• Syrian Army advances, takes Khan-Sheikhun, launches airstrike on Turkish convoy

Flags are areas from which HTS has withdrawn

• The economic entrails at the heart of the 'deal of the century'
• The Saker: Debunking the rumors about Russia caving in to Israel
• From joker to peacemaker? Zelensky needs to follow his words with actions to end Ukraine's conflict
• Israel now arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine
• Sara Netanyahu's air rage at not being welcomed aboard plane, security stops her storming cockpit

The decision to deny Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) entry into Israel may be one of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu worst strategic mistakes in recent times.

Whatever points he scored with President Trump, whatever damage he believes would be prevented by barring the lawmakers' visit, it pales in comparison to the damage this decision causes to Israel's campaign against its delegitmization. The decision to reverse the ban on Tlaib on "humanitarian grounds" does little to undo the damage, especially since Tlaib rejected the offer. Tlaib cited Israel's "oppressive conditions" of travel as her reasoning, which became the headline of the day. Israel played right into her hands.

Since the early 2000s, Israel has faced a concerted campaign of delegitimization against it, led by the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS). As part of Israel's response to the BDS, it amended its entry law to allow the government to refuse entry to BDS supporters. This law was invoked to bar Tlaib and Omar's visit. The congresswomen have openly supported BDS and Tlaib announced her intention of leading a delegation to the West Bank to counter the narrative produced by pro-Israel groups such as AIPAC. But even AIPAC criticized the decision to deny Tlaib and Omar's entry.

This was an extraordinary move on the part of the Israeli government, but it is not the first time it has fumbled the response to BDS. Just last summer, it detained liberal Jewish-American journalist Peter Beinart when he attempted to enter the country on a personal visit. Soon after, it refused entry to American student Lara Alqasem, despite her receiving a visa to study in Israel, on the claim that she had been a leader in her university's chapter of Students For Justice in Palestine (SJP).

The Alqasem case received wide coverage in Western media. Even conservative supporters of Israel, questioned the decision. What was not reported as widely was that in her 16 days of detainment, Alqasem was afforded access to three levels of the judicial system, all the way to the Israeli Supreme Court, which reversed the order and granted her entry. Alqasem is now a student at Jerusalem University. That part of the narrative was lost in the kerfuffle of Israel's overreaction.

Delegitimization is and should be treated as a threat to Israel. It presents a serious challenge to Israel's ability to maintain its Jewish character, which is increasingly viewed as incompatible with the modern values of the international society. Though the BDS movement has had little success in hurting Israel's economy or diplomatic relations with political elites, it has made considerable strides at the grassroots level, with civil society, on campuses, labor unions and churches.

As a 2016 Pew Research survey indicates, American millennials, including Jews, are far less sympathetic towards Israel than their older counterparts. In certain progressive, and some liberal spaces, Israel is becoming a pariah state.

If Israel hopes to successfully defeat the delegitimization campaign, it must avoid at all cost illiberal, largely ceremonial actions that serve little to enhance its security. Barring American students and lawmakers, even those most critical of Israel, represents a short-sighted and misguided approach to addressing the challenge. In many ways, Israel is contributing to the very threat it seeks to thwart.

Instead, Israel should have opened its doors to them. Demonstrating that it has nothing to hide. Perhaps Tlaib and Omar would have refused to meet with Israelis while on their trip, perhaps they would have met with Israeli groups that are strong critics of the government — and this would have highlighted Israel's openness to criticism. Perhaps they would have also met with Israeli and Palestinian victims of political violence. We will never know.

All that is left is the image of Israel as an oppressive state, one that does Trump's bidding, thereby alienating the very liberal audiences that Israel must win over if it hopes to defeat the delegitimziation campaign against it. With this decision, Netanyahu has done more to undermine Israeli security than the visit by Tlaib and Omar could have.

Ronnie Olesker is an associate professor of government at St. Lawrence University. Her upcoming article, "Delegitmization as a National Security Threat: Israel and BDS" will be featured in the fall issue of Israel Studies Review Journal.

• Former engineer: Google plans to meddle in 2020 elections to derail Trump
• Google is censoring political content? *Gasp!* Who knew?
• 'We are moving into a new, controlled society worse than old totalitarianism' - Zizek on Google leak
• Google whistleblower: Same scheme may have been used for suspending Jordan Peterson, Tulsi Gabbard
• Insider hands DOJ 950 docs and laptop exposing Google's AI platform bias operation

'Britain's Trump': Corbyn slams BoJo and 'reckless' govt, warns of 'disastrous' no-deal Brexit

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has attacked PM Boris Johnson for being a "phoney outsider" and cosying up to US President Donald Trump, in a speech that warned of a grim no-deal Brexit scenario.

Speaking at a children's centre in Corby, Northamptonshire on Monday, Corbyn reaffirmed his intention to table a vote of no-confidence in Johnson's government when MPs reconvene in parliament after the summer holiday period.

In what was ostensibly a pre-election pitch to voters, the socialist leader criticized Johnson's apparent cosying up to Trump ahead of a possible hard Brexit, accusing the Tory PM of siding with right-wing wealthy elites.

"Tories have lurched to the hard right under Boris Johnson, Britain's Trump, the fake populist and phoney outsider... committed to protecting vested interests of the richest and the elites, while posing as anti-establishment."

Corbyn also laid down the gauntlet to MPs in parliament who claim to want to avoid the UK leaving the EU without a deal on October 31. A number of pro-remain Tories, as well as Liberal Democrats led by Jo Swinson, have so far failed to back Corbyn as a temporary PM in order to prevent a no-deal exit.

"If MPs are serious about stopping a no-deal crash out, then they will vote down this reckless government," Corbyn told the audience, adding that, constitutionally, it falls on the biggest opposition party to form a minority administration in those circumstances.