid-19 vaccine as it pushes for emergency authorization

• Objective:Health - Operation 'Warped' Speed - These People Are Crazy!
• Objective:Health - Deconstructing the Covid Narrative with Investigative Journalist Rosemary Frei
• Objective:Health - Gov. Response Killed More Than Covid - Interview with Denis Rancourt

• The 'Oxford Black Panther' behind Britain's first black-led political party vows to make white men 'our slaves'
• BLM UK crowdfunds £700,000, but do donors know the real ambitions of these radical activists?
• 'Covid-19 suddenly turned woke?' Packed Pride & BLM rally in Chicago draws criticism of hypocrisy

• Trump-allied legal activist: GOP vote suppression is reminiscent of Jim Crow-era ballot bias
• Pennsylvania Secretary of State allegedly allowed special interests to alter voter rolls resulting in false Biden lead
• First Michigan allegation: Detroit city worker claims ballots were ordered backdated; FBI begins probe