OF THE
TIMES


Among the most striking examples of a missed opportunity to halt the attacks before they began was a statement attributed to an intelligence analyst reviewing video surveillance of the vehicle that was being tracked near Deir el-Zour. Others involved in monitoring the scene had already concluded that it was an IS vehicle, based on the appearance of its occupants.Some more details released by Coe:
Coe quoted the unidentified intelligence analyst as saying prior to the decision to attack, "What we're looking at can't possibly be ISIL," using an acronym for the militant group. "At the time," Coe said, "that analysis was not pushed to a larger group or to the final decision makers."
When the vehicle reached a group of other fighters in the area and was treated as friendly, the coalition analysts watching the events for many hours concluded that all present must be Islamic State fighters. The dissenting analysts' opinion was that the vehicle was a tank and therefore unlikely to be part of the IS force. Other analysts, however, noted that IS had recently commandeered a Syrian army tank, so they dismissed the dissenters' conclusion, Coe said.
Australian, Danish, British and American planes all took part in the air strike, which the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights monitoring group has said killed at least 90 regime troops.
Brigadier General Richard Coe, who investigated the case, told reporters that each of the four countries "did employ weapons," dropping a total of 34 guided bombs and firing 380 rounds of 30-mm ammunition.
The targets struck included "defensive fighting positions," vehicles, tents, tunnels and people -- all of which were thought to be legitimate IS targets, he added.
...
Further complicating matters, the troops were not wearing recognizable military uniforms or carrying identifying flags, the Pentagon said.
Comment: Further reading: Washington Post's Sloppy 'Journalism' Blames Russia for 'Fake News' Crisis and Trump's Win, While Pushing Neo-McCarthyism