As the façade of the World Economic Forum (WEF) Borg Cube fades, the West's self-styled financial "elite" are now in desperate need of a new narrative pivot. As events around the trucker Freedom Convoy in Canada have demonstrated, a revolutionary spirit is emerging within the population. This spirit is manifesting itself with the kind of peaceful and creative non-linear character that lies at the heart of all truly lasting moral human uprisings, as opposed to anarchist, Jacobin, Communist, or Fascist controlled revolutions and terrorist-infiltrated "regime change." All this has the WEF Borg Cube terrified.

As events within the West become increasingly more unpredictable, and as the establishment tries to maneuver its way out of a situation which increasingly poses an existential threat to its power, the self-styled elite are stuck using the same old formulaic and worn-out approaches to mass control. Its failed narrative matrix is making plain for the whole world just how utterly uncreative and soulless (and mindless) the financial elite are. In such a situation, the rate of mistakes committed by this decrepit Zeusian class and its managerial establishment can be expected to only increase with each new attempt to squash the numerous Promethean fires popping up across the West.

Former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe said a raft of documents he provided to special counsel John Durham supports additional charges in his criminal inquiry into the Russia investigation.

A recent grand jury indictment against Michael Sussmann, a cybersecurity lawyer accused of lying to the FBI, is just the tip of the iceberg, Ratcliffe teased during a Fox News interview on Sunday. He told host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures:

"Michael Sussmann's is the first of what I would hope would be a number, based on the fact — I provided not just those declassified documents, but I provided 1,000 intelligence community documents that I think support additional charges that I would expect John Durham to bring."

Pertinent commentary to this article begins at 6:20:

Canada appears to be facing its greatest threat since Benedict Arnold came close to seizing Ottawa in 1775. The source of this "insurrection" and "attack on democracy," however, is not a foreign government but Canadians who have descended on their own capital to protest continuing COVID-19 mandates.

The protest has been peaceful — and highly successful in cutting off key highways. But the most alarming development has not come from the convoy but from the commentary about it, including calls for mass arrests and even vigilantism. The Ottawa Police Services Board chairman has called it a "nationwide insurrection," adding, "Our city is under siege."

CNN analyst and Harvard professor Juliette Kayyem was apoplectic at the thought of truckers shutting down roads and interfering with trade. She tweeted out a call to "slash the tires, empty gas tanks, arrest the drivers, and move the trucks." CNN correspondent Paula Newton said this act of civil disobedience was nothing less than a "threat to democracy. An insurrection, sedition."

Russia's ambassador to Sweden, did not mince his words when he delivered a strong rebuke to the West's coercive measures on Sunday.

"Excuse my language, but we don't give a s**t about sanctions," Viktor Tatarintsev told Stockholm daily Aftonbladet.

The US, Britain, and the EU have all threatened to impose new penalties on Russia if it invades Ukraine. Moscow, meanwhile, has denied any plans to attack its neighbor.

The Russian diplomat accused the US and NATO of stoking tensions in Europe. "The expansion of NATO is the biggest threat to Russia," Tatarintsev said.

Russia is seeking legally binding assurances that the Western military bloc will not continue to expand eastward. This would effectively bar countries like Ukraine from joining the alliance.

NATO, however, has refused to abandon its so-called 'open-door policy' of accepting new members.

The Michael Sussmann case is heating up.

On February 11, 2022, Durham filed the Government's Motion to Inquire into Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Michael Sussmann case. Read it here. As you might recall, Sussmann was charged with giving false statements to then-FBI General Counsel James Baker regarding the interests he was representing in pushing to the FBI the Alfa Bank/Trump Organization hoax. More background information on the Sussmann indictment can be found here.

The basis for the latest motion is that Sussmann's current counsel, Latham & Watkins LLP (Latham) might have a conflict of interest because Latham previously represented Perkins Coie and Mark Elias "in this investigation." It is alleged that Latham "likely possesses confidential knowledge about Perkins Coie's role in, and views concerning, Sussmann's past activities." (Cleaned up.)

There might also be a conflict because Latham was representing both the Clinton Campaign and Hillary for America in the Special Counsel's investigation. Durham observes that Latham's duties to these former clients "might cause its interests to diverge from those of [Sussmann]."

Why might there be a conflict?

'Tech Executive-1 and his associates exploited this arrangement by mining the EOP's DNS traffic and other data for the purpose of gathering derogatory information about Donald Trump.'

Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to "infiltrate" servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham says.

Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty.

Beijing said on Friday that the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (the Quad), a format for annual consultations between the US, Australia, India, and Japan, is "essentially a tool for containing and besieging China [in order] to maintain US hegemony."

"It aims to stoke confrontation and undermine international solidarity and cooperation," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian told reporters. "As the Cold War is long over, the attempt to forge a so-called alliance to contain China wins no support and leads nowhere."

Zhao urged the four countries to drop the "antiquated Cold War mentality" and change their approach to China.

Is your country on the hit list of Soros and/or Omidyar and/or USAID and/or the NED and/or any of the other deep state Trojan horses hiding behind their convenient "NGO" cutouts? Are you worried that a regime change operation is in the offing?

Well, fret not! Here's some good news for a change!

As is turns out, the colour revolution string-pullers — you know, the gaggle of inbred, eugenics-obsessed elitists whose awesome power is supposed to make us cower in fear — are not so omnipotent after all. In fact, sometimes they're a bunch of incompetent, bumbling, ivory tower buffoons and I have the receipts to prove it.

Buckle in for this one, folks. It's an incredible story.

How To Topple A Government

As you know by now, the would-be world controllers have a number of tricks up their sleeve for overthrowing governments that dare defy their agenda.

Of course, there's always the plain old brute force method.

But I'm not talking about militarily imposed regime change here. I'm talking about the subtler tactics that the Evil Empire employs to undermine governments and install pliable puppet regimes around the globe.

There are the so-called "colour revolutions," for instance; synthetic protest movements that are fostered, supported or created out of whole cloth by groups like the National Endowment for Democracy. These operations follow the Gene Sharp handbook for destabilizing a country and encourage people to rally around a colour or symbol (the Rose Revolution in Georgia, the Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, the Orange Revolution in Ukraine, etc.) on the path to overthrowing the government in power.

Then there are the engineered crises where, for example, snipers are sent into otherwise peaceful protests to shoot at both sides, creating chaos and undermining the ruling government's legitimacy in the court of public opinion (as happened in both Ukraine and Syria).

There's the "IMF riot," of course; a four-step plan to economically cripple a country so that the IMF and/or World Bank can swoop in and "save" it (for the benefit of foreign investors).

And don't forget the debt trap diplomacy described by John Perkins, where corrupt dictators are bribed into selling off their nation's resources and infrastructure to foreign investors and plunging their country into debt, thus giving the Western financial interests political leverage over future governments.

There's even the plain old assassination of inconvenient political figures, a tried-and-true method for taking opponents off of the geopolitical chessboard that has worked time and again in nation after nation (and even, when needed, at home).

For months, the lawyer representing Kaleb Franks — one of six men charged with conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in 2020 — has produced some of the most detailed and damning reports to make a case for FBI entrapment. Defense attorneys last year discovered that at least a dozen FBI agents and informants were intimately involved in the abduction plot, brought to a dramatic conclusion in October 2020 when the men were arrested after an FBI informant drove them to meet an undercover FBI agent to buy materials for explosives.

With the trial date just weeks away, the Justice Department's case is imploding amid numerous scandals.

The timing could not be worse for the government, especially the FBI, which is now under scrutiny for its suspected role in fomenting the Capitol breach on January 6, 2021. After all, the two events share many similarities, including plans to "storm" Michigan's state Capitol building, the use of militia groups reportedly loyal to Donald Trump, and official designations that both represent "domestic terror" attacks.

The Russian Ministry of Defense claimed on Saturday that it employed "appropriate means" to chase away a US submarine that intruded in the country's territorial waters near Urup (not to be confused with the island of Iturup that Japan claims as its own alongside several others), which is one of Russia's Kuril Islands, and refused to surface after being demanded to do so. The US military attaché in Moscow was summoned to the Ministry of Defense where he was handed over a note. The Pentagon officially denied that the incident took place but wouldn't comment on the location of its submarines, with a representative only saying that "we do fly, sail, and operate safely in international waters." Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov also said that Presidents Putin and Biden didn't discuss the incident during Saturday's call.