
Andrés Manuel López Obrador
US National Security Advisor McMaster claimed that Russia is meddling in the upcoming Mexican elections.
This explosive news was shared by
Reuters, which in turn was reporting on a mid-December
video of a speech that McMaster gave to the Jamestown Foundation and which was just posted on a Mexican journalist's Twitter account over the weekend. In it, one of the US' most influential security figures says in relation to the unsubstantiated claims of Russian interference in foreign elections that "you've seen, actually, initial signs of it in the Mexican presidential campaign already", but to Reuters' credit they added that he didn't elaborate on this afterwards and
even cited an expert who remarked that "so far, it's just speculation".That said, Reuters attempted to propel the paranoia forward by remarking that the leftist populist-nationalist candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, commonly known by his abbreviated initials as AMLO, is "seen
by some analysts as the Kremlin's favorite, given the positive coverage he has received from government-funded media outlets like Sputnik and Russia Today", thus relying on the conspiracy theory that everything on Russia's publicly funded international media outlets is apparently aired on direct orders of the Kremlin, which isn't true at all. Nor, for that matter, is the inference in the report that Russia is backing AMLO because of its desire to sow problems between the US and Mexico.
Comment: If a candidate is pro-Russian in any way, he or she must be a Russian agent. There is no other explanation. If voters agree with the Russian point of view on any topic, they must be victims of Russian propaganda. There is no other explanation. If a "pro-Russian" candidate wins an election, it must have been as a result of Russian meddling. There is no other explanation. These are the key tenets of Russian meddling.
Western opinion makers have set up the perfect system. They lie, make sure only lies get any air time, then slam anyone who points out the lie or tells the truth as a Russian tool, simply because Russian sources also point out the lie or tell the truth. Since the truth is not available from Western sources, the source of such insidious truth must come from Russia. And that's bad. Even though it's the truth. Doesn't make sense? Maybe you're a victim of Russian mind control.
See also:
Euroskeptic Zeman leads in Czech polls amid anti-Russian hysteria about "Russian meddling"
Comment: See also: