OF THE
TIMES
US looks into claims Pakistan misused F-16 fighter, as media war over Kashmir clash heats upIt's notable that when buying US military equipment countries are apparently bound to consult them before using it. One wonders whether the US consults anyone when using banned white phosphorous in Syria?The US State Department is investigating claims Pakistan improperly used a US-supplied F-16 jet against India this week, Indian media claims. The jet has been a bone of contention between the two nuclear powers.© Reuters / Faisal MahmoodFILE PHOTO: A Pakistan Air Force F-16 flies above a military parade in Islamabad
The Indian Air Force (IAF) claimed on Thursday to have shot down a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) F-16 one day earlier, during a PAF raid on Indian military bases. Pakistan denied using the American-supplied fighter and denied that any of its planes had been shot down. The IAF countered by showing off the twisted wreckage of an AIM-120 AMRAAM missile, claiming the projectile "conclusively proves" Pakistan deployed an F-16.
Pakistan's alleged use of an F-16 may have been in breach of its end-user agreement with the United States. Pakistan operates 45 F-16s, and has used the jet since the 1980s. However, Islamabad's use of the fighter is bound by agreements with Washington, including a requirement that flights outside of Pakistani airspace be cleared with the US government.
"We are aware of these reports and are seeking more information," a State Department spokesperson told India's PTI news agency on Saturday.
Amid rising tensions between the two countries, accusations have been kicked back and forth. Pakistan's World News Observer reported on Friday that Lockheed Martin - the F-16's manufacturer - was planning a lawsuit against the Indian government for falsely claiming to have shot down the Pakistani jet "for political gains."
Lockheed Martin India said it "has made no such comments."


Comment: Social media giants in league with politicians are increasingly claiming themselves to be the arbiters of free speech, and this nefarious drift towards censorship is alarming because it's being used to shut down much more legitimate outlets and voices than just Tommy Robinson's: