Puppet MastersS

Light Sabers

Is Hong Kong's showdown with Beijing inevitable?

Hong Kong protest
© TreefongDemonstration in Hong Kong against the extradition bill. (Hf9631, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons)
This reckoning with Beijing's authority was baked into the cake 22 years ago when the Union Jack came down over Government House.

It is impossible not to admire the bravery and commitment pro-democracy demonstrators display daily as they clog Hong Kong streets, shut down its airport, and disrupt the territory's beating heart in Central, the commercial and financial district. But neither can one deny the tragic fate that appears near as Beijing stiffens its resolve and signals the threat of military intervention.

The futility of all action, the necessity of any: Maybe those protestors building barricades and hurling Molotov cocktails at tear-gassing riot police are reading Camus in their off-hours.


Comment: Reading Camus in their off-hours in no way endears them to us. All we see are British-flag waving, US anthem-singing deluded rich kids.


There is no question of Chinese President Xi Jinping compromising Beijing's authority to mollify those now in their third month of protests across Hong Kong. He is too firm a believer in the primacy of the Chinese Communist Party to entertain any such risk. But there is too much at stake for the Chinese president to order mainland troops or police units into the territory short of a decisive challenge to the local administration's ability to govern. This accounts for Beijing's restraint over the past 10 weeks.


Comment: Or... Beijing's giving them all the rope they need to hang themselves. Western pundits have really poor grasp of Chinese leadership.


The best outcome in prospect now โ€” and the chances of this appear slim at the moment โ€” is that Xi will authorize influential political allies in Hong Kong to frame a set of reforms sufficient to isolate demonstrators by eliminating the broad public support they have to date enjoyed. In any other resolution of this crisis, the democracy advocates in the streets stand to lose everything. Even as they number in the hundreds of thousands, they are simply no match against a government intent on centralized control over a nation of 1.4 billion.

Comment: So, if HK is to fully become part of China by 2047 anyway, what the heck is the point of all this posturing about establishing a separate state there??

Obviously, it's not coincidental that protest movements have erupted in Russia and China at the same time: the Empire is pulling out all the stops to thwart their efforts to create an alternative system of world government.

If this is not up and running by the time the Western Order collapses, there's going to be a crisis unlike any the world has ever seen.


Pharoah

Best of the Web: All along the watchtower and the follies of history

Bayon Temple
© Bruno Morandi, Robert Harding Heritage/AFPBayon temple, Angkor World Heritage site in Siem Reap, northern Cambodia.
The ultimate American imperial dream is to engineer a Chinese vassal state
There must be some kind of way outta here
Said the joker to the thief
There's too much confusion
I can't get no relief

Business men, they drink my wine
Plowmen dig my earth
None were level on the mind
Nobody up at his word

- Bob Dylan, All Along the Watchtower (immortalized by Jimi Hendrix)
Nothing beats the beguiling, stony smiles at the Bayon temple near Angkor Wat in Cambodia's Siem Reap to plunge us back into history's vortex, re-imagining how empires, in their endless pursuit of power, rise and fall, usually because they eventually get the very war they had sought to avoid.

Comment: See also:


Boat

Trump privately floats the possibility of a naval blockade against Venezuela

TrumpBattleships
© ABC7.com/marineartists.co.uk/KJNUS President Donald Trump โ€ข Battleships 1917
President Trump privately suggested stationing Navy ships around Venezuela to block goods from entering and exiting the country multiple times, Axios reported Sunday. Five current and former officials told the outlet they had either directly heard the president discuss the idea or been briefed on it.

Trump has reportedly raised the idea for at least a year and a half, and as recently as several weeks ago.

Earlier this month he answered "Yes, I am" when a reporter asked whether he was mulling a blockade, according to Reuters. However, he did not elaborate on the idea.

"He literally just said we should get the ships out there and do a naval embargo," one source who heard the president's comments in private told Axios. "Prevent anything going in." The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A blockade would be a significant escalation of the Trump administration's efforts to force Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro out of office.

Comment: See also:


Sheriff

Iranian oil tanker released by Gibraltar (UK) is on its way to Greece - If it docks there, US will consider Greeks 'aiding & abetting terrorists'

Grace 1
© AFP/Jorge GuerreroGrace 1
Gibraltar authorities rejected a US request to extend the seizure of the Grace 1 tanker, citing differences in US and European sanctions against Iran. Gibraltar reportedly released the vessel after receiving assurances from Tehran that the ship would not deliver its cargo to Syria.

Iran's Ambassador to the UK, Hamid Baeidinejad, confirmed on Sunday that the Grace 1 oil tanker set course for international waters. Baeidinejad wrote in Twitter:
"At this juncture, we confirm that, finally, seven days after stopping in Gibraltar waters, the Iranian oil tanker began to move toward international waters. The overwhelming attention of global and regional politicians and public opinion reflects the important political, international and legal consequences of the actions taken in these few days."
Earlier, the GBC News broadcaster said that "the Adrian Darya, formerly the Grace 1, is leaving" the territorial waters of Gibraltar. A marine traffic monitoring site also showed that the Iranian supertanker was moving away from Gibraltar.

Comment: It's apparently headed for Greece next. The Empire is apoplectic!

The US State Department has told the Greek government that if it "provides any assistance to the Iranian oil tanker," the US govt will consider this as "providing material support to a US-designated foreign terrorist organization."

This is presumably based on its designation earlier this year of the IRGC as a 'terrorist organization', which it isn't, of course. But how interesting that after 18 years of the War on Terror, the ideological mask has slipped to the point that everyone can see that it was always really about geopolitics and the 'civilizational mission' to control the whole Earth.

It will be interesting to see what happens when the tanker reaches the eastern Med. Iran has said it will send IRGC Navy boats to escort the tanker to ward off imperial cruisers.

In the meantime, the release of the Adrian Darya was apparently not contingent on Iran releasing the Stena Impero, the British oil tanker seized by the Iranians in the Strait of Hormuz, which remains impounded in southern Iran.

Poor America. In a multipolar world, she just aint able to do what she used to!


Star of David

Kiev: Netanyahu greeted with slogan of Jew-slaughtering Nazi collaborators

Neti/Zelenskiy
© Reuters/Valentyn OgirenkoIsraeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu โ€ข Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy
Grandfathering a slogan of past-era nationalists who took part in ethnic massacres makes for awkward moments when you have to use the slogan to greet a foreign leader of said ethnicity during an official visit.

Take Benjamin Netanyahu's ongoing visit to Ukraine. The Israeli prime minister was greeted by President Volodymyr Zelenskiy with a lot of decorum. There were red carpets, flags, ceremonious signing of important documents, and a small military parade to treat the former Israeli commando.

And of course Zelenskiy used the official greeting, which Ukraine adopted last year, "Glory to Ukraine," to which his loyal troops gave the regulation response, "Glory to heroes." The exchange is new for the Ukrainian military, but relatively old in itself.

Comment: More about this contentious visit from RT 19/8/2019: Sara Netanyahu's row with pilot mars start of Israeli PM's visit Ukraine
The wife of the Israeli prime minister reportedly became enraged at a pilot who took her and her husband to Ukraine this weekend, and may have even taken her annoyance out on their hosts in Kiev.

Sara Netanyahu apparently tried to make her way to the cockpit of the plane, but her own security detail is said to have stopped her. Israel's Channel 12 claimed that she was offended after not hearing the captain of the El Al flight welcome her on board. While she was not allowed into the cockpit to express her anger, she seems to have got some satisfaction later, when the captain welcomed the VIP passengers again, this time referring to Mrs Netanyahu by name.

The prime minister's office described the report as "distorted," but wouldn't deny it in its entirety. "There was a misunderstanding which was immediately clarified and the flight went according to plan. The story about the security guards, as well, is a total lie," a statement from the office said. "It is another attempt to divert attention from the important international visit that the prime minister carried out."

The El Al airline simply said they "were pleased to host the prime minister and Mrs Netanyahu on our flight to Ukraine," without elaborating about what happened during the flight.

Upon arrival in Kiev, the Netanyahus were welcomed by the city mayor and his delegation, which included young women dressed in traditional Ukrainian folk dresses. They offered the guests bread and salt in a gesture of hospitality.

While the prime minister ate his piece of bread, his wife wouldn't take a bite, and seems to have dropped her piece on the ground, according to footage from the airport. Whether this apparent disdain for her Ukrainian hosts should be considered a sign of Sara Netanyahu's irritation at that moment is up for interpretation.

From Sputnik 18/8/2019: Netanyahu promises military operation in Gaza 'if necessary'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that Tel Aviv will undertake a massive military campaign in Gaza Strip, if forced to, The Times of Israel reported Sunday. "We will embark on a wide campaign, if necessary," he told reporters before departing for Ukraine. "My objective is to maintain security and quiet, and we are taking all the necessary actions to this end."

He said he is aware of an opinion that upcoming September election considerations hold him back from undertaking military attacks in Gaza, but claimed that this is not true.

"This is not correct," Netanyahu said, according to The Jerusalem Post. "Everyone who knows me knows that my considerations are to the point, genuine, and that I act in full coordination with the security forces with firmness and the necessary consideration."

He asserted that necessary measures will be taken regardless of the political climate. "If it is required, we will embark on a large campaign, with considerations to the elections โ€” with elections or without elections," he said.

His comments come in the wake of a rocket attack originating from Gaza on Saturday night, with one missile landing in the town of Sderot, located near the border with the Gaza Strip. The missile caused damage, but no injuries, The Jerusalem Post reported.

Earlier on Sunday, Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz dismissed the option of a ground invasion, saying that "what happened yesterday in Sderot will not be left without a response. We are maintaining a policy of not initiating a wide-scale operation but keeping the deterrence."

The position was criticized by the Blue and White party leader and former IDF chief of staff, Benny Gantz, who claimed on Sunday that "the deterrence hasn't been eroded, it's been erased," The Jerusalem Post report says.



Footprints

Duterte to visit China despite claims from Manila hawks he 'kowtows' to Beijing

Duterte/Xi
© Getty Images/www.tibetanreview.net/KJNPhilippine President Rodrigo Duterte โ€ข Chinese President Xi Jinping
Philippine President Duterte earlier admitted that Beijing controls most of the South China Sea, urging every state, including those outside the region, to avoid creating tensions with Beijing.

Prior to his visit to China this month, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte stated that he would finally claim his country's rights in the South China Sea in accordance with a 2016 ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague.

"The arbitral ruling, we will talk about [it] ... That's why I'm going to China", Duterte said during a speech this month at the Filipino-Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry in Manila.

The statement was made after weeks of rising bilateral tensions between the two Asian nations as Filipino generals question Duterte's warming relations with its northern neighbour. Last month, Filipino Defence Secretary Delfin Lorenzana accused China of "bullying" smaller claimant states in the South China Sea. Furthermore, the country's navy has recently criticised the idea of leasing several northern islands to Chinese companies, citing security concerns.

Comment: See also:


Rocket

US tests a cruise missile banned by the expired INF treaty

Missile test
© US Department of Defense/Scott HoweConventional ground-launched cruise missile test, San Nicolas Island, CA, August 18, 2019.
The US military has tested a ground-launched cruise missile with a range of over 500km, the Pentagon confirmed. Such weapons were banned under the INF arms control treaty, which the US exited this month.

The flight test of a "conventionally configured ground-launched cruise missile" was conducted on August 18 at a range on San Nicolas Island, California, the US Department of Defense said Monday. After a successful launch, the missile struck its target more than 500km (310 miles) away.

Weapons with a range of between 500km and 5,000km were banned under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty, a key arms control mechanism that helped de-escalate Cold War nuclear tensions when it was signed in 1987.

Handcuffs

Bernie Sanders unveils his proposal for massive overhaul of the criminal justice system

BSanders
© Justin Sullivan/Getty ImagesCandidate for President Senator Bernie Sanders
Bernie Sanders, who was criticized by liberal activists in 2016 for not focusing more on racial injustice, is unveiling a sweeping plan on Sunday aimed at slashing the country's prison population in half and ridding the criminal justice system of "institutional racism and corporate profiteering."

The ambitious, nearly 6,000-word proposal seeks to remake the nation's prisons, police departments, courts, drug laws and treatment of people who have mental illnesses with a full-throated progressive agenda. Sanders' left-wing allies have argued he has "evolved" in recent years on the issue of criminal justice.

The plan calls for banning cash bail, solitary confinement and civil asset forfeiture, which allows law enforcement officials to seize people's homes and other property even if they are not convicted of a crime. The plan also looks to legalize marijuana and abolish the death penalty, a practice Sanders has long opposed.

Comment: Every candidate is looking for a magic promise to capture the voting public and outdo his or her opponents. While Sanders may be justified on these issues, the PTB will never let it happen.


Arrow Up

Iran's high-risk deterrence policy: Trading tankers, withdrawal steps from the JCPOA - Magnier

Johnson/Rouhani
© Tehran TimesIranian President Hassan Rouhani โ€ข UK PM Boris Johnson
The UK acknowledged its first defeat by Iran when it released the Iranian super tanker Grace 1 captured by 30 Royal Navy commandos in the first week of July in response to a US request, as the Spanish Foreign Minister Josep Borrell revealed. In response, Iran will release the British-flagged tanker Stena Impero, captured by the "Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps" (IRGC) Special Forces before Saturday mid-day. This tit-for-tat response by Iran showed its determined deterrence policy towards the west: Iran is ready to accept any consequences, including a possible war if necessary.

Moreover, Iran is prepared for another partial withdrawal from the nuclear deal three weeks from today as a counter reaction to the insufficient response of western signatory countries and their failure to effectively oppose the illegal actions of US President Donald Trump. The US unilaterally decided to revoke the deal, persuaded by Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu - even though its Chief of Staff acknowledged the nuclear deal was working. The bras-de-fer between Iran and the west is transforming the Middle East into a powder keg, ready to blow-up after the next challenging decision.

Comment: Israel's 'might' and bravado is predicated upon the power and decisions of the US. That it has a strong grasp of how to achieve a confluence of aim and power, through manipulation and subterfuge to move its big brother to action and do its bidding, is evident in the confident rhetoric coming out of Tel Aviv. Will, as Magnier suggests, the US 2020 elections put temporary brakes on fulfilling Israel's aggressive pursuit to eliminate Iran or will blinders and triggers (real or false) set the unthinkable into motion? Iran promises to not sit idly by.


Boat

UK's Royal Navy to 'go big' as it joins US-led maritime coalition against Iran

HMS Duncan
© AP/Ben SuttonHMS Duncan, Typer 45 Destroyer
The United Kingdom has agreed to join a US-led maritime mission to patrol the Persian Gulf region in the wake of a series of "attacks" on oil tankers there that was unfoundedly blamed on Iran.

The British Navy has already dispatched three warships, HMS Montrose and HMS Kent, Type-23 submarine-hunters, and HMS Duncan, a Type-45 air-defence destroyer, to the Gulf as it has officially signed up for the US-proposed Operation Sentinel against a purported Iranian threat.

Incidentally, HMS Kent left Portsmouth earlier this week together with another Type-45 air-defence destroyer, HMS Defender, which is set to start a mission in the Asia-Pacific region, but can potentially cover a wide area, including the Indian Ocean, meaning that it would be within an easy reach of the Gulf if needed.

The UK government said in a statement on 5 August:
"Following constructive discussions at an international conference in Bahrain last week [31 July], the UK has agreed to join an international mission [that] will see the Royal Navy working alongside the US Navy to assure the security of merchant vessels in the Strait of Hormuz."
London's decision to send another warship to the Gulf marked a clear shift from its original plans to set up a European-led naval mission there to escort British-flagged oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, even though its key allies, Germany and France, have expressed readiness to pitch in. They have, however, been reluctant to support the US initiative out of concerns that they might be dragged into a confrontation with Iran.

Comment: Keep in mind that the 'need' for these warship escorts was a set-up - a page out of the Israeli handbook on creating blamable action (on Iran) to foster desired reaction (by US). Britain needs US trade deals to support its economy, given its looming break with the EU, so anything the US (Israel) wants it will likely get.