Puppet MastersS


Attention

NATO chief issues new warning to Russia

Stoltenberg
© Kenzo Tribouillard/AFPNATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg speaks at an event in Brussels, Belgium
February 17, 2022
If Russia takes steps to try to force NATO out of Eastern Europe, the US led-military bloc's presence in the region will only increase, its top official has warned amid a growing standoff between Moscow and the West.

Speaking at the Munich Security Conference in Germany on Saturday, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said:
"In response to Russia's pattern of aggressive actions, we have been strengthening our deterrence and defense across the alliance to avoid any miscalculation or misunderstanding about our ironclad commitment to defend each other."

"So, if the Kremlin's aim is to have less NATO on its borders, it will only get more NATO. And if it wants to divide NATO, it will only get an even more united alliance."
At the same time, Stoltenberg insisted that NATO was a defensive alliance "not threatening Russia or anyone else."

The NATO chief made his remarks after Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova accused the bloc of employing "the tactic of escalation for the sake of de-escalation."

Comment: Threats only buy time and discredit the source.


X

Moscow mocks London over latest 'invasion' claim

Liz Truss
© Rob Pinney/WPA/Getty ImagesUK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova replied on Sunday to the latest 'Russian invasion' claim made by the UK foreign secretary. Speaking to the Mail on Sunday, Liz Truss said that Russia would not be satisfied once it invaded Ukraine, but rather would shift its focus to the Baltic states and even the western Balkans.

According to the UK's top diplomat, President Vladimir Putin
"wants to turn the clock back to the mid-1990s or even before then. It's so important that we and our allies stand up to Putin. It could be Ukraine next week but then which country will it be next?"
Zakharova gave a tongue-in-cheek response to the allegations on Telegram, writing that Truss "has nailed our insidious plans to invade the Kaliningrad region," referring to the Russian enclave on the Baltic coast.

Her response is also an apparent nod to Truss' talks with her Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov earlier this month, when Russian media revealed that the foreign secretary, replying to a question from Lavrov, said the UK would "never recognize Russia's sovereignty over" the Rostov and Voronezh regions. British Ambassador Deborah Bronnert reportedly had to intervene, informing her boss that the two regions in fact belong to Russia.

Comment: See also:


Putin

Putin gave the West plenty of warning, but the West didn't listen

Shoigu and Putin
© ReutersFILE PHOTO: Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu
Like it or not, the Russian president is doubling down on his crusade against American hegemony

Fifteen years ago in Munich, Vladimir Putin shook the West with a sharp attack on its efforts to bend the world to its will. The West chose not to listen. As the clouds of war gather over Europe, one has to ask if that was wise.

With US officials anonymously briefing journalists that Russia will invade Ukraine within days, one wonders how things came to this. The optimism that prevailed after the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union some 30 years ago has been replaced by very real fears of war in Europe. Something went badly wrong. What, precisely?

Propaganda

Fake news: Durham did not 'distance' himself from Hillary-Campaign spying claims

Durham
© US Department of Justice/APFederal prosecutor John Durham
Whenever evidence emerges that Democrats may have acted in a corrupt, potentially illegal manner — as it recently did when a John Durham filing disclosed that Clinton's campaign may have recruited a tech company to spy on Donald Trump's Internet activity in 2016 — a defensive media springs into action.

"Durham Distances Himself From Furor in Right-Wing Media Over Filing," read a New York Times piece by Charlie Savage today. "The right-wing media quickly embraced a theory that even special counsel John Durham has distanced himself from," wrote Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler. "In filing, Durham appears to distance himself from far-right theories," says MSNBC. "John Durham distances himself from right-wing furor," writes Axios.

Anyway, "distanced" is the word of the day.

Yoda

El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele on Ukraine: 'The real war is in Canada'

Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador
© Marvin Recinos/AFP via Getty ImagesNayib Bukele, President of El Salvador
Nayib Bukele, the president of El Salvador, said on Sunday the crisis in Ukraine is just a distraction, while the "real war" of interest to free people around the world is being fought over authoritarian coronavirus mandates in Europe, Canada, and the United States.


Comment: Bukele seems to be a leader of some perception: Meanwhile in Canada:



Flashlight

Der Spiegel confirms that NATO deceived Russia when it promised not to expand its border east

nato hq
© Dursun Aydemir / Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
A newly discovered document from March 1991 shows US, UK, French, and German officials discussing a pledge made to Moscow that NATO would not expand to Poland and beyond. Its publication by the German magazine Der Spiegel on Friday comes as expansion of the US-led bloc has led to a military standoff in Eastern Europe.

The minutes of a March 6, 1991 meeting in Bonn between political directors of the foreign ministries of the US, UK, France, and Germany contain multiple references to "2+4" talks on German unification in which the Western officials made it "clear" to the Soviet Union that NATO would not push into territory east of Germany.

"We made it clear to the Soviet Union - in the 2+4 talks, as well as in other negotiations - that we do not intend to benefit from the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Eastern Europe," the document quotes US Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and Canada Raymond Seitz.

"NATO should not expand to the east, either officially or unofficially," Seitz added.

Comment: A former German defense official, Willy Wimmer, also said he personally witnessed the West vowing not to expand eastward in an RT interview.

The veteran politician, who served as parliamentary secretary to Germany's defense minister between 1985 and 1992, said that he personally witnessed this promise when he "sent Chancellor Helmut Kohl the statement on the Bundeswehr in NATO and NATO in Europe, which was completely incorporated into the treaties on reunification."

Berlin's decision at that time "not to station NATO troops on the territory of the former East Germany and to stop NATO near the Oder" was part of this promise. He explained why the West quickly changed course:
Wimmer believes that the promises made by the Western leaders in the early 1990s were eventually dashed by the US ambitions formulated in the infamous 1992 'Wolfowitz Doctrine'.

The 'doctrine' was in fact a Defense Planning Guidance for the 1994-1999 fiscal years that was leaked to the New York Times at that time and sparked a wave of criticism even in the US itself. The document outlined the policy of unilateralism and pre-emptive military actions designed to suppress potential threats and prevent any supposedly authoritarian states from becoming superpowers. The official text of the guidance was then changed following the uproar but many tenets of the 'doctrine' still found their way into the former US President George W. Bush's foreign policy.

Since that time, the US and its allies have been on the "wrong track" as they have been virtually doing everything to create a fairly "justified" impression in Moscow that the Western nations seek to "kick Russia out of Europe, to build a new wall between the Baltic and the Black Sea" and eventually to "destroy" Russia instead of cooperating with it, Wimmer pointed out.



Bomb

War or Images of War?

War or Images of War?
© Off-Guardian
Experienced foreign policy analysts such as Ray McGovern, Scott Ritter, and Pepe Escobar, while agreeing that the Biden administration is clearly guilty of provoking Russia over Ukraine, are divided over whether it will lead to war.

All agree that Russia has no intention of invading Ukraine and that it is clearly justified in demanding safe borders by insisting US/NATO withdraw troops and missiles from the countries surrounding it, stop NATO's "open door" policy, stop putting nuclear weapons in Europe, etc.

Clearly such demands are consonant with the US's own historical demands for safe borders, evidenced most clearly in the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 when the world nearly suffered a nuclear war over Soviet missiles in Cuba. And equally obvious is the fact that the American posture today is hypocritical in the extreme and can only be accepted by propagandists and those ignorant of history.

The Biden administration must assume that most people are ignoramuses and that its obvious belligerence and blatant propaganda will pass as some sort of defense of freedom, even when the US engineered a Ukrainian coup d'état in 2014 in support of Neo-Nazis when Biden was President Obama's vice-president. But that was nearly eight years ago, which is an eternity in a country of amnesiacs.

Whether this US persistent aggression is a propaganda charade or not, it is a most dangerous game.

In December 2021, Russia claimed that the US was preparing a false flag event to provoke a Russian response. This was dismissed or ignored by the western media as absurd. Recently, however, the Biden administration has been pounding the message that it is Russia that is preparing a false flag event to blame on Ukraine in order to justify a Russian invasion.

The western press, led by The New York Times, CNN, The Guardian, and the Washington Post - stenographers for the CIA, British intelligence, and the Pentagon - have become more hysterical by the day pushing this lie without any evidence whatsoever. It is sardonically comical.

Light Saber

Breakaway republics mobilize soldiers as Ukraine continues shelling frontline villages, blasts at gas pipeline reported

Donetsk Oblast  soldier military
Donetsk Oblast: The head of the Donetsk People's Republic has called on all able-bodied men to stand up to "Kiev's aggression"
The leaders of the self-declared Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) and Lugansk People's Republic (LPR) in eastern Ukraine have announced on Saturday that they have ordered the mobilization of all able-bodied men in response to claims of shelling along the frontline.

"I urge compatriots who are in the [army] reserve to come to military enlistment offices," DPR head Denis Pushilin said in a video address. "I call on all men in the republic capable of carrying arms to stand in defense of their families, their children, wives, mothers."

Pushilin also claimed the DPR is capable of "holding off Kiev's aggression" and alleged that its forces are taking action in response to shelling by the Ukrainian Army.

Comment: See also: And check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: Ukraine Gambit - US Attempting to Destroy Russia




Newspaper

East Ukraine headed for 'full-scale war', Donetsk infrastructure on guard for terrorist attack - separatist leader

ukraine tank
© Ukrainian Defense Ministry/UPI | License PhotoUkrainian troops take part in a military drill outside the city of Rivne in northern Ukraine on Wednesday.
Full-scale war in eastern Ukraine can break out at any moment, with an attack by forces loyal to the government in Kiev, the head of the breakaway, unrecognised 'Donetsk People's Republic,' Denis Pushilin, told Russian media on Friday evening.

"Kiev can start a full-scale assault on Donbass at any moment, the situation is critical," Pushilin told Russian television, referring to the two self-proclaimed republics in eastern Ukraine.

Asked by the host if there will be a war, Pushilin responded: "Yes. Unfortunately, yes."

Comment: This article is from two days ago and since then evacuations of those in the frontline regions have begun, meanwhile, contrary to Western propaganda, Kiev admits that there is NO evidence that Russia intends to invade Ukraine, and this is further supported by comments by ministers of other countries: No sign Russia intends to invade Ukraine, says German Defense Minister, Moscow expels top US diplomat in retaliation for minister



See also: The dubious paternity of Ukraine's modern borders

Also check out SOTT radio's: NewsReal: Ukraine Gambit - US Attempting to Destroy Russia




Question

Why isn't anyone listening to Ukraine? Kiev rejects invasion claims

Alexey Danilov Secretary  defense Ukraine
Alexey Danilov, Secretary of Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council
Senior defense official in Kiev disagrees with Western predictions of an imminent attack

Ukraine does not believe that Russia is planning to launch a full-scale invasion, despite claims from Western officials that an offensive is imminent, the secretary of Kiev's National Security and Defense Council said on Thursday.

Speaking to TV channel 1+1, Alexey Danilov stated that Kiev had not picked up any signs that a military incursion was approaching.

"If we are talking about a full-scale operation against our state, then we don't see that," Danilov insisted.

Comment: RT adds:
However, [White House spokesman Ned] Price made the caveat that Blinken's attendance rests on the condition that Russia does not begin an offensive on its neighbor Ukraine. The US has accused Moscow of planning an invasion since November, and on Thursday, US President Joe Biden declared that it could take place "in the next several days."

"The Russians have responded with proposed dates for late next week, which we are accepting, provided there is no further Russian invasion of Ukraine," he said, according to TASS.


Price highlighted the secretary of state's motivations to agree to an exchange centered around a US pursuit of "diplomacy and dialogue" - key aspects, in his opinion, of a "responsible" solution to the ongoing crisis in Ukraine.

Speaking to the UN Security Council on Thursday, Blinken announced that an invasion would prove Moscow's disregard for maintaining diplomatic relations going forward.

"If they invade in the coming days, they will make it clear that they have never been serious about diplomacy," the state secretary declared, while promising that US negotiators would "continue to coordinate with allies and partners and seek further engagement with Russia."

The meeting between the White House and Kremlin officials next week will be set against the backdrop of heightened tensions on the Ukraine-Russia border. Washington has accused Moscow of amassing over 100,000 troops along the frontier, allegedly with intent to launch an invasion.
The West is hell-bent on provoking a war with Russia, and the opinions, let alone the desires, of the proxies nominated for the job don't seem to matter.