Puppet MastersS

Bullseye

Libyan forces claim to have shot down Turkish drone after Haftar vows to expel Ankara - UPDATE: Parliament refuses to ratify deal with Turkey

Libyan National Army
© REUTERS/Esam Omran Al-FetoriLibyan National Army (LNA) anti-aircraft unit, file photo
The Libyan National Army (LNA) said it shot down a Turkish drone over Tripoli, shortly after its leader General Khalifa Haftar called for a holy war against Turkey for supporting a rival government.

On Friday, the LNA said it had shot down a Turkish drone south of Tripoli, the seat of the Government of National Accord (GNA). One report identified it as a Bayraktar TB2 armed drone, downed after targeting a column of LNA vehicles.

On Thursday, the Turkish parliament approved the deployment of troops, advisers and equipment to Libya to prop up the GNA, the internationally recognized authority which controls only a small portion of the country. The exact scope of the deployment was not made public.

Comment: In Libya's elected government demands UN's usurper regime gone Joanne Morarity provides an overview of the two groups in Libya:
[...] it should be noted that the GNA has been given control of the Libyan central bank and all the oil money in Libya by the UN/US/NATO. [...]

Therefore, the great tribes of Libya have come together in an unprecedented move to support their national army (LNA) to forcibly remove the illegitimate GNA regime, take back control of Libyan assets and set up security for a nation wide vote to create a new Libyan government of the people and by the people.

[...]

3. The usurper regime (GNA) in Tripoli is losing their hold on Tripoli (their last stronghold) and they realize that they will be ousted before long, losing their "golden goose". They have attempted to stop the advance of the Libyan National Army (LNA) by signing an agreement with Turkey.
For more on the situation, see: Turkey threatens to take Libya by force and install Turkish governor

Also check out SOTT radio's:NewsReal: Interview With The Moriartys - New Light on Benghazi, And Liberating Libya

UPDATE: 4th January @ 22:26

RT reports:
The Tripoli-based government of Al-Sarraj struck a military agreement with Turkey, which prompted Ankara to send its troops to Libya. Their aim is to confront Khalifa Haftar, the powerful Libyan military commander based in the eastern port of Tobruk.

The Libyan parliament, which backs Haftar, said on Saturday it refused to ratify the Turkey deal and called for pressing high treason charges against Fayez Al-Sarraj, Al Arabiya reported. The lawmakers said they may refer the situation to the International Court of Justice.

Haftar, who commands the so-called Libyan National Army, earlier declared mobilization to fight against Turkish troops, calling their looming deployment an invasion.



Binoculars

Best of the Web: Iran says US, immediately after airstrike killing General Soleimani, asked them to 'get revenge in proportion to what we did'


Comment: This is another sign that neither 'WW3' nor anything resembling it is on the cards. But there may be even more to it...


Soleimani funeral
© AFP/SABAH ARARIraqis mourn over a coffin during the funeral procession of Iraqi paramilitary chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis and Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, and eight others, in Kadhimiya, a Shiite pilgrimage district of Baghdad, on January 4, 2020.
Washington asked Tehran to respond "in proportion" after US forces killed top Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani, the deputy commander of the Revolutionary Guards said.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps confirmed Soleimani, the commander of its Quds Force foreign operations arm, had been killed on Friday in a US air strike near Baghdad airport.

After the attack, the Americans "resorted to diplomatic measures... on Friday morning", Rear-Admiral Ali Fadavi told state television that night.

They "even said that if you want to get revenge, get revenge in proportion to what we did", he said, quoted on the broadcaster's website.

Comment: Most interesting. This means Trump expects blowback. Immediately after ordering the airstrike, he pleaded with the Iranians to keep it 'within reason'. On the one hand, it's audacious and merely rubs salt into the wound. On the other, maybe he's trying to convey to them that he was compelled to do it...

What War Was Trump Trying to Stop by Killing Iranian General Soleimani?


Stop

Trump's order to kill Soleimani ends fake Russiagate narrative, increases odds of war

Demonstrators burn flags
© Reuters/WANA/Nazanin TabatabaeeDemonstrators burn the US and British flags during a protest against the assassination of the Iranian Major-General Qassem Soleimani, in Tehran, Iran, on January 3, 2020.
Trump's ordered assassination of General Qasem Soleimani, head of the Revolutionary Guards' elite Quds force, not only means a dangerous escalation of tensions with Iran, but also ends fiction that Russia was controlling him.

Just imagine..... If Iran's President Rouhani had authorised a New Year drone strike on General Mark Milley, the Chairman of the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff, as he was being driven to the airport in Canada.

Would anyone even be suggesting that the attack was done in 'self-defense'? But that's exactly the line we're being fed now about the killing of Qasem Soleimani.

The undeniable truth is that for all his posthumous neocon demonization as the most evil man on the planet, the silver-haired Soleimani played a key role in the defeat of the barbaric death-cult ISIS and other al-Qaeda affiliates in the Middle East. He helped mastermind secular, Christian-protecting, Syria's against-the-odds survival in the face of a ferocious onslaught by some of the most powerful countries in the world, who unleashed an alphabet soup of jihadist proxies and death squads to try and achieve a violent 'regime change'. Soleimani's reward for fighting the groups that have targeted western civilians around the globe- including American citizens on 9-11, and British tourists in Tunisia in 2015, was to be blown up right at the start of 2020. Remind me again, who are the terrorists here?

The airwaves are full of talk about the likelihood of a war on Iran, but the fact is that hostilities have already started. Trump provocatively pulled out of the Iranian nuclear deal, boasted that his new sanctions on Iran were 'the highest ever imposed on a country,' and now has ordered the killing of a man regarded by many as the most powerful figure in the country.

Star of David

Flashback Best of the Web: Netanyahu caught on tape in 2001: 'America is a thing you can move very easily in the right direction'

Image
A shorter version of this video circulated a few years ago, in which Netanyahu could be heard boasting in 2001 that Israel 'controlled the U.S.'

In this apparently extended version, the Israeli PM can be heard describing Israel's true strategy vis a vis the Palestinians. Have a listen...


Comment: This video makes Netanyahu look like a really good negotiator to the die-hard Israel-firsters. To them, he is trying to ensure that if and when Palestinians get their own state, it will be as small and meaningless as possible. At which point, Israel can move in for the kill, or for exploitation of a small impoverished state at their leisure.

From an Israeli perspective, this can only increase their support of him, which may be the reason that it was filmed and released. On the other hand, to those impartial or sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, this video exposes Netanyahu as a liar and as THE clear impediment to peace in Palestine/Israel, as such, it undermines everything he and his supporters in the West have ever said about the situation.

The most troubling thing, however, is his glib attitude about the 'absurd' fact that Israel 'never has to worry about US support' - no matter WHAT it does...


Bad Guys

Best of the Web: 3,000 more US troops headed to Middle East as coalition members suspend ops in wake of Soleimani murder


Comment: Four more years, four more wars?


Leyen
© AFP / Maja HitijThen-German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen speaks with a Kurdish Peshmerga and German soldiers in Iraq.
Members of the international coalition gathered to fight Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) have suspended operations in Iraq after the targeted assassination of a top Iranian general by the US.

Germany's Bundeswehr will put on pause all military missions in Iraq, it announced late on Friday night. That includes both operations aimed against IS and training of Kurdish troops. There are around 130 German soldiers deployed in Iraq at the moment, including 27 stationed at the Taji military base 30km (18 miles) north of Baghdad.


Comment: The German troops are not allowed to leave their bases.


The same security lockdown is true for the 70 soldiers from Sweden, who act as advisers to the Iraqi military. "We have to see what happens. We cannot go into details for safety reasons, but we have paused and taken it hour by hour," explained Swedish military spokesperson Kristina Swaan.

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called the situation serious for the 140 soldiers the country has in Iraq, but wouldn't comment on whether it was necessary to bring them home as a precaution.

NATO, which has many of the same members as the anti-IS coalition, has suspended its training operations in Iraq too, spokesman for the alliance Dylan White said. NATO has hundreds of personnel under its aegis in the country.

Comment: U.S. forces are also pausing operations, because Baghdad is forcing them to:
"After the recent events that have taken place, it was decided to limit the work of US forces in Iraq. The US side has been notified ... They can act only with Iraqi consent, but after such a stab in the back, we will, of course, limit their activities," Khalaf stated.

The spokesman also added that an investigation is currently ongoing to ascertain how the information of Soleimani's movements, such as his flight from Damascus to Baghdad and onward transport from Baghdad International Airport, was shared with the US.

"Yes, an investigation is underway. The investigation will concern everyone who could have had any information inside the [Baghdad International] airport," Khalaf remarked.

He also stated, echoing comments made by Iraqi military spokesman Brig. Gen. Yehia Rasool earlier on Saturday, that Iraq had the capability to defend itself, even if NATO suspended military training in the country.

"Iraq is able to cope with this task on its own, as well as with the task of protecting its territory. Of course, coalition forces provided air support, but the Iraqi military did everything else," Khalaf remarked.
But that's not stopping the Americans from sending an additional 3,000 troops to the region.

And, somewhat ominously, Kataib Hezbollah are warning Iraqi forces to avoid U.S. bases starting tomorrow evening: "Security forces must stay clear of American bases by a distance not less and a thousand metres starting Sunday evening," al-Mayadeen quoted the militia as saying.

Meanwhile, American politicians are chiming in on the idiocy of this move, including NYC Mayor de Blasio:


Former Virginia State Senator Richard Black:
In a statement to RT on Friday, retired Virginia Senator Richard Black said the assassination "may presage a new war of aggression โ€” this time, against the Iranian people." Black noted that the commander of the IRGC's Quds Force had led the fight against both Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) terrorists and Al-Qaeda affiliates in Syria. "We are not genuinely fighting a war on terror. I fear that in a sense, we are becoming the terror."

The former senator, who retired at the end of 2019, cautioned against further escalation in the Middle East, recalling a claim predating the 2003 invasion of Iraq that regime change in Tehran was the ultimate objective. "I pray that we draw back from the vast war that looms," Black added. "Neither our soldiers nor our people have a voice to stop it."
Presidential Candidate Tulsi Gabbard:



And Ron Paul:


See also:


Vader

Best of the Web: The US unwittingly raised up Iran's Qassem Soleimani. Then, just as ignorantly, they killed him

Qassem Soleiman rally
© AFP / Tauseef Mustafa / File
The US is unprepared for the consequences of its assassination of Qassem Soleimani, if only because it knows nothing about the reality of the man it murdered, and can't gauge the impact of his death on Iran or the Middle East.

Qassem Soleimani, an Iranian military commander whose paramilitary organization, known as the Quds Force, helped position Iran as a modern regional power, was assassinated on January 3, 2020, on order of the President of the United States, Donald Trump. American political leaders of both major parties have been united in their description of Soleimani as an evil man whose death should be celebrated, even while the consequences of his demise remain unknown.

The celebration of Soleimani's death, however, is born of an ignorance regarding the events and actions that shaped the work he directed, and which defined the world in which he operated. While the US has cast Soleimani as a byproduct of Iran's malign intent in the Middle East, the reality is much starker: Soleimani is the direct result of America's irresponsibly aggressive policies. In a world defined by cause-effect relationships, the link between Soleimani and the United States is undeniable.

Bad Guys

Soleimani murder: What happens next?

soleimani
© ReutersIranian general, Qassem Soleimani, uses a walkie-talkie at the frontline during an offensive against Islamic State militants in the town of Tal Ksaiba, Iraq, on March 8, 2015.
First, a quick recap of the situation

We need to begin by quickly summarizing what just happened:
  1. General Soleimani was in Baghdad on an official visit to attend the funeral of the Iraqis murdered by the USA on the 29th
  2. The US has now officially claimed responsibility for this murder
  3. The Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has officially declared that "a severe retaliation awaits the criminals who painted their corrupt hands with his and his martyred companions' blood last night"
The US paints itself - and Iran - into a corner

The Iranians simply had no other choice than to declare that there will be a retaliation. There are a few core problems with what happens next. Let's look at them one by one:

Comment: Fars broadcast footage of a blood-red flag being raised and unfurled over one of Shia Islam's most holiest sites, the Jamkaran Mosque in Qom, central Iran. This is highly symbolic, and highly meaningful:
The footage shows the flag being carried up the steps of the mosque, with a portrait of slain Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani placed on top of the banner in a solemn procession. The flag is then seen being raised over the mosque's dome.


In Shiite tradition, the red flag symbolizes the unjust spilling of blood and a call to avenge the victim or victims. Its use goes back to the period of Imam Husayn ibd Ali, grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, who was beheaded at the Battle of Karbala in 680 AD along with dozens of his followers. The flag signifies the intent of Shia Muslims to avenge their slain leader.




According to observers, the flag had never been hoisted over the holy site before. It was taken to mean that the conflict between Iran and the US over commander Soleimani's assassination would escalate further.
New details are emerging about the assassination itself. First, footage:


Four Quds Force personnel were killed along with Soleimani in the attack:
The central HQ of IRGC's Qods Force issued a statement on Friday, recounting that during the attack of Americans in the early hours of the day, 10 people were martyred, 5 of them Iranians, including Lieutenant General Soleimani, and 5 of them Iraqis, including Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy commander of Iraq's Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), or Hashad al-Shabi.

The 4 Iranians in Soleimani's entourage were Brigadier General Hossein Jafarinia, Colonel Shahroud Mozaffarinia, Major Hadi Taromi, and Captain Vahid Zamanian. The statement also dismissed the rumors that General Soleimani's son-in-law accompanied him or was killed in the attack.
...
The PMF media arm said the two were killed in an American airstrike that targeted their vehicle on the road to the airport. A PMF official said seven other people were killed by missiles fired by the US forces at Baghdad International Airport. He said the dead included PMF airport protocol officer, Mohammed Reda.
A "hunter-killer" drone was used in the strike:
Modified Hellfire R9X 'Ninja' missiles were used by the US military to destroy Qasem Soleimani, the head of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)' elite Quds Force, Al Arabiya news network reports. Instead of an explosive warhead in the centre, the R9X missile has six swing-out sword-like blades designed to minimise collateral damage.

The New York Times, in turn, reported that the missiles were launched by the US unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) MQ-9 Reaper, which is capable of almost silently flying at a speed of 230 miles per hour with four R9Xs on board. The "hunter killer" drone was reportedly sent by US Central Command headquarters in Qatar.
Planning for the assassination allegedly started soon after Christmas:
The operation to kill General Soleimani was put together by a handful of Donald Trump's most senior aides in a matter of a few days, with the president approving plans to assassinate the Iranian commander shortly after the December 27 rocket attack on a US military compound in Kirkuk, northern Iraq, Bloomberg has reported, citing three people said to be familiar with the matter.
...
No group has claimed responsibility for the Kirkuk attack. The US has accused Kata'ib Hezbollah, an Iraqi Shia paramilitary force, but has yet to present evidence to back up its allegations. Prior to the strike on Soleimani, the US had already 'retaliated' against Kata'ib Hezbollah, killing dozens of militants and prompting Iraqis to try to storm the US's Baghdad Embassy compound.

The select group of advisors planning the strike on Soleimani reportedly included National Security Advisor Robert O'Brien, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Vice President Mike Pence and Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, with the officials communicating by secure lines from locations across the US in the days after Christmas.

One US official said that the US military wasn't monitoring Soleimani directly on the night of the attack, but rather launched the strike on the basis of earlier-obtained information that he would be at Baghdad International Airport, on route to a third country - Syria or Lebanon, on Friday morning.

An official also said the Trump administration decided not to notify Congress about the attack ahead of time amid 'security concerns', with White House press officers similarly kept out of the loop. US allies were also left uninformed, leading to mild criticism from the UK.
This is what UK "partners" had to say:
Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee in the last parliament Tom Tugendhat has deplored that the US was routinely failing to inform the UK of such decisions in advance.

"I've long believed that the purpose of having allies is that we can surprise our enemies and not each other, and it's been a pattern, sadly, which has been a bit of a shame, that the US administration of late has not shared with us, and that is a matter of concern," Tugendhat was quoted by BBC News as saying.

Urging the US administration to "share much more closely with allies" in the future, he added: "The government needs to make some very quick choices on the safety of citizens overseas and the security of British personnel."
And so the Americans murdered the man the Russian defense ministry described as essential to the defeat of ISIS:
The ministry slammed the assassination of the Iranian general, carried out on orders from Washington, calling it a "short-sighted" move that would lead to a "rapid escalation" of tensions in the Middle East. It also described Soleimani as a talented and experienced commander, who enjoyed "well-earned authority" throughout the Middle East.

"It was under Soleimani's direct command that military resistance to the international terrorist groups Islamic State [IS, formerly ISIS] and Al-Qaeda was organized in Syria and Iraq, long before the so-called US-led 'international coalition' was formed."

In its statement, the ministry called the Iranian general's achievements in fighting international terrorism "undeniable" and warned that his death would be detrimental to the whole system of global security.

Soleimani was seen as a key strategist, coordinating the efforts of the Iranian advisers assisting both Syrian and Iraqi forces in their fight against terrorists. Iranian media reported that he'd personally assisted Baghdad in several counter-terrorism operations, including the liberation of the strategic city of Tikrit from IS jihadists in 2015.
Aside from the sharp rise in oil prices, another immediate effect has been a dive in the US stock market, with Dow Jones and S&P 500 indexes posting lower-than-normal losses:

As markets closed on Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 233.92 points or 0.8 percent, in what was its biggest single-day drop in a month. The S&P 500 did not fare much better, plummeting more than 0.7 percent to close the day at 3.234.85 as renewed fears over of a large-scale conflict potentially breaking out in the Middle East soured investor mood.

Defense and aerospace shares surged, however, with Northrop Grumman (NOC) stocks rising 5.45 percent. Lockheed Martin, the maker of the beleaguered F-35 jets, saw its stocks jump 3.63 percent, their best showing in half a year. Missile-maker Raytheon also rallied at the news, adding around 1.5 percent.


Oil and gold stocks were also jubilant. Brent crude leaped 3.5 percent to over $68 a barrel, while US crude climbed 3.1 percent to reach $63.05 a barrel.

The US attack drove up gold prices, too. They rose to the highest level in four months.
See also:


Attention

US' killing of Iranian commander ignites global concerns, dire warnings and punishing commentary

QasemS
© TasnimAssassinated IRGC Commander Qasem Soleimani
The U.S. assassination of a top Iranian military commander in Iraq has sparked statements of concern from around the world as countries brace for fallout from one of the most serious Iran-U.S. escalations in decades.

Tehran responded with threats of reprisals after the United States announced that it had targeted Qasem Soleimani, the longtime head of an elite unit of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) known as the Quds Force, in an air strike outside the Iraqi capital on January 3. The attack also reportedly killed Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, a deputy commander of the Iran-backed Hashd Shaabi militia in Iraq.

"The cycle of violence, provocations and retaliations which we have witnessed In Iraq over the past few weeks has to stop. Further escalation must be avoided at all cost," European Council President Charles Michel said in a statement.

His words were echoed by United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who said in a statement that this is a moment in which leaders "must exercise maximum restraint. The world cannot afford another war in the Gulf."


Comment: Global repercussions, condemnations and statements from around the world come forth regarding US' actions:
General Gholamali Abuhamzeh, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) commander in Kerman Province, said "The Strait of Hormuz is a vital point for the West and a large number of American destroyers and warships cross there." He said that Iran had identified "vital American targets in the region" and that "some 35 U.S. targets in the region as well as Tel Aviv are within our reach."

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi
spoke with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif by telephone on January 4 and emerged urging the United States not to "abuse" the use of force and resolve issues "via dialogue," according to Reuters.

Wang also said Beijing would play a constructive role in maintaining peace and security in the Persian Gulf region.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian said he had spoken with Wang and with German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas about the situation in the Middle East and that all agreed on the need to preserve Iraqi sovereignty and stability, Reuters reported.

Le Drian also said Paris, Berlin, and Beijing agreed on the importance of ensuring that Tehran does not violate the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers to trade sanctions relief for limits on Iran's nuclear activities.

Zarif also discussed the killing of Soleimani with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in a phone call on January 3, the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

"Lavrov expressed his condolences over the killing," according to the statement issued January 4. "The ministers stressed that such actions by the United States grossly violate the norms of international law."

Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Majid Takht Ravanchi, said late on January 3 that the attack "in fact was an act of war on the part of the United States and against Iranian people. Last night they started a military war by assassinating by an act of terror against one of our top generals. So what else can be expected of Iran to do? We cannot just remain silent. We have to act and we will act."

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has warned of "severe retaliation."

Ali Fadavi, a top IRGC commander, told Iranian state television late on January 3 that the United States "resorted to diplomatic measures...on Friday morning" after the attack. He claimed that the Americans had "even said that if you want to get revenge, get revenge in proportion to what we did," according to AFP.

Mohsen Rezaee, secretary of Iran's influential Expediency Council, suggested that Israel had provided intelligence that contributed to the operation that killed Soleimani. "There is a high possibility that Israel had taken information from Syria about his flight and passed the intelligence to America."

Iran on January 3 sent a letter to the UN secretary-general and the Security Council stating that Tehran "reserves all of its rights under international law to take necessary measures" in response to the killings.




Yoda

Flashback "I Oppose Interventionism, But-" But nothing. Stop being a pro bono CIA propagandist!

women quiet argument
In a recent interview with The Corbett Report, the Ron Paul Institute's Daniel McAdams spoke disdainfully of those ostensibly anti-interventionist libertarians who picked this moment of all times to loudly and aggressively condemn Venezuela's president Maduro, just as the US power establishment is ramping up its campaign to topple the Venezuelan government.

"All of a sudden now there are millions of Venezuela experts in America, and many of them could not point Venezuela out on a map five days ago," McAdams said.
"And everyone has to have this disclaimer, 'Well, I know it's probably worse than North Korea, but the US government shouldn't get involved.' It's cowardice, because once the war starts, they can say 'Hey I never called for US intervention!' No, but you're a conveyor belt for propaganda. You're a conveyor belt to get the machine ginned up for war. And so you've got to stand up and take responsibility."
McAdams has for years consistently operated in the hub of one of America's most forceful and effective branches of opposition to US interventionism, and he is absolutely correct here. On both sides of America's political divide, the primary objections you will see to this administration's campaign to delegitimize and topple the Venezuelan government are prefaced with a strong condemnation of Maduro followed by some feeble equivocations voicing vague objections to Trump's actions, if that.

Comment: Every comment by Ms. Johnstone applies equally to the current propaganda campaign to justify the assassination of Soleimani.


Info

Obama Administration official blames Trump for storming of US embassy in Iraq

iraq protest
© REUTERS / THAIER AL-SUDANI
On 31 December, protesters in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad set fire to the outer fence of the US embassy and then the checkpoint gate, reportedly in response to recent American airstrikes against the Iraqi Shia Kata'ib Hezbollah militia. Washington blamed Iran for the raid, while US President Donald Trump threatened Tehran with retaliation.

Former Obama-era undersecretary for political affairs, Wendy Sherman, lambasted Trump for his foreign policy, claiming that it has led to the attacks on the US embassy in Baghdad.
"It is President Donald Trump's failed policy toward Iran that has brought us to this combustible moment," she wrote in a column for USA Today, adding that even "confronting Iran over its nuclear program and malign behavior elsewhere", the US has "maintained an uneasy coexistence in Iraq, where Tehran holds considerable sway."