Now here is quite a thing. What is being suggested, is that the primary users of any of these terms are supposedly Russian bots, or other vectors for material that can be 'safely dismissed' out of hand as "propaganda".
This is not, strictly speaking, "Orwellian" - in the sense of Orwell's conception of "Newspeak". That, after all, was the deliberate efforts to change cognition and render rebellion impossible through the policing of language by removing whole words and thus, potentially, concepts ... whilst proffering other, more rote and mechanical formulations elsewhere. A pruning and 'simplification' of thought, with the goal of removing the "thought" bit.
No, this is something else. It is keeping alive [for how long, who can say], these terms rather than attempting to obviate them from our collective political discourse.
And doing so with a very specific agenda in mind -
rendering them from potentially quite apt terms of description and/or castigation ... particularly of those in power today [you know, the politics of the "Establishment" .. oop there's one right there!] ...
into taboo terms.
Words which delineate and demarcate the user, the possessor as some sort of false-flag enemy agent; who has no interest in the furtherance of democracy or in the positive participation of their state's genuine political process. And who therefore, once again, can safely be de-legitimated rather than listened to or otherwise dialogued with (lest they, you know, change the minds of people they talk to with facts and/or persuasive rhetoric), as "propaganda and propagandists do not argue in good faith" or whatever.
In a way, it is even more effective than the properly Orwellian approach outlined several paragraphs above.
Comment: And it's not just specific words but entire ideas or complete thoughts. If you think Crimea is Russian, you are a Russian propagandist. If you think Russia and Syria are waging a war on terror in Syria (not a war on civilians), you are a Russian propagandist. If you think the coup in Ukraine was an illegal coup, you are a Russian propagandist. If you think Putin is generally a smart and effective president, you are a Russian propagandist. If you think the U.S. has supported al-Qaeda or ISIS (whether directly or indirectly), you are a Russian propagandist. And so it goes.