Puppet MastersS


Question

Real fake news exposed: Did the BBC fabricate news of chemical attacks in Syria to start a war?

fake news
"The press has been routinely creating fake news reports to start a war," exclaims Armstrong Economics' Martin Armstrong, pointing to a recent report exposing The BBC allegedly faking news over chemical attacks in Syria...
What follows is shocking evidence that crisis actors, green screens, CGI, and paid propagandists are being used to fake worldwide events in order to scare people into giving up liberties and sending us into war. To say this was shocking would be to put it lightly.

From video proof showing "dead soldiers" killed by "chemical weapons" walking around after they thought the videos stopped recording, to digitally altering sounds to add in "explosions" that never happened, this segment demonstrates some of the most damming evidence against the media ever shown on television.
Armstrong continues... "This is a serious issue for the press is conspiring against the people to create war, sell climate change, and rig elections. This is by no means something new."

They taught me in high school history class about how the press started the Spanish-American War by reporting that the Spanish attacked a US ship, which never happened.


Георгиевская ленточка

Russia's MOD chides US, UK, France and UN as not 'eager to provide aid' for liberated civilians in eastern Aleppo

civilians eastern Aleppo
© SANA / ReutersSyrians that evacuated the eastern districts of Aleppo gather to board buses, in a government held area in Aleppo, Syria in this handout picture provided by SANA on November 29, 2016.
Not a single offer to deliver humanitarian aid to the 90,000 residents living in the neighborhoods of East Aleppo that have been freed from terrorists by the Syrian army has been made by the US, UK, France, or the UN, the Russian Defense Ministry said.

"While Western countries and representatives of various international organizations were vocal about the need to make humanitarian deliveries to eastern Aleppo possible when it was fully under rebel control, they seem to have lost interest in helping the stricken residents now that they've been liberated by government forces," Russian Defense Ministry spokesman General Igor Konashenkov said on Wednesday.

"In the last few weeks, they [Western countries] were insistently demanding that humanitarian convoys be ensured access to the rebel-held parts of eastern Aleppo. However, now, two days since over 90,000 Aleppo residents were liberated from the terrorists, it turns out that not a single offer to provide humanitarian help to them has been submitted either by the office of UN special envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura, or the UK, the French foreign ministries, or the US State Department," Konashenkov elaborated, adding that nothing is preventing aid deliveries at the moment.

Konashenkov says the apparent reluctance of Western governments to provide aid to East Aleppo's recently liberated residents now that it's actually possible to deliver it suggests that those powers weren't really concerned about those supplies reaching the civilian population in the first place.

"Apparently, this aid was intended for some other people living in the eastern Aleppo neighborhoods," he said, implying that it had really been meant for the militants fighting the Syrian government there.

Comment: Russia pulls another bit of the mask off the psychopathic West.


Info

Take Erdogan's statements on regime change in Syria for what they are: Hot air

syria
A video has just surfaced where Erdogan brags about how Turkey's military operation in northern Syria has always been for the purpose of advancing regime change, causing a panic on alternative and social media that President Putin and the Iranian Supreme Leader were both devilishly tricked by the wily Erdogan in falling for Turkey's "Trojan Horse" rapprochements with their countries. The reactionary narrative is predictably one of "I told you so!", with advocates on the verge of "celebrating" what the Sultan has just proclaimed, despite this supposedly being "proof" that Moscow and Tehran are just so woefully incompetent that they couldn't even see a threat to their Damascus ally when it was staring them in the face this entire time.

The intentions of those peddling this narrative vary widely, and it's not the author's purpose to speculate on what's behind their joyful glee now that their dire anti-Syrian "prediction" has supposedly come to pass. Instead, it's much more constructive to examine what's wrong with this narrative and prove how categorically false it really is, with the tangential hope that this solid refutation will allow objective observers to identity the alternative and social media personalities which have "jumped the gun" on this whole episode and may have inadvertently revealed their true biases as a result.

Before proceeding, the reader should be reminded that the trilateral relationship between Russia, Turkey, and Iran has been flimsy from the get-go, owing mostly to the fact that it had been historically unprecedented until the first efforts were made at forming the Tripartite this summer (and which the author has thenceforth written about in a book-length article series for Katehon). There's always a chance that Erdogan really is as nefarious as his most virulent detractors claim that he is, and that a betrayal of Russia and Iran might indeed be imminent, but for now at least, that hasn't happened, and here's why.

Comment: Russian Deputy FM Mikhail Bogdanov points out the obvious:
This runs counter to all agreements. First, Resolution 2254, Resolution 2268, decisions of the Vienna format, Lausanne format. We have been participating in these formats jointly with Turkey.
Translation: Erdogan knows this and knows what the response would be if he were really serious about it. Peskov and Zakharova had similar reactions:
Peskov told journalists: "Erdogan's statement is really news. This is a very serious statement, a statement which, overall, is discordant with previous ones, and a statement which is discordant with our own understanding of the situation as a state whose armed forces are the only ones legitimately present on the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic on the basis of the legitimate authorities' corresponding appeal. This is very important to remember."

The Kremlin's spokesperson also noted that it is too early to speak of any possible impact of Erdogan's words on Russian-Turkish relations. "This statement is new. Therefore, we count on an explanation of this position before passing any judgement," Peskov added.

The spokeswoman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia, Maria Zakharova, remarked earlier that Moscow is dealing with the Syrian issue on the basis of existing agreements with Turkey. "We rely on those statements which were repeatedly made by Ankara and in particular those by the leader of Turkey publicly which lie at the heart of the agreements to which Turkey is a party," the diplomat emphasized, adding that this not only concerns bilateral documents, but also international agreements which Turkey has signed onto.



Che Guevara

Zakharova: UN aid in Syria politicized, most convoys go to militant-held areas

maria zakharova
Russia said on Wednesday that the delivery of humanitarian aid by the UN in Syria is politicized as most UN help was going to militant-held areas.

Russia's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told reporters in her press briefing in Moscow that only 1 percent of UN aid was being directed to Deir Ezzur, where she said at least 200,000 people were trapped by ISIL militants and in need of supplies, Sputnik reported.

Zakharova said Moscow has repeatedly introduced humanitarian pauses in Aleppo to help civilians however the militants use the truce to regroup and replenish arms and ammunition, stressing that such issue is politicized.

However, she said that Moscow is ready to work with all international humanitarian organizations on the issue of humanitarian aid delivery.
"We strongly believe that humanitarian issues should not become a tool for political pressure or serve as means of flirting with terrorists or shielding them."

Rocket

Russian air defense forces in Crimea on high alert following Ukraine's missile launches in Black Sea

Russian soldier
© Vitaliy Nevar/TASS
Russia's air defense forces in Crimea are ready for Ukraine's missile launches in the Black Sea and have been put on high alert, a source in the Crimean defense structures told TASS on Wednesday.

"Ukraine's firing exercises are a sort of a PR-move aimed at creating a nervous situation but in any case the military perceive this as a real and potential threat and, therefore, the Russian air defense forces in Crimea have been placed on enhanced alert," the source said.

"This refers not only to ground-based but also to shipborne air defense forces as ships of the Black Sea Fleet are self-sustained combat units for repelling any threats," the source said.

Comment: See also: Ukraine decided to hold missile-firing exercise over Crimea without Moscow's approval


Snakes in Suits

BBC alters headline to avoid pointing out liberated Aleppo civilians seek safety by rushing to Syrian Army

syria civilian
Why does this nasty old woman hate democracy?
As the Syrian army continues to drive into the "moderate rebel" stronghold of East Aleppo, responsible western news outlets have been faced with the daunting, seemingly impossible task of turning the liberation of tens of thousands of civilians into a dark day for humanity.

Even the reliably shameless BBC suffered from a temporary but serious lapse in editorial judgment, as Aleppo civilians rushed to areas of the city controlled by the Syrian army:


War Whore

Compromise 2017 defense bill drops military draft for women

US military helicopter forces
© Erik de Castro / Reuters
Congress has managed to finalize a $618.7 billion defense bill for the 2017 fiscal year, boosting it with an extra $3.2 billion for manpower, while stripping extra ships and jets. Requirements for women to register for the draft are also gone from the bill.

After months of negotiations, both legislative chambers have reached an accord on the new National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which is set to come to a final floor vote in the House this week and in the Senate next week.

Senior staffers from the House and Senate Armed Services committees have unveiled details of the bill on Tuesday, at an off-camera background briefing.

The compromised version of the NDAA would authorize a total of $618.7 billion in defense spending for the 2017 fiscal year. Of that, $59.5 billion would be earmarked for the so-called Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), a budget that exceeds the president's request by $3.2 billion. Part of the OCO account - $8.3 billion - would be used for base budget requirements, including troop increases, while President Barack Obama requested $5.1 billion.

There are concerns that such voluntary add-ons may again be an issue for Democrats, which want all defense hikes to be matched by increases in domestic budget programs.

Stock Down

OPEC deal reached: Production to be cut by 1.2 million barrels starting Jan. 1

OPEC oil prices
© Heinz-Peter Bade / ReutersThe logo of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is pictured at its headquarters in Vienna, Austria
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has agreed to cut supply by 1.2 million barrels per day (bpd) to 32.5 million barrels, the head of the organization announced.

Ahead of the official announcement, Bloomberg broke the news, quoting an unnamed delegate in Vienna. Crude prices soared more than 7 percent on the report.

Calling the decision "historic," the organization said the output cut would be in effect from January 1, 2017.

As of 16:29 GMT, Brent crude was trading at nearly $50 per barrel, while US crude benchmark WTI was above $48.

The deal was reached after weeks of negotiations, as Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran fought for the very last barrel of production. This is the first coordinated cut from OPEC in eight years.


Stormtrooper

How the White Helmets leader played Western media, who ignored his record of deception and manipulation

White helmets
© Thaer Mohammed / AFPThe White Helmets walk amid the debris in a rebel-held neighborhood of Aleppo.
The White Helmets, founded to rescue victims trapped under the rubble of buildings destroyed by Syrian and Russian bombing, have become a favorite source for Western news media covering a story on Russian-Syrian bombing. Portrayed as humanitarian heroes for over the past year and even nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize last summer, the White Helmets have been accorded unquestioned credibility by journalists covering the Syrian crisis.

Yet the White Helmets are hardly a non-political organization. Funded heavily by the U.S. State Department and the British Foreign Office, the group operates only in areas in northern Syria controlled by an al Qaeda affiliate and their extremist allies—areas to which Western journalists have not had access. Given that the White Helmets work under the authority of those who hold the real power in east Aleppo and other opposition-controlled zones, the Western media's reliance on this organization for information comes with serious risks of being manipulated.

The highly political role played by the White Helmets in relation to foreign press coverage was dramatically demonstrated after the attack on a Syrian Red Crescent truck convoy in the rebel held area of Urum al-Kubra, just west of Aleppo on September 19. The assault took place immediately after a ceasefire agreed to by Russia, the U.S. and the Syrian government was shattered by a deadly U.S. air attack on Syrian army forces battling ISIS around the city of Deir Ezzor on September 17.

Comment: The White Helmets didn't just "play" Western media. They were and are a foreign-funded propaganda outlet used by the West to push their narrative to the unsuspecting public. Much like the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, the White Helmets are treated like objective sources of information by the Western press not because they are actually objective, but because they are disseminating the exact kind of propaganda that Western governments want their people to read. See also:


Eye 2

Pay for play: Merkel backed Killary campaign using £4M in taxpayer cash to support Clinton Foundation

hillary merkel
© Getty
According to reports, the failed Democratic nominee's US-based charity received the cash to help plant trees in Africa at exactly the time she declared Angela Merkel her "favourite" politician.

But the revelation of the financing arrangement has been met with scorn.

In October, around the same time the transaction was made, it was revealed that Mrs Clinton said the German Chancellor was one of her "favourites" when asked about who she admired in global politics.

Mrs Clinton said on board her plane: "One of my favourites is Angela Merkel because I think she's been an extraordinary, strong leader during difficult times in Europe, which has obvious implications for the rest of the world and, most particularly, our country.

"And I hope I'll have the opportunity to work with her in the future."

The Clinton Foundation has been the subject of much controversy since the publishing of a top selling book "Clinton Cash", by author Peter Schweizer.